


Ask the community...
I'm so sorry you're dealing with this incredibly frustrating situation! Unfortunately, those 3+ hour wait times with no answer are sadly becoming the new normal for TWC - you're definitely not doing anything wrong. I just went through this exact same nightmare when I filed my claim last month after losing my job. What finally worked for me was calling at exactly 7:00 AM on a Wednesday morning (set multiple alarms!). I know it sounds brutal, but I got through in about 25 minutes instead of the usual hours-long torture session. Tuesday and Wednesday mornings seem to be the sweet spot based on what others have shared. For your employer address question, definitely use the address where you physically worked, not their new relocated location - that's exactly what the system is looking for and it won't delay your claim. Before you subject yourself to more phone hell though, I'd recommend trying the online portal at ui.texasworkforce.org one more time with that employer address clarification. The system has actually improved quite a bit and you might be able to complete your entire claim without ever needing to call. If you do need to call, have all your employment documents ready beforehand - W-2s, employment dates, reason for separation, etc. Once you finally get through, you'll want to move quickly to resolve everything in one call. I know how stressful this is when you desperately need that income, but don't give up! The early morning strategy really does work. You've got this! đź’Ş
I'm currently going through this exact same frustrating experience right now! Lost my job at a logistics company two weeks ago and have been trying to get through to TWC for the past 5 days with absolutely zero success. My record so far is 3 hours and 20 minutes yesterday before I had to hang up to pick up my kids from school - so I totally feel your pain about that 3+ hour wait! This thread has been absolutely incredible though - I had no idea about all these strategies everyone's sharing. The 7:00 AM Wednesday morning approach seems to be the magic formula that everyone's discovered. I'm definitely setting multiple alarms tonight to try that tomorrow (along with having my coffee ready like others suggested!). I also had the same confusion about employer addresses since my company recently consolidated offices, so it's really helpful to get confirmation about using the physical work location. Going to try the online portal one more time with that clarification before attempting the early morning phone strategy. It's honestly ridiculous that we have to become tactical experts just to file for unemployment benefits, but this community sharing all their hard-won knowledge is such a lifesaver. Thanks to everyone for making me feel less alone in this broken system - you're all amazing! 🙏
I'm so sorry you're dealing with this incredibly frustrating situation! I went through almost exactly the same thing about 5 months ago - my employer was also a no-show at my appeal hearing, and I was completely blindsided when I still lost despite their absence. What I learned through my experience is that TWC operates on what they call "record evidence review" - meaning all documentation submitted by both parties gets considered, regardless of who actually shows up to defend it. It's really misleading how their paperwork makes it sound like a no-show would automatically benefit you! But here's what should give you tremendous hope: based on everything you've described, you have an exceptionally strong case for Commission Appeals. The combination of: - Termination for alleged "performance issues" with zero documented warnings - Positive performance reviews from just 3 months prior - Complete absence of progressive discipline procedures - Their no-show preventing you from cross-examining their claims These are exactly the types of procedural failures that get overturned at the Commission level. I ended up winning my Commission Appeal after about 6-7 weeks, and the back payments made all the stress worth it. The Commission reviewers are much more thorough about examining whether employers actually followed proper termination procedures. When there's such a glaring contradiction between recent positive reviews and sudden "performance" termination with no documentation trail, it seriously undermines their case. Don't lose hope - make sure to file that Commission Appeal within 14 days if this decision doesn't go your way. Your situation sounds very winnable based on their clear procedural failures. This community has been such a support system for so many of us going through these battles. You're not alone in this fight!
Thank you so much for sharing your experience and offering such detailed encouragement! Your explanation of "record evidence review" finally clarifies why I was so confused about the employer no-show not helping my case. It's really frustrating that TWC's paperwork is so misleading about this crucial aspect of the process. Reading through your breakdown of my strong points gives me renewed confidence about filing the Commission Appeal. You're absolutely right that the contradiction between positive reviews from 3 months ago and sudden termination for "performance issues" with zero documentation is a glaring procedural failure. It really does seem like common sense that you can't claim someone's performance warrants immediate termination when you have no warnings, no improvement plans, and recent positive evaluations on file. The 6-7 week timeline and successful outcome you described gives me so much hope! After reading all these success stories in this thread, I'm starting to believe that the Commission Appeals level is where justice actually happens for cases like ours. It's incredibly comforting to know that the reviewers at that level dig deeper into whether proper procedures were followed. I'm definitely going to file within that 14-day window and emphasize all the procedural failures you mentioned. This community really has been a lifeline during this stressful time - knowing that so many others have fought similar battles and won makes me feel much less alone. Thank you for taking the time to encourage a newcomer and share your hard-won knowledge!
I'm really sorry you're going through this frustrating situation! I just joined this community because I'm dealing with something very similar right now. My employer also didn't show up to my appeal hearing last week, and reading through all these responses has been incredibly eye-opening about how the process actually works. Like you, I initially thought their no-show would automatically help my case, but now I understand that TWC reviews all submitted evidence regardless of attendance. It's really misleading how their paperwork doesn't explain this clearly! Based on everything you've shared - being terminated for "performance issues" with no documented warnings, having positive reviews just 3 months prior, and no evidence of progressive discipline - you honestly have one of the strongest cases I've seen described in this thread. The contradiction between recent positive performance evaluations and sudden termination claims is exactly the type of procedural failure that seems to get overturned at the Commission Appeals level. I've been taking notes from all the success stories shared here, and the consistent theme is that the Commission reviewers are much more thorough about examining whether employers actually followed proper procedures. Your situation with zero documentation backing up their performance claims while you have recent positive reviews seems like a textbook case for appeal success. Don't give up! From everything I've learned here, filing that Commission Appeal within 14 days could very well turn this whole situation around. This community has been such a valuable resource for understanding that we're not alone in these battles with the system.
Welcome to the community and thank you for sharing your perspective as someone currently going through a similar situation! It's really helpful to hear from someone who just had their hearing last week - your timing gives you a front-row seat to see how all this advice plays out in real time. You're absolutely right that the paperwork is misleading about the no-show implications. I think TWC should really clarify that upfront so people don't get false hope like we did. But reading through all these success stories has definitely shifted my perspective from feeling defeated to feeling cautiously optimistic about the Commission Appeals process. Your point about this being a "textbook case" really resonates with me. When I step back and look at the facts objectively - positive reviews, zero warnings, no progressive discipline documentation - it does seem like such an obvious procedural failure on their part. It's encouraging to hear that from someone else's fresh perspective. I'm curious how your case differs from mine, if you don't mind sharing? Are you also dealing with a "performance" termination situation, or is it something else? Either way, I hope we both get better outcomes at whatever level our cases end up. This community has been such a lifeline for understanding that persistence really can pay off in these situations. Thanks for the encouragement - I'm definitely filing that Commission Appeal if this first decision doesn't go my way!
One thing to keep in mind is that the TWC representative has to follow a script and ask certain questions for legal reasons. Their demeanor shouldn't affect the outcome if your case is legitimate. For position elimination cases, the TWC is primarily checking: 1. That you were indeed laid off and didn't quit 2. That there was no misconduct involved 3. That you're available and actively searching for work Since you mentioned you have documentation confirming the elimination of your position, you're in a strong position. The determination is typically made within 7-10 business days after the fact-finding interview. If you haven't received a determination letter by then, you can check your claim status online or try contacting them again.
let us know what happens!! this is so stressful
I just remembered something I learned from my tax preparer last year - if you happen to receive unemployment in two different states (like if you moved mid-year), you'll get separate 1099-Gs from each state's unemployment office. Just mentioning in case anyone had benefits from another state before Texas.
Good to know! I was only on Texas unemployment, but that's helpful info for others reading this thread. I'm learning so much about this process - thanks again to everyone for all the tips!
Just wanted to add one more thing that might help - if you're planning to file your taxes early (like in February), definitely check your TWC online account first rather than waiting for the mail. I've found that the electronic version is usually available a few days before the physical form gets mailed out. Also, if you're using tax software like TurboTax or H&R Block, they have a specific section for unemployment income where you'll enter the amounts from your 1099-G. Don't forget that unemployment benefits are taxable at both federal and state levels in Texas!
Wait, I think there might be some confusion in your post - Texas doesn't have state income tax, so unemployment benefits are only taxable at the federal level if you're a Texas resident. But you're absolutely right about checking the online account first! I'm definitely going to do that in late January rather than waiting for the mail. Thanks for the tip about tax software having specific sections for unemployment income - I'll probably end up using one of those since this is my first time dealing with unemployment benefits on my taxes.
Jessica Suarez
Victoria, I've been following this thread and wanted to add my perspective as someone who went through a very similar situation last year. Your story sounds almost identical to mine - my employer initially said I was terminated for "poor performance" but then told TWC I was also "unreliable" and had "attitude problems" that I'd never heard about before. What really helped me was understanding that TWC investigators are specifically trained to recognize when employers are adding reasons after the fact. During my fact-finding interview, the investigator actually asked me directly if these additional allegations had ever been discussed with me before my termination. When I said no, she made a note of it. The key thing that worked in my favor was having documentation that contradicted my employer's claims - similar to your approved time off screenshots. I had performance reviews that directly contradicted their "poor performance" claim. TWC ended up approving my benefits because they found the employer's additional reasons lacked credibility. One practical tip: if you haven't already, write down the exact questions the TWC investigator asked you and your responses while they're still fresh in your memory. If you do need to appeal later, having that detailed record of the fact-finding interview can be really valuable. You've got this - from everything you've shared, it sounds like you handled the interview perfectly and have solid documentation to back up your case. The fact that you were genuinely surprised by the new allegations is actually one of your strongest pieces of evidence that they're not legitimate!
0 coins
Yuki Sato
•Jessica, thank you so much for sharing your experience! It's incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who went through almost the exact same situation and came out successful. The fact that the TWC investigator actually asked you directly about whether the additional allegations had been discussed before really gives me hope - it shows they're definitely aware of this tactic. Your tip about writing down the exact questions and responses is brilliant - I wish I had thought to do that immediately after the call, but I'm going to try to reconstruct as much as I can remember while it's still relatively fresh. The investigator did ask me some very specific questions about dates and prior discussions regarding these new allegations, and my honest answers were that I had no knowledge of any of this. It's so encouraging to hear that having documentation that contradicts the employer's claims was key to your success. I feel much more confident now knowing that my approved time off screenshots and the follow-up email I sent (that they ignored) actually carry real weight in this process. Thank you for the encouragement and for taking the time to share such detailed advice. This whole thread has been like a masterclass in understanding the TWC process - I went from panicking after that phone call to feeling cautiously optimistic about my case!
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
I've been reading through this entire thread and wanted to add some encouragement from someone who recently went through TWC appeals. Victoria, based on everything you've described, you actually have a stronger case than you might realize. The fact that your employer is now claiming multiple new reasons they never mentioned during your actual termination is a huge red flag that TWC investigators are trained to spot. Your genuine surprise during the fact-finding interview was probably one of your best pieces of evidence - you can't fake that kind of authentic reaction. Here's something that might help ease your mind: I work with a lot of folks who've been through this process, and in cases where employers add significant new allegations after the fact (especially when the claimant has documentation like your approved time off), TWC tends to view the employer's credibility as questionable. The key things working in your favor: - You have documentation proving your approved time off - You were genuinely surprised by the new allegations (which came through during your interview) - Your employer's story changed between what they told you and what they told TWC - You sent a follow-up email asking for clarification that they ignored Keep documenting everything and definitely continue requesting payments. The determination should come within the next week or two. Even if it goes against you initially, your documentation and the inconsistencies in your employer's story would make for a strong appeal case. You've handled this exactly right so far - stay confident!
0 coins
Margot Quinn
•Thank you so much for this incredibly detailed and encouraging response, AstroAdventurer! Reading through your breakdown of all the factors working in my favor has honestly given me the most confidence I've felt since this whole situation started. You're absolutely right about not being able to fake that genuine surprise - I was completely blindsided when the TWC investigator mentioned those additional allegations. It's such a relief to know that this authentic reaction actually works as evidence in my favor rather than making me look unprepared. The point about my employer's credibility being questionable due to their changing story is something I hadn't fully considered, but it makes perfect sense. The inconsistency between what they told me in person versus what they're now telling TWC really does paint a clear picture of what's happening here. I'm definitely going to keep requesting payments and staying organized with all my documentation. It's amazing how much more prepared and confident I feel after reading everyone's advice in this thread. When I first got that phone call, I thought my case was doomed, but now I understand that I actually have some strong points working in my favor. Thank you for taking the time to lay out such a thoughtful analysis of my situation - it means more than you know during such a stressful time. This community has been absolutely incredible!
0 coins