IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Yara Haddad

•

anyone else notice how the where's my refund tool shows different info than the transcript? super annoying

0 coins

bruh wmr is useless, transcript is the only way to know whats really goin on

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

šŸ’Æ WMR been showing still processing for 3 months but my transcript updated last week

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

Don't stress about the wording! The IRS uses "Accepted" and "Return Accepted" interchangeably - they both mean your return passed their initial screening and is in the system. The different dates (01/21 for federal, 01/23 for state) are totally normal since federal and state returns get processed separately. Maryland probably just took an extra day or two to process yours. As long as both show accepted status, you're good to go!

0 coins

19 Has anyone actually had success getting an organization to reissue a corrected tax form? My university issued me a 1099-NEC for a research stipend that should have been on a 1098-T, but their accounting department keeps saying "that's just how we report it" and refuses to fix it. I'm going to end up paying hundreds extra in self-employment tax!

0 coins

5 I work in university administration (not accounting) and unfortunately this happens a lot. Your best bet is to escalate to the department chair or dean who approved your stipend, not just talk to accounting. Have them clarify in writing that it was an educational stipend not contingent on services, then take that to accounting. If they still won't budge, you can file your taxes correctly with Form 8275 explaining the discrepancy, but it might trigger a review. Another option is to contact the Taxpayer Advocate Service - they can sometimes intervene when organizations report incorrectly.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

I went through something very similar with a nonprofit I worked with last year. They issued me a 1099-NEC for what was clearly described as an "educational development stipend" in my original contract, but their accounting department treated it like regular contractor income. The key thing that helped me was getting a written statement from the program director confirming that the stipend portion was specifically for my professional development and continuing education costs, not compensation for services rendered. I also had to show that the stipend amount was reasonable relative to actual educational expenses I incurred. With that documentation, I was able to report the stipend portion as "other income" on Line 8i of Schedule 1 (Form 1040) rather than as self-employment income. I attached a statement explaining the nature of the payment and referencing the organization's written confirmation. The IRS didn't question it during processing, and I saved about $400 in self-employment taxes. The regular contractor work portion still went on Schedule C as usual. Just make sure you have solid documentation about the educational purpose and that it wasn't contingent on work performance.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

This is really helpful - thank you for sharing your experience! I'm curious about the documentation you mentioned. Did you need to get anything specific from the IRS or just the written statement from your program director? Also, when you reported it as "other income" on Line 8i, did you include any specific description or just put "educational stipend"? I want to make sure I handle this correctly and avoid any red flags.

0 coins

Adriana Cohn

•

This whole discussion has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who's been renting for years and just started seriously house hunting, I had no idea about the complexity of itemized deductions vs. the standard deduction. One thing I'm wondering about as I look at potential homes - is there a way to estimate beforehand whether itemizing will be worth it for my situation? I'm looking at houses where the property taxes would be around $6-7K annually, and I live in a state with moderate income taxes (probably $4-5K withheld yearly). So I'd be right around that $10K SALT cap. With mortgage interest on top of that, it seems like I'd probably come out ahead itemizing, but I'm curious if there are any online calculators or rules of thumb for figuring this out during the home shopping process. It would be helpful to factor this into the overall cost analysis of different properties. Also, reading about all the document tracking and escrow timing complexities makes me realize I should probably start getting organized about tax record keeping well before I actually buy! Any suggestions for systems that work well for new homeowners?

0 coins

KhalilStar

•

Great questions about planning ahead! For estimating whether itemizing will be worthwhile, most tax software websites (TurboTax, H&R Block, etc.) have free calculators where you can input your expected mortgage interest, property taxes, and state income tax to see if it exceeds the standard deduction ($13,850 for single filers in 2023, $27,700 for married filing jointly). A rough rule of thumb: if your state income tax + property tax gets you close to that $10K SALT cap, and your expected mortgage interest is more than $3,850 (single) or $17,700 (married), then itemizing will likely save you money. In your case with $10K+ SALT and mortgage interest on top, you'd almost certainly benefit from itemizing. For record keeping, I'd recommend setting up a simple filing system before you buy: one folder for mortgage documents (including your annual 1098 form), one for property tax records (both escrow statements and any direct payments), one for charitable donations, and one for medical expenses if they're significant. Many people also photograph receipts and store them digitally using apps like Evernote or even just phone photos organized in albums. The key is starting the organization system from day one rather than trying to reconstruct everything at tax time!

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

This is such a valuable discussion for new homeowners! I went through this exact confusion when I first started itemizing after buying my house in 2022. The key insight that helped me was understanding that the SALT deduction isn't just about property taxes - it's about preventing the federal government from taxing you on money that's already been claimed by state and local governments. Your state income tax withholding represents money that never actually reached your pocket because your state government took it first. The federal system recognizes this by allowing you to deduct it. Think of it this way: if your gross pay was $50,000 but your state took $3,000 in income tax, you really only had $47,000 available to live on or pay federal taxes with. The SALT deduction ensures the federal government doesn't tax you on that full $50,000. One practical tip for tracking everything: I set up a simple Google Sheet with columns for date, amount, type (state income tax, property tax, charitable donation, etc.), and notes. Every time I get a relevant document - W2, 1098, property tax bill, donation receipt - I add it to the sheet immediately. Come tax time, I just sort by category and everything's ready to go. Much easier than digging through boxes of papers in April! The $10K cap is frustrating for those of us in higher-tax states, but at least understanding how it all works together helps with planning and peace of mind.

0 coins

This is such a helpful way to think about it! The example of $50,000 gross pay with $3,000 going to state taxes really clarifies why this isn't "double-dipping" - you're right that you never actually had access to that $3,000 to begin with. I love the Google Sheets tracking idea too. I've been dreading the paperwork aspect of homeownership, but having a simple system like that from the start makes it seem much more manageable. Do you include estimated amounts for things like quarterly estimated tax payments, or just stick to the actual withholdings and direct payments? Also, your point about planning is spot on. Even though the $10K cap is frustrating, at least knowing exactly how much you can deduct helps with budgeting decisions throughout the year.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

This has been such an incredibly helpful discussion! As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by how thoroughly everyone has broken down the W4 changes and shared real-world strategies. I'm in a slightly different situation - I'm switching from contractor work (1099) to W2 employment for the first time in several years, so I'm not only dealing with the new W4 format but also transitioning from making quarterly estimated payments to having taxes withheld from my paychecks again. From what I've gathered here, it sounds like I should be extra careful about Step 4(a) since I'll likely have some 1099 income early in the year before my W2 job starts. And based on everyone's advice about being conservative, I'm thinking I should definitely use Step 4(c) to have additional withholding to account for the complexity of my transition year. The recommendation about using tools like the IRS withholding estimator mid-year seems especially important for someone like me with a mixed income situation. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with both the official IRS tools and the third-party options - it's really helpful to know what actually works in practice! This thread has given me so much more confidence about tackling my W4. I'll definitely be bookmarking this for reference!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Welcome to the community! Your situation with transitioning from 1099 to W2 mid-year is definitely more complex, but you're absolutely right to focus on Steps 4(a) and 4(c) for your mixed income scenario. Since you'll have both 1099 and W2 income in the same tax year, I'd strongly recommend being conservative with your withholding. The challenge is that your W2 withholding won't account for the self-employment tax on your early 1099 income, so you might want to calculate roughly what you'll owe in SE tax and add some of that to Step 4(c) as additional withholding. Also, don't forget that if you've already made estimated quarterly payments for your 1099 income early in the year, you'll want to account for those when planning your W2 withholding strategy. The IRS withholding estimator should help you factor in both your estimated payments and projected W2 withholding to avoid either owing a big bill or massively overwithholding. Your instinct to be extra conservative during this transition year is smart - mixed income years can be tricky to get exactly right, and a small refund is much better than underpayment penalties!

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This thread has been absolutely fantastic! As someone who's been lurking in this community for a while but never posted, I felt compelled to jump in because this W4 discussion hits so close to home. I went through this exact same confusion last year when I started a new job. The biggest revelation for me was understanding that the new W4 isn't just a different version of the old form - it's a completely different approach to withholding calculations. Once I stopped trying to find the "allowances equivalent" and started thinking about it as inputting actual tax situation data, everything clicked. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is how helpful it can be to keep a copy of your completed W4 with your tax documents. When tax season rolls around, it's really useful to see exactly what you told your employer to withhold and compare that to your actual tax situation. This helped me fine-tune my approach for the following year. Also, for anyone still feeling overwhelmed by all the options and tools mentioned - sometimes the simplest approach is the best. I ended up just using the basic IRS withholding estimator and adding a small cushion in Step 4(c), and it worked out perfectly. You don't always need the most sophisticated solution! Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge here. This is exactly the kind of practical, real-world advice that makes this community so valuable.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Welcome to the discussion! Your point about keeping a copy of your completed W4 with your tax documents is brilliant - I never thought of that but it makes so much sense for year-over-year comparison and learning. I totally agree about not overthinking the tools and solutions. Sometimes we get so caught up in finding the "perfect" calculator or method that we forget the goal is just to get reasonably close to the right withholding amount. Your approach of using the basic IRS estimator plus a small cushion sounds like exactly the right level of complexity for most situations. The mindset shift you mentioned - from thinking about "allowances equivalent" to "inputting actual tax data" - really captures what makes the new system better once you understand it. It's more work upfront but ultimately more accurate than the old guessing game approach. Thanks for jumping into the conversation and sharing your experience! It's always helpful to hear from someone who's been through the transition successfully.

0 coins

For golf influencers, I'd recommend establishing clear documentation standards from the start. Create a simple spreadsheet tracking each equipment purchase with columns for: purchase date, item description, cost, content where it was featured, and revenue attribution. The IRS looks favorably on taxpayers who can demonstrate a clear business purpose and profit motive. If your client is genuinely making income from this content and treating it as a business (not just a hobby), equipment purchases are much more defensible. One thing to watch out for: make sure they're not double-dipping by deducting equipment they later sell or give away. If they do equipment reviews and then sell the clubs, that sale price should be reported as income, and the original purchase becomes cost of goods sold rather than a business expense. Also consider depreciation for expensive items like club sets - depending on how long they plan to use them for content creation, it might be better to depreciate over several years rather than expense everything in year one.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

This is really comprehensive advice! The point about equipment sales is especially important - I've seen clients get tripped up on that. One question about the depreciation approach: for items that might only be used for a few videos before becoming obsolete (like when new club models come out), would it make more sense to expense immediately rather than depreciate? It seems like the useful business life for some golf equipment could be pretty short in the content creation world. Also, do you have any specific recommendations for revenue attribution? Some of my client's content generates income through multiple streams (ad revenue, sponsorships, affiliate links) and it can be tricky to tie specific equipment purchases to specific revenue amounts.

0 coins

Great question about depreciation vs. immediate expensing! For items with short useful lives in content creation, Section 179 or bonus depreciation might be your best bet - you can often expense the full amount in year one anyway. The key is documenting the business useful life expectation upfront. For revenue attribution, I'd suggest tracking at the content piece level rather than trying to tie individual equipment to specific dollars. Create a simple formula based on views/engagement for equipment-focused content vs. your client's average revenue per view. This gives you a reasonable basis for business use percentage without getting too granular. Also consider the "ordinary and necessary" test - if comparable golf influencers regularly purchase similar equipment for content, that strengthens the deduction argument regardless of the exact revenue attribution.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned yet - if your client does equipment reviews and receives free golf clubs/equipment from manufacturers for testing, they need to report the fair market value of those items as income. This actually strengthens the business expense argument for equipment they purchase themselves, since it demonstrates the review/testing activity is clearly income-generating. I'd also suggest having them maintain a content calendar that shows planned equipment purchases tied to upcoming video concepts. This proactive approach demonstrates business planning rather than just deducting personal golf expenses after the fact. For audit protection, consider having them sign a brief memo each time they purchase equipment outlining the intended business use. Something like "Purchased TaylorMade driver set for upcoming 'Best Drivers Under $500' video series, planned filming dates X-Y." Takes 30 seconds but creates contemporaneous documentation of business intent.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

This is excellent advice about the free equipment reporting - I hadn't thought about how that actually strengthens the case for purchased equipment deductions. The contemporaneous documentation idea is brilliant too. One quick follow-up question: when documenting business intent for equipment purchases, should clients also note if they plan to use items for personal recreation after the business use is complete? Or is it better to keep the documentation focused purely on the business purpose to avoid muddying the waters? Also, for the content calendar approach - do you recommend they update it retroactively if plans change, or just maintain it going forward and document any deviations separately?

0 coins

Prev1...584585586587588...5643Next