IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

What does IRS Code 898 on transcript mean? Partner's $1,055 refund shows as "Applied to non-IRS debt" despite being issued

Can someone help me understand what my partners transcript means? I noticed something weird when looking at his tax refund info. He filed his taxes and got a refund of $1,055 in late February, but when I look at his transcript there's a bunch of codes that don't make sense to me. His transcript shows: RETURN DUE DATE OR RETURN RECEIVED DATE (WHICHEVER IS LATER) Apr. 15, 2025 PROCESSING DATE Mar. 10, 2025 TRANSACTIONS CODE EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION - CYCLE - DATE - AMOUNT 150 Tax return filed - 20250805 - 03-10-2025 - $764.00 806 W-2 or 1099 withholding - 04-15-2025 - -$1,819.00 846 Refund issued - 02-26-2025 - $1,055.00 898 Refund applied to non-IRS debt: - 03-10-2025 - $0.00 $1,055.00 This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data What confuses me is that it shows a tax return filed with a tax amount of $764, withholding of $1,819, then a refund issued on 02-26-2025, and then something about "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" with $0.00 but then his refund amount of $1,055 again. What does all this actually mean? Is part of his refund being taken for something? Did he actually get the full $1,055? The dates are also confusing - some dates like 04-15-2025 are in the future, but the processing date is 03-10-2025 and we're still in early 2025. And what's that "CYCLE" number 20250805 mean? Does the code 898 "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" mean they're taking his refund for something else? But then why does it show $0.00? I'm really confused about what happened with his money.

Aidan Percy

β€’

This is such a great thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now where I saw code 898 on my transcript and immediately freaked out thinking the IRS was taking money from my refund. But reading through all these explanations has been incredibly helpful - I had no idea that $0.00 next to "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" actually means the OPPOSITE of what it sounds like! It's so reassuring to know that this code appears on everyone's transcript as part of the Treasury Offset Program check. The IRS really needs to work on their communication - making "we checked for debts and found none" look like some kind of scary government seizure is just unnecessarily stressful for regular taxpayers trying to understand their own documents. Thanks to everyone who contributed their knowledge here. You've probably saved countless people from hours of worry and confusion! This community is amazing at breaking down these cryptic government codes into actual human language 😊

0 coins

1 coin

I just wanted to add my experience since I went through this exact same confusion last month! When I first saw code 898 with "Refund applied to non-IRS debt" on my transcript, I was convinced the government had secretly taken money from my refund for some unknown debt. But after doing some research (and panicking for a few days), I learned that the $0.00 amount is actually the BEST thing you can see there. It means the Treasury Offset Program ran their automatic check for things like unpaid child support, defaulted student loans, back taxes, etc., and found absolutely nothing to take from your refund. Your partner's math is perfect: $1,819 withholding - $764 tax liability = $1,055 refund. That February 26th date next to code 846 is when the money was actually sent to his account. Those weird March 2026 dates are just the IRS using their bizarre internal processing cycles - I swear they design these transcripts to be as confusing as possible! But everything looks completely normal and he definitely got his full $1,055. It's frustrating how the IRS can make "congratulations, you got your full refund with no issues" look so scary with their cryptic codes! πŸ˜…

0 coins

@Maleny That's really unfortunate that the transcript was misleading in your case! This is exactly why IRS transcripts can be so frustrating - they don't always reflect real-time processing accurately. It sounds like your offset was processed but the transcript hadn't updated to show the actual offset amount yet when you first looked at it. This is a good reminder for everyone that while the $0.00 offset usually means good news, it's always worth double-checking with "Where's My Refund" and calling the offset hotline if something seems off. I hope you're able to resolve whatever debt caused the offset and get things sorted out. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful for others to know that transcripts aren't always 100% current with what's actually happening to your refund.

0 coins

Mal U

β€’

@Sean Doyle @hugh Thank you for that and yeah it was unfortunate. I still don’t know what’s going on with that they said it could take up to 6 months the since the offset has its own process when they take the funds. Idk at the moment :

1 coin

Emma Wilson

β€’

As someone who recently went through this exact process with my small tech consulting business in Amsterdam (also a V.O.F.), I completely understand your frustration! The W-8BEN-E is genuinely one of the most confusing tax forms out there. Here's what I learned that might help: For a Dutch V.O.F., you're essentially dealing with a pass-through entity similar to a US partnership. The key sections you need are Part I (basic info), Part III (treaty benefits), and Part XXIX (signature). For Part I line 5, definitely select "Partnership" since that's how the IRS views a V.O.F. For the TIN fields - you can leave the US TIN blank since you don't need one for basic consulting. For foreign TIN, use your KVK number including any leading zeros. Skip GIIN entirely unless you're somehow a financial institution (which you're not). The treaty benefits section (Part III) is where you'll claim Article 7 from the US-Netherlands tax treaty at 0% withholding rate, assuming you're just providing remote consulting services with no permanent establishment in the US. One thing that really helped me was printing out the form and physically crossing out all the sections that don't apply - it made the relevant parts much clearer. You're basically filling out maybe 15% of the actual form. The whole process took me about 2 hours once I figured out what applied to us, and our US client accepted it without any issues. Feel free to ask if you have specific questions about any of the sections!

0 coins

Melina Haruko

β€’

Thank you so much for sharing your experience with the Amsterdam V.O.F.! It's incredibly helpful to hear from someone who's literally been in the exact same situation. Your tip about physically crossing out irrelevant sections is brilliant - I think that visual approach will really help me focus on what actually matters instead of getting overwhelmed by all the sections that don't apply to us. I'm curious about one thing you mentioned - when you filled out Part I line 5 as "Partnership," did you run into any questions from your US client about providing additional partnership documentation? I'm wondering if they might ask for our partnership agreement or other proof that we're structured as a V.O.F., or if the W-8BEN-E form itself was sufficient for their records. Also, regarding the 2-hour timeframe you mentioned - was that including the time to research and understand the form, or just the actual completion time once you knew what to fill out? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for how long this might take us!

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

β€’

The 2-hour timeframe was just for actually filling out the form once I understood which sections to complete - the research phase took me much longer! I probably spent a full day reading through IRS publications and forum posts like this one before I felt confident enough to actually start filling it out. Regarding additional documentation, my US client never asked for our partnership agreement or any proof of our V.O.F. structure. The W-8BEN-E form was completely sufficient for their needs. I think most US companies are used to dealing with these forms and trust that foreign businesses are accurately representing their entity type. The form itself serves as the certification they need for their withholding obligations. One practical tip I forgot to mention: make sure whoever signs the form in Part XXIX has their signature match any other documents you might send to the US client. It's a small detail, but consistency in business relationships always looks more professional.

0 coins

Steven Adams

β€’

I went through this exact same process with my small consulting business in Belgium last year, and I totally feel your pain with the W-8BEN-E! It's honestly one of the most intimidating forms I've ever encountered. What really helped me was breaking it down into just the essentials for a simple EU consulting business like yours. For your Dutch V.O.F., you're looking at completing maybe 4-5 sections total out of the entire form. The key is understanding that most of those complex sections are for financial institutions, large corporations, or entities with complicated ownership structures - none of which apply to a small 3-person consulting firm. Here's what made it click for me: think of the form as the IRS trying to cover every possible type of foreign entity in one massive document, but your V.O.F. is actually a pretty straightforward case. You're a transparent partnership providing services remotely - that's about as simple as it gets from a US tax perspective. One thing I wish someone had told me upfront: don't try to understand every section of the form. Focus only on Parts I, III, and XXIX, and you'll have everything you need. The rest is just noise for your situation. Once I adopted that mindset, what seemed like an impossible task became totally manageable. Your US client will be familiar with receiving these forms from foreign consultants, so they'll know exactly what to do with it once you submit it. You're definitely not the first Dutch V.O.F. they've worked with!

0 coins

Olivia Garcia

β€’

This perspective is really reassuring! You're absolutely right that trying to understand every section of the form is what makes it so overwhelming. I've been getting stuck reading through all the complex sections that probably don't even apply to our situation. Your point about the US client being familiar with these forms from other foreign consultants is particularly comforting - I was worried we might be creating extra work for them or that they'd question our completion of the form. It's good to know this is probably routine for them. Quick question: when you completed your Belgian form, did you have any second thoughts about your choices after submitting it, or did you feel confident you'd filled it out correctly? I'm trying to gauge whether it's normal to have some lingering uncertainty even after completing it, or if there's a clear "yes, this is definitely right" feeling once you finish. Also, did your Belgian business structure translate pretty directly to one of the US entity classifications, or did you have to do some research to figure out the best match?

0 coins

Ellie Kim

β€’

I definitely had some lingering uncertainty after submitting it! I think that's completely normal with tax forms, especially international ones where the stakes feel higher. Even after double-checking everything, I kept wondering "what if I missed something important?" But here's what gave me confidence: I realized that the W-8BEN-E is essentially a self-certification form. You're telling the US client (and by extension, the IRS) who you are and why you qualify for certain treaty benefits. As long as you're being honest about your business structure and services, you're on solid ground. For my Belgian business structure (SPRL), I classified it as "Corporation" since that's the closest US equivalent. Your Dutch V.O.F. actually maps more directly to "Partnership" than my situation did, so you might have an easier classification decision. One thing that helped ease my anxiety: I kept a copy of the completed form along with notes about why I made each choice. That way, if questions ever came up later, I could explain my reasoning. But honestly, over a year later, it's never been questioned by either the client or any tax authorities. The uncertainty feeling is normal, but once you submit it and start getting paid without issues, you'll realize you probably got it right!

0 coins

Great question about handling Vine income without a 1099! You're absolutely right that the absence of a 1099 doesn't eliminate your reporting obligation. If you don't receive a 1099 from Amazon (typically because your total annual ETV was under $600), you should still report the fair market value of items received as "Other Income" on your tax return. Here's what I'd recommend: **For items with ETVs:** Use the ETV as your starting point, but document the actual Amazon selling price if there's a significant discrepancy. The IRS expects you to report fair market value, which is generally what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller. **For zero ETV items:** These are typically consumable health/beauty products that Amazon considers samples. While the ETV shows zero, if these items have actual retail value, you should technically report that value. However, many tax professionals treat legitimate samples (small quantities clearly intended for testing) as having minimal taxable value. **My suggestion:** Keep a simple log of everything you receive with dates, descriptions, ETVs, and actual selling prices. Even without a 1099, this documentation will protect you if questioned and help you calculate the most accurate fair market values. The key is being consistent and reasonable in your approach. If you're unsure about specific items, consider consulting with a tax professional, especially if your total annual value is substantial.

0 coins

This is really helpful guidance, thank you! As someone brand new to both Vine and tax reporting complexities, I appreciate the practical approach you've outlined. I'm particularly interested in your point about zero ETV health/beauty items. I've noticed quite a few of these in the available selections and was wondering about their tax treatment. Your explanation about treating legitimate samples as having minimal taxable value makes sense, though I imagine the line between "sample" and "full product" could get blurry with some items. For documentation purposes, would you recommend taking screenshots of the Amazon product pages at the time of receipt, or is noting the selling price in a spreadsheet sufficient? Also, when you mention "substantial" total annual value, what would you consider the threshold where professional tax consultation becomes worthwhile - $1,000? $2,000? I'm trying to set up good systems from the start rather than scrambling to figure this out later. Thanks for sharing your experience!

0 coins

Vir

β€’

Has anyone on SSDI, NOT SSI (the disability insurance that is based on your work credits), used this program before? I was debating doing it because it's been 3 years and I cannot find any gig work I can do with my disabilities. I'm bored to say the least and need the 'purpose' in life but without people interaction as I'm autistic with cptsd and an introvert loner. I used to be a research scientist so I always write thorough Amazon reviews, which is likely why Amazon invited me. Well, considering I have a very strict budget as is, I will be honest in saying that I am concerned I'd be able to scarf up the taxes later. I wouldn't be reviewing many products as my symptoms peak and I have bad weeks and months sometimes. But it would give me something to look forward to and be productive with in some way. Like I feel depressed I'm relying on section 8 and other welfare just to survive because I can't find any work at all I can do with my physical, mental and learning disabilities. Like I found with my limited phone data I can earn a few bucks playing mobile games, but it's infrequent at best given my data limitations and I started that 4 months ago. So I'm wondering if I'd even need to file taxes because I might not even make the income limit. Like recently I tried filing taxes to see if my SSDI would be taxable as I was curious because a supposed refund check our president was trying to get going. Well I went through the Tax USA program and it determined my SSDI was non-taxable and I had $0 taxable income. Any helpful information from people who have tried this program on SSDI would be appreciated, and naturally any tax experts. I haven't made any income, or enough income, to even file taxes in 5 years so any help is appreciated so I can decide if I want to join this program. Thanks!

1 coin

How Long Does IRS Take To Process Form 8962 & 1095-A After Faxing For Premium Tax Credit Reconciliation?

I just faxed in my Form 8962 (Premium Tax Credit) and Form 1095-A (Health Insurance Marketplace Statement) that the IRS requested for marketplace insurance verification. According to their notice, these forms are required because advance payments were made for my health care coverage through the Marketplace, and I need to reconcile these advance credit payments with the amount I'm allowed for the year. The IRS letter I received states: "According to our records, advance payments were made for health care coverage through the Marketplace for you or someone listed on your tax return. In this case, you must use Form 8962, Premium Tax Credit, to reconcile the advance credit payments with the amount you are allowed for the year." The notice also mentioned "You should have received a Form 1095-A, Health Insurance Marketplace Statement, from the Health Insurance Marketplace. Use Form 1095-A and Form 8962 instructions to help you complete Form 8962. If you didn't receive a Form 1095-A, visit HealthCare.gov or your state Marketplace website." The IRS specifically requested that I "Send us the following documents: - A completed Form 8962 - A copy of your Form 1095-A" The letter warned that "If you don't reconcile, you won't be eligible for the premium tax credit or cost-sharing reductions for Marketplace health insurance coverage in future years. You may also be required..." to do something else, but that part was cut off in the letter. I've sent everything they asked for - both the completed Form 8962 and a copy of my Form 1095-A that I received from the Health Insurance Marketplace. Anyone know how long the IRS typically takes to reprocess after receiving these docs? Getting anxious about my refund being held up. If anyone needs help finding these forms, you can call 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676), or if you're missing your Form 1095-A, you can visit your state Marketplace website.

Rita Jacobs

β€’

Just went through this same nightmare last year! Took exactly 11 weeks from when I faxed my Form 8962 and 1095-A until I saw the 846 refund code on my transcript. The IRS is super backed up with these marketplace verifications. Here's what helped me stay sane during the wait: - Set up IRS online account ASAP if you haven't already - checking transcript weekly becomes addictive but at least you'll see movement before any letters arrive - Document everything - dates you faxed, confirmation numbers, screenshots of your transcript - Don't call until week 10 unless you see weird codes - they'll just tell you to wait longer anyway The good news is once they finally process it, the refund hits your account within 2-3 business days. The reconciliation process is actually protecting you from owing money back next year, so even though it sucks right now, it's better to get it sorted properly. Stay strong! The 6-12 week range everyone's mentioning is unfortunately pretty accurate. Your refund will come, just later than expected 😀

0 coins

Salim Nasir

β€’

Thanks for sharing your experience! 11 weeks is definitely on the longer side but good to know what to potentially expect. I'm only about 3 weeks in so still have a ways to go apparently πŸ˜… Really appreciate the tip about not calling until week 10 - I was already thinking about calling but sounds like it's pretty pointless until then. The part about documenting everything is smart too, I've been screenshotting my transcript each time I check it. Did you notice any specific pattern in how the codes updated on your transcript during those 11 weeks, or was it pretty quiet until the end?

0 coins

Lakaidra Dixon

β€’

Its been 6 weeks and thats a ridiculous length of time not knowing if they received your fax.

1 coin

12345...5644Next