


Ask the community...
As someone who's been preparing financial statements for construction companies for over 8 years, I can tell you that your quotes are actually reasonable for the scope of work involved. Construction accounting adds significant complexity that many general practice CPAs aren't equipped to handle properly. The $2,800-$5,500 range you're seeing likely reflects different levels of service and the accountant's experience with construction-specific issues. Here's what should be included in a proper construction company financial statement preparation: 1. Proper revenue recognition using percentage of completion method for long-term contracts 2. Work-in-progress schedules showing costs incurred vs. billings 3. Proper classification of retention receivables and payables 4. Equipment and depreciation schedules 5. Job cost analysis and gross profit by project 6. Cash flow considerations for construction cycles Before choosing an accountant, ask them specifically about their experience with ASC 606 revenue recognition standards and how they handle over/under billings. A good construction accountant will immediately know what you're talking about and can explain how it affects your specific situation. Also, definitely get clarification from your bank about whether they'll accept compiled statements versus reviewed statements. For a $840K construction company, compiled statements with proper disclosures are often sufficient, which could save you $1,500-$2,000. Your current tax accountant's quote of $3,200 isn't unreasonable if they truly understand construction accounting. Sometimes the familiarity with your business is worth the slightly higher cost.
This is incredibly helpful - thank you for breaking down exactly what should be included! I'm definitely going to use this as a checklist when interviewing potential accountants. Quick question about the ASC 606 standards you mentioned - is this something that affects all construction companies or just larger ones? I'm wondering if my size ($840K revenue) means I might be exempt from some of these more complex requirements. Also, when you mention "proper disclosures" for compiled statements, what specific disclosures are typically required for construction companies that banks look for? I want to make sure I'm asking the right questions when I call my bank back.
ASC 606 applies to all construction companies regardless of size - it's been required since 2019 for private companies. However, the complexity of implementation depends on your contract types. For smaller contractors like yourself doing mostly short-term projects (under 12 months), the impact might be minimal since you can often recognize revenue when work is completed rather than over time. For compiled statements, banks typically want to see specific construction-related disclosures including: revenue recognition methods used, significant accounting policies for long-term contracts, details about retention practices, and any material contracts or change orders that could affect financial position. They also want to see work-in-progress presented correctly on the balance sheet. When you call your bank, specifically ask if they require "industry-specific disclosures for construction companies" and whether they need supplementary schedules showing contract details. Some banks are satisfied with basic compiled statements plus a simple WIP schedule, while others want more detailed project-level reporting. The good news is that at your revenue level, you're likely not subject to some of the more complex requirements that larger contractors face, but proper percentage of completion accounting is still essential if you have any multi-month projects.
I've been through this process twice now with my electrical contracting business, and I learned some hard lessons that might help you avoid costly mistakes. First, definitely confirm with your bank whether they'll accept compiled vs reviewed statements. Like others mentioned, many banks will accept compiled statements for businesses under $1M, but you need this in writing. I made the mistake of assuming and ended up paying for a review when compilation would have been fine. Second, since you're in construction, make absolutely sure your accountant understands job costing and percentage of completion accounting. I hired someone who claimed construction experience but didn't properly handle my work-in-progress, and the bank rejected the statements. Had to start over with a specialist. The $3,200 quote from your current tax accountant isn't bad if they truly know construction accounting. Ask them specifically about how they'll handle your ongoing projects and retention receivables. If they can't give you clear answers about WIP schedules and over/under billings, find someone else. One tip that saved me money: get your QuickBooks completely cleaned up first. Make sure all job costs are properly allocated, your accounts are reconciled, and you have backup documentation for any large transactions. This prep work can cut 3-4 hours off your accountant's time, which translates to real savings. Also, ask about payment terms. Some firms will let you pay in installments, especially if you're establishing an ongoing relationship for future years.
This is all really great advice! I'm new to this whole financial statement process and feeling pretty overwhelmed by all the different requirements and terminology. As someone just starting to navigate this, I'm curious - how do you typically find accountants who specialize in construction? Is there a certification or credential I should be looking for, or is it more about asking the right questions during interviews? Also, when you mention getting QuickBooks "completely cleaned up," could you give some specific examples of what that looks like? I think my books are in decent shape, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something obvious that could end up costing me more later. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this process multiple times!
One additional consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is the impact on your FSA or HSA contributions if you have them. When switching from bi-weekly (26 pay periods) to semi-monthly (24 pay periods), your pre-tax deductions will be spread across fewer paychecks, which means a slightly larger deduction per paycheck. For example, if you contribute $2,600 annually to an FSA, that's $100 per bi-weekly paycheck but about $108 per semi-monthly paycheck. This doesn't change your total contribution or tax savings, but it does affect your per-paycheck take-home amount. Also, with your salary increase to $72k, you might want to consider increasing your retirement contributions if you weren't already maxing out your 401(k). The higher income gives you more room to save pre-tax dollars, which can help offset some of the additional tax burden from being in a higher bracket for part of your income. The timing of when you start the new job in January is actually perfect for tax planning - you'll have the full year to let the new withholding work properly, rather than trying to catch up mid-year.
This is such a comprehensive breakdown, thank you! The FSA/HSA point is really important - I hadn't considered how the deduction timing would change. I currently contribute $1,500 to my FSA, so going from about $58 per bi-weekly paycheck to $62.50 per semi-monthly paycheck isn't huge, but it's good to know for budgeting purposes. Your point about January timing being perfect makes me feel better about this transition. I was worried about having to do complicated mid-year calculations, but starting fresh in January should make everything cleaner for tax purposes. Quick question - with the salary jump to $72k, do you think I should increase my 401(k) contribution percentage to take advantage of the higher income, or is it better to keep the same percentage and just enjoy the higher take-home pay for now? I'm currently contributing 6% to get my full company match.
That's a great question about 401(k) contributions! Since you're already getting your full company match at 6%, you have some flexibility here. With your salary jumping from $58k to $72k, I'd actually recommend considering a slight increase in your contribution percentage - maybe bumping up to 8% or 10%. Here's why: The additional $14k in income will be taxed at your marginal rate (likely 22%), so increasing pre-tax 401(k) contributions can help reduce that tax hit while boosting your retirement savings. Plus, you'll still see a meaningful increase in take-home pay even with higher retirement contributions. For example, if you increase from 6% to 8% on your new $72k salary, you'd contribute $5,760 annually instead of $3,480 (6% of $58k). That extra $2,280 in contributions would reduce your taxable income and save you about $500 in taxes, while still leaving you with significantly more take-home pay than your current job. The beauty of starting fresh in January is you can set your contribution rate from day one and let it run consistently all year. You could always start at 8% and adjust later if needed once you see how the new budget feels!
The pay frequency change itself won't impact your taxes at all - you'll owe the same amount whether you're paid bi-weekly or semi-monthly. The main difference is that with semi-monthly pay, you'll get 24 larger paychecks instead of 26 smaller ones, so your withholding per paycheck will be proportionally higher. However, your salary increase from $58k to $72k is definitely something to address on your W-4. That's a significant jump that will likely push some of your income into the 22% tax bracket. Since the W-4 was redesigned in 2020, the old "claiming 0" system doesn't apply anymore - the new form is actually much more straightforward. I'd strongly recommend using the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator tool on irs.gov when you start your new job. It will walk you through exactly how to fill out your W-4 based on your new salary and help ensure you're not under-withheld. Starting a new job in January is actually perfect timing since you'll have the full year for proper withholding rather than trying to catch up mid-year. One bonus tip: with your higher salary, consider whether you want to increase your 401k contribution rate to take advantage of the additional income while reducing your taxable income at the same time!
This is really solid advice! I'm actually in a similar situation - switching jobs next month with both a pay frequency change and salary increase. The IRS Tax Withholding Estimator sounds like exactly what I need since I've been putting off figuring out my new W-4. One question about the 401k suggestion - is there a general rule of thumb for how much to increase your contribution rate when your salary goes up? I know the goal is usually to save 10-15% for retirement total, but I'm curious if there's a smart way to phase that in rather than jumping to a high percentage right away. Also, does anyone know if the withholding estimator accounts for things like student loan payments or other deductions that might affect your tax situation? I want to make sure I'm giving it all the right information.
I can definitely understand your concern! I went through this exact same worry pattern last year. Here's what I learned from my experience and talking to IRS representatives: The "pending" status in TurboTax generally means your return has been transmitted to the IRS but they haven't yet sent back the official acknowledgment. This is completely normal and expected during the first 24-48 hours after e-filing. Regarding your amended return concerns from last year - those delays were likely due to the complexity of Form 1040-X processing, which requires manual review. Regular returns (Form 1040) go through automated systems first, so the timeline is much more predictable. A few things to keep in mind: β’ WMR often lags behind TurboTax status updates by 24-72 hours β’ Filing time matters - returns submitted on weekends may take longer for initial processing β’ Peak filing season (late February through April) can cause slight delays in status updates If you're still seeing "pending" in TurboTax after 72 hours, then I'd recommend contacting their support. But given that you mentioned checking "multiple times today," you're likely still well within the normal processing window. Your return is almost certainly in the IRS queue and progressing normally.
This is really reassuring, thank you @Savanna Franklin! I'm definitely still in that early window you mentioned - I filed yesterday evening, so I'm probably just being impatient. Your point about amended returns being different from regular returns makes a lot of sense too. I was letting last year's Form 1040-X experience color my expectations for this year's regular filing. I'll give it the full 72 hours before worrying and stop obsessively checking every few hours!
I had this exact same issue two weeks ago and want to share what I learned from calling TurboTax support directly. The rep explained that "pending" specifically means your return has been successfully transmitted to the IRS Electronic Filing system, but they're waiting for the official acknowledgment response from the IRS servers. Here's the timeline I experienced: β’ Filed Sunday evening - TurboTax showed "pending" β’ Monday afternoon - Still "pending" in TurboTax, nothing in WMR β’ Tuesday morning - TurboTax updated to "accepted," WMR still blank β’ Wednesday evening - WMR finally showed "Return Received" The key thing the TurboTax rep told me was that "pending" is actually a good sign - it means there were no immediate rejection codes (like wrong SSN, math errors, etc.). If the IRS was going to reject your return, you'd typically see that within 2-4 hours of filing. Since you mentioned your amended return delays last year, I totally understand the anxiety. But regular 1040 returns go through a completely different automated processing pipeline than Form 1040-X. You're comparing apples to oranges in terms of processing speed. Give it until Wednesday if you filed over the weekend, or 48 business hours if you filed on a weekday. The systems will sync up!
This timeline breakdown is super helpful @Chloe Martin! I'm curious though - when TurboTax support told you that "pending" means no immediate rejection codes, does that mean the IRS has already done some preliminary validation of the return? Like checking SSNs and basic math? Or is "pending" just confirmation that the file was successfully uploaded to their servers without any transmission errors?
FYI - TurboTax handles 1099-B and Form 8949 reporting much better than TaxSlayer in my experience. I switched this year after having similar frustrations. They have a direct import feature that works with most brokerages, and they're much clearer about how to handle wash sales and basis reporting. Yes, it costs more, but when you're dealing with investment transactions, the extra guidance is worth it. They also have much better support if you get stuck.
I see people recommending TurboTax for everything, but it's so expensive compared to TaxSlayer! Is it really that much better for investment reporting? Does it generate Form 8949 correctly? I day trade so I have hundreds of transactions...
For day trading with hundreds of transactions, TurboTax is definitely worth the extra cost. It handles bulk imports much better than TaxSlayer and automatically generates Form 8949 correctly. The wash sale calculations are also more reliable when you have that volume of trades. However, if you're already stuck in TaxSlayer for this year, you might want to check out taxr.ai like others mentioned above. It can help organize your transactions properly for TaxSlayer's format, which could save you from having to switch mid-filing. But definitely consider TurboTax for next year - the time savings alone justify the price when you're dealing with day trading volumes.
I had the exact same frustration with TaxSlayer and stock reporting last year! One thing that helped me was understanding that you absolutely do NOT need to report every single transaction if your broker already reported the basis to the IRS (which Fidelity usually does for covered securities). Here's what worked for me: Look at your 1099-B and find the summary totals at the bottom of each section (short-term vs long-term). If the "basis reported to IRS" box is checked, you can enter these as summary transactions in TaxSlayer instead of individual trades. For the dates, use "VARIOUS" for acquisition date and 12/31/2023 for sale date when doing summary reporting. This is totally acceptable and saves hours of data entry. For wash sales in TaxSlayer: When you're entering your 1099-B info, there's a section that asks about "adjustments" - that's where the wash sale amounts go. Just enter the total wash sale adjustment from your 1099-B summary (it should be clearly labeled). The key is to match exactly what's on your 1099-B totals - don't overthink it! TaxSlayer will generate Form 8949 automatically based on what you enter.
This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been stressing about entering every single trade when I probably don't need to. Just to clarify - when you say "VARIOUS" for the acquisition date, do you literally type the word "VARIOUS" in TaxSlayer, or is there a dropdown option for that? Also, did you run into any issues with the IRS accepting summary reporting, or does it go through without problems as long as the totals match your 1099-B?
Levi Parker
I'm currently experiencing Reference 1581 as well and this thread has been incredibly helpful! Filed my return about 2 weeks ago and just started seeing this code a few days ago. Like everyone else here, I was immediately worried I'd made some serious error on my return. I also claimed EITC this year due to reduced income from switching jobs mid-year, so my situation fits perfectly with the pattern everyone's describing. It's really reassuring to see how consistent all these experiences are - clearly this is part of the IRS's expanded compliance review process rather than individual problems with our returns. The real-world timelines shared here (4-8 weeks) are so much more valuable than that generic "up to 120 days" message on the IRS website. @QuantumQuest I'm definitely implementing your weekly check strategy starting now - I can already tell I'm going to become obsessive about refreshing that status page if I don't set boundaries! It's also encouraging to hear from @CosmicVoyager and others who spoke with IRS agents and confirmed these are routine reviews where refunds typically aren't changed. That was one of my biggest worries. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences and creating such a supportive discussion. This community has honestly saved my sanity during this stressful waiting period. It's so comforting to know we're all going through this together and that the vast majority of these codes resolve themselves with patience!
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
β’I'm also dealing with Reference 1581 right now and this thread has been such a blessing to find! Filed my return about 10 days ago and just saw this code appear yesterday. Like everyone else, I was immediately worried that I'd made some major mistake on my tax return. I also claimed EITC this year since I'm a single mother working multiple part-time jobs with lower overall income, so it sounds like my situation fits the exact same pattern everyone's describing. Reading through all these shared experiences has been incredibly comforting - it's amazing how many people are going through this same thing this tax season. The timeline information from people who've actually been through this process (4-8 weeks) is so much more realistic and helpful than that scary "up to 120 days" message on the IRS website. @QuantumQuest I'm absolutely going to follow your weekly check advice - I can already feel myself wanting to obsessively refresh that page multiple times a day, which would just make me more anxious! It's also really reassuring to hear from @CosmicVoyager and others who got actual explanations from IRS agents that these are just routine compliance reviews. Knowing that most people's refund amounts don't change during these reviews takes away a lot of my worry. Thank you so much to everyone for being so open about sharing your timelines and experiences. This community support has already made such a huge difference in managing my stress about this situation. It's so comforting to know I'm not alone in dealing with this mysterious code and that the vast majority of people get their refunds without any issues!
0 coins
Caden Turner
I'm also currently dealing with Reference 1581 and this thread has been incredibly reassuring! Filed my return about 2.5 weeks ago and have been stuck with this code for the past 10 days. Like so many others here, I was really starting to panic thinking I'd made some major error on my return. I also claimed EITC this year due to reduced hours from a work injury, so my situation definitely fits the pattern everyone's describing. What's been most helpful is reading all the real-world timelines from people who've actually been through this - knowing to expect 4-8 weeks instead of that terrifying "up to 120 days" message makes such a huge difference for managing my anxiety. @QuantumQuest your advice about limiting status checks to once per week is brilliant - I've already been guilty of refreshing that page multiple times daily, which just adds stress without changing anything. Starting tomorrow I'm implementing your weekly check strategy! It's also really encouraging to hear from @CosmicVoyager and @Javier Morales who got through to IRS agents and confirmed these are routine compliance reviews rather than actual problems with our returns. The fact that most refunds process without changes to the amount is such a relief. Thanks to everyone for sharing your experiences and creating such a supportive community around this frustrating situation. This thread has honestly been a lifesaver for my peace of mind during this stressful waiting period. It's so reassuring to know we're all in this together and that the vast majority of these codes resolve themselves with patience!
0 coins