


Ask the community...
Just want to say as someone who's been self-employed for years, taking the job while pregnant isn't a bad idea at all. The paperwork isn't that complex for small amounts and you can literally do it whenever you have time. The tax software questios are basically: did you make money from self employment? how much? did you have expenses? list them. That's it. And the money could be great for baby stuff! Take the job if you want it, the tax part is not a reason to turn it down.
Totally agree! I started a side gig when my second baby was 2 months old. The flexibility was actually great with a newborn - I could work during naps or when my partner was on baby duty. And the extra money came in handy for all the surprise expenses babies bring!
Congratulations on the baby coming soon! I totally understand your hesitation about complicating taxes during such a busy time, but honestly, for $3,300 in freelance income, it's really not as overwhelming as it seems. The self-employment tax will be around $465 (15.3% on about 92% of your earnings), but you can deduct legitimate business expenses to lower that. Things like a portion of your internet bill, any software or supplies you bought for the work, even part of your phone bill if you use it for business calls. With married filing jointly (definitely stick with that), you'll just add a Schedule C to your regular tax return. Most tax prep software walks you through it step by step with simple questions. The whole process might add 30-45 minutes to your normal tax filing. That extra income could really help with baby expenses, and since you're due in 6 weeks, you could potentially finish the project before the baby arrives or work on it flexibly afterward. Don't let tax concerns stop you from taking an opportunity that could benefit your growing family!
RIGHT?! This waiting game is brutal π©
Just wanted to share my experience with cycle 05 - filed on 1/20 and got the same code. Been refreshing WMR obsessively until I found this thread! Thanks for the heads up about waiting until tomorrow morning, gonna save my sanity tonight π Also curious about that taxr.ai tool everyone's mentioning - might give it a shot since I'm tired of trying to decode my transcript myself
Just a heads up - if you received a check over $600, the settlement administrator will likely send you a 1099-MISC form reporting the payment to the IRS. So even if you're unsure about taxability, the IRS will know about the money. If you disagree with how it's reported on the 1099, you'll need documentation to support your position that some/all is non-taxable. I learned this the hard way with another settlement!
This happened to me! I got a 1099 for the full amount but had documentation showing part was for repairs. Should I just report what's on the 1099 or can I adjust it somehow?
You can definitely adjust it! You should report the full amount from the 1099 as income first, then subtract the non-taxable portion as an adjustment on a separate line. Include a note like "Settlement - excludable portion per IRC 104(a)(2)" and keep your documentation in case of an audit. This way you're acknowledging the 1099 but also properly excluding the non-taxable repairs portion. A tax professional can help you format this correctly on your specific tax software.
I went through something similar with a different class action settlement last year. The key thing that helped me was calling the settlement administrator directly - they were actually really helpful in explaining exactly what each portion of the payment was for. In my case, they broke it down like this: part was reimbursement for the cost difference between the defective airbag and a proper replacement (not taxable), and part was compensation for the inconvenience and potential safety risk (taxable). The administrator also told me that if the settlement was over $600, they'd automatically send me a 1099 form, but they said I could still exclude the non-taxable portions when filing my return as long as I had proper documentation. I'd definitely recommend getting that breakdown in writing from them before tax season hits. It made my filing so much cleaner and I felt confident I was handling it correctly.
This is really helpful! I'm dealing with the same airbag settlement situation and have been worried about how to handle it. Did you have to do anything special to get the administrator to break down the payment like that, or did they just provide it when you called? I'm nervous about calling because I'm not sure what questions to ask to make sure I get all the information I need for my taxes.
@Olivia Van-Cleve When I called, I simply explained that I received a settlement check and needed to understand the tax implications for filing my return. I asked them to break down what each portion of the payment represented - specifically whether any parts were for reimbursement versus compensation. The key questions I asked were: What "specific damages or costs does this settlement payment cover? and" Can "you provide a written breakdown showing which portions are reimbursement for actual costs versus other types of compensation? They" were surprisingly helpful and emailed me a detailed explanation within a few days. Don t'be nervous - they deal with these tax questions all the time, especially this time of year. Just be clear that you need the information for proper tax reporting and they should be able to help you out.
I've been lurking in this community for a while and this discussion really resonates with me. I'm currently a mid-level manager at a tech company but have been building a side consulting practice and looking at real estate investments. The tax complexity is overwhelming and I find myself in that same cycle of not knowing what questions to ask my CPA. What strikes me about this thread is how many people are in similar situations - we're all knowledge-seeking business owners who want to optimize our taxes but don't necessarily need to become practitioners. The EA path seems like overkill for our goals, especially when you consider the ongoing CPE requirements just to maintain a credential we won't use professionally. The hybrid approach discussion here has been eye-opening. I hadn't considered AI tools for tax strategy, but given how sophisticated these systems have become in other domains, it makes sense they'd be valuable for tax analysis too. The ability to upload your actual documents and get specific advice rather than generic information seems like a game-changer. I'm particularly interested in the LLC to S-corp analysis capabilities mentioned. I've been putting off that decision because getting clear guidance on the break-even point for my specific income situation has been difficult. Having a tool that could model different scenarios based on my actual financials would be incredibly valuable. Think I'll give taxr.ai a try before committing to the EA certification path. Thanks for sharing all these perspectives!
Welcome to the community! Your situation sounds very familiar - that cycle of not knowing what questions to ask your CPA is so frustrating when you know there are probably optimization opportunities you're missing. I've been following this thread closely and the consensus seems to be building around trying the targeted approach first before committing to the massive EA certification investment. The point about ongoing CPE requirements for a credential you won't use professionally is spot-on. For your LLC to S-corp decision specifically, having a tool that can model your actual numbers rather than giving generic advice could save you significant money in self-employment taxes. From what I understand, the break-even point varies dramatically based on your specific income, business expenses, and other factors that are hard to evaluate without detailed analysis. Would love to hear how the AI tool approach works out for you if you decide to try it. It sounds like several people in this thread are going that route, so we might have some good comparison data in a few months!
This is such a thoughtful discussion! I'm in a similar situation - self-employed with growing business complexity and constantly hitting those knowledge walls you mentioned. What's really resonating with me is the distinction everyone's making between needing the EA *credential* versus needing EA-level *knowledge*. Since you're not planning to practice, the hundreds of hours spent on client representation procedures seems like a poor use of your time when you could get the strategic knowledge you need more efficiently. The timing factor is crucial too - with your LLC to S-corp conversion timeline and multiple business launches, you need actionable insights now, not after months of certification study. The AI tools and targeted education approach seems much more aligned with your actual goals. I'm curious about one thing though - have you considered what happens if your business ventures grow to the point where you do want to offer tax services? Would starting with the hybrid approach now preclude pursuing EA certification later if circumstances change? From what I can tell, the knowledge you'd gain from targeted study would actually make the EA process easier if you decided to pursue it down the road.
That's a great point about keeping the EA option open for the future! I think the hybrid approach actually sets you up perfectly for potentially pursuing the credential later if your business ventures grow to that scale. The knowledge you'd gain from using AI tools and targeted education would give you a much stronger foundation for EA study if you ever decided to go that route. Plus, you'd have real-world experience applying tax strategies to your own businesses, which would make the EA material more meaningful and easier to understand. What I like about this approach is that it's not an either/or decision - it's more like a logical progression. Start with getting the immediate knowledge you need for your current situation, then reassess as your business portfolio grows. If you eventually find yourself naturally advising others or wanting to formalize that capability, the EA certification would be the next step. The alternative of spending months studying EA material now while your businesses need immediate tax optimization seems backwards. Better to solve the current problems efficiently and keep your options open for the future!
Caleb Stone
I just went through this exact scenario last month. Had all codes but 846, with a hold status for 6 weeks. Called the IRS, got through after multiple attempts, and found out it was stuck in education credit verification. Asked for a taxpayer advocate referral due to financial hardship (needed money for tuition). Got my 846 code 3 days later and refund the following week. Don't just wait - be proactive and specifically request hardship consideration if you need the funds urgently.
0 coins
StarStrider
I'm in a very similar situation right now - filed February 12th with education credits and seeing the exact same pattern on my transcript. All the processing codes are there (150, 570, 971) but no 846, and it just updated to hold status yesterday. This is really concerning since I need my refund for spring semester expenses. Has anyone tried contacting their congressional representative's office for help? I've heard they can sometimes intervene with the IRS when there are processing delays. Also wondering if anyone knows whether the hold specifically relates to the education credit amount or if they're verifying the entire return. The uncertainty is really stressful when you're counting on that money for school costs.
0 coins