Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I'm new to this community and just found this thread while struggling with the exact same Form 8960 issue! The $130 difference between tax software programs had me completely stumped, and I was starting to panic about filing incorrectly. This discussion has been absolutely invaluable - seeing how everyone systematically worked through this complex problem gives me so much confidence. The consensus about using the full state tax amount (without the SALT cap) in the investment income ratio calculation makes perfect sense now, especially with the explanation about NIIT being designed as a separate tax system to prevent double taxation. I ran my numbers using this methodology: $45,000 investment income ÷ $180,000 total income = 25%, then 25% × $12,800 state taxes = $3,200 for Line 9b. This should save me about $122 in NIIT compared to what I was calculating before. The multiple confirmations from IRS agents, CPAs, and the Treasury Regulation 1.1411-4(f)(3) citation really solidify this approach. I'm documenting everything carefully including my calculation method and the regulatory basis for it. Thank you all for sharing your research and experiences - this collaborative problem-solving approach is exactly what I needed to navigate this confusing situation with confidence!
Welcome to the community! I'm also brand new here and just discovered this incredibly helpful thread while dealing with my first Form 8960 filing. Like you, I was completely baffled by the different results I was getting from various tax software programs - in my case, about a $150 difference that I couldn't explain. Reading through everyone's detailed analysis has been so reassuring! The systematic way this community worked through the problem - from identifying the core issue to getting multiple independent confirmations from different sources - really demonstrates how collaborative problem-solving can tackle even complex tax situations. Your calculation example is really helpful: seeing how the 25% ratio ($45K ÷ $180K) multiplied by your full state taxes ($12,800) gives you $3,200 for Line 9b reinforces that this methodology works consistently. The $122 NIIT savings you calculated definitely makes it worth getting this calculation right! What I find most convincing is the convergence of evidence - whether people called the IRS directly, consulted CPAs, used AI tools, or found Treasury Regulation citations, everyone arrived at the same interpretation. That kind of consensus across different verification methods gives me confidence to proceed with this approach. I'm also keeping detailed documentation of the calculation method and the regulatory basis (Treasury Reg 1.1411-4(f)(3)) as others have suggested. Thanks for sharing your specific numbers - having multiple real-world examples really helps confirm this methodology works across different income situations!
I'm completely new to this community and just discovered this amazing thread while pulling my hair out over Form 8960! Like so many others here, I was getting wildly different NIIT calculations between different tax software - about a $165 difference between TaxSlayer and TaxAct that had me totally confused. After reading through this entire discussion, I'm blown away by how thoroughly everyone worked through this complex issue. The collaborative approach here is incredible - seeing people verify the same methodology through IRS calls, CPA consultations, AI tools, and Treasury Regulation research really builds confidence in the solution. The explanation about NIIT operating as a separate tax system designed to prevent double taxation (rather than provide additional deductions) finally made the rules click for me. That's why the SALT cap doesn't apply to the Form 8960 Line 9b allocation - it's fundamentally different from Schedule A deduction limits. I worked through my numbers using the consensus methodology: $55,000 investment income ÷ $220,000 total income = 25%, then 25% × $16,200 state taxes = $4,050 for Line 9b. This should reduce my NIIT by about $154, which definitely makes getting this right worthwhile! The concrete examples with real numbers throughout this thread were incredibly helpful for understanding the mechanics. I'm documenting my calculation method along with the Treasury Regulation 1.1411-4(f)(3) reference that was mentioned multiple times. Thank you all for sharing your research and experiences - this kind of community knowledge-sharing is exactly what makes complex tax situations manageable for newcomers like me!
Welcome to the community! I'm also brand new here and just stumbled upon this incredible thread while struggling with my first Form 8960 filing. Like you, I was completely bewildered by the significant differences between tax software programs - in my case, about a $140 variance that I couldn't reconcile. This entire discussion has been absolutely enlightening! What impressed me most is how the community systematically tackled what initially seemed like a simple software discrepancy but revealed a genuinely complex tax interpretation issue. The convergence of evidence from multiple independent sources - IRS confirmations, CPA consultations, Treasury Regulation citations - all pointing to the same methodology is really compelling. Your calculation example perfectly illustrates the approach: $55K ÷ $220K = 25%, then 25% × $16,200 = $4,050 for Line 9b, potentially saving $154 in NIIT. Seeing these real numbers helps cement the concept beyond just theoretical understanding. What really helped me grasp this was the legislative context explanation - understanding that NIIT was designed to prevent double taxation rather than create additional deduction benefits makes the separation from SALT cap limitations logical. It's one of those "aha" moments where the underlying purpose clarifies the technical application. I'm definitely following everyone's advice about documentation, keeping detailed notes about the calculation method and Treasury Reg 1.1411-4(f)(3) reference. This collaborative approach to solving complex tax issues is exactly what I was hoping to find in this community!
@Zara Malik I need to voice an unpopular opinion in the thread. Form 8960 Line 9b is subject to SALT limit. https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8960 has explanation for Reasonable "method allocations ."Reasonable """ method allocations. To the extent that you have a properly allocable deduction that’s allocable to both NII and excluded income, you may use any reasonable method to determine that portion of the deduction that’s properly allocable to NII. The items that may be allocated between NII and excluded income are the following. Certain taxes under section 164 a(reported) as itemized deductions, if properly deducted on your return when calculating your U.S. regular income tax. Allowed deductions can include state, local, and foreign income taxes; state, local, and foreign real property taxes; and state and local personal property taxes. Total tax deductions may be limited under section 164 b(6)(if) the expense is not associated with a trade or business or with a section 212 activity for the production of income. These deductions under section 164 for state, local, and foreign taxes are excepted from miscellaneous itemized deductions per section 67 b(2)(.)See """ the wording of if "properly deducted ."And also Total "tax deductions may be limited under section 164 b(6)(.)"Section 164 b(6)(IS) actually the SALT limit. So it is pretty clear that the calculation for Form 8960 Line 9b is subject to the SALT limit.
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
As someone completely new to this community, this discussion has been absolutely transformative for my understanding of corporate taxation! I came here totally convinced by those viral "$0 in taxes" headlines about Amazon, and I'm genuinely amazed by how much context was missing from those social media posts. The explanation of loss carryforwards really clicked for me - it makes complete sense that Amazon wouldn't owe federal income tax during years when they were operating at massive losses while building their infrastructure, or immediately after becoming profitable. Understanding that R&D credits and stock-based compensation deductions are deliberate Congressional policy tools rather than sneaky loopholes completely changed my perspective on the whole issue. What I found most valuable was the distinction between federal income tax in specific years (which generates all the headlines) versus Amazon's total tax burden across all categories and time periods. I followed the advice here and looked up their actual 10-K filings on SEC EDGAR - seeing billions paid in various taxes over the years was eye-opening compared to those "$0 taxes" viral posts. I'm planning to launch a small tech startup next year, and I was initially worried I was missing out on some secret tax strategies. But now I understand the scale is completely different - Amazon's billion-dollar R&D credits come from massive research investments, while my relevant strategies will be things like equipment depreciation, home office deductions, and proper business expense tracking. The practical advice throughout this thread about focusing on legitimate small business tax strategies rather than getting distracted by corporate controversies has been invaluable. The hybrid approach of self-education through IRS publications combined with strategic professional consultations sounds perfect for someone at my stage. Thanks to everyone who turned this into such an educational discussion rather than just another political argument - this is exactly the kind of informed community dialogue that helps newcomers like me actually understand these complex systems!
Join the conversation
This entire thread has been absolutely incredible - I wish I had found this information when I first opened my HSA three years ago! I've been keeping paper receipts in various random places around my house and it's become a complete mess. The retirement strategy discussion has completely changed how I think about HSA management. I had no idea there was no time limit on reimbursements, and the concept of building up a "reimbursement bank" for tax-free withdrawals decades from now is brilliant. Reading about people with $8K-15K+ in documented expenses that can be withdrawn tax-free whenever needed is incredibly motivating. I'm implementing several strategies from this thread immediately: 1. Scanning all receipts with Adobe Scan (thanks for the app recommendations!) 2. Setting up the Year > Provider folder structure in Google Drive with proper backups 3. Starting to track medical mileage with MileIQ - I drive to several specialists regularly and never realized this was HSA-eligible 4. Saving EOB statements alongside receipts for complete documentation 5. Creating a spreadsheet to track my accumulated reimbursable expenses The tip about thermal paper receipts fading is so important - I just checked my shoebox and several pharmacy receipts from earlier this year are already becoming illegible. Definitely scanning everything this weekend before I lose any more documentation. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world systems and experiences. This is exactly the practical guidance that makes HSA management actually achievable rather than overwhelming!
This thread has been a game-changer for me too! I just started contributing to my HSA last month and had no clue about any of these strategies. The retirement approach especially blew my mind - I've been thinking about HSAs all wrong, just as a way to pay current medical bills rather than as a long-term investment vehicle. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned: do you all set up any kind of regular review schedule for your digital receipt system? Like monthly or quarterly checks to make sure everything is properly backed up and organized? I'm worried about starting this system and then letting it get disorganized over time. Also, for the mileage tracking - does MileIQ work well if you use public transportation to get to medical appointments? I live in a city and usually take the subway to my doctor visits. Are those transit costs HSA-eligible too, or is it just personal vehicle mileage? Thanks for sharing all these incredibly practical tips. I'm definitely bookmarking this thread and starting my scanning project this weekend before any more receipts fade!
Noah huntAce420
I'm so sorry for your family's loss and the difficult situation you're navigating. Losing someone who handled all the finances can feel incredibly overwhelming, especially during such an emotional time. From everything you've described, FreeTaxUSA is absolutely correct in how it's handling the IRA distribution reporting. For traditional IRA distributions that are fully taxable (which is typical unless there were non-deductible contributions made over the years), both line 4a (total IRA distributions) and line 4b (taxable amount) should show the same amount that matches boxes 1 and 2a on the 1099-R. The previous accountant's practice of leaving line 4a blank while only filling line 4b was actually incorrect according to current IRS instructions. This could have been an outdated method that just kept getting repeated year after year, or possibly a simple oversight that never got caught. What's wonderful is that you're not only helping your mom save $550, but you're also ensuring her taxes are filed more accurately than they have been. The confidence she's gaining in understanding her own finances during this transition is invaluable and will serve her well moving forward. You should feel completely confident proceeding with FreeTaxUSA. The amounts matching between the software and the 1099-R is exactly what you want to see, and you're following proper IRS guidelines. Your mom is fortunate to have such caring support during this challenging time.
0 coins
Salim Nasir
•I'm so sorry for your loss and what your family is going through. As someone who recently had to help my grandmother navigate similar tax issues after my grandfather passed, I completely understand how overwhelming this can be. Reading through this entire thread has been incredibly educational and reassuring. It's clear that FreeTaxUSA is handling your mom's IRA distributions correctly according to current IRS guidelines, while her previous accountant was using an incorrect method for years. The fact that both lines 4a and 4b should show the same amount for fully taxable traditional IRA distributions makes perfect sense when you think about it - the total distribution and taxable amount would be the same if there were no non-deductible contributions. What's remarkable is that your mom is not only saving over $500 annually but actually getting more accurate tax preparation than she was receiving from a "professional." That must feel both validating and frustrating at the same time. Your support in helping her gain confidence with her finances during such a difficult transition is truly admirable, and it sounds like she's becoming more empowered in understanding her own financial situation. Thank you for sharing this experience - it's helping many of us learn about proper IRA distribution reporting and the importance of understanding our own tax returns rather than blindly trusting preparers.
0 coins
Alexander Zeus
I'm so sorry for your family's loss. Going through tax preparation for the first time after losing someone who always handled the finances is incredibly stressful, and you're being such a wonderful support to your mom during this difficult time. You're absolutely doing the right thing with FreeTaxUSA. Based on your description, the software is correctly reporting the IRA distributions. For traditional IRA distributions that are fully taxable (which is typical), both line 4a (total IRA distributions) and line 4b (taxable amount) should indeed show the same number that matches boxes 1 and 2a on the 1099-R. The previous accountant's practice of leaving line 4a blank while only filling line 4b was actually incorrect according to IRS instructions. This might have been an outdated method or simply an error that got repeated year after year. While it probably didn't change the actual tax owed, it's not the proper way to complete the form. What's encouraging is that your mom is not only saving over $500, but she's also getting more accurate tax preparation than she has been receiving. The fact that she's gaining confidence in understanding her own finances during this transition is wonderful - that knowledge and independence will serve her well going forward. Trust FreeTaxUSA on this one. You have the 1099-R documentation to support the amounts, and you're following current IRS guidelines correctly.
0 coins