


Ask the community...
Has anybody used TaxAct or TurboTax for nonprofit returns? I'm wondering if they handle these kinds of special situations or if I need specialized nonprofit tax software.
Just want to echo what others have said about documenting everything, even for that short initial period. I went through something similar with my nonprofit - we incorporated in late 2022 but didn't really start operations until 2023. For your situation, since you had zero revenue in 2023 and minimal expenses, the 990-N (e-Postcard) is probably your best bet for that first partial year (11/15/23-12/31/23). It's much simpler and you can file it online in about 10 minutes. The key eligibility factor is that your gross receipts were under $50K for that period, which they clearly were. Regarding penalties - yes, there can be late filing penalties ($20 per day up to $10K for small organizations), but the IRS is generally reasonable about waiving them for new organizations with legitimate reasons. When you file, include a statement explaining you were a newly formed organization waiting for 501(c)(3) determination and had no significant financial activity. I did this for our late first filing and never heard anything about penalties. One thing to keep in mind - make sure your fiscal year is properly established with the IRS. Since you're doing calendar year (Jan 1 - Dec 31), that should be straightforward, but double-check that it matches what you indicated in your 1023 application.
Has anyone considered the state tax implications? Each state handles entity transitions differently. In California, for example, using an old sole prop bank account for your corp can trigger a "successor liability" issue where your corp could be responsible for any unpaid taxes from the sole prop. On the flip side, in some states incorrectly attributing income to a corporation when it should be on the sole prop could trigger minimum corporate tax requirements you otherwise might have avoided.
This is a really complex situation that touches on several areas - entity separation, tax compliance, and banking regulations. From what I've seen in similar cases, the key is to act quickly to clean this up before it becomes a bigger problem. First, I'd strongly recommend getting that bank account ownership updated to your corporation ASAP. Most banks will let you do this with the right paperwork (corporate resolution, new signature cards, etc.). This eliminates the appearance that your sole prop is still operating. Second, you need to be very careful about how you're documenting any transfers between accounts. The IRS will want to see clear business purposes for any money movement between entities. If it looks like you're just using them interchangeably, that could jeopardize your corporate status. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - make sure you're not accidentally triggering any state franchise tax or minimum tax requirements by keeping the sole prop "active" through bank activity. Some states consider any business banking activity as evidence the entity is still operating, which could create ongoing tax obligations you don't need. I'd also suggest talking to a CPA who specializes in entity transitions. They can help you figure out if you need to file any forms with the IRS to properly document the transfer of assets from your sole prop to the corporation. Getting this documented properly now could save you major headaches if you ever get audited.
This is really comprehensive advice! I'm curious about the state franchise tax issue you mentioned - how would someone know if their state considers banking activity as evidence the entity is still operating? Is there a resource to check state-specific rules on this, or do you just have to call each state's tax department individually? I'm dealing with a multi-state situation and want to make sure I'm not creating problems in states where I might not even realize there are ongoing obligations.
I just wanted to add my experience to help ease anyone's anxiety about this. I'm a CPA and have been helping clients navigate this exact confusion for months now. The IRS has been gradually rolling out these new portal features throughout 2024, and the "Audit Status" tab is appearing for virtually all users regardless of their actual audit status. The key thing to remember is that the IRS operates on a very structured timeline for audits. They typically have 3 years from your filing date to initiate an audit (with some exceptions), and they MUST send written notice before beginning any examination process. This isn't optional - it's required by law. Since you filed in February, received your refund in March, and haven't received any correspondence, you can be confident you're not under audit. The IRS processes over 150 million individual returns each year, and less than 1% are actually audited. The new portal tabs are just poor user experience design - they should only show relevant information to each taxpayer's situation. If you want peace of mind, keep checking your mail for the next few weeks, but based on everything you've described, you're in the clear!
This is exactly the kind of professional insight that helps so much! As someone who's never dealt with an audit before, knowing that there's actually a legal requirement for written notice makes me feel much more confident. The 3-year timeline is also helpful to understand - I had no idea they had that kind of window. It really does seem like the IRS could save everyone a lot of stress by just making these portal features more targeted to individual situations instead of showing everyone the same confusing tabs. Thanks for breaking down the actual statistics too - less than 1% being audited puts things in much better perspective!
I completely understand the panic you must have felt seeing that tab! I went through the exact same thing about two months ago and it really threw me for a loop. What helped me was understanding that the IRS has been rolling out these new portal features in waves, and they're appearing for everyone regardless of their actual tax situation. The fact that you already received your refund is actually the most reassuring sign possible. The IRS has automated systems that flag returns for review BEFORE they issue refunds, not after. If there had been any issues with your 2022 return, they would have held your refund while they reviewed it. I ended up calling the IRS (which took forever to get through) and the representative confirmed that these new tabs are part of their system modernization but don't indicate your personal status unless you've received official mail from them. Since you haven't gotten any letters, you're almost certainly not being audited. Try not to stress too much - the new interface is just poorly designed from a user experience standpoint. They really should only show relevant tabs instead of displaying everything to everyone!
Thank you so much for sharing your experience! It's really comforting to hear from someone who went through the exact same panic. I was literally losing sleep over this when I first saw that tab appear. Your point about the automated systems flagging returns BEFORE refunds makes total sense - I hadn't thought about it that way. It's such a relief to know that getting my refund in March was actually a good sign rather than something to worry about. I really appreciate you taking the time to call the IRS and share what you learned. It sounds like so many of us have been confused by this poorly designed rollout. The IRS definitely needs to work on their user experience - this tab is causing way more anxiety than it should!
One additional consideration that might be helpful - make sure to review your S-corp election timing and any potential Section 1202 Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) benefits. If your LLC made the S-corp election early enough and you've held your interest for at least 5 years, you might qualify for the QSBS exclusion which could eliminate federal taxes on up to $10 million of the gain (or 10x your basis, whichever is greater). This would be even better than just avoiding the 3.8% NIIT - it could potentially eliminate the entire federal capital gains tax on your $875K gain. The QSBS rules are complex and have specific requirements around when the election was made, the type of business, and how the stock was acquired, but it's definitely worth having your accountant review this when they return. Also, since you mentioned multiple owners, each owner can potentially claim their own $10M QSBS exclusion, so the total benefit for your group could be substantial. This is one of those situations where the entity structure (LLC electing S-corp treatment) might actually work in your favor for tax planning purposes.
This is excellent advice about QSBS! I hadn't even considered this possibility. Since we started the business in 2018 and made the S-corp election pretty early on, we might actually qualify for the 5-year holding period requirement by the time of sale. The potential to exclude the entire $875K from federal capital gains tax would be incredible - that could save me around $131K in federal taxes (15% or 20% capital gains rate) plus avoid the 3.8% NIIT entirely. Even if we only partially qualify, any QSBS exclusion would be huge. I'm definitely going to have my accountant dive deep into this when they get back. Do you know if there are any specific documentation requirements we should be gathering now to support a QSBS claim? I want to make sure we have everything ready since the sale timeline is tight.
For QSBS documentation, you'll want to gather several key items before your accountant returns: **Essential QSBS Documentation:** - Your LLC operating agreement and all amendments - The S-corp election form (Form 2553) and the date it was filed - Documentation showing when you acquired your ownership interest (original investment records, partnership agreements, etc.) - Business formation documents (Articles of Organization, EIN application) - Financial records showing the business had gross assets under $50M when you acquired your interest and when the S-corp election was made **Business Activity Verification:** - Records showing the business qualifies as an "active business" (not just passive investments) - Documentation that it's not in an excluded industry (hotels, restaurants, farms, mining, etc.) - Financial statements or tax returns showing business operations **Timing Documentation:** - Any stock certificates or membership interest documentation with dates - Capital contribution records with timestamps - Bank records showing when investments were made The 5-year holding period is calculated from when you first acquired the interest, not from the S-corp election date, so if you were a founding member in 2018, you're likely well past the 5-year requirement by now. Given the potential tax savings, it's worth having your accountant expedite this analysis even if it means paying for rush service. The QSBS exclusion could dwarf any costs associated with getting professional guidance quickly.
Looking at your situation, you're in a really strong position to avoid the 3.8% NIIT on your $875K gain. Since you've been actively involved in running the business since 2018, you almost certainly meet the material participation requirements that exempt you from NIIT. A few key points based on the great discussion above: **Material Participation** - With 6+ years of active involvement, you likely qualify under multiple tests (500+ hours annually, substantially all participation, or the 5-of-10 years test). The LLC/S-corp structure doesn't change this fundamental exemption. **Documentation Priority** - Start gathering evidence of your participation NOW: emails showing business decisions, calendar entries, meeting minutes, travel records, contracts you signed, etc. Even without perfect hour logs, multiple types of evidence showing consistent involvement will be convincing. **QSBS Potential** - This could be huge! If your LLC made the S-corp election early and you've held your interest since 2018, you might qualify for Section 1202 QSBS exclusion. This could eliminate federal taxes on your entire $875K gain (not just the 3.8% NIIT). Given the potential $131K+ in tax savings, consider having your accountant prioritize this analysis even if they're on vacation. **Next Steps** - Gather all formation documents, S-corp election paperwork, and ownership records. Document your business activities timeline. If QSBS doesn't apply, the material participation exemption alone should save you about $33K in NIIT. With the sale in 6 weeks, time is critical but you have multiple strong paths to significant tax savings. This is definitely worth expediting professional review!
This is such a comprehensive summary - thank you! I'm feeling much more confident about avoiding the NIIT now. I've already started gathering documentation and found tons of emails, calendar entries, and meeting records that clearly show my active involvement throughout the years. One quick follow-up question: If we do qualify for QSBS treatment, does that completely eliminate both federal capital gains tax AND the NIIT, or would there still be some portion subject to regular capital gains rates? With multiple owners potentially each claiming their own $10M exclusion, I want to make sure I understand how this stacks with the material participation exemption. I'm definitely going to contact my accountant tomorrow to see if they can prioritize this analysis remotely. The potential savings are too significant to wait, especially with the tight timeline. Thanks again to everyone who contributed - this community has been incredibly helpful!
Nina Chan
As someone who's been through this exact headache, I want to add a few practical tips that might help both your current situation and future filing: **For your immediate concern:** Look in your TurboTax files or printed return for Form 8453. If it wasn't generated, you likely don't need to mail anything. If it was created, the form should include the specific IRS mailing address (varies by state) and list exactly which documents to include. **The "3-day rule" isn't as strict as it sounds** - while officially you're supposed to mail within 3 days of e-file acceptance, the IRS processing timeline is much more flexible in practice. Many tax professionals report that documents arriving weeks later are still processed without issues. **For next year:** Consider this hierarchy of approaches with TurboTax Desktop: 1. Import all transactions (fix errors individually if needed) = no mailing required 2. Use TurboTax Online instead = electronic document upload available 3. Enter summary numbers = requires mailing Form 8453 The frustrating part is that TurboTax doesn't make this workflow clear upfront. The software should warn users about the mailing requirement when choosing to enter summary data instead of importing transactions. One silver lining: Since your broker already sent your 1099-B data to the IRS electronically, there's built-in redundancy in the system. The mailing requirement is more about IRS verification procedures than missing information.
0 coins
Yara Assad
β’This breakdown is extremely helpful, especially the hierarchy of approaches! I'm definitely a newcomer here but dealing with this exact TurboTax Desktop situation. Your point about the "3-day rule" being more flexible in practice is reassuring - I was really stressing about missing some hard deadline. I checked my files and did find Form 8453 was generated, so I guess I technically should mail my 1099-B documents. But knowing that the IRS already has this information from my broker and that there's built-in redundancy makes me feel less anxious about the whole process. The hierarchy you outlined will definitely guide my approach next year. I had no idea that importing transactions (even with errors to fix) would avoid the mailing requirement entirely. TurboTax really should make this clearer upfront - it would save so many people this stress and confusion. Thanks for sharing your experience and practical advice. This community has been incredibly helpful for navigating what seemed like a really complicated situation!
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
As a newcomer to this community, I'm dealing with this exact same TurboTax Desktop situation and want to share what I've learned from reading through everyone's experiences here. I also entered summary numbers for my 1099-B instead of importing transactions (due to too many errors that seemed overwhelming to fix), and like the original poster, I only realized afterward that this might require mailing physical documents. After reading through all the helpful responses, here's what I'm taking away: **For immediate action:** Check if Form 8453 was actually generated in your TurboTax files. If it was, that form will tell you exactly what to mail and where. If it wasn't generated, you might not need to mail anything. **Key insight I missed:** Importing transactions with errors and then fixing specific problematic entries individually would have avoided the mailing requirement entirely, while still maintaining accuracy. This seems like the best approach for future years with TurboTax Desktop. **Long-term solution:** Switch back to TurboTax Online next year for the electronic document upload capability that Desktop lacks. The tools mentioned here like taxr.ai for processing investment documents and Claimyr for actually getting through to the IRS also seem worth exploring. It's reassuring to know there are practical solutions beyond just struggling with the software's limitations. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community has been incredibly helpful for understanding what initially seemed like a very confusing and stressful situation!
0 coins