IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Honorah King

•

I'm confused about which line on Form 6251 these specified private activity bond interest dividends go on. My tax software seems to be putting them on line 2g, but is that right? Also, if my AMT calculation ends up being lower than my regular tax (which it usually is), do I need to worry about this at all?

0 coins

Line 2g on Form 6251 is indeed correct for specified private activity bond interest dividends from Box 13 of your 1099-DIV. This is where you report tax-exempt interest from private activity bonds as a tax preference item for AMT purposes. If your AMT calculation ends up lower than your regular tax, you won't owe any additional tax due to these bonds. The AMT system is designed to ensure you pay at least a minimum amount of tax, so if your regular tax is already higher than the calculated AMT, you only pay the regular tax amount. So in that case, no, you wouldn't need to worry about the AMT implications of these bond interest dividends.

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

•

Great discussion everyone! As someone who just went through this exact situation, I wanted to add that it's also worth checking if your mutual fund company provides any supplementary tax information beyond what's on the 1099-DIV. Some fund companies will send additional documentation explaining the source of the private activity bond interest and whether it comes from bonds issued before or after August 7, 1986 (which can affect certain calculations). They might also break down which states the bonds were issued in, which could be relevant for state tax purposes. I found that understanding the underlying investments helped me feel more confident about how to handle the tax reporting, especially when explaining it to my accountant. The $2,800 you mentioned is a pretty substantial amount, so it's definitely worth making sure you're handling it correctly!

0 coins

That's a really helpful point about the supplementary documentation! I never thought to look for additional information from my mutual fund company beyond the 1099-DIV. Do you know if all fund companies provide this kind of detail, or is it just certain ones? I'm with Vanguard and Fidelity for most of my investments - wondering if I should be looking for something specific from them regarding my private activity bond interest. Also, you mentioned the August 7, 1986 date - what's the significance of that cutoff? Does it change how the bonds are treated for AMT purposes?

0 coins

I'm a Canadian freelance developer who's been working with US clients for over 4 years, and I want to echo what everyone else is saying - you absolutely need to complete the W-8BEN form! The confusion you're experiencing is super common. I remember getting similarly conflicting advice when I first started, including from IRS reps who weren't familiar with international contractor situations. Here's the bottom line: the W-8BEN isn't about YOUR tax obligations to the US (you won't owe any since you're working from Canada). It's entirely about protecting your client from having to withhold 30% of your payments and send that money to the IRS. Without the form, US tax law requires your Chicago client to do backup withholding, which creates a mess for both of you. They have to deal with extra paperwork and remittances, and you'd have to file a US tax return to get your own money back - a process that can take months. For graphic design work performed as an independent contractor, you'll want to cite Article XV (Independent Personal Services) of the US-Canada tax treaty. You can use your Canadian SIN - no need to get a US tax ID number. Your client sent you this form because they know what they need for compliance. Completing it is actually the professional thing to do and shows you understand cross-border business requirements. Don't worry about "causing problems" - you'd be causing way more problems by not providing the documentation they need! The form is straightforward and valid for 3 years once completed. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

0 coins

This thread has been so incredibly helpful! As someone completely new to international freelancing, I was getting overwhelmed by all the conflicting information I found online. Your explanation about the W-8BEN being for client protection rather than personal tax obligations really makes everything click. It's reassuring to hear from so many experienced Canadian freelancers who've successfully navigated this situation. I was worried about making things complicated for my new client, but now I understand that completing the form is actually the professional approach that prevents complications for everyone. Thanks for sharing your 4+ years of experience with this - it gives me confidence that this is just standard business practice I need to get comfortable with as I expand internationally!

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

I'm a Canadian freelance marketing consultant who went through this exact situation 18 months ago with a client in Austin! The confusion is totally understandable - I also got conflicting advice initially. You definitely should complete the W-8BEN form. The IRS rep who told you not to was likely thinking about your Canadian tax filing obligations rather than what your US client needs for their compliance. Here's the key insight that finally made it click for me: the W-8BEN has absolutely nothing to do with whether you owe US taxes (you don't, since you're working from Canada). It's entirely about giving your Chicago client the paperwork they need to justify NOT withholding 30% of your payments. Without this form, US tax law requires them to do backup withholding - they'd have to take 30% of every payment and send it to the IRS. This creates a huge headache for them and means you'd have to file a US tax return just to get your own money back. For your graphic design work as an independent contractor, you'll cite Article XV of the US-Canada tax treaty. You can use your Canadian SIN (no US tax ID required), and the form is good for 3 years. Your client sent you the W-8BEN because they know what they need for compliance. Completing it shows you're professional and understand cross-border requirements - definitely not causing them problems, but preventing them! This is standard practice for Canadian freelancers working with US companies. Don't overthink it - just complete the form and you're all set.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! As someone brand new to freelancing with US clients, all the contradictory advice I was finding online was making me second-guess everything. Your explanation about the W-8BEN being for the CLIENT'S compliance needs rather than my personal tax situation finally makes it all make sense. I was so worried about doing something wrong or creating problems for my new client, but now I understand that completing this form is actually the professional thing to do and prevents headaches for both of us. It's really reassuring to hear from so many experienced Canadian freelancers in this thread who've been through the same confusion and successfully navigated it. I'll definitely complete the W-8BEN using Article XV and my Canadian SIN as everyone has suggested. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience - it's given me the confidence to move forward!

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

I've been locked out for about 36 hours now and still can't get back in, so it definitely varies by person/situation. Really frustrating when you're trying to track your refund! I've tried the usual tricks - different browsers, clearing cache, even tried from my work computer - nothing works until their system decides to let you back in. Since you filed March 5th, you should be hearing something soon based on the typical 21-day timeline. I know that "still processing" message is absolutely useless - gives you zero actual information about what's happening. Have you tried calling that automated line others mentioned? Sometimes it at least confirms they received your return properly even if it doesn't give you a timeline. The whole IRS system feels like it's held together with duct tape and prayers. Hopefully both our refunds start moving soon!

0 coins

I feel your pain! I'm actually going through the exact same thing right now - been locked out for almost 40 hours and getting increasingly anxious about my refund status. It's so frustrating that their "24 hour" lockout message is basically meaningless when it can take up to 72 hours in reality. I haven't tried the automated line yet but I'm definitely going to give it a shot based on what everyone's saying here. At this point I just want to know SOMETHING is happening with my return! The IRS really needs to invest in some modern technology - this whole experience feels like we're dealing with systems from the 1990s.

0 coins

Kevin Bell

•

Ugh, I feel your frustration! I've been through this lockout nightmare myself. In my experience, it's usually 24-48 hours, but I've seen it go as long as 72 hours depending on how overloaded their servers are. The "24 hour" message they show is basically meaningless. While you're waiting, definitely try the automated refund hotline at 1-800-829-1954 - you just need your SSN, filing status, and exact refund amount. Sometimes it has more current info than the website. Also, since you filed March 5th, you're right at that 21-day processing window, so hopefully you'll see movement soon even if you can't access your account right now. One trick that's worked for me: try accessing from a completely different network (like your phone's mobile data instead of home WiFi) or even a different device. Sometimes their IP-based lockout system gets confused and will let you in that way. Worth a shot while you're waiting for the timer to reset! The whole IRS tech infrastructure is stuck in the stone age. Hang in there - your refund is probably processing in the background even if you can't see it right now.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to dealing with IRS issues and had no idea about trying different networks or the IP-based lockout thing. That's actually genius - I'm definitely going to try switching to my phone's data connection. The automated hotline tip is great too since I'm getting tired of that useless "still processing" message online. It's reassuring to hear from someone who's been through this before that the refund is probably still moving along in the background even when we can't see it. Thanks for taking the time to share these practical tips!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year and it was so frustrating! My Box 10 was completely blank too, and like you, I thought it meant I had zero property taxes to claim. What I ended up doing was calling my county tax assessor's office directly - they were actually super helpful and could tell me exactly when property taxes were paid on my address and by whom. Turns out my mortgage company had paid taxes twice during the year from my escrow account, but for some reason didn't report it in Box 10. I also found out that since I bought mid-year like you did, I needed to look at my HUD settlement statement from closing. There should be a line item for "real estate taxes" that shows what you paid upfront. In my case, I had paid about $900 at closing that I would have completely missed if I just relied on the 1098. Don't stress too much about it - you're definitely not alone in dealing with incomplete 1098 forms. The key is to track down what you actually paid rather than what the mortgage company reported. Your closing documents and mortgage statements should have all the info you need!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience Miguel! This gives me so much hope. I've been putting off dealing with this because it seemed so overwhelming, but calling the county tax assessor sounds way more manageable than trying to decode all these mortgage documents on my own. Quick question - when you called the assessor's office, did you need any specific information beyond just your address? And did they charge anything for looking up the payment history? I'm worried they might want account numbers or other details I don't have readily available. Also, that's a great point about the HUD settlement statement. I remember that stack of papers being massive, but if there's a specific line item to look for, that makes it much easier to find. Did you end up having to amend your return after you found all this missing information, or were you able to catch it before filing?

0 coins

I can relate to the anxiety around tax season! The empty Box 10 situation is actually pretty common and definitely doesn't mean you paid zero in property taxes. Since you bought in June and have been making escrow payments, you almost certainly have deductible property taxes. Here's what I'd recommend checking: Look at your year-end mortgage statement (many lenders send these in January) - it should show a breakdown of what was paid from your escrow account for taxes. Also, dig out your closing disclosure from when you purchased - there should be property tax adjustments showing what you paid at closing. The reason Box 10 is empty could be that your lender handles escrow payments to multiple tax jurisdictions, or they simply don't complete that section reliably. Some mortgage companies are notorious for leaving it blank even when they've paid thousands in taxes on your behalf. If you're still confused after checking those documents, consider calling your local tax collector's office with your property address - they can tell you exactly what was paid and when. Don't let the empty box cause you to miss out on legitimate deductions you're entitled to!

0 coins

Luca Marino

•

This is such solid advice, Destiny! I'm dealing with the exact same situation and your point about the year-end mortgage statement is really helpful. I just checked mine and found a section called "Escrow Account Summary" that shows they paid $2,847 in property taxes throughout the year, even though my 1098 Box 10 is completely blank. I think what's happening is that mortgage companies are required to send the 1098 but Box 10 is optional for them to fill out, so many just don't bother. It's so misleading though - I almost filed thinking I had no property tax deduction at all! One thing I'm still unclear on - if I find property taxes paid both at closing AND from my escrow account during the year, I can claim both amounts on my Schedule A, right? Want to make sure I'm not double-counting anything or claiming something I shouldn't.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

This thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who's been doing taxes for a few years but never encountered multiple localities before, I had no idea this was such a common situation for government and school district employees. What really stands out to me from reading everyone's experiences is how the tax software companies have actually made this pretty straightforward to handle - it's just that most of us don't know to look for the "Add another locality" feature. I've been using TurboTax for years and never noticed that button because I never needed it. The explanation about different localities treating pre-tax deductions differently makes perfect sense once you understand it, but it's definitely not intuitive for first-time filers. I think a lot of the confusion comes from expecting all the numbers to "match up" when really they're supposed to be different. For anyone still working through this - the consensus seems clear: don't try to do any math or "fix" the numbers, just enter each locality exactly as it appears in boxes 18, 19, and 20, and trust your software to handle the calculations. The system is designed to work with these multiple entries. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge here. This is exactly the kind of practical, real-world tax guidance that you can't easily find elsewhere!

0 coins

Chloe Wilson

•

You're absolutely right about the "Add another locality" feature being hidden in plain sight! I've been using various tax software for years but only discovered it this year when I needed it. It makes me wonder how many people overpay for tax preparation services just because they don't realize the software can handle these situations automatically. Your observation about expecting numbers to "match up" is spot on. I think that's the biggest mental hurdle for newcomers - we're conditioned to think something's wrong when we see different amounts, but in this case, the differences are actually the whole point! Each locality is literally telling you "this is how much of your income we consider taxable under our specific rules." What's been really valuable about this thread is seeing how many different scenarios people have encountered - from simple two-locality situations to complex three-locality cases. It shows that once you understand the basic principle (enter each locality separately, exactly as shown), the complexity doesn't really matter. The software handles everything regardless of how many jurisdictions you're dealing with. Thanks for adding your perspective as someone with more tax experience. It's reassuring to know that even people who've been filing for years can learn something new from these discussions!

0 coins

AstroAlpha

•

As a newcomer to this community, I just wanted to add my voice to say how incredibly helpful this entire discussion has been! I'm also filing taxes for the first time and was completely stumped by having two different entries in my W-2 boxes 18-20. What really helped me was reading through everyone's real experiences - especially seeing that so many people initially thought there was an error on their W-2 when it's actually completely normal. The "mini-governments" explanation was a game-changer for understanding why the same deduction gets treated differently by different localities. I work for a municipal library system that apparently spans multiple tax jurisdictions, and now I understand why my Box 18 amounts differ by exactly my parking benefit deduction. One locality taxes it, the other doesn't - just like the health insurance situation described in the original post. I'm feeling much more confident about entering both localities separately in my tax software now. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their knowledge and experiences - this thread should be pinned for other first-time filers who inevitably run into this same confusion!

0 coins

Prev1...285286287288289...5643Next