Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'll be hitting my full retirement age (67) next month and plan to start collecting Social Security while continuing to work full-time. My annual salary is around $40,000. I understand that working after FRA can increase my monthly benefit amount through recalculations, but I'm trying to figure out roughly how much my check might go up each year I continue working. Has anyone here continued working past FRA and seen their benefits increase? I'm trying to decide if working another 2-3 years is worth it financially or if the benefit increase would be minimal. Thanks for any insights!
I'm turning 62 next month and planning to file for my Social Security retirement benefits. I understand I can apply online, but I'm also eligible for spousal benefits since my husband has been collecting his retirement for about 3 years now (he's 66). Is there a way to apply for BOTH my own retirement benefit AND spousal benefits in the same online application? Or do I have to make a separate appointment to discuss the spousal benefits? The SSA website is so confusing on this! I tried calling our local office twice but got disconnected after waiting 45+ minutes each time. Really don't want to drive across town for an in-person appointment if I don't have to. Any advice from someone who's done this recently would be so helpful! I'm worried about missing out on money if I don't file everything correctly.
somebody said u get both benefits added together thats wrong!!! u only get the higher of the two not both added up. my cousin thought she was gonna get both and was real disappointed
You're partially correct. You don't get both benefits added together completely, but it's also not just the higher of the two. If your spousal benefit would be higher than your own benefit, you receive your own benefit plus the difference to equal the spousal amount. It's effectively like getting the higher amount, but technically it's structured as your benefit plus a supplement.
Just wanted to add a helpful tip from my recent experience - when you're filling out the online application, make sure you have all your documents ready beforehand! You'll need your birth certificate, marriage certificate, and your husband's Social Security number and date of birth. Also, the application will ask about any previous marriages for both you and your husband, so have those dates handy too if applicable. The whole process took me about 45 minutes, but I had to start over once because I didn't have all the info I needed. One more thing - after you submit, you'll get a confirmation receipt number. Screenshot it or write it down! I needed it when I had to call them later about a minor issue with my direct deposit setup.
I'm so confused about my Social Security retirement timing! I did everything right - applied 3 months ahead like everyone says to do. Got my approval notice at the end of December which was a relief. My birthday is in February, so I thought I'd get my first payment in March (I know they pay a month behind). But when I checked my MySocialSecurity account, it's showing my first deposit scheduled for April 2nd! That's like 2 months after my birthday. Did something go wrong with my application? Is there a new delay I didn't know about? The SSA office never answers when I call and I'm getting worried about my budget planning.
One additional thing to be aware of: if April 10th is your first payment, it will include your benefit for March only. But going forward, you'll receive a payment every month. So while it might feel like you're "missing" a month at the beginning, you'll continue receiving benefits throughout your lifetime, including for the last month of your life (though that final payment would go to your estate).
I went through this exact same confusion when I applied! The key thing that helped me understand is that Social Security uses something called the "whole month rule." Since your birthday is February 18th, you weren't eligible for benefits for the entire month of February - only from the 18th onward. So March becomes your first full month of eligibility, and you get paid for that in April. It's counterintuitive because most of us think "I turn 66 in February, so I should get February benefits," but the system requires you to be eligible for the complete calendar month. Once you get that first payment though, it really is like clockwork every month after that. The waiting is definitely the hardest part!
I'm really confused about a letter I just got from Social Security. I've been receiving survivor benefits from my ex-husband who passed away about 14 months ago. The monthly amount has been $2,340. But yesterday I got this strange letter saying I'll be enrolled in Medicare Parts A&B starting in November (when I turn 65), and they'll be sending me my first payment for October benefits in November. The weird part is that the benefit amount they're showing is only $2,140 - which is about $200 LESS than what I'm already getting from the survivor benefits! Does this mean I'm switching from survivor benefits to my own retirement benefits automatically? I never even applied for my own benefits yet! I've got a callback scheduled with SSA but it's not for another 2 weeks and I'm freaking out a bit. Will I be receiving BOTH payments or are they replacing my survivor benefits with a smaller amount? Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before?
Wow, what a journey! This thread is incredibly helpful for anyone dealing with the maze that is Social Security benefits. I'm actually approaching 62 and starting to think about all these decisions, and reading about your experience with the "benefit type review" note is both scary and educational. It sounds like SSA systems are set up to potentially make automatic changes that aren't always in the beneficiary's best interest, which is why being proactive like you were is so crucial. The fact that Claimyr helped you get through quickly is also a great tip - I've heard horror stories about people waiting hours on hold or weeks for callbacks. Thanks for sharing both the problem and the solution - this is exactly the kind of real-world experience that helps the rest of us navigate these complex systems!
This is exactly why I love this community! Reading through everyone's experiences here has been so educational. I'm actually in my early 60s and starting to research all these Social Security decisions myself, and seeing the real-world complications like Lia faced with that "benefit type review" note is incredibly valuable. It's concerning that the system seems designed to potentially make changes that aren't necessarily in our best interest without clear communication. The tip about Claimyr is something I'll definitely keep in mind - waiting weeks for callbacks during stressful situations like this would be awful. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge here, especially about the difference between Medicare enrollment and benefit switching. This thread should be required reading for anyone approaching these major Social Security milestones!
This entire thread has been incredibly enlightening! As someone who is still years away from these decisions, I had no idea how complex the interaction between Medicare enrollment and Social Security benefits could be. The fact that Lia received such a confusing letter that mentioned a payment amount without clearly explaining it was just about Medicare enrollment shows how important it is to not just accept these communications at face value. What really stands out to me is how the "benefit type review" note in the system could have led to an automatic switch to a lower benefit amount if Lia hadn't been proactive. It makes me wonder how many people might have had their benefits automatically switched without realizing they had a choice to stay on the higher survivor benefits. The advice throughout this thread about keeping detailed records, getting names of representatives, and asking for notes to be added to your file seems crucial for anyone dealing with SSA. And the Claimyr tip is definitely something I'll remember - being able to get through quickly during a stressful situation like this could make all the difference. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise here. This is exactly the kind of practical, real-world guidance that makes this community so valuable!
You've really captured the essence of what makes this situation so tricky! As someone who's also new to understanding these Social Security complexities, I'm struck by how this whole experience highlights the importance of being an informed advocate for yourself. The fact that SSA letters can be so unclear - showing payment amounts without proper context - really drives home why we can't just passively accept whatever communications we receive. It's almost like the system expects us to be experts when most of us are just trying to figure things out as we go. Reading about that "benefit type review" note potentially triggering automatic changes is honestly a bit terrifying - it makes you wonder what other automated processes might be working behind the scenes that could affect people's financial security. This thread has definitely opened my eyes to how crucial it is to stay engaged and ask the right questions rather than assuming everything will work out automatically in our favor.
So I started donating plasma twice a week to earn some extra money. The donation center puts the payments on a special debit card - around $120-150 per week depending on promotions. I know Social Security has income limits and I'm currently on SSDI, waiting for a medical review. Do these plasma donation payments count as income I need to report? Could this affect my benefits? I've heard different things from other donors - some say it's a 'gift' or 'compensation' not income, others say anything you receive has to be reported. Anyone know the official rules on this?
Thanks everyone for the advice! I'm going to document all my plasma donation payments just to be safe, but it sounds like I don't need to worry about it affecting my SSDI since it's not earned income from employment. I'll probably still mention it during my next medical review just to be transparent. I'm so relieved - this extra money really helps with my medication costs that insurance doesn't fully cover.
You're making a smart decision to document everything and be transparent! Just wanted to add one more thing - if you're donating twice a week consistently, make sure you're taking care of your health too. Sometimes people get so focused on the extra income that they don't listen to their body. The plasma centers have medical requirements for a reason. Also, since you mentioned medication costs - have you looked into patient assistance programs from the drug manufacturers? Many offer significant discounts or free medications for people on disability. Might be worth checking out alongside your plasma donations. Good luck with your medical review when it comes up!
Luca Romano
As someone new to this community, I've been lurking and reading through discussions like this while trying to figure out my own retirement planning. I'm still a few years away from FRA but this conversation has been incredibly helpful! I had no idea that working past FRA could actually increase your Social Security benefits through recalculations - I thought once you hit FRA, that was it. The point about checking your earnings history on my.ssa.gov to see if you have low-earning years that could be replaced is brilliant advice. It seems like the decision really comes down to your individual situation - your earnings history, health insurance costs, and how much you actually need/want to keep working. For anyone else reading this who's new to Social Security planning like me, this thread has been a goldmine of real-world experiences and practical advice. Thanks to everyone who shared their actual numbers and experiences!
0 coins
Christian Burns
Welcome to the community, Luca! I'm also pretty new here and have been learning so much from these discussions. I had the same misconception about Social Security being "set in stone" once you reach FRA. This thread really opened my eyes to how the annual recalculations work and why checking your earnings history is so crucial. It's amazing how much real-world insight you can get from people who have actually gone through this process. I'm bookmarking this discussion to refer back to when I get closer to my FRA. The practical advice here is worth its weight in gold compared to trying to decipher the official SSA publications!
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
As a newcomer to this community, I've been reading through this entire discussion and it's been incredibly eye-opening! I'm 65 and will hit my FRA in about 18 months, currently earning $43k annually. What I find most valuable here is seeing actual real-world numbers from people who've lived through this decision rather than trying to interpret the confusing SSA website. A few key takeaways that really resonated with me: First, the importance of checking your earnings history on my.ssa.gov to see if you have low-earning years that could be replaced - I just did this and found I have about 7 years under $15k from my early career. Second, the health insurance factor seems huge and something I hadn't fully considered in my calculations. Third, Collins' point about the broader financial picture including 401(k) matching and other benefits really puts things in perspective. One question for those who've been through this - when you were making your decision about working past FRA, did you set a specific timeline (like "I'll work exactly 2 more years") or did you take it year by year based on how you felt? I'm trying to figure out the best approach for planning purposes while still maintaining some flexibility. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed and honest experiences - this community is a goldmine of practical retirement wisdom!
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
Ravi, welcome to the community! Your situation with 7 years of low earnings sounds really promising for benefit increases - you're likely to see much better results than someone who already has 35 solid earning years. To answer your question about timeline planning, I think flexibility is key. From what I've observed reading through everyone's experiences here, life has a way of throwing curveballs - health changes, family situations, job satisfaction, etc. Many people seem to benefit from setting an initial goal (like "I'll plan to work 2-3 more years") but then reassessing annually based on how they're feeling physically, mentally, and financially. You might consider setting some specific benchmarks to evaluate each year - things like: Am I still enjoying the work? Is my health holding up well? Are the financial benefits (SS increases, 401k growth, preserved savings) still making it worthwhile? Having those checkpoints could help you make informed decisions year by year rather than feeling locked into a rigid timeline. Given your earning history and the comprehensive financial picture that Collins outlined, it sounds like you're in a great position to benefit from working past FRA. But keeping that flexibility to reassess annually seems like the wisest approach based on what others have shared here!
0 coins
Peyton Clarke
Ravi, great question about planning timelines! As someone who's been following this discussion closely, I think the flexible approach makes the most sense. From what I've gathered here, many people benefit from doing an annual "checkup" where they evaluate not just the financial aspects, but also their physical health, job satisfaction, and family circumstances. Your situation with those 7 low-earning years is really encouraging - you could see some meaningful increases by replacing those years with your current $43k salary. I'd suggest maybe planning for 2-3 years initially, but building in review points each year to reassess. Things like major health changes, shifts in job satisfaction, or even changes in family needs (grandchildren, aging parents, etc.) can all impact whether continuing to work feels right. One thing that struck me from this thread is how the decision isn't just about the Social Security increases - it's the whole package of preserving retirement savings, maintaining employer benefits, and yes, those modest but permanent SS bumps that also get future COLAs. Setting annual benchmarks for all these factors seems like a smart way to stay flexible while still having a general direction. Welcome to the community - this discussion has been incredibly helpful for all of us planning these decisions!
0 coins