

Ask the community...
I'm new to this community and wanted to thank everyone for this incredibly reassuring discussion! I was having the exact same panic after seeing those misleading articles claiming Login.gov would be "mandatory" for receiving Social Security benefits. Like many others here, I've been struggling with the identity verification process for weeks - my state ID keeps getting rejected and I'm not receiving the phone verification codes. I was genuinely terrified that my monthly retirement payments might stop because of these technical issues. Reading all of your experiences has been such a huge relief! It's clear from multiple people who have spoken directly with SSA representatives that Login.gov is ONLY for online account access, not for actual benefit eligibility. The fact that so many of you continued receiving your monthly payments throughout weeks of Login.gov technical difficulties really proves this point. I'm definitely going to try some of the great troubleshooting suggestions mentioned here - using incognito browsing, trying during off-peak hours, checking if my phone carrier is blocking verification texts, and maybe visiting my local library for better internet connection. The tip about taking ID photos in natural light against a dark background sounds promising too. But most importantly, I can finally stop losing sleep over this! It's frustrating how those sensationalized headlines caused so much unnecessary anxiety for seniors who are just trying to access services we've earned. Thank you all for creating such a supportive community and sharing your real experiences to cut through all the fear-mongering. This discussion has been invaluable for a newcomer like me who was genuinely scared about potentially losing benefits over website technical problems!
Welcome to the community! I'm new here too and your message really resonates with me. It's incredible how many of us have been through this exact same panic - those headlines really were written in such a scary way! Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a lifesaver. I was also terrified about potentially losing my benefits over website technical issues, but seeing story after story of people confirming that their payments continued normally throughout Login.gov struggles really puts things in perspective. The troubleshooting tips you mentioned are exactly what I plan to try too - especially the one about checking with phone carriers since so many people seem to have issues with verification texts being blocked as spam. It's amazing how this community has compiled all these practical solutions from everyone's trial and error experiences. You're absolutely right about those sensationalized headlines causing unnecessary anxiety. It's such a relief to finally understand that our actual monthly payments are protected by federal law and completely separate from any website access issues. Thank you for sharing your story - it helps knowing other newcomers are finding the same reassurance here!
I'm new to this community but wanted to add my experience to this incredibly helpful discussion! I was having the exact same panic about Login.gov after reading those scary headlines claiming benefits would be cut off without it. Like so many others here, I've been struggling with the verification process - my driver's license photo keeps getting rejected and verification texts aren't coming through. I was genuinely worried I might lose my Social Security payments over these technical glitches. This entire thread has been such a relief! Seeing so many people confirm with actual SSA representatives that Login.gov is ONLY for online account access, not benefit eligibility, has finally put my mind at ease. The fact that everyone's monthly payments continued throughout their Login.gov struggles really drives this point home. I'm going to try some of the great troubleshooting tips mentioned here - using incognito browsing, checking with my phone carrier about blocked verification texts, and maybe visiting my local library for better internet connection. The suggestion about taking ID photos in natural light against a dark background sounds really promising too. But most importantly, I can stop worrying about losing my benefits! These misleading headlines have caused so much unnecessary stress for seniors. Thank you all for sharing your real experiences and creating such a supportive community. Your stories have been invaluable for helping newcomers like me understand that our monthly payments are secure regardless of website technical issues!
I'm actually in a very similar situation - turning 70 in August 2025 and have been doing a lot of research on this exact timing question! From everything I've learned, you're absolutely right about the 3-4 month application window. I'm planning to apply in April/May to be safe. Just wanted to add one thing that helped me understand the payment schedule better: Social Security actually has a really clear chart on their website that shows exactly which Wednesday of the month you'll get paid based on your birth date. Since you're born on the 15th, you'll definitely get paid on the 3rd Wednesday of each month once payments start. I've also been tracking the delayed retirement credits on my Social Security statement online, and it's pretty amazing to see how much the benefit grows each month you wait past full retirement age. At this point we're so close to 70 that it would be crazy to claim early now! The finish line is in sight for both of us. Good luck with your application process!
Thanks for sharing your timeline - it's so helpful to connect with someone going through the exact same process just a month after me! I've been checking that Social Security payment schedule chart too, and you're right that it makes everything very clear. The 3rd Wednesday timing is definitely etched in my calendar now. It's encouraging to hear from another person who's been watching those delayed retirement credits accumulate month by month. You're absolutely right that we're so close to the finish line now - it would be crazy to give up on those credits after waiting this long! The discipline has been tough at times, but knowing we'll both be getting that maximum possible benefit makes it all worthwhile. Best of luck with your April/May application timing. Hopefully we'll both be celebrating our first maximized payments around the same time later this year!
This is such a comprehensive thread with great advice from people who've actually been through the process! As someone who's turning 70 next year as well, I really appreciate everyone sharing their real experiences. One small detail I wanted to add that might help with your exact planning: since you mentioned wanting to know the precise date for your calendar, the third Wednesday of August 2025 will be August 20th. So that's when you can expect your first payment to hit your account (barring any processing delays). Also, I've been using the Social Security benefits calculator on ssa.gov to play around with different scenarios, and it's pretty incredible how much those delayed retirement credits add up. For someone with a decent earnings history, waiting from age 66 to 70 can mean an extra $800-1200+ per month for life. That's a guaranteed return you just can't get anywhere else in today's market! The patience has definitely paid off - congratulations on making it to the finish line. Your future self will thank you for every month you waited!
Thank you for pinpointing the exact date - August 20th, 2025! That's exactly the kind of specific detail I needed for my financial planning. I'll mark that date on my calendar and make sure I have enough cash flow to bridge the gap until then. Your point about the $800-1200+ monthly difference really drives home why waiting was worth it. When I think about that extra amount compounded over potentially 15-20+ years of retirement, we're talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional lifetime benefits. The guaranteed 8% annual return from delayed retirement credits really is unbeatable in today's low interest rate environment. It's been such a relief reading through everyone's experiences here - makes me feel much more confident about the application process and timeline. Thanks to everyone for sharing their real-world insights!
Emma, I went through almost the exact same situation when I got laid off at 64 last year. The good news is that you CAN collect both - unemployment benefits absolutely do NOT count toward your Social Security earnings limit. I collected both for about 6 months with no issues whatsoever. A few things I learned along the way: - You'll need to report your SS benefits to your state unemployment office (they'll ask about "other income" during your weekly certifications) - Some states reduce unemployment benefits dollar-for-dollar with SS, others don't - definitely call your state office to find out - Keep detailed records of all payments and communications from both agencies - Consider having taxes withheld from both sources to avoid a big bill later The unemployment office might initially tell you that you can't collect both, but that's usually because their staff doesn't always understand the distinction between "earned" and "unearned" income. Stand your ground if needed - the SSA website is very clear that unemployment doesn't count against the earnings test. Good luck with your job search! The combination of both benefits should give you some breathing room while you figure out your next steps.
@Oliver Weber This is so helpful - thank you for sharing your real experience! I ve'been stressed about this exact situation and your advice gives me confidence. One quick question - when you said some states reduce unemployment dollar-for-dollar with SS while others don t,'do you happen to know what determines this? Is it just state policy or are there federal guidelines involved? I m'in California and trying to get a sense of what to expect before I call tomorrow. Also really appreciate the tip about having taxes withheld from both sources. With unemployment being $380/week and SS around $1,850/month, I m'definitely going to look into that to avoid any surprises come tax time!
@Oliver Weber This is incredibly reassuring, thank you! I was starting to panic about whether I d'done something wrong by applying for both. Your experience gives me so much confidence. I m'particularly grateful for your point about unemployment office staff sometimes not understanding the earned vs unearned income distinction. I ve'already gotten mixed messages from different sources, so it s'good to know I should be prepared to reference the SSA website if needed. One question - when you reported your SS benefits during weekly certifications, did you report the full monthly amount or did you have to break it down differently? And did your state end up reducing your unemployment benefits once SS kicked in, or were you able to collect the full amount of both? Planning to call my state office first thing tomorrow armed with all this great advice!
I just went through this exact situation last month! Got laid off at 63 and was so confused about whether I could collect both. After multiple calls to both agencies, I can confirm that unemployment benefits DO NOT count against your Social Security earnings limit - they're considered "unearned income" by SSA. However, here's what I learned the hard way: my state (Michigan) does reduce unemployment benefits by about 50% of whatever Social Security I receive. So while SSA doesn't care about my unemployment, the unemployment office definitely cares about my Social Security! The weekly certification process is a bit more tedious now because I have to report my SS amount every week, but it's manageable. Just make sure you have your exact monthly SS amount handy for those certifications. One tip - I set up tax withholding on both benefits right away. With both income sources, you'll likely owe taxes on a good portion of your Social Security benefits, so it's better to have it taken out now rather than get hit with a big bill later. Hang in there - the financial breathing room from having both really helps while job hunting!
One more thing to consider - if you're taking care of any children or dependents with disabilities that your late husband was supporting (even if not biological children), there might be benefits available to them. Also, while the 9-month marriage rule is generally strict, there are occasionally unique circumstances where SSA can make exceptions. For anyone dealing with a similar situation, it's worth filing an application even if you think you'll be denied, because: 1. The application establishes your protective filing date 2. You get a formal, appealable decision 3. Sometimes unusual circumstances do result in exceptions In your specific case, since you mentioned you're 58 now, the most viable path would likely be examining benefits based on your 10+ year first marriage when you reach age 62, while comparing that amount to what you'd receive on your own record.
Thank you for the additional information. We didn't have any children or dependents together, so that won't help in my case. I think I will go ahead and file an application anyway, just to get the formal decision. And then I'll definitely look into the ex-spouse benefits when I turn 62. I worked part-time for many years while caregiving, so my own benefit might not be very high.
wait i'm confused...if you were with him for 16 years why did you only get married 6 months before he died? not judging just wondering if there was a reason because that timing seems important
We always planned to get married eventually, but there was never a rush since we were committed to each other. When he got his cancer diagnosis and it was terminal, we decided to make it official. We didn't realize the Social Security rules at the time or that the 9-month requirement would matter. By the time we learned about it, his health was declining rapidly and we knew we wouldn't make it to 9 months. It's heartbreaking that decades of commitment means nothing compared to a few months on paper.
Liam McConnell
I wanted to add something that might be helpful for anyone dealing with this situation - keep really good records of your monthly earnings while you're subject to the earnings limit! I learned this the hard way when SSA asked me to provide documentation of my part-time work income for their annual reconciliation. Having detailed pay stubs and records made the whole process much smoother. Also, if your income varies month to month like mine did, consider setting aside some of your Social Security payments in a separate account just in case there's an overpayment situation that needs to be resolved later. It's rare, but it can happen if your actual earnings end up being different from what you initially estimated. The peace of mind is worth it, and you can always use that money later once you reach FRA and don't have to worry about the earnings limit anymore.
0 coins
Elijah Knight
•This is excellent advice about keeping detailed records! I'm just starting to navigate this whole process and hadn't thought about the documentation aspect. It makes total sense that SSA would want to verify actual earnings against what you initially estimated. I'm definitely going to set up a separate tracking system for my part-time income and maybe even that separate account you mentioned. Better to be over-prepared than scrambling to find paperwork later. Thanks for sharing what you learned - these kinds of practical tips from people who've actually been through it are so much more valuable than just reading the official SSA guidelines.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
I've been following this discussion closely since I'm in a very similar situation - planning to file for benefits soon while continuing to work part-time. What strikes me most is how the automatic recalculation at FRA really does work as designed, based on everyone's actual experiences here. The key insight I'm taking away is that those withheld benefits aren't truly "lost" - they're essentially converted into a permanent monthly increase for life after reaching FRA. For anyone still on the fence about this decision, it seems like the math works out pretty well in the long run. The temporary reduction while working gets compensated by higher monthly payments for potentially decades after FRA. Plus, you get the benefit of additional income during those working years when you might really need it. The administrative side sounds manageable too, especially with the automatic recalculation process. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - it's made this complex topic much clearer than any SSA publication I've read!
0 coins