Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm turning 62 next month and just submitted my application for Social Security retirement benefits. My payment amount should be around $1,850 monthly based on my earnings history. I have two adult children (ages 26 and 31) who both became disabled before age 22 and qualify as Disabled Adult Children (DAC). Now that I'm filing for my own benefits, I want to apply for them too, but I'm confused about how much they'll actually receive. Will they each get 50% of my benefit amount? Does the family maximum limit apply here? The local SSA office gave me vague answers and the representative seemed unsure about DAC benefits specifically. Has anyone gone through this process recently? What documentation will my kids need beyond their existing disability determinations?
Can someone please explain what this HR 82 bill means for me? I worked at USPS for 26 years and retired in 2018. I keep hearing different things from coworkers about how it's supposed to increase my Social Security payments because of the WEP/GPO that's currently reducing my benefits. I'm only getting about $840/month from Social Security even though I worked enough quarters before the post office to qualify for more. Will this bill actually pass in 2025 and will it really help postal retirees like me? Anyone else here dealing with the same situation?
THEY'VE BEEN TEASING US WITH THIS BILL FOR OVER A DECADE!!! Don't get your hopes up. This is just another empty promise from politicians who don't actually care about retired federal workers. I'll believe it when I see the money in my account!!!
To determine exactly how much your benefit would increase without WEP, look at your Social Security statement (available on mySocialSecurity). Find the section that shows your projected benefit WITHOUT the WEP reduction. The difference between that amount and what you're currently receiving would be your increase if HR 82 passes. For FERS employees who worked at USPS after 1984, WEP typically only applies if you also had substantial non-SS-covered employment or if you were switched from CSRS to FERS mid-career.
I just checked my statement online and you're right - it does show both amounts. Looks like I'd get about $560 more per month without the WEP reduction. That would make a huge difference for me. Keeping my fingers crossed this bill finally passes.
That's exactly the kind of increase many postal retirees are hoping for! $560/month would be life-changing for most people on fixed incomes. I'm in a similar situation - retired from USPS in 2020 and dealing with WEP reduction. The frustrating part is that we paid into Social Security for years before federal service, so we earned those benefits fair and square. Have you considered contacting your representatives about supporting HR 82? I know it feels like shouting into the void, but constituent pressure does matter for bills like this.
I'm getting confused about how the annual COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment) works with Medicare premiums. Does Social Security calculate the COLA percentage increase on my gross benefit amount BEFORE they take out my Medicare Part B premium, or is it calculated on the net amount I actually receive after the Medicare deduction? I'm asking because with the Medicare premium going up too, I want to understand if I'm getting the full COLA increase or if it's somehow reduced because of the Medicare deduction timing. This makes a difference in my budget planning for next year. Thanks in advance for explaining this!
Going back to the original question - here's a simple example to make it crystal clear: Let's say your gross SS benefit is $2,000/month and Medicare Part B premium is $170/month. Your net check is $1,830. If COLA is 3%, the increase is calculated on the $2,000, giving you a $60 increase (to $2,060). If Medicare then increases by $15 (to $185), your new net check would be $1,875 ($2,060 - $185). So even though you got a full 3% COLA ($60), your actual check only increased by $45 because of the Medicare premium increase. This is why many beneficiaries feel like they don't get the full COLA - other costs are rising simultaneously.
Just wanted to add that you can also check your exact COLA calculation by looking at your Social Security Statement online at ssa.gov/myaccount. It shows your benefit history and how each year's COLA was applied to your base amount. This helped me understand exactly how much my gross benefit increased versus what my net payment became after Medicare and other deductions. It's really helpful for budget planning since you can see the pattern of how COLA and Medicare premium changes have affected your payments over time.
I've been trying to schedule an appointment with Social Security for almost 3 weeks now and I'm getting nowhere! I need to discuss my upcoming retirement (turning 62 in June) and have some questions about taking early benefits vs. waiting until my FRA. I've tried calling the 800 number but keep getting disconnected after 45+ minutes on hold. The online appointment system shows no available slots for the next 2 months at my local office. Should I just show up in person first thing in the morning? Will they even see me without an appointment? Has anyone had success with either method recently? This is so frustrating!
One more tip - if you're able to get an in-person appointment, make a list of ALL your questions beforehand. I thought I'd covered everything during my appointment about spousal benefits, but realized after I left that I forgot to ask about taxation of benefits. Had to start the whole process over again!
Another option that worked for me recently - try using the SSA's "Contact Us" form on their website to request a callback. I filled it out explaining my situation (similar to yours with early retirement questions) and they actually called me back within 3 business days. The representative was able to answer most of my questions over the phone and scheduled a follow-up appointment for the more complex stuff. It's not advertised much but it's worth trying alongside the other suggestions here. The form is under "Help" on the ssa.gov homepage.
I've been trying to understand how Social Security calculates my retirement benefit. From what I've read, they take your highest 35 years of earnings, but I'm confused about how this works in practice. I'm 62 now and planning to wait until my Full Retirement Age to collect (which is 67 for me). My work history is pretty inconsistent - I had about 8 years in my 20s where I barely made anything (waiting tables part-time, some gig work that probably wasn't even reported correctly). Then I got into construction management and have had much better income for the last 25 years. Do those early low-earning years get completely replaced by my higher-earning years when SSA calculates my benefit? Or do they still count all 35 years no matter what? I'm trying to estimate what my monthly payment might be at 67. Also, if I keep working until 70, would those extra 3 years bump out more of my low-earning years in the calculation? Thanks for any clarity you can provide!
One thing to add that might help with your planning - you can actually see how your benefit estimate changes by using the retirement estimator on ssa.gov and plugging in different retirement ages. It will show you the projected benefit at 62, full retirement age (67), and 70. While it won't show you exactly which years are being used in the calculation, it does factor in the assumption that you'll keep earning at your current level until the retirement age you select. This can give you a clearer picture of how much those extra working years might benefit you financially.
Just wanted to add something important that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you had any years where you earned above the Social Security wage base (the maximum amount subject to SS taxes), those years might be more valuable than you think. For example, in 2023 the wage base was $160,200. If you earned more than that in any year, only the wage base amount counts for SS purposes, but it still gets the full inflation indexing when they calculate your benefit. So a year where you earned $160,200 in 2023 might actually be worth more in the calculation than a year where you earned $180,000 but the excess didn't count for SS. Just something to keep in mind when estimating which of your years will make the top 35!
You can see your earnings record on the SSA website, but it doesn't explicitly highlight which years hit the wage base cap. However, you can compare your reported earnings for each year against the historical wage base limits. For example, if your 2023 earnings show exactly $160,200, that likely means you hit the cap. The SSA's annual statistical supplement has historical wage base amounts going back decades, or you can find lists online. Years where your earnings match or are very close to that year's wage base probably indicate you maxed out SS contributions. It's worth checking because those capped years might be more valuable in your top 35 calculation than years with higher gross income but the same SS-taxable amount.
On your SSA earnings record, any year where your earnings equal exactly the wage base for that year indicates you likely hit the cap. You can look up historical wage base amounts on the SSA website - they publish a table going back decades. For example, if your 2020 earnings show exactly $137,700, you hit that year's cap. If it shows less, that's what you actually earned. The SSA statement doesn't explicitly mark capped years, so you do need to cross-reference with the historical limits. It's worth doing this check because those capped years often end up being among your highest 35 after indexing, even if your actual income was higher.
Kaiya Rivera
Has anyone here dealt with what happens when one parent is retired and the other isn't yet? My husband is 64 and filing for his benefits next year, and we have a DAC son. I'm only 58. Can our son get DAC benefits on my husband's record now and then switch to mine later if my record would give him a higher payment? Or is he stuck with whichever parent files first?
0 coins
KhalilStar
Your son can initially receive DAC benefits on your husband's record when he files. Later, when you file for your retirement benefits, SSA will automatically determine which record provides the higher benefit amount for your son. If your record would provide a higher DAC benefit, they'll switch him to your record. This is one of the few cases where dual entitlement can work to maximize benefits. Your son is not permanently "stuck" with the first parent who files. SSA should handle this comparison automatically, but it never hurts to specifically ask them to check both records when you eventually file for your own benefits.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
Thank you all for the incredibly helpful information! I just wanted to update that I spoke with a technical expert at SSA yesterday (finally!) and got some specific numbers. My PIA (full retirement age amount) would be about $2,650, so my reduced age-62 benefit will be around $1,850 as I mentioned. The family maximum in my case will be about $4,550. So with my benefit at $1,850 and two DAC benefits that would normally be $1,325 each (50% of my PIA), we'd exceed the family maximum. This means my benefit stays at $1,850, and my children will split the remaining $2,700 from the family maximum, giving them each about $1,350 per month. I've started gathering all the documentation, including medical records from when they were teenagers showing disability onset before 22. Both of my children already receive SSI, so we'll need to be careful about that transition as many of you mentioned. I really appreciate all your help navigating this complicated process!
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
So glad you got specific numbers! One important correction though - the math you described doesn't quite work. If the family max is $4,550 and your benefit is $1,850, then there's $2,700 remaining for your children. Split between two children, that's $1,350 each, not $675. Did the SSA representative mention their actual benefit amounts?
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
You're absolutely right, Lucy - I made an error in my math! Each child would get $1,350, not $675. I was dividing wrong. The SSA representative did confirm that each of my children would receive approximately $1,350 monthly once the family maximum reduction is applied. That's actually better than I was expecting since it's higher than the normal 50% they'd get without the family max coming into play. Thanks for catching my mistake!
0 coins