New York Unemployment

Can't reach New York Unemployment? Claimyr connects you to a live NYDOL agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the NYDOL
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the NYDOL drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

KylieRose

I'm currently going through a very similar situation with Walmart right now - got terminated about 5 weeks ago for attendance issues and they're definitely contesting my claim. From everything I've experienced and researched, Walmart has a pretty aggressive approach to fighting unemployment claims, especially attendance-related ones. They seem to contest around 70-80% of claims automatically through their HR system. However, I've been encouraged by reading through this thread and seeing how many people have actually won their cases when they had legitimate documentation. Car problems are exactly the type of "circumstances beyond your control" that the NYS Department of Labor looks for. The key seems to be having solid evidence - repair receipts, towing bills, photos, even text messages that establish a timeline. My adjudication has been going on for about 3 weeks now, so your 2-week wait is still totally normal. I know how stressful the waiting is, especially when you're counting on those benefits to cover basic expenses. But don't let Walmart's automatic pushback discourage you - from what I'm seeing in these responses, many people do successfully win these cases against big retailers when they can prove their absences were unavoidable. Keep gathering any documentation you have and stay strong!

0 coins

@KylieRose Thank you for sharing your experience! It's so helpful to connect with someone who's going through this right now too. 3 weeks of waiting must be incredibly stressful, but it sounds like you're staying strong through it. I'm feeling much more optimistic after reading through everyone's responses in this thread - it's clear that while Walmart does automatically contest most claims, the actual adjudicators at NYS DOL really do look at the evidence fairly. I've been busy gathering all my documentation today and found more than I initially thought I had - repair receipts, towing records, even some photos and text messages that help establish the timeline of my car troubles. The 70-80% contest rate you mentioned actually makes me feel better because it confirms this isn't about the strength of my case, it's just their standard business practice. Really hoping both of our cases get resolved soon - this financial uncertainty while job hunting is definitely adding extra stress to an already difficult situation!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation with Walmart about 8 months ago - terminated for attendance issues due to car problems and they absolutely contested my claim. The good news is I eventually won after about 3.5 weeks of adjudication! What really helped my case was organizing all my documentation clearly - I had repair receipts from my mechanic, photos of my car broken down on the side of the road, and even bank statements showing the timing of the repair payments that correlated with my missed work days. Walmart definitely contests claims automatically (I learned they have entire departments dedicated to this), but the NYS Department of Labor adjudicators really do look at whether your absences were due to circumstances beyond your control. Since you have legitimate car trouble with documentation, you're in a much better position than you might think. Make sure to upload everything through your online portal - receipts, photos, even text messages about your car problems can help establish the timeline. The waiting is absolutely brutal when you need those benefits, but 2 weeks is still completely normal for contested claims. Don't give up hope - many of us have successfully beaten Walmart's automatic pushback when we had solid proof our absences were unavoidable!

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same situation! Just accepted a job offer this week with a start date of February 14th, and I was really stressed about whether I could continue filing my weekly claims. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly reassuring - it sounds like complete transparency is the key. I've been making sure to answer "yes" when asked about accepting work with a future start date and always include February 14th on my weekly certifications. The way everyone explains it makes perfect sense - we're still technically unemployed until we actually start working and earning paychecks. I'm definitely keeping my offer letter saved and documenting everything just to be safe. It's such a relief to know this is a completely normal situation and that so many people have successfully navigated the same gap period. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this thread has been a huge help in understanding that we're doing everything right by being honest and claiming benefits until we actually begin working!

0 coins

I'm going through this exact same situation right now - just accepted an offer last week with a February 21st start date! This entire thread has been such a relief to read through. I was honestly losing sleep over whether I was somehow breaking the rules by continuing to file my weekly claims. After seeing all these success stories, I feel so much more confident about the approach I've been taking. I've been completely transparent on every weekly certification about accepting the job offer and including my February 21st start date. The way everyone explains being "still unemployed until you actually start earning" really clarifies everything perfectly. I'm keeping my offer letter and screenshots of all my filings just in case they need documentation later. It's amazing how much anxiety this whole process can cause when you're genuinely just trying to follow the rules correctly! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - knowing so many people have successfully navigated similar gap periods without any issues gives me so much peace of mind. This community is incredibly helpful for situations like this where the rules aren't always crystal clear.

0 coins

I'm in a very similar situation too! Just accepted a job offer yesterday with a start date of February 25th and was really anxious about continuing to file claims. This thread has been absolutely invaluable - it's so reassuring to see so many people who've successfully gone through the exact same process. I've been following the same transparent approach everyone's mentioned - answering honestly about the job offer and including my start date on every weekly certification. The point about still being genuinely unemployed until we actually start earning really puts everything in perspective. I'm also keeping my offer letter and taking screenshots of my filings for documentation. It's incredible how much stress this can cause when you're just trying to do the right thing! Thanks for adding your experience to this thread - it's so helpful to know we're all handling this correctly and that these gap periods are completely normal.

0 coins

I'm new to this community but unfortunately not new to NYS DOL overpayment issues. I went through a similar situation about a year ago and wanted to share some practical advice that helped me navigate the process. First, definitely take advantage of that 30-day window - even if you're unsure about appealing, at least call to discuss your options and buy yourself time to gather documentation. When I called, I specifically asked for a supervisor who could explain the calculation in detail, which helped me understand where the discrepancy occurred. One thing I learned is that you can request to see the exact records they used to determine your overpayment - this often reveals errors in their system or misinterpretations of your reported information. I also discovered that keeping detailed records of EVERYTHING is crucial - dates of calls, representative names, confirmation numbers, payment receipts. Their system doesn't always sync properly between departments. For those dealing with fraud penalties specifically, I found that providing a written statement explaining your understanding of the rules at the time, along with any supporting documentation, can be very helpful in showing the mistake was unintentional. The process is definitely stressful and confusing, but don't let that intimidate you into just paying without exploring your options. You have more rights than they initially tell you about.

0 coins

This is such helpful advice, thank you for sharing your experience! I'm particularly interested in your point about requesting to see the exact records they used to determine the overpayment. When you asked for this information, did they provide it willingly or did you have to push for it? I'm wondering if there's specific language I should use when making this request to ensure they actually give me the detailed breakdown. Also, your tip about asking for a supervisor to explain the calculation is brilliant - I've been getting different explanations from different representatives and it's been so confusing. Did you find that supervisors were generally more knowledgeable and helpful than the initial representatives you spoke with? I have about 18 days left in my window and I'm trying to be as strategic as possible about gathering the right information before deciding whether to appeal.

0 coins

I'm reading through all these experiences and I'm both grateful for the support and frustrated by how common this problem seems to be. I've been dealing with my own $2,800 overpayment notice for about a week now and the stress is overwhelming. What strikes me most from everyone's stories is how inconsistent the information seems to be from different representatives, and how the system appears to automatically flag things as "fraud" even when it's clearly just confusion about reporting requirements. I'm definitely going to try the 8 AM calling strategy and ask specifically about both appeals and the waiver option that @fda89eaa80bc mentioned. It's really helpful to know that I can request detailed documentation about their calculation - I feel like I need to understand their math before I can effectively challenge it. For those who successfully reduced their penalties or payments, it seems like persistence and good documentation are key. I'm also taking notes on everyone's advice about getting everything in writing and keeping detailed records of every interaction. Thank you all for sharing your experiences - it's making this scary situation feel a bit more manageable knowing I'm not alone and that there are actual strategies that have worked for others.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about the inconsistency - I've talked to at least 5 different representatives and gotten slightly different explanations each time, which just adds to the confusion and stress. The automatic "fraud" flagging seems to be a major flaw in their system that catches a lot of people who were genuinely trying to follow the rules correctly. Your plan to call at 8 AM and ask about both appeals and waivers sounds smart - having multiple options to explore gives you more leverage. One thing I'd add based on what others have shared here is to ask for reference numbers for everything and confirm that they're noting your calls in your file. I've heard too many stories of people having to repeat the same information multiple times because there's no record of previous conversations. The documentation request strategy seems really important too - if their math is wrong or based on incomplete information, that could be your strongest argument for getting the penalties reduced or removed. Stay persistent and don't let them pressure you into making a quick decision. You've got this!

0 coins

@945f3cdc5e0b You're definitely not alone in this - the number of people going through similar situations in this thread shows just how widespread this problem is. I'm actually dealing with my own overpayment case right now and found it really helpful to create a simple spreadsheet to track all my interactions with NYS DOL - date, time, representative name, what was discussed, and any reference numbers. It's been a lifesaver when I need to reference previous conversations. One thing I learned from reading everyone's experiences is to be very specific when asking for documentation - don't just ask for "information about my overpayment" but request things like "detailed benefit payment history showing which specific weeks are in question" and "the wage records used to calculate the overpayment." The more specific you are, the harder it is for them to give you vague or incomplete information. Also, if you do get through to someone helpful, ask if there's a direct number or extension you can use to reach them again - some people have had luck building a relationship with one knowledgeable representative rather than starting over with someone new each time. Good luck with your 8 AM call strategy!

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact situation and this thread has been such a relief! I was laid off from my job two weeks ago and have a small rental property that brings in about $1,300/month. I was so worried that having rental income would completely disqualify me from unemployment benefits or somehow complicate the process. Reading all these real experiences from people who've successfully navigated this with NYS Department of Labor has given me so much confidence. The passive vs earned income distinction really makes sense - rental income isn't wages from employment, so it shouldn't count against unemployment benefits. I'm going to file my claim this week and plan to be completely upfront about the rental income from day one. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it's amazing how much clearer everything becomes when you hear from actual people who've been through the process!

0 coins

I'm in a very similar situation and this thread has been incredibly reassuring! I got laid off from my job at a marketing firm about 10 days ago and have been hesitant to file for unemployment because I rent out a basement apartment in my house for $900/month. I was convinced that having any kind of rental income would somehow disqualify me or create major complications with my claim. Reading everyone's experiences about rental income being treated as passive income has really put my mind at ease. It makes total sense that there's a difference between rental income and wages from actual employment. I'm definitely going to file my application this week and be completely transparent about the rental income from the beginning. The consistent theme from everyone who's successfully gone through this process seems to be honesty and proper reporting on the weekly certifications. Thanks so much to everyone who took the time to share their real experiences - this community support has been invaluable for understanding how the NYS Department of Labor actually handles these situations!

0 coins

@Tristan Carpenter I m'so glad this thread has helped you feel more confident about filing! Your situation with the basement apartment rental is actually really common and totally manageable. The $900/month you re'getting is exactly the type of passive rental income that everyone here has successfully reported without any issues. You re'absolutely right about the honesty and proper reporting being key - that theme comes up over and over from people who ve'navigated this smoothly. Ten days is already quite a bit of time to have waited, so definitely don t'delay any longer! The weekly certification process for reporting rental income is much more straightforward than our worried minds make it seem. Once you get that first week done and see how simple the other "income section" actually is, you ll'feel so much relief. This community really has been amazing for cutting through all the confusing official language and getting real answers from real people!

0 coins

NY unemployment application question: How to answer if I lost main job due to layoff but quit part-time job months earlier?

I got laid off back in August 2022 because my company was downsizing. Now I'm trying to file for unemployment benefits in New York state through their labor.ny.gov/UBQC/ulGateway website, and one of the questions in the Eligibility Information, Part 1 section is really throwing me off. The form specifically asks: "1. Did you lose all of your employment in the last 18 months due to lack of work?" with Yes/No options. The thing is, I had a second part-time gig on weekends that I quit on my own about 4 months before getting laid off from my main job. So technically I didn't lose ALL employment due to lack of work. But my main job that provided 80% of my income was definitely from lack of work. Then there's a follow-up question: "1a. If you answered 'no' to question 1, did you earn more than $5040 gross pay from your most recent employer?" with Yes/No/NA options. I definitely earned more than $5040 from my main job (the one I was laid off from). If I answer "No" to the first question (since I didn't lose ALL employment due to lack of work), and then "Yes" to the follow-up about earning more than $5040 from my most recent employer, will that mess up my claim? I'm really confused about how to answer these questions correctly. The NY state unemployment system seems pretty specific with their wording, and I don't want to answer incorrectly and potentially lose benefits. Anyone dealt with this before and know the right way to answer these questions in my situation?

I'm in a very similar situation right now! Got laid off from my main job at a design agency about 3 weeks ago due to budget cuts, but I had quit a small evening tutoring job about 2 months before that because it was conflicting with my regular work schedule. This entire thread has been such a huge help - I was really stressing about those confusing questions on the NY unemployment application. Reading through everyone's real experiences has given me so much confidence about how to answer correctly. Based on all the consistent advice here, I'm definitely going to answer NO to question 1 (since I didn't lose ALL employment due to lack of work - I voluntarily quit the tutoring job) and YES to question 1a (since my main job definitely paid way more than $5040). It's really reassuring to see that the system focuses on whether your primary income source was lost involuntarily, not trying to penalize you for smaller jobs you might have left on your own. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their stories - it makes this whole confusing process feel so much more manageable when you can learn from people who've actually been through it successfully!

0 coins

I'm also in this exact same situation! Just got laid off from my main job at a nonprofit about 2 weeks ago due to funding cuts, but I had quit a small weekend catering gig about 6 months before because the irregular hours were making it hard to focus on my full-time work. This whole thread has been such a relief to read - I was so anxious about those confusing questions and whether I'd accidentally disqualify myself. Seeing all these success stories from people in nearly identical situations has really put my mind at ease. It's clear the system is designed to focus on your primary income source being lost through no fault of your own, not to penalize you for leaving smaller jobs voluntarily. I'll definitely go with NO to question 1 and YES to 1a like everyone's been recommending. Thanks to everyone for sharing your real experiences - it makes such a difference when you're stressed about getting everything right!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation about 8 months ago! Had a main job at a publishing company and was doing some weekend work at a coffee shop that I quit in February because the early morning shifts were exhausting me before my regular workday. Then got laid off from my main job in June due to company downsizing. The wording on those questions definitely confused me too, but here's what I learned after successfully getting through the process: Answer NO to question 1 since you didn't lose ALL employment due to lack of work (you voluntarily quit the part-time job), then YES to question 1a since your main job definitely paid more than $5040. I was super worried that quitting the coffee shop job would hurt my claim, but it had zero impact on my eligibility. During my phone interview, they asked about both jobs - I explained that I left the coffee shop due to schedule conflicts and was laid off from my main job due to budget cuts. Since my primary income source was clearly lost through no fault of my own, I got approved and started receiving benefits after the waiting week. The whole process took about 2-3 weeks from application to first payment. Just be completely honest about your work history and remember that they're really focused on whether your main source of income was lost involuntarily. You should be totally fine - don't stress too much about it!

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely incredible! I'm in such a similar situation - got laid off from my main job about a month ago but had quit a small evening job earlier this year. I was so confused by those NY unemployment questions and honestly pretty scared I'd mess something up and lose my benefits. Reading through everyone's real experiences has been such a huge relief - it's clear that the system really does focus on your primary income source being lost involuntarily rather than trying to penalize you for smaller jobs you left on your own. I'll definitely go with NO to question 1 and YES to 1a based on all the consistent advice here. Thanks so much to everyone who took the time to share their actual experiences - it makes navigating this stressful process so much less overwhelming!

0 coins

Prev1...9192939495...1378Next