IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone used TurboTax Self-Employed for this kind of situation? I'm doing similar consulting work and wondering if it's worth the extra cost compared to the regular version.

0 coins

Vince Eh

•

I've used both and honestly the self-employed version is worth it if you're just starting out. It walks you through all the Schedule C stuff and helps find deductions specific to your type of work. Just make sure you're keeping good records throughout the year - that's where most people mess up.

0 coins

Welcome to the consulting world! You're asking all the right questions early, which is smart. Here's my take as someone who's been doing side consulting for a few years: You definitely don't need an LLC immediately - you can operate as a sole proprietor and report everything on Schedule C. However, I'd strongly recommend getting that separate business bank account ASAP. It makes tracking so much easier and looks more professional to clients. For the Venmo situation, try to transition to more formal payment methods when possible. Ask your clients to send payments with a memo describing the work performed - this helps with record keeping. Even better, consider using something like PayPal Business or Stripe for future payments. One thing I wish someone had told me early on: start tracking your mileage if you drive to meet clients, and keep receipts for everything work-related. Even small expenses add up to meaningful deductions. Also, consider setting up a simple spreadsheet or using an app to track income and expenses monthly - don't wait until tax season! The quarterly payment thing can seem scary, but if you stay on top of setting aside that 25-30% mentioned earlier, you'll be fine. You've got this!

0 coins

Something nobody's mentioned yet - if this is going to be an ongoing issue, consider setting up separate business bank accounts for each gig job. I did this last year and it's made tracking expenses for each Schedule C WAY easier. Not helpful for your current situation but might save you headaches next year.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This would help for some expenses but not really for the mileage issue, right? You'd still need to track which miles went to which gig even with separate accounts.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

Great question! I went through something similar last year with Uber and Instacart. Here's what I learned from my tax preparer: The IRS generally accepts reasonable allocation methods when you don't have perfect records. Your best bet is to allocate based on a combination of factors that make sense for your situation: 1. **Income proportion** - If DoorDash was 70% of your gig income, allocate 70% of miles there 2. **Adjust for business type** - Since food delivery typically requires more driving per dollar than dog walking, you might weight the DoorDash allocation slightly higher For your 4,000 total miles, document your reasoning (maybe DoorDash gets 75% = 3,000 miles, Wag gets 25% = 1,000 miles) and keep a simple written explanation of how you arrived at these numbers. The key is being reasonable and consistent. At $0.67 per mile for 2024, that's still a significant deduction that's worth claiming properly. Just make sure to use the standard mileage rate consistently across both Schedule Cs - don't mix it with actual expense method. And definitely start tracking properly going forward! Even a simple phone app will save you this headache next year.

0 coins

Help with Schedule K-1, 1099-B and Section 1256 Gains for commodity futures - double taxation?

I'm stuck in a Section 1256 nightmare and could use some advice. I've done extensive research including poring over Schedule K instructions (probably missing something obvious) and even visited a tax pro who seemed completely lost on this issue. Here's my situation: Year 1 - I bought shares in a publicly traded limited partnership (USO) that deals with commodity futures through my Fidelity account. Year 2 - USO sent me a Schedule K-1 for Year 1 showing my unrealized gains, which I reported using the 60-40 split tax treatment since commodity futures fall under Section 1256 Contracts and are marked-to-market. Year 2 - I sold my USO position. After year-end, I received another Schedule K-1, which I handled like before. However, Fidelity also included the sale on my 1099-B, using my original cost basis and categorizing it with my regular long-term security transactions - NOT in any Section 1256 category. I called Fidelity thinking they made a mistake and should have listed it under Section 1256, but they insisted they have to report the sale with a 1099-B just like any other ETF. My questions: 1. Is Fidelity wrong? Should they correct my 1099 to show the security under a Section 1256 classification? 2. Do I need to adjust the 1099-B gain using Form 8949? 3. Am I mistaken in thinking I shouldn't be taxed TWICE - once under Sec 1256 rates AND again under normal capital gains rates? Any help would be greatly appreciated as I'm completely confused at this point.

I got audited last year on this exact issue with a different commodity futures partnership! My advice: keep EXTREMELY detailed records of your basis adjustments. The IRS computer system often flags returns where the basis reported on Form 8949 differs significantly from what's on the 1099-B, even when you use the adjustment codes correctly. The auditor initially thought I was trying to avoid taxes until I showed my spreadsheet tracking each year's: - K-1 income by category (especially Section 1256 gains) - Distributions received - Basis adjustments calculated - Supporting documentation After reviewing everything, the auditor agreed my calculations were correct. But save yourself the headache and document EVERYTHING about your basis calculations!

0 coins

Did the IRS give you any specific form or format they want to see for tracking partnership basis? I've heard some people attach a statement to their return explaining the basis adjustment, but I'm not sure if that's required or helpful.

0 coins

Based on everyone's helpful responses, I want to add one more critical point that saved me significant time and potential errors: always request the "Partnership Basis Schedule" or "Outside Basis Statement" from the partnership if they provide one. Some partnerships like USO will provide a detailed basis tracking statement upon request that shows your cumulative basis adjustments from year to year. This can be incredibly helpful for complex situations involving multiple years of Section 1256 gains and distributions. If your partnership doesn't provide this, I highly recommend creating your own tracking spreadsheet starting from day one. Include columns for: - Beginning basis each year - K-1 income items (by line) - K-1 loss items (by line) - Distributions received - Ending basis This becomes invaluable when you sell, especially for partnerships with complex activities like commodity futures. It also provides clear documentation if you ever face an audit on the basis adjustments you report on Form 8949. The key is being proactive about tracking rather than trying to reconstruct everything when you sell years later!

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

This is excellent advice about requesting the Partnership Basis Schedule! I wish I had known about this when I first started dealing with USO. I've been manually tracking everything in Excel, but having an official statement from the partnership would have saved me so much time and given me more confidence in my calculations. For anyone else reading this thread - do partnerships typically charge a fee for these basis statements? And should I request this annually or just when I'm planning to sell? I'm wondering if it's worth getting one each year to verify my own tracking is correct, especially given how complex the Section 1256 treatment makes everything. Also, does anyone know if other commodity futures partnerships besides USO provide these statements? I'm looking at potentially investing in some other futures-based partnerships but want to make sure I can get proper documentation before I get into another basis tracking nightmare!

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

The way I remember the difference: BEAT targets payments going OUT to related foreign entities, while GILTI targets income coming IN (or that should come in) from foreign subsidiaries. BEAT = payments OUT (deductions) GILTI = income IN (inclusions) Hope that helps!

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

That's a really good memory trick! I'd add: Subpart F = bad income (passive, tax haven stuff) GILTI = excess income (above normal return) 245A = good income (active business that paid reasonable tax

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Thanks! I've found these memory devices super helpful for keeping all these international tax concepts straight. Your additions are excellent too - especially framing 245A as "good income" since that's essentially what the participation exemption is designed to encourage (active foreign business operations that aren't just tax plays).

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm a CPA working with several multinational clients and these concepts still trip me up sometimes. One thing I'd add for your exam prep is to really focus on the ordering rules - understanding which income gets characterized as Subpart F first, then GILTI, and how that affects your foreign tax credit calculations. Also, remember that the participation exemption creates a "previously taxed income" concept that's different from the old PTI rules. Income that's been subject to GILTI or Subpart F inclusion can later be distributed tax-free under 245A, but you need to track the basis adjustments carefully. The policy story helps too: Congress wanted to move toward a territorial system (245A) but was worried about base erosion, so they added guardrails (GILTI for income shifting, BEAT for deduction shifting, enhanced Subpart F for passive income). Understanding this framework makes the mechanical rules easier to remember.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive overview I needed! The ordering rules point is crucial - I hadn't really thought about how the sequence of characterization affects the overall tax picture. Your explanation about the policy framework really helps tie everything together. It makes sense that Congress would want to move territorial but needed these anti-abuse measures to prevent companies from gaming the system. One quick question on the previously taxed income concept - when you mention tracking basis adjustments carefully, are you referring to the adjustments under Section 961, or are there additional adjustments specific to the post-TCJA rules that I should be aware of for the exam? The way you've framed it as territorial system + guardrails is going to be my new mental model for approaching these problems. Thank you!

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

ngl that taxr.ai thing mentioned above is clutch. used it last week and it broke down everything step by step. way better than trying to decode these transcripts myself lol

0 coins

Sergio Neal

•

fr? might have to check it out

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

do it! best dollar i ever spent no cap

0 coins

Had the exact same situation last year - 570/971 codes appeared after my EIC processed. The waiting is definitely stressful but in my case it was just routine verification. They wanted to confirm my child's social security number matched their records. Got my notice about 3 weeks after the 971 code date, sent back the requested docs, and refund hit my account about 6 weeks later. Keep checking your transcript for updates and respond to any IRS correspondence ASAP. The delay sucks but it's pretty standard for EIC claims nowadays.

0 coins

Prev1...22972298229923002301...5643Next