

Ask the community...
Not to get off topic but make sure ur checking the tax implications to! When I retired at 63 I had SS + part time work and got surprised by how social security is taxed when u have other income. Up to 85% of benefits can be taxable if ur over certain thresholds.
Good point. For 2025, if combined income (AGI + nontaxable interest + 1/2 of SS benefits) exceeds $25,000 for an individual or $32,000 for a couple filing jointly, up to 50% of benefits become taxable. Above $34,000 individual/$44,000 couple, up to 85% becomes taxable. Definitely something to consider in retirement planning.
Just wanted to add one more consideration that might help with your planning. Since your wife will be retiring in August, you should also think about how the timing affects her annual earnings record for Social Security benefit calculations. If she's close to her highest 35 years of earnings, working those extra months in 2025 could potentially increase her average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) and boost her benefit amount. This might offset some of the complications with the earnings test. Also, regarding the maintenance payments - if her sister is paying her as an independent contractor for property maintenance, make sure you're keeping detailed records of when the work was actually performed versus when payment is received. This documentation will be crucial if SSA questions the timing of those earnings. Have you considered having her sister put the maintenance payments on a more regular schedule starting in 2025? Even quarterly payments would be easier to track than one annual lump sum in December.
That's a really good point about the AIME calculation! I hadn't thought about how those extra months of higher earnings could boost her overall benefit. We'll definitely look into whether 2025 would be one of her top 35 earning years. And yes, we're planning to ask her sister to switch to quarterly payments starting next year - that should make tracking much easier. Right now we just have a handshake agreement, but it sounds like we need to get more formal documentation about when work is performed versus when it's paid. Thanks for the practical advice!
Thank you all for the helpful responses! I've learned so much. To summarize what I understand now: Since my sister was born after 1954, when her SSDI converts to retirement at 67, she has to choose either her own benefit OR 50% of her ex's (whichever is higher) - she can't do one then switch to the other. I'll help her set up a my Social Security account to see her projected benefit amount and then we'll try to figure out what her ex might be receiving to compare. I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain this complicated situation!
One final tip - when her time comes to make this decision, have her schedule an appointment with SSA rather than just calling or walking in. An actual appointment gives her the best chance of speaking with someone knowledgeable about these complex scenarios involving SSDI conversion and divorced spouse benefits. And bring all documentation about the marriage and divorce to that appointment.
Just wanted to add one more consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet - if your sister's ex-husband hasn't filed for his own benefits yet, she might still be able to claim divorced spouse benefits even if he's just eligible (age 62+). The rule is that if they've been divorced for at least 2 years, she can claim on his record even if he hasn't actually applied yet. This could be relevant depending on his age and filing status. Also, make sure she understands that claiming divorced spouse benefits won't affect what her ex receives - it's completely independent of his benefits. Good luck navigating all this!
That's a really important point about the 2-year divorce rule! I hadn't heard about that before. So even if her ex hasn't filed yet, as long as he's 62 or older and they've been divorced for at least 2 years, she could still potentially claim on his record? That might open up more options for timing. And it's reassuring to know that whatever she does won't impact what he receives - I was worried there might be some awkward situation where claiming benefits on his record would somehow reduce what he gets. Thanks for adding that detail!
After reading all these comments, I'd suggest you have a one-on-one consultation with a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security claiming strategies. With a significant difference between your benefit amounts, proper timing could make a substantial difference in your lifetime benefits, especially considering survivor benefits down the road. While the spousal benefit won't increase if your husband delays claiming, survivor benefits would be based on his actual benefit amount including any delayed retirement credits.
Just wanted to add my experience as someone who recently navigated this! I was in a very similar situation - my own benefit was around $400/month and my husband's was $3,800. The key thing that helped me understand it was when the SSA representative explained that you essentially get "topped up" to the higher amount. So you're not losing your own work credits - they're still there as the foundation - but you get supplemented up to that 50% spousal amount. Also, definitely recommend keeping detailed notes when you talk to SSA reps because I got slightly different explanations from different people, which was confusing. The bottom line for me was getting about $1,900/month total (50% of his PIA) instead of my $400. Make sure you understand the timing requirements too - I had to wait until after my husband filed, but once he did, the process was pretty straightforward. Good luck!
Thank you so much for sharing your real-world experience! It's really helpful to hear from someone who went through the exact same situation. I like how you explained the "topped up" concept - that makes it much clearer than some of the other explanations I've seen. The idea that my work credits are still the foundation but I get supplemented to reach the higher amount really helps me understand it better. I'm definitely going to take your advice about keeping detailed notes when I talk to different SSA reps. It sounds like consistency in explanations can be an issue! Your final amount of $1,900 is pretty close to what I'm expecting to get, so that gives me more confidence in the calculations everyone has been sharing here.
my aunt went thru this last year. she got the spousal increase but had to fight for backpay. they only gave her 6 months backpay even tho she shoulda been getting it for 2+ years! make sure u ask about retroactive benefits when u apply
I'm in a very similar situation - took my benefits at 62 and just turned 64. Reading through all these responses has been really eye-opening! I had no idea about the spousal benefits potentially being available. My husband's benefit is about $2,800/month and mine is only $1,100, so it sounds like I should definitely look into this. One question for those who've successfully gotten the spousal benefit - did you need to bring any specific documentation when you applied, or do they have everything they need in their system already? I want to be prepared when I call so I don't waste the opportunity if I actually get through to someone! Also, @Sean Murphy, thanks for mentioning that Claimyr service - I'm definitely going to look into that since the thought of sitting on hold for hours is making me put this off.
Gavin King
I'm sorry to hear about your loss and the confusion around benefits eligibility. Based on the excellent information already shared here, it sounds like you handled things correctly given the circumstances. Just to reinforce what others have said - the age 62 requirement for divorced spousal benefits is a hard rule, so there really wasn't anything available to you when your ex-husband was alive since you were only 53. The survivor benefits you claimed at 60 were actually the earliest possible benefit available to you in your situation. One additional thing to consider: if you're still working part-time, make sure you're aware of the earnings test rules. Since you're past full retirement age (66 and 6 months), there's no earnings limit that would reduce your survivor benefits, so you can work as much as you want without penalty. This wasn't always the case - before reaching FRA, there were earnings limits that could temporarily reduce benefits. You seem to have a good handle on your situation now, and staying with the higher survivor benefit makes perfect sense financially.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
•Thank you for the clarification about the earnings test! I wasn't sure about those rules since I'm still working part-time. It's reassuring to know I can continue working without worrying about my survivor benefits being reduced. This whole conversation has been incredibly helpful - I went from feeling like I might have missed out on thousands of dollars to understanding that I actually made all the right decisions given the circumstances. The community knowledge here is amazing!
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
I'm really glad to see how this community came together to help clarify your situation! As someone who's dealt with Social Security questions for family members, I can confirm that the information shared here is accurate. The age 62 requirement for divorced spousal benefits is indeed a firm rule, and you absolutely did the right thing by claiming survivor benefits at 60. One thing I'd like to add that might be helpful for others reading this thread - if anyone finds themselves in a similar situation where they're unsure about benefit timing, SSA does offer benefit estimates through their online portal at ssa.gov. You can create a my Social Security account and run different scenarios to see projected benefit amounts at various claiming ages. It's a great tool for planning purposes. Your decision to stick with the higher survivor benefit of $2,125 versus your own retirement benefit of $1,980 is definitely the smart financial choice. And as others mentioned, you have the flexibility to reassess this if your work record changes significantly in the future.
0 coins