Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful to have found such a thorough and supportive discussion about the GPO/WEP reform! My spouse has been teaching in Florida under FRS for 29 years (no SS contributions) while I've worked in the private sector and expect about $2,750/month from Social Security at full retirement age. Like so many others here, I completely misunderstood what the reform actually meant - I thought it would provide immediate full spousal benefits, so learning about the gradual 10-year phase-in period definitely requires some adjustment to our retirement planning. But honestly, after reading through all these experiences, I'm feeling much more informed and prepared to navigate this process. The practical advice shared throughout this thread has been invaluable - the callback service recommendations, SSA calling strategies, documentation tips, and various resource suggestions from union workshops to AARP chapters to state retirement system websites. My spouse did work in banking for about 6 years before teaching, so those early SS quarters could potentially help our situation similar to what others have described. I'm starting the employment documentation spreadsheet today and plan to reach out to our Florida Education Association about any available guidance sessions. The collective knowledge this community has built while we all wait for official SSA implementation is remarkable - you've created a much more comprehensive resource than anything I've found on government websites. Thank you all for sharing your experiences and making this confusing transition period feel much less overwhelming!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Yara! Your situation with Florida FRS sounds exactly like what so many of us are experiencing across different states. It's really striking how consistent these challenges are regardless of which state teacher retirement system we're dealing with. Your spouse's 6 years in banking before teaching could definitely be significant for the calculations - those early SS quarters seem to be a common thread that might help many of us more than we initially realized. The Florida Education Association outreach is a great idea, and I'm curious to hear what kind of guidance they might have available. It's been really encouraging to see how this community has evolved throughout this discussion, with each new member adding valuable resources and perspectives. Between all the suggestions for documentation strategies, contact methods, workshops, and information sources, we've definitely created something more useful than the official guidance that's currently available. The collective experience and support here makes navigating this uncertain transition period feel much more manageable. Thanks for adding to the resource pool - the more we share our different state experiences and contacts, the better prepared we'll all be when SSA finally gets their systems updated!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm so thankful to have found this incredibly detailed discussion about the GPO/WEP reform! My situation is very similar to many shared here - my wife has been teaching in Colorado under PERA for 26 years (no SS contributions) while I've worked in the private sector and expect about $2,950/month from Social Security. Like everyone else, I initially thought the reform meant immediate relief, so learning about the 10-year gradual phase-in has definitely adjusted our retirement expectations. But this conversation has been more informative than anything I've found through official channels! The practical strategies shared here are gold - the callback services for reaching SSA, the Tuesday/Wednesday 8AM calling approach, the comprehensive documentation advice, and all the additional resources from AARP workshops to state pension websites to union contacts. My wife worked in healthcare administration for about 8 years before teaching, so those early SS quarters could be crucial for our calculations. I'm particularly impressed by how this community has collectively built such a comprehensive resource while we all wait for SSA to catch up. The documentation spreadsheet idea is brilliant and I'm starting mine immediately. I'm also going to reach out to our Colorado Education Association and local AARP chapter to see what guidance they might have available. Thank you all for turning what felt like an overwhelming and confusing situation into something much more manageable through shared knowledge and support!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly informative! I'm actually planning to file for benefits in May 2025 (turning 67 then) and had the exact same concerns about COLA timing. It's really reassuring to see so many people confirm that new beneficiaries automatically get the current year's COLA built into their initial benefit amount. I've been trying to research this for weeks and the SSA website just wasn't clear about it. The fact that your PIA gets updated every January regardless of when you start collecting makes total sense from a fairness perspective - nobody should be penalized for their timing within the year. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences, especially those who went through this recently. This gives me much more confidence in my retirement planning!

0 coins

I'm so glad this thread has been helpful for you too! I was in the exact same position a few months ago - trying to figure out all these Social Security timing questions and feeling overwhelmed by how confusing the official materials can be. It's amazing how much clearer everything becomes when you hear from real people who've actually been through the process. The community here has been such a great resource for getting straight answers about these kinds of practical questions. Good luck with your May filing - sounds like you'll be all set with the COLA information now!

0 coins

I'm also planning to retire soon and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I had no idea that the COLA increases were automatically built into your PIA even before you start collecting. It makes me feel much better about my decision to wait until my FRA instead of filing early. One thing I'm curious about - does this same principle apply to delayed retirement credits? If someone waits until after their FRA to file, do those credits also get adjusted for COLA increases? I know DRCs accrue at 8% per year, but I'm wondering if that percentage gets applied to the COLA-adjusted PIA or the original amount. Thanks again to everyone for sharing their knowledge and experiences!

0 coins

To follow up on your question about how much the increase might be - it varies based on how many months were withheld and over what period. The formula is a bit complex, but for someone who had 8 months withheld between age 60 and FRA (approximately 72 months total), you might see an increase of around 1.5-2% of your current benefit. So if your current survivor benefit is $2,000, you might see an increase of $30-40 per month. Not huge, but as others mentioned, it adds up over time, and you should also receive back payments from your FRA month to present.

0 coins

Thank you for explaining this so clearly. $30-40 per month would be welcome, especially with how inflation has been lately! I'll definitely follow up with SSA now that I understand the process better.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation about 3 years ago! The SSA is supposed to automatically do the ARF adjustment, but in my experience, they often don't unless you push them. I had to call multiple times over several months before they finally processed mine. When you do get through to them, make sure to ask for a written confirmation of when the adjustment will be processed. They gave me a reference number and told me it would take 4-6 weeks, which turned out to be accurate. The back pay was nice - I got about 8 months worth of the difference in one lump sum. One tip: if you have trouble getting through on the phone, try calling right when they open at 8 AM EST. I had better luck early in the morning than later in the day.

0 coins

@Oliver Cheng That s'great advice about calling at 8 AM EST! I had the same issue - could never get through in the afternoons. When you called, did they have all your work history and benefit withholding information readily available in their system, or did you need to provide specific dates or documentation about which months your benefits were withheld? I kept all the letters they sent me when benefits were stopped, but I m'wondering if I should have those ready or if their system tracks it automatically.

0 coins

@Oliver Cheng This is really helpful information! I m'the original poster and I m'definitely going to try calling at 8 AM EST tomorrow. Quick question - when they processed your ARF adjustment, did you notice the increase right away in your next monthly payment, or did it take a separate deposit? Also, did they send you any paperwork explaining the calculation they used? I want to make sure I understand exactly what they re'doing so I can verify it s'correct. Thanks again for sharing your experience - it gives me hope that this will actually get resolved!

0 coins

Just a heads-up. I think that the Voluntary Tax Withholding option that's now available online via SSA dot gov might be calculating the withdrawal incorrectly, because it did so with my benefit. From my benefit of $1351, 22% would have been $297.22. Instead, they took out only $256.50, which is more than a $41 difference for just one month. Somehow, the online process had incorrectly subtracted the $185 premium from my benefit and then applied the withholding of 22% to the reduced amount. From what I've read, it seems that people who submit the official tax form rather than using the online form *might* get their withdrawal computed correctly.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of issue that makes me nervous about relying on automated systems for important financial matters! Thank you for doing the math and catching this error. It's really troubling that SSA's online withholding tool would have such a basic calculation mistake - applying the percentage to net instead of gross benefit completely defeats the purpose of proper tax planning. I was actually considering switching to the online system for convenience, but after reading your experience, I'm definitely sticking with the paper W-4V form. Have you been able to get through to someone at SSA to report this bug? This seems like something that could be affecting thousands of beneficiaries who trust that the online system is calculating correctly.

0 coins

tim keirn

@Dana Mulvany has anyone had any luck contacting SSA about this issue? i sent a paper W-4v back in 2024 and as stated in a previous response, tax was on gross amount, then when starting medicare it subtracted that before tax to arrive at net amount.

1 coin

This is really eye-opening! As someone who's completely new to Social Security benefits, I had no idea there was even a difference between using the online system versus the paper W-4V form. Dana's discovery about the calculation error in the online system is incredibly valuable - that's a $41 monthly difference which adds up to nearly $500 over a year! I was actually planning to set up my withholding through the online portal since it seemed more convenient, but now I'm definitely going to use the traditional paper form instead. It's concerning that such a fundamental calculation error exists in SSA's online system. Has anyone else noticed similar discrepancies, or has Dana been the first to catch this? Thanks to everyone in this thread for sharing such detailed experiences - it's helping newcomers like me avoid costly mistakes!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Nick! I'm also pretty new to all this Social Security stuff and this thread has been a real eye-opener. Dana's discovery about the online calculation error is definitely concerning - it makes me wonder how many people have been affected without even realizing it. I was leaning toward using the online system too since it seemed simpler, but after seeing the math discrepancy, the paper W-4V route seems much safer. It's frustrating that we can't trust the automated system to do basic calculations correctly! I really appreciate how helpful everyone has been in sharing their real experiences here. It's making me feel much more confident about navigating all these benefit decisions as a newcomer.

0 coins

You're absolutely right to be cautious about the online system after Dana's discovery! I'm also relatively new to SS benefits and this thread has been incredibly educational. That $41 monthly error Dana found is exactly the kind of mistake that could really mess up someone's tax planning for the whole year. It's honestly pretty shocking that SSA's online system would have such a basic calculation flaw - you'd think they would have caught something like that in testing. I'm definitely sticking with the paper W-4V form now too. Better to deal with a little extra paperwork than risk having my withholding calculated wrong all year. Thanks to Dana for catching this and to everyone else for sharing their experiences - this community is such a valuable resource for navigating all these government processes!

0 coins

As someone who just went through the Social Security application process myself (started receiving benefits in January 2025), this thread has been incredibly valuable! I haven't received any adjustment payments yet, but after reading everyone's experiences, I'm much better prepared if one shows up. What really stands out to me is how much SSA's systems have apparently improved. The fact that they're automatically catching these earnings record discrepancies and issuing corrections within 2-3 months is actually quite impressive for a government agency. It sounds like these adjustment payments are becoming a routine part of ensuring people get their correct benefit amounts, especially for those of us who started collecting recently. I'm definitely going to start monitoring my mySocialSecurity account more closely and keep detailed records of any payments. The advice about not panicking if an unexpected deposit appears, but also not spending it until you get official documentation, seems like the perfect balanced approach. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical information that's impossible to find in the official SSA materials!

0 coins

Mei Liu

Welcome to the community and congratulations on starting your Social Security benefits! You're absolutely right that this thread has been incredibly educational. It's really smart of you to be proactive about monitoring your account and keeping records from the start. Since you started benefits in January 2025, you're definitely in the same timeframe as everyone else who's been receiving these adjustment payments, so there's a good chance you might see something similar in the coming weeks. If you do get an unexpected payment, you'll be much better prepared than most of us were initially! The fact that SSA's systems are catching these discrepancies so quickly now is definitely encouraging for the accuracy of everyone's benefits going forward.

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely fascinating to follow! As someone who's been helping my elderly parents navigate Social Security for the past few years, I'm really impressed by how much the system seems to have improved. The pattern everyone's describing with these Q4 2024 earnings adjustments makes perfect sense - it sounds like SSA has finally modernized their data reconciliation processes to catch these discrepancies automatically instead of relying on beneficiaries to notice and report issues themselves. What's particularly encouraging is seeing how consistent these experiences have been across different people and different payment amounts. It really does seem like this is a systematic improvement in how SSA handles earnings record updates rather than isolated incidents. The fact that most people are getting their explanation letters within 2-3 weeks of the payment also suggests their communication processes have gotten more reliable. For anyone still dealing with similar situations, I'd echo the advice about keeping detailed documentation and being patient for the official explanation. It's also worth noting that these adjustment payments seem to be a good sign that SSA is being more proactive about ensuring benefit accuracy - something that benefits everyone in the long run!

0 coins

I completely agree about how encouraging these systematic improvements are! As someone who's relatively new to this community, I'm amazed by how helpful everyone has been in sharing their experiences and creating such a comprehensive picture of what's happening with these adjustment payments. It's particularly reassuring to see that SSA has moved from being reactive (waiting for beneficiaries to notice problems) to being proactive (automatically detecting and correcting discrepancies). The consistency across all these different cases really does suggest this is an intentional improvement in their processes rather than random glitches. I'm definitely bookmarking this entire thread as a reference - it's been more informative than hours of trying to navigate the official SSA website! Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their experiences and follow up with resolutions. This kind of community knowledge-sharing is invaluable for people trying to understand these complex systems.

0 coins

Prev1...3738394041...836Next