
Ask the community...
has anyone mentioned the kids can get benefits from BOTH US and canada? my friends kids got both after their dad died who worked in both countries, but i dont know much about how it worked
Since you're dealing with both US and Canadian benefits, here's what I recommend for your planning: 1. Request your SSA earnings record and your CPP contribution statement to confirm your work history in both countries is accurate. 2. For your wife's planning, she should compare these scenarios: - Taking survivor benefits at her FRA, then switching to her own SS at 70 - Taking her own reduced benefit early, then switching to survivor benefits at her FRA 3. Calculate the family maximum benefit now so you have realistic expectations for what your children will receive. 4. Contact both SSA and Service Canada to confirm children's eligibility for survivor benefits under both systems. 5. Consider consulting with a financial planner who specializes in cross-border retirement planning, particularly someone with expertise in the US-Canada Social Security Agreement. The fact that survivor benefits aren't reduced by WEP is extremely important to your planning and could significantly impact your strategy.
Thank you for these concrete steps! I've requested my earnings record from SSA already, but I hadn't thought to get my CPP contribution statement. I'll do that right away. I'm going to start checking for financial planners with US-Canada expertise. Does anyone know if there's a directory or professional association that might help me find someone qualified in this niche area?
BTW if your uncle was married make sure his wife applies for the $255 death benefit too!!! its not much but its something
YES! Don't forget this! The lump-sum death payment of $255 is separate from the underpayment issue. They don't automatically send it - you have to apply for it. And it's ONLY $255 no matter how much your uncle paid into the system over his lifetime...which is kind of insulting tbh. But every bit helps when dealing with funeral costs.
Something else to consider - if your aunt was already receiving spousal benefits on your uncle's record, her benefit amount should increase to his full benefit amount as a widow. She should contact SSA about this too, as survivor benefits need to be applied for; they don't automatically convert. And if she's not yet at her full retirement age, there could be strategic filing considerations to maximize her long-term benefits.
I don't think my aunt was receiving any benefits yet - she's only 62 and still working part-time. That's really good information though, I'll make sure she knows to look into survivor benefits. Is there a waiting period before she can apply?
She can apply immediately for survivor benefits. At 62, she'll receive a reduced amount (about 71-73% of your uncle's full benefit). However, if she's still working and earns above the earnings limit ($21,240 in 2025), her benefits will be reduced by $1 for every $2 earned above that limit. Depending on her own work record, it might be better strategy to take her reduced survivor benefits now and switch to her own record at 70, or vice versa. She should definitely schedule an appointment with SSA to discuss options.
also tell ur sister to be ready for backpay when approved! they pay from when she applied or sometimes even from when her disability started if thats within a year of applying. she could get a big chunk of money all at once when approved
One more important point - if your sister has any dependent children under 18 (or adult disabled children whose disability began before age 22), they may also qualify for benefits on her record once she's approved for SSDI. This doesn't apply to most 61-year-olds, but worth mentioning in case it's relevant to her situation.
wait i just remembered something else important my aunt told me! if your getting the spousal benefit as a top-up on your own benefit, and then your husband passes away, you CANT get both the spousal AND the survivor benefit. you have to pick one. she said lots of people don't know this and expect to get both
That's correct - you can never receive both spousal and survivor benefits simultaneously. You'll receive either your own benefit or the survivor benefit, whichever is higher. The spousal benefit is only available while both spouses are living. When a spouse passes away, the spousal benefit is no longer available, and is replaced by the survivor benefit option. This is an important distinction that many people misunderstand.
Thank you all so much for this information! I'm feeling much more prepared now. Let me see if I understand the key points correctly: 1. If my husband passes away, I CAN claim survivor benefits before my FRA of 67, but they'll be reduced if I claim early 2. His early claiming at 62 won't fully reduce my survivor benefits due to the RIB-LIM rule (I'll get at least 82.5% of his FRA benefit) 3. I have flexibility to switch between my own benefit and survivor benefits at any point after he passes 4. If he passes away early, I could potentially take my reduced retirement benefit at 63 as planned, then switch to the unreduced survivor benefit at my FRA of 67 This is all so much more reassuring than what I feared. I really appreciate everyone taking the time to help me understand this complicated system!
You've got it exactly right! Your summary hits all the key points perfectly. The flexibility to switch between benefit types is a special provision for survivors that gives you important financial options. One additional note: when the time comes to make these decisions, be very explicit with SSA about whether you're applying for retirement benefits, survivor benefits, or restricting your application to just one type. The precise wording matters, as does getting confirmation in writing of which benefit you're receiving. Glad you're feeling more confident about your planning now!
One more important thing: if your friend's husband worked in both SS-covered employment AND government employment not covered by SS, the SSA will need to carefully review his earnings record to calculate the correct benefit. Make sure she brings his complete work history if possible. Also, the fact that she receives a small SS benefit suggests she might have enough SS-covered work quarters to potentially reduce the GPO impact. The rules are extremely technical, which is why an in-person appointment with documentation is crucial.
Just to add - there's a movement to repeal GPO and WEP with multiple bills introduced in Congress over the years, but nothing has passed yet. The Social Security Fairness Act would eliminate both provisions, but it's been stalled for years despite bipartisan support. Public pension recipients should follow this legislation.
I think everyone's making this more complicated than it needs to be. If you're making good money and don't need the SS now, just wait till 70. That's what my financial advisor told me to do. The 3 extra years of growth is worth it in the long run especially if you have family history of longevity.
To correct my earlier mistake: Since you were born after 1/2/1954, you can't do a restricted application. However, if your ex-spouse benefit would be higher than your own benefit (which seems unlikely from your numbers), you could claim now and then switch to your own at 70. But since your own benefit is higher, you're better off waiting. One consideration: If you have health concerns that might impact longevity, waiting to 70 might not be optimal. The general breakeven age is around 82-83 - if you live beyond that, waiting to 70 pays off.
There's no special advantage to applying in your birthday month. Social Security benefits can begin as early as the first full month you're eligible. For retirement benefits, that eligibility can start at age 62 (with permanent reduction), at Full Retirement Age (with no reduction), or anytime in between or after.
You need to watch out because they make you pick a Medicare plan too when you file for SS if he hasn't already done that part. My husband got totally confused by all the Medicare options when he was trying to do his SS application. Just a heads up that might slow things down.
My friend at work said something about a "restricted application" if you were born before 1954? does that matter for divorced benefits?
Good question! The "restricted application" strategy (which allowed claiming ex-spouse benefits while letting your own benefit grow) is only available to people born before January 2, 1954. For those born after that date, when you file for any benefit, you're deemed to be filing for all benefits you're eligible for, and you'll receive whichever is higher. So if the original poster was born after that date, this strategy won't be available to them.
I've been through this exact process! Just FYI - when you do apply, make sure to specifically tell them you want to file for divorced spouse benefits. I originally just applied for retirement and the claims specialist never mentioned I could get more by claiming on my ex's record (we were married 11 years). Had to go back and refile 6 months later when I found out, and they only gave me 6 months of retroactive payments even though I was eligible all along. So frustrating!
just wondering if u ever got this resolved? im in a similar boat and scared about how long it might take
Not yet! It's been 9 weeks now. I did contact my Congressional rep's office as someone suggested here, and they've opened an inquiry. They said they typically hear back from SSA within 30 days on these inquiries, which isn't great but at least it's something. I also tried calling the payment center directly (different than the main SSA number) but couldn't get through to anyone helpful.
After reading through this thread, I think contacting your Congressional representative was a smart move. Their constituent services can often push things forward much faster than we can as individuals. Just to confirm a few technical points: 1. The form you filed (SSA-521) requests withdrawal of a claim, which is different from simply changing your month of entitlement. If you only wanted to delay by 3 months, a withdrawal might have been more complicated than necessary. 2. For Social Security retirement benefits, changing your month of entitlement can affect your benefit amount due to the monthly delayed retirement credits you earn after Full Retirement Age until age 70. 3. When transitioning from survivor to retirement benefits, there's often confusion about the Medicare premium transfers, which is why you're experiencing the issues with having to pay out of pocket. Keep detailed records of all your out-of-pocket Medicare payments. When your case is resolved, you'll need to submit Form SSA-795 (Statement of Claimant) with copies of your receipts to request reimbursement. This won't happen automatically.
Thank you for the additional information! You're right - it does seem like the SSA-521 withdrawal might have been more complicated than necessary if I just needed to change the start date. The rep at the office insisted this was the right approach, but now I'm wondering if there was a simpler way. I've started organizing all my Medicare payment receipts and bank statements showing the payments. Hopefully that will make the reimbursement process smoother when we finally get there.
Samantha Hall
I really appreciate everyone's help! I think I'm starting to understand this better. So if something happens to my husband, I have options: 1. Claim survivor benefits early but face significant reductions due to both early claiming AND the earnings test 2. Wait until FRA to claim 100% of his benefit with no earnings limit, while still working 3. Potentially delay my own benefit until 70 to maximize it I'm going to try calling SSA to get my specific numbers. Does anyone have tips for actually getting through to a real person there?
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•Yes! Like I mentioned above, I used Claimyr (claimyr.com) and got through to SSA in minutes instead of hours. Their service connects you directly to an SSA agent. I found their video demo helpful: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU When you do talk to SSA, ask specifically about the "restricted application" strategy, which allows you to take survivor benefits while your own retirement benefit continues to grow. They might not volunteer this information unless you ask directly.
0 coins
Ryan Young
One more important point: If your husband passes away, you would be eligible for a one-time death benefit payment of $255 from Social Security. It's not much, but it's something. Also, regarding your student loans - federal student loans are discharged upon death, and there are income-driven repayment plans that could help while you're alive. If you're working for a non-profit, definitely look into PSLF as someone suggested. The survivor benefit rules are complex but designed to provide flexibility. The key decision points are: 1. When to claim (early with reduction vs. FRA with full amount) 2. How your current earnings affect benefits before FRA 3. When/if to switch between survivor benefits and your own retirement benefit A personalized analysis of your exact situation by SSA would be very helpful.
0 coins
Samantha Hall
•Thank you! I didn't know about the death benefit - not a large amount but good to be aware of. I'm definitely going to look into PSLF too. I think my best strategy might be to continue working at my current job, and if my husband passes before I reach FRA, evaluate whether it makes sense to reduce my hours to get under that earnings limit or just wait until FRA to claim the full survivor benefit. A lot depends on my financial situation at that time. I really appreciate everyone taking the time to explain this complicated system. It's not easy to navigate!
0 coins