IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sean O'Brien

•

Just went through this exact situation last month! One thing I learned that might help - when you're entering the W-2C in TurboTax, pay close attention to the "difference" column on the form. That's usually what you'll need to enter as adjustments, not the "correct information" column. Also, if your employer changed your state withholding like yours did, make sure to check that TurboTax is calculating the correct state refunds/payments. I almost missed that my New Jersey return needed to be filed because the software initially only showed my original (incorrect) state. You might need to manually add the NJ state return if it doesn't automatically appear after entering the W-2C. The good news is that since you filed an extension, you have until October 15th to get this sorted out properly. Better to take your time and get it right than rush and make mistakes!

0 coins

This is super helpful advice, especially about the "difference" column! I've been staring at my W-2C for days trying to figure out which numbers to actually use. Quick question - when you say to check that TurboTax calculates the correct state refunds, did you have to go back and manually adjust anything after entering the W-2C? I'm worried I might miss something since my situation is pretty similar with the state tax mess up.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

I went through this exact same nightmare last year! My employer messed up my state withholding too and I was so stressed about getting it right. Here's what I learned: You definitely need to enter BOTH forms in TurboTax. Don't delete the original W-2 info - the software needs to see the complete picture. When you get to the W-2C section, TurboTax will walk you through entering the corrections and it handles all the math automatically. One thing that really helped me was printing out both forms and highlighting the differences before I started entering anything. Made it way easier to spot what actually changed. Also, double-check your state returns after entering everything - sometimes the software doesn't automatically create the correct state return if there were major changes to state withholding. You're doing the right thing by being careful about this. The IRS actually expects corrections like this and as long as you report everything properly using both forms, you'll be fine. Since you already filed the extension, you have plenty of time to get it right!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience! The highlighting tip is brilliant - I wish I had thought of that before I started entering everything. I'm curious though, when you say the software handles all the math automatically, did you notice any issues with how it calculated your final tax liability? I'm worried that having corrections might trigger some kind of audit flag or cause problems down the line. Also, did you end up owing more or getting a bigger refund after the corrections were processed?

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

I went through this exact same situation last year with a client who converted from C-corp to S-corp. The key thing that helped me was creating a detailed basis reconciliation worksheet that tracked everything chronologically. Start with the shareholder's original investment in the C-corp stock, then add any additional capital contributions made during the C-corp years, subtract any distributions received as a C-corp shareholder, and make any other basis adjustments that occurred before the S election date. That becomes your "conversion date basis." Then from the conversion date forward, you track all the normal S-corp basis adjustments (income, losses, distributions, etc.) on top of that foundation. One thing that tripped me up initially was making sure I had the exact conversion date right, because you need to split the year if they converted mid-year. The IRS is very particular about getting the timing correct for basis calculations. Also, definitely keep detailed documentation of how you calculated the beginning basis - the IRS loves to audit basis calculations on converted entities, so having a clear paper trail is essential.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

This is really helpful! I'm new to handling these conversions and the chronological worksheet approach makes a lot of sense. Quick question - when you mention splitting the year for mid-year conversions, do you need to prorate the income/loss items based on the exact conversion date, or is it more about making sure distributions before vs after conversion are treated correctly for basis purposes?

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

Great question! For mid-year conversions, you need to do both actually. You'll need to prorate the C-corp income/loss items up to the conversion date (which affects the final C-corp basis), and then separately track the S-corp items from the conversion date forward. But you're absolutely right that distributions are crucial - any distributions made while still a C-corp are treated completely differently for basis purposes than distributions made after the S election. C-corp distributions typically reduce basis only after they exceed current and accumulated E&P, while S-corp distributions reduce basis dollar-for-dollar (subject to the basis limitation rules). The timing precision matters because if you get the split wrong, you could end up with incorrect basis calculations that compound over multiple years. I always recommend getting the exact conversion effective date from the S election paperwork and using that as your dividing line.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with my first C-corp to S-corp conversion and was completely overwhelmed by Form 7203. Reading through everyone's experiences and explanations has clarified so much. One thing I want to add that might help others - make sure you also check if there were any Section 1244 stock elections made during the C-corp years. This can affect how you treat certain losses, and I almost missed it on my client's conversion because it was buried in their old corporate records. Also, for anyone struggling with reconstructing basis when records are incomplete, don't forget to check state tax returns too. Sometimes they have additional detail that the federal returns don't show, especially regarding capital contributions or distributions that might not be obvious from just the federal filings. The advice about keeping detailed documentation cannot be overstated. I created a separate Excel workbook just for basis tracking with tabs for each year, and it's already saved me hours when the client had follow-up questions.

0 coins

Thanks for mentioning Section 1244 stock! I hadn't thought about that at all and just realized I should check my client's records for this. Also, the tip about state returns is brilliant - my client's state has different reporting requirements that might have captured some transactions I'm missing from the federal side. Quick follow-up question for everyone - when you're creating these basis tracking workbooks, do you typically set them up to automatically carry forward the ending basis each year as the beginning basis for the next year? I'm wondering if there's a good template approach that minimizes manual errors when updating annually.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with the exact same situation - W-2 plus a 1099-DIV with qualified dividends - and was completely lost about how this all works together. One thing I want to add that might help others: if you're using tax software instead of paper forms, most programs will automatically handle this qualified dividend calculation for you. But understanding how it works manually (like everyone explained here) is still really valuable because you can see exactly how much you're saving with the preferential rates. For those mentioning the 0% rate - that's huge if you qualify! I just calculated my situation and my taxable income should be right around that threshold. Even if you're slightly over, you might get a blend where part of your qualified dividends get the 0% rate and the rest get 15%. The worksheet accounts for all of this. Sofia, definitely don't skip that worksheet when you get to line 16. The tax savings on $5,900 in qualified dividends could be pretty significant depending on your income level!

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

This is such a great point about tax software handling it automatically! I've been doing my taxes by hand for years but might consider software next year just to double-check my worksheet calculations. The blended rate thing you mentioned is really interesting - I hadn't thought about how you might qualify for 0% on part of your qualified dividends and 15% on the rest if you're right at that income threshold. That worksheet must be pretty sophisticated to handle all those different scenarios. @59c2da189aa0 Do you happen to know if there are any good free tax software options that would show me the detailed qualified dividend calculations? I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of what I calculated manually versus what the software comes up with.

0 coins

Just wanted to chime in as someone who was in your exact shoes a couple years ago - W-2 plus dividends, trying to figure out this qualified vs ordinary dividend thing on paper forms. Everyone here has given you great advice! The one thing that really helped me was actually working through a simple example first. Let's say you're single and your taxable income (after standard deduction) is $40,000. Without qualified dividends, that $5,900 would be taxed at your marginal rate (probably 12%). But with the qualified dividend treatment, it gets taxed at 0% since you're under that $47,025 threshold! That's potentially saving you over $700 in taxes. Even if you're above that threshold, the savings are still significant. At the 15% qualified dividend rate versus 22% or 24% ordinary income rates, you're looking at real money. The key thing that clicked for me was realizing that the 1040 form is just data collection, and the actual tax benefit happens in that worksheet calculation. Don't get discouraged by how confusing it seems at first - once you work through it once, it becomes much clearer for future years!

0 coins

This example is so helpful! I never realized the potential tax savings could be that significant. Your point about the $700 savings really puts it in perspective - that's substantial money for someone in that income bracket. I'm curious though - when you say "taxable income after standard deduction," are you referring to what ends up on line 15 of the 1040 (taxable income), or is there another calculation I need to do? I want to make sure I'm using the right number when I work through that worksheet to see which rate bracket I fall into. Also, did you find that first year doing the worksheet by hand was pretty straightforward once you got started, or were there any particular steps that tripped you up? I'm feeling more confident after reading everyone's explanations, but always good to know what to watch out for!

0 coins

Just went through this exact situation last year! I had to give $8,200 in closing credits to my buyers and was completely lost on how to handle it tax-wise. What helped me was understanding that the closing credits aren't really an "expense" you deduct - they just reduce what you actually received from the sale. Think of it this way: if your contract was for $400,000 but you gave $7,500 in closing credits, you effectively only received $392,500. That's what you report as your sale price. The credits never actually went into your pocket, so they can't be your proceeds. One thing that caught me off guard - make sure you're calculating your gain correctly by using your adjusted basis (original purchase price plus qualifying improvements minus any depreciation). Since you mentioned you might qualify for the capital gains exclusion anyway, you'll want to double-check that your total gain is under the threshold before deciding whether you even need to report the sale. Keep all your closing documents - the settlement statement will clearly show the credits, which makes it easy to document if the IRS ever has questions.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

This is really helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now - we're under contract to sell our home and already agreed to $5,000 in closing credits to help the buyers with their costs. I've been stressing about how to handle this on our taxes since it's our first time selling a home. Your explanation about it reducing the actual proceeds rather than being a separate expense makes so much sense. Did you end up needing to report the sale at all, or did you qualify for the full exclusion? We should be well under the $500k threshold but want to make sure we handle everything correctly.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

I just wanted to chime in as someone who works in real estate and sees this confusion all the time! You're absolutely right to be careful about how you report this - closing credits are one of those things that can trip people up. The key thing to remember is that closing credits to buyers are considered a "selling expense" that reduces your net proceeds, not a separate deduction you can take. So if your home sold for $350,000 but you gave $7,500 in credits, your reportable sale price is $342,500. Since you mentioned you didn't receive a 1099-S and you lived in the home as your primary residence, you'll likely qualify for the capital gains exclusion. Just make sure to calculate your actual gain correctly: (Sale Price - Closing Credits) minus (Original Purchase Price + Qualifying Improvements + Buying/Selling Costs). One tip: if you're using TurboTax, when you get to the home sale section, it will ask for your "gross proceeds." That should be your contract price minus the buyer credits. TurboTax is pretty good about walking you through this, but knowing the concept ahead of time helps you enter everything correctly. Keep all your closing documents - the settlement statement will show exactly how much you gave in credits, which makes your tax filing much cleaner.

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely incredible - I feel like I just got a master class in ACA tax strategy that I never knew existed! As someone who's been on marketplace plans for two years and always stressed about potential repayments, I'm now realizing I've been approaching this completely wrong. The HSA angle that @Camila Castillo brought up is particularly intriguing to me. I have an HDHP through the marketplace and have been contributing to my HSA sporadically, but now I see it could be a powerful tool for MAGI management. The fact that you can make HSA contributions up until the tax filing deadline (unlike 401k contributions) gives you even more flexibility for year-end planning. I'm also fascinated by the strategic income timing discussion. As a freelance graphic designer, I have quite a bit of control over when I invoice clients and when I recognize income. I never thought to coordinate this with my ACA subsidy situation, but it makes so much sense. The idea of essentially getting an interest-free loan from the government (through higher monthly subsidies) and then paying it back at a capped amount is brilliant. One question I have: for those doing this kind of strategic planning, how do you handle the psychological aspect of potentially owing money at tax time? Even though the repayment is capped and might result in overall savings, I imagine it still feels stressful to have a large tax bill. Do you set aside money throughout the year, or just factor it into your overall tax planning? This discussion has definitely motivated me to be more proactive about coordinating my healthcare, retirement, and tax planning strategies!

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

Great question about the psychological aspect! I totally get that concern - even when you know the math works in your favor, owing money at tax time can feel stressful. What I've found helpful is reframing it mentally. Instead of thinking "I owe the IRS money," I think "I got an interest-free loan that saved me money overall." I actually set up a separate savings account specifically for potential ACA repayments and treat it like an escrow account. Each month when I receive my subsidy, I calculate roughly what my repayment might be based on my projected year-end income and put a portion aside. This way, when tax time comes, I'm not scrambling to find the money - it's already sitting there waiting. Plus, if my final repayment ends up being less than expected (which happens when you stay within the favorable caps), I get to keep the extra as a bonus. The key insight from this whole thread is that once you understand the repayment limitations, owing at tax time becomes a strategic choice rather than an accident. That mental shift makes all the difference in how it feels psychologically. For freelancers like us with variable income, I'd also recommend doing quarterly projections to adjust your savings accordingly. That way you're never caught off guard and can even optimize your estimated tax payments around the potential repayment amounts.

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely mind-blowing! I've been on an ACA marketplace plan for the past year and have been terrified of the potential repayment situation. Reading through everyone's experiences and strategies has completely shifted my perspective from viewing repayments as a penalty to understanding them as a potential planning opportunity. What really struck me was the discussion about HSA contributions as a MAGI management tool. I have an HSA-eligible plan but haven't been maximizing my contributions. The fact that I can contribute up until tax filing deadline and directly reduce my MAGI dollar-for-dollar seems like such an obvious strategy now that I understand the FPL threshold implications. I'm also intrigued by the multi-year Roth conversion strategy several people mentioned. As someone in their early 40s starting to think seriously about retirement planning, the idea of coordinating ACA subsidy optimization with tax-advantaged retirement account conversions is fascinating. The repayment caps essentially provide a safety net that could allow for more aggressive conversion strategies than I would have considered otherwise. One question for the group: has anyone dealt with how stock option exercises might factor into this planning? I have some ISOs that I've been hesitant to exercise because of the AMT implications, but I'm wondering if the ACA repayment limitations might change the calculus. If I could exercise enough to hit the top of a repayment cap bracket, the additional MAGI might be more manageable than I originally thought. This discussion has definitely inspired me to take a more strategic approach to coordinating my healthcare, tax, and retirement planning!

0 coins

Great question about stock option exercises! ISOs can definitely be incorporated into ACA subsidy planning, though it gets complex fast because of the AMT implications you mentioned. For regular tax purposes, exercising ISOs doesn't create taxable income (just the spread gets added to AMT), so your regular MAGI for ACA calculations wouldn't be affected by the exercise itself. However, if you later sell the shares, that's when it impacts your ACA planning - either as ordinary income (if it's a disqualifying disposition) or capital gains (if you hold long enough for qualifying disposition). The strategic angle is timing those sales to optimize your FPL position. If you're planning ISO exercises anyway, you could potentially time the sales to land in years where you want to hit specific repayment cap brackets. The key is modeling different scenarios to see how the AMT liability compares to the ACA repayment savings. One thing to watch out for - if the ISO exercise creates a large AMT liability, you might want to ensure you have enough cash flow to handle both the AMT and any potential ACA repayments. But given the repayment caps, the ACA piece might be more predictable than the AMT piece. Have you run any projections on the AMT impact of your ISO exercises? That might help determine whether the ACA optimization is worth factoring in, or if the AMT considerations dominate the planning.

0 coins

Prev1...3031323334...5643Next