


Ask the community...
An 82% on your first practice test is actually excellent! I just passed the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 exam last month and was scoring very similarly on my practice tests (80-84% range). The practice tests are definitely representative of the actual exam - same question format, similar difficulty level, and they cover all the key concepts you'll encounter. I found the real exam to be very fair and comparable to what I'd practiced with. My advice would be to focus on understanding the "why" behind each answer rather than just memorizing correct responses. When you review questions you missed, dig into the underlying tax principles. For example, if you missed a question about business deductions, make sure you understand the "ordinary and necessary" standard, not just the specific answer to that one question. Also, keep track of which topic areas you're consistently missing questions on across all your practice tests. For me, it was education credits and retirement account contribution limits. Once I identified those patterns, I could focus my remaining study time more effectively. With your current score and methodical approach, you're definitely on track to pass. The 70% threshold gives you a good buffer, and taking all the practice tests first is smart. You've got this!
This is really encouraging to hear from someone who just passed! I'm new to tax preparation and feeling a bit overwhelmed by all the different rules and regulations. Your advice about focusing on the "why" behind answers really makes sense - I've been guilty of just trying to memorize correct responses without fully understanding the underlying principles. Could you elaborate a bit more on how you identified those consistent weak areas across practice tests? Did you keep a formal tracking system, or was it more of a mental note-taking approach? I want to make sure I'm being systematic about identifying my knowledge gaps as I work through the remaining practice tests.
Your 82% on the first practice test is a really solid foundation! I passed the Intuit Academy Tax Level 1 exam about 8 months ago after scoring consistently in the 79-85% range on practice tests, so you're definitely in good territory. From my experience, the actual exam closely mirrors the practice tests in both difficulty and format. The questions test the same core concepts and use similar scenario-based approaches. I'd definitely recommend completing all available practice tests since they each tend to emphasize different areas within the curriculum. One strategy that really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track my performance across practice tests. I noted which specific topics I missed questions on (like tax credits, business expenses, filing status rules, etc.) and could quickly see patterns emerging. This helped me focus my study time on areas where I was consistently weak rather than reviewing topics I already understood well. The 70% passing threshold means you already have a comfortable margin, but I'd suggest aiming for consistent 85%+ scores on practice tests before taking the real exam. That extra confidence really makes a difference on test day. Your methodical approach of taking multiple practice tests first is exactly the right strategy - it shows you're serious about being properly prepared rather than just hoping to get lucky.
Has anyone used the IRS Free File program for super simple returns like this? Is it worth the hassle or should I just use one of the popular tax websites?
I used IRS Free File last year for a similar situation (one W-2 with minimal income). It was actually pretty straightforward and took maybe 20 minutes total. Definitely less hassle than I expected and completely free for federal filing.
I second this! IRS Free File is definitely the way to go for simple situations like yours. Since you only have one W-2 with such a small amount, it'll be one of the easiest returns possible to complete. Most of the commercial tax sites will also let you file for free with income that low, but Free File cuts out the middleman entirely. Plus you don't have to worry about any upselling or "audit protection" nonsense they try to push on you.
Just wanted to chime in as someone who went through this exact same situation a couple years ago! I had worked at a coffee shop for literally one week before realizing it wasn't for me, and got a W-2 for like $89 total income. Everyone here is giving you solid advice - you're definitely not required to file with such low income, but absolutely should file to get back any withholding. I was being lazy about it and almost didn't bother, but my mom convinced me to just do it. Took me maybe 15 minutes using the IRS Free File and I got back $8 in federal withholding. Not life-changing money, but hey, free money is free money! The peace of mind of having it officially filed was worth it too. No more wondering "should I have filed?" every time tax season rolls around.
This is such a relatable situation! I'm in college and worked at a retail store for exactly three shifts last summer before I realized the schedule wouldn't work with my classes. Got a W-2 for something like $140 and had the same exact question. Reading through everyone's responses here has been really helpful. I was procrastinating on dealing with it but you're all right - it's basically free money sitting there if they withheld anything. Plus it sounds way less complicated than I was making it out to be in my head. Thanks for asking the question I was too nervous to ask myself!
One approach I don't see mentioned yet is offsetting the recapture with other passive losses if you have them. If you have other rental properties that are showing paper losses this year, you might be able to use those to offset some of the recapture income. Also look into if a 1031 exchange makes sense for you. If you're planning to reinvest in another property anyway, you can defer the recapture tax by doing a like-kind exchange. You'd need to identify a replacement property within 45 days and close within 180 days, but it could save you a significant tax bill now.
For 1031 exchange, don't you need to use a qualified intermediary? I've heard horror stories about people trying to DIY this and getting denied by the IRS. Has anyone used a good QI they'd recommend?
This is a tough situation but unfortunately very common with bonus depreciation. I went through something similar with a commercial property where I took 100% bonus depreciation and then had to sell due to cash flow issues. One thing that might help reduce the sting - make sure you're capturing ALL your selling expenses when calculating the recapture. Things like realtor commissions, legal fees, title insurance, transfer taxes, etc. can all be deducted from your sale proceeds, which effectively reduces the amount subject to recapture. Also, if you haven't already, consider getting a second opinion from a tax professional who specializes in real estate. Some CPAs aren't fully up to speed on all the nuances of bonus depreciation recapture, especially with mixed-use properties or cost segregation studies. The $400k depreciation you mentioned seems quite high for a $1.3M property unless there were significant personal property components involved. The silver lining is that at least you got the tax benefit upfront when you probably needed it most. Still stings though - I totally get the frustration of paying taxes on "phantom income" from a property that barely generated any cash flow.
This is really helpful context about capturing all the selling expenses! I'm curious though - when you say the $400k depreciation seems high for a $1.3M property, what would be more typical? I'm trying to understand if maybe there's something unusual about how the depreciation was calculated that could affect the recapture. Also, do you know if there's a way to challenge the depreciation amount if it was calculated incorrectly on the original return? Or are you basically stuck with whatever was claimed?
I'm dealing with the exact same issue right now! Filed my 1040NR last week and owe about $3,100. The payment portal keeps timing out or giving me error messages when I try to submit. It's so frustrating because the form itself went through fine, but now I can't pay what I owe. I've tried different browsers and devices like you did, but no luck. Reading through these comments, it sounds like there are several workarounds people have had success with. The international tax line that Natasha mentioned sounds promising - I had no idea that existed! I'm also intrigued by the suggestion to try early morning hours when there might be less traffic on the system. Has anyone else noticed if there are better times of day to attempt the online payment? Really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here. It's reassuring to know this isn't just me having technical difficulties, but seems to be a known issue with the 1040NR payment system. Going to try calling that international number first thing tomorrow morning.
I had the same exact experience! The timing issue is definitely real - I found that attempting payments between 6-8 AM Eastern time worked much better than during business hours. The system seems less overloaded then. Before calling the international tax line, try one more thing that worked for me: when entering your payment information, use all capital letters for your name and address fields. The IRS system seems to be very particular about formatting for 1040NR filers. Also, if you have any special characters in your address (like accents or hyphens), try removing them completely. The international tax line is great but sometimes has wait times too, especially during tax season. If you do call, I'd recommend calling right when they open to minimize hold time. Good luck with your payment!
I just went through this exact same nightmare last month! The 1040NR payment portal is notoriously glitchy, especially for certain visa types. Here's what finally worked for me after days of frustration: First, try using the EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System) instead of the regular IRS payment portal. You have to register first which takes a few days, but it's specifically designed to handle different tax form types including 1040NR. The interface is much more reliable. If you need to pay immediately, try calling the automated payment line at 1-888-PAY-1040 (1-888-729-1040). You can make payments over the phone using your bank account or credit card. There's usually no wait time since it's automated, and it handles 1040NR payments without the technical issues the online portal has. Also, make sure you're using the correct tax year when making your payment - I made the mistake of selecting the current year instead of the tax year I was filing for, which caused all sorts of errors. Don't stress too much about the deadline - if you can't get any electronic payment to work, you can always mail a check with Form 1040-V. Just make sure to send it certified mail or overnight to have proof of when it was sent. The IRS is pretty understanding about technical difficulties with their payment systems.
This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I wish I'd found earlier! I'm currently stuck in the same situation with my 1040NR payment and have been pulling my hair out for the past week. The automated payment line sounds like a perfect solution - I had no idea that existed and it would save me from having to wait on hold. One quick question about EFTPS - when you register, do you need to have your ITIN already, or can you use your SSN if you're on a work visa? I'm on an H-1B and have an SSN but haven't applied for an ITIN since I thought I didn't need one. Also, thank you for mentioning the tax year selection issue! I bet that's been part of my problem. I've been so focused on getting through the payment screens that I probably wasn't paying close attention to which tax year was selected. These little details make such a huge difference with government systems.
Yuki Ito
This is a frustrating situation that many field workers face. While the tax deduction landscape changed significantly in 2018, there are still some important distinctions to understand about your specific situation. Since you mentioned you don't have a regular office and travel to different client sites daily, this could potentially change how your mileage should be classified. The IRS distinguishes between: 1. **Commuting** - travel from home to your regular workplace (not deductible) 2. **Business travel** - travel between work locations or to temporary work sites (should be reimbursable) If you're truly going to different temporary work locations each day rather than one fixed workplace, your employer's policy of treating the first 90 miles as "commuting" may not align with IRS guidelines. Here's what I'd recommend: - Document that you have no fixed office location - Keep records showing you visit different client sites - Research IRS Publication 463 which covers travel expenses - Present this information to your employer's HR/finance department While you can't currently deduct unreimbursed employee expenses on your personal taxes, you may have grounds to argue for better reimbursement from your employer based on the temporary work location rules. The key is demonstrating that your daily travel pattern doesn't fit the traditional "home to office" commute model.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
ā¢This is really helpful! I think you've hit on exactly what I need to focus on. I definitely don't have a regular office - I get my assignments each morning and drive to completely different locations every day. Some are 30 miles away, others are 80+ miles. I never go to the same place twice in a week usually. Based on what you're saying about temporary work locations, it sounds like my employer might be incorrectly classifying ALL my driving as commuting when it should actually be business travel. Do you know if there's a specific distance threshold or time period that defines "temporary" versus "regular" work locations? I want to make sure I have the right terminology when I talk to HR. Also, would it help to get something in writing from my supervisor confirming that I have no assigned office location and that all my work sites are temporary assignments?
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
ā¢Great questions! The IRS generally considers a work location "temporary" if you realistically expect to work there for one year or less. If you're going to different sites daily/weekly and none are expected to be long-term assignments, that strongly supports the temporary work location classification. Getting written confirmation from your supervisor about having no fixed office location would be extremely valuable documentation. I'd also recommend requesting a letter stating that your work assignments are to various temporary client locations rather than a regular workplace. When you approach HR, emphasize these key points: - No fixed office or regular workplace - Daily assignments to different temporary locations - Current policy may misclassify business travel as commuting - Request policy review based on IRS Publication 463 guidelines You might also want to calculate the annual financial impact - if you're losing $300+ per week in unreimbursed expenses, that's over $15,000 annually. Having concrete numbers often gets management's attention faster than abstract policy discussions. The fact that you use your own vehicle and tools for temporary work assignments actually strengthens your case that this is business travel, not a regular commute to a fixed workplace.
0 coins
Cameron Black
I've been following this thread and want to add something important that might help your case. The IRS actually has a specific ruling about workers who have no fixed office location - it's called the "home office deduction" principle, but it also applies to travel reimbursement policies. If your home is your principal place of business (which sounds like it might be, since you get assignments there and have no fixed office), then travel from your home to temporary work locations should be considered business travel, not commuting. This is covered under IRS Revenue Ruling 99-7. The key factors the IRS considers are: - Do you perform administrative tasks at home? - Do you receive work assignments at home? - Is your home where you store work materials/tools? - Do you have no other fixed business location? If you can answer "yes" to these questions, you have a strong argument that your employer's 90-mile "commute" exclusion is incorrect. Your home should be treated as your business headquarters, making all travel to client sites reimbursable business travel. I'd suggest documenting these factors and presenting them to your employer along with Revenue Ruling 99-7. Even though you can't deduct unreimbursed expenses personally, this ruling could help you get proper reimbursement from your company.
0 coins
Marilyn Dixon
ā¢This is exactly the kind of information I needed! I definitely check all those boxes - I receive my daily assignments via email at home, store all my work tools in my garage, do my paperwork and invoicing from my home office, and have zero fixed business locations. Revenue Ruling 99-7 sounds like it could be a game-changer for my situation. Do you happen to know if there are any specific forms or documentation templates that HR departments typically expect when employees request policy reviews based on IRS rulings? I want to present this as professionally as possible. Also, I'm curious - have you seen other people successfully use this approach with their employers? I'm hoping this isn't one of those "technically correct but companies ignore it anyway" situations. Thanks for pointing me toward this specific ruling - it feels like the first real solution I've found in this whole mess!
0 coins