


Ask the community...
Michigan has a flat state income tax rate of 4.25%, so you'll want to set aside an additional $1,530 (4.25% of $36,000) on top of whatever you're saving for federal taxes. So if you're setting aside 25-30% for federal, you're looking at roughly 29-34% total when you include state taxes. The good news is Michigan's tax is pretty straightforward - it's just a flat rate on all income, so no complicated bracket calculations like with federal. But definitely don't forget about it! I've seen people get caught off guard by state taxes on large one-time payments because they only planned for federal. You might also want to check if Michigan requires estimated tax payments for large income increases. I'm not 100% sure on their specific rules, but it's worth looking into to avoid any penalties.
This is super helpful, thanks for breaking down the Michigan specifics! So if I'm doing the math right, I should probably set aside around $11,000-$12,000 total to be safe (30% federal + 4.25% state). That's a pretty significant chunk but better than being caught off guard at tax time. Do you know if there's a threshold where Michigan requires estimated payments? Like if you're going to owe over a certain amount, do you have to make quarterly payments to avoid penalties? I'd rather pay it now than deal with penalty fees later.
Yes, Michigan does require estimated tax payments if you expect to owe $500 or more in state taxes for the year. Since you're looking at owing around $1,530 just on the settlement alone, you'll definitely want to make an estimated payment to avoid the underpayment penalty. Michigan's estimated tax payment deadlines follow the same schedule as federal - so if you receive your settlement soon, you could make a payment by January 15th for the fourth quarter, or wait until April 15th when you file your return (but you'd risk penalty fees for the delay). You can make the estimated payment online through Michigan's e-file system or mail in Form 1040ES with a check. The online system is pretty user-friendly and you'll get immediate confirmation. Given that your settlement is from a business dispute and will be added to your 2024 income, I'd definitely recommend making both federal and state estimated payments as soon as you receive the money.
Just wanted to add another perspective here - I work as a tax preparer and see this situation all the time. The key thing to remember is that settlement income is typically taxed as ordinary income, not capital gains, so you'll pay your regular tax rates on it. One strategy I often recommend to clients is to not just set aside the tax money, but actually put it in a separate high-yield savings account immediately when you receive the settlement. That way you're earning a little interest on the money while you wait to pay the taxes, and you're not tempted to spend it on something else. Also, since this is a contract dispute settlement, make sure you get proper documentation (1099-MISC) from whoever is paying you. Sometimes there are delays in getting the tax forms, and you want to make sure you report the income correctly even if the 1099 is late. Keep all your settlement paperwork - it'll make tax filing much smoother. The 25-30% federal plus 4.25% state advice others have given is solid. Better to overestimate and get a refund than to be scrambling to find money you don't have come April!
I went through this exact same situation about 8 months ago and completely understand your stress! The duplicate EIN issue is actually more common than most people realize, especially with the processing backlogs the IRS has been dealing with. Here's what worked for me: Call the Business & Specialty Tax Line at 800-829-4933 and clearly explain that you received two EINs despite only submitting one application. The misspelling on your second EIN letter is actually perfect evidence that this was an IRS processing error, not something you did wrong. Timing is crucial - I had the best luck calling on Tuesday mornings right at 7 AM Eastern. The wait times are significantly shorter then compared to other days. Have both EIN letters ready with the exact numbers and dates they were issued. The IRS representative will mark one EIN as "inactive" in their system (they don't actually delete EINs, just deactivate them). Definitely keep the first one since it has the correct business name. This is super important: ask for written confirmation of the resolution. It takes about 2-3 weeks to arrive, but you'll want that documentation for your records. Since you haven't used either EIN for any business activities yet (banking, vendor accounts, payroll, etc.), this should be a very straightforward 15-20 minute call once you get connected. You'll only need to file taxes under the active EIN going forward. Don't worry too much - this is a known issue with a standard resolution process, and the IRS handles these situations regularly. You'll have it sorted out soon!
This is such comprehensive and helpful advice! As someone who's been dealing with IRS issues for the first time, it's really reassuring to know that this duplicate EIN situation has a standard resolution process. I was starting to panic thinking I'd somehow created a major tax compliance problem for my new business. Your timing suggestion about calling Tuesday at 7 AM Eastern is gold - I've been trying to call during lunch breaks and afternoons with no luck. I'll definitely try the early morning approach. One thing I'm curious about - when you got your written confirmation, did it clearly state both EIN numbers and specifically mention which one was marked inactive? I want to make sure I know exactly what to look for in that documentation so I can follow up if needed. Thanks for sharing your experience and reassuring those of us going through this stressful situation for the first time!
I completely understand your frustration - dealing with duplicate EINs can be really stressful! Based on everyone's experiences shared here, it sounds like you have a very manageable situation that the IRS handles regularly. The consensus seems clear: call the Business & Specialty Tax Line at 800-829-4933, ideally on Tuesday or Wednesday morning right at 7 AM Eastern for the shortest wait times. Having both EIN letters ready with exact numbers and dates will help the call go smoothly. Since your second EIN has the misspelled business name, that's actually perfect evidence this was an IRS processing error rather than something you did wrong. The representative will mark one as "inactive" (keep the first one with correct spelling) and you should definitely request written confirmation for your records. The fact that you haven't used either EIN for any business activities yet (banking, vendor accounts, etc.) means this should be a straightforward 15-20 minute resolution once you get connected. You'll only need to file taxes under whichever EIN remains active. Don't stress too much about this - from all the experiences shared in this thread, it's clear the IRS has a standard process for these duplicate situations and you're definitely not the first person they've helped with this exact issue. You'll have it sorted out soon!
This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding these situations! I wanted to add my perspective as someone who works in healthcare administration - we see these automatic renewal cases frequently, especially from the COVID period when states suspended many eligibility reviews. A few additional points that might be helpful: 1. Most states have a "discovery grace period" - usually 30-90 days from when you become aware of the coverage to report income changes without penalty. Since you're reporting this during tax season when you naturally discovered it, you're likely well within any grace period. 2. The fact that you looked into marketplace coverage and decided against it actually works in your favor - it shows you weren't trying to "double-dip" or hide income. That's important context to mention when you call. 3. Keep your tax forms showing the Medicaid coverage along with any documentation of your marketplace research. This timeline helps demonstrate you acted in good faith throughout. 4. When you call, ask specifically about "retroactive eligibility determination" - this is the formal process they use to review these cases, and using the correct terminology can help ensure you're transferred to the right department. The system really wasn't designed to handle the pandemic-era automatic renewals smoothly, so you're definitely not alone in this situation. States are generally being reasonable about resolving these cases when people come forward voluntarily.
Thank you for this professional perspective, Avery! The "discovery grace period" concept is really important - I had no idea that was even a thing. It makes so much sense that states would have policies in place for when people naturally discover coverage during events like tax season. Your point about mentioning that I looked into marketplace coverage is brilliant. I was actually worried that might make things look worse somehow, but you're right that it demonstrates I was trying to be responsible about getting coverage through proper channels. I'll definitely include that context when I call. The terminology tip about "retroactive eligibility determination" is exactly what I needed. I've been struggling with how to explain my situation when I call, and using the correct administrative language should help me get connected to someone who deals with these cases regularly rather than getting stuck in general customer service. It's reassuring to hear from someone who sees these cases professionally that states are generally being reasonable about pandemic-era renewals. This whole situation felt so unique and scary, but it's clear from this thread and your insight that it's actually a fairly common administrative issue with established resolution procedures.
This thread has been incredibly enlightening! I'm dealing with a nearly identical situation where I discovered Medicaid coverage for 2023 that I wasn't aware of, and my income was definitely above the eligibility threshold. Reading through everyone's experiences has transformed this from a terrifying situation into something that feels manageable. The key takeaways that have given me confidence are: 1. This is apparently much more common than I thought, especially due to pandemic-era automatic renewals 2. States have established procedures for handling these "discovery" cases differently from fraud cases 3. Voluntary reporting is crucial and seems to significantly impact how cases are classified 4. Documentation is key - both for protecting yourself and demonstrating good faith I'm planning to call my state office this week using the advice shared here: - Ask for an eligibility specialist who handles retroactive determinations - Emphasize that I'm voluntarily reporting a potential discrepancy I discovered during tax preparation - Request written documentation of whatever resolution they provide - Mention that I had researched marketplace coverage but chose not to enroll due to cost The professional insight from Avery about "discovery grace periods" and using proper terminology was particularly valuable. It's clear that while this situation is stressful, there are established pathways to resolve it without major penalties when handled proactively and honestly. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community support has been invaluable for navigating what initially felt like an impossible situation!
This is such a comprehensive summary of all the great advice shared in this thread! I'm in a similar situation and have been reading through everyone's experiences multiple times to build up the courage to make that call to my state office. Your action plan is spot-on - I'm basically going to follow the exact same approach. The terminology tips and emphasis on voluntary reporting seem to be the common themes from everyone who had successful resolutions. One thing I wanted to add that helped me feel better about this whole situation: I realized that if the government systems automatically renewed me without my knowledge or input, then logically they must have procedures in place for when people discover this and want to correct it. It's not like we're the first people this has ever happened to! I'm going to call next week and will definitely update this thread with my experience. The community support here has been amazing - it's turned what felt like a potential disaster into just another administrative task to handle. Thanks for putting together such a clear summary of the key points!
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now! Got a W2 from my employer's disability provider with zeros in all wage boxes but about $5,200 in Box 12 Code J from when I was out on medical leave. After reading through everyone's responses here, I feel much more confident about just leaving this W2 off my return entirely. It sounds like multiple people have successfully done this without any issues from the IRS. The fact that Code J specifically indicates non-taxable benefits makes sense - why would I need to report income that isn't actually income? I was initially worried about "hiding" a W2 from the IRS, but now I understand they're not expecting me to report non-taxable amounts anyway. Going to go ahead and e-file without including it. Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations and real-world experiences - this community is so helpful for navigating these confusing tax situations!
I'm going through this exact same thing right now too! It's so confusing when you first see a W2 with all zeros but then money in Box 12. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring - especially hearing from people who actually left these W2s off their returns and had no problems. I think the key thing I learned is that Code J is specifically for non-taxable sick pay/disability, so the IRS literally doesn't expect us to report it as income. It makes sense that the tax software gets confused because it's programmed to flag unusual situations, but this is actually a normal scenario that happens to lots of people on medical leave. Going to follow the same approach as @Jasmine Hancock and @Andre Laurent and just e-file without it. Thanks everyone for sharing your real experiences - it s so'much more helpful than trying to decode IRS publications on your own!
I just went through this same situation a few months ago! Had a W2 from my company's short-term disability provider with $0 in all wage boxes but about $3,100 in Box 12 Code J. After doing some research and calling the IRS directly (which took forever to get through), they confirmed that Code J amounts are non-taxable sick pay benefits that don't need to be reported as income on your return. The agent told me that many people get confused by this because they think every W2 has to be included, but that's not the case when there's no taxable income involved. I ended up leaving it off my return completely and e-filed through FreeTaxUSA without any issues. Got my refund processed normally and never heard anything from the IRS about the "missing" W2. The key thing to remember is that your employer sends this W2 for documentation purposes - they're required to report any payments they made to you, even if they're non-taxable. But you're only required to report taxable income to the IRS, which in this case is zero. Don't let H&R Block's software limitations force you into mailing your return. Just file electronically without this W2 and keep the physical copy with your tax records for your own documentation.
Wow, it's really reassuring to hear from someone who actually called the IRS directly and got confirmation! That must have taken incredible patience to get through to an actual agent. Your experience really solidifies what everyone else has been saying about Code J amounts being purely informational. I'm in the exact same boat with a similar amount ($4,250 vs your $3,100) and was getting really frustrated with H&R Block's software. It's good to know that FreeTaxUSA handled it without any issues when you left the W2 off completely. Thanks for sharing the specific details about what the IRS agent told you - that's exactly the kind of official confirmation I was hoping to find. Going to follow your approach and just e-file without including this W2. Really appreciate you taking the time to call the IRS and share what you learned with the rest of us!
Anastasia Kozlov
Has anyone tried just using the IRS e-file system instead of faxing? I've submitted most of my documents electronically through their portals and haven't needed to fax anything for the past two years.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
ā¢E-file is great for tax returns, but there are tons of other IRS forms that can't be e-filed. Things like penalty abatements, audit responses, and amended returns often need to be faxed or mailed. The IRS is slowly modernizing but still has a long way to go!
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
ā¢Thanks for explaining that. I guess I've been lucky that my tax situation has been simple enough to handle through e-file. Sounds like faxing is still necessary for more complex situations. Crazy that in 2025 we're still relying on 1980s technology to communicate with the government!
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
I've been using RingCentral Fax for sending documents to the IRS and it's been solid. What I really like about it is that they provide detailed transmission reports that include not just delivery confirmation, but also the exact time stamps and even the quality of the transmission. One thing I learned the hard way - always double-check the IRS fax number you're sending to. Different departments have different fax numbers, and I once sent my documents to the wrong one and had to resend everything. The IRS website has a directory of fax numbers by department and form type. Also, if you're sending multiple pages, I'd recommend calling the IRS first to confirm they received everything. Even with confirmation receipts, pages can sometimes get separated or lost in their system. Better to verify than to find out months later that they're missing page 3 of your submission!
0 coins
Lucas Turner
ā¢That's a great point about double-checking the fax numbers! I made a similar mistake once and it was such a headache. Do you happen to know if there's a specific page on the IRS website that lists all the department fax numbers? I've had trouble finding a comprehensive directory in the past and usually end up calling to confirm the right number, which defeats the purpose of trying to avoid phone calls in the first place.
0 coins