Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Does anyone know if there are any pending changes to the UCC 9-616 requirements? I heard there might be some updates to consumer protection provisions in the works.
I haven't seen any specific proposed changes to UCC 9-616, but there's always discussion about enhancing consumer protections in secured transactions. The best practice is to follow current requirements and stay tuned to UCC updates from your state's Secretary of State office.
Makes sense. I'll keep an eye on the UCC updates. For now, I'll stick with the current notice requirements.
UPDATE: I sent the UCC 9-616 notice via certified mail yesterday and it was delivered today. Used the language suggestions from this thread and included all the specific details about the terminated financing statement. Thanks everyone for the help! This was definitely a learning experience and I'm updating our consumer goods procedures to include automatic 9-616 notices going forward.
Great to hear you got it sorted out! Updating your procedures is smart - it's easy to forget about the consumer notice requirement when you're used to commercial filings.
Excellent follow-up. Having good procedures for consumer goods terminations will save you time and stress on future deals.
Join the conversation
I ran into something similar and ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to cross-check my security agreements against what should have been filed. It helped me realize there were discrepancies in how the debtor name was recorded that were causing my search problems. Once I knew exactly what to look for, I found the filing right away.
How long does the analysis usually take? Sometimes these automated tools are slow.
Super fast, like a few minutes max. Much quicker than manually comparing documents line by line.
Just wanted to circle back and say thanks for posting this question. I'm in a similar situation with an old filing and these suggestions are really helpful. Going to try the secured party search approach first.
Glad it's helpful! I'll update the thread once I track down my UCC number. Hopefully one of these methods works.
Definitely post an update, I'm curious which approach ends up working best.
Join the conversation
THE WHOLE UCC SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO PROTECT LENDERS AT YOUR EXPENSE! They want to make sure they can take your equipment if you miss payments. Texas makes it easy for them to file these liens. Just remember - once they file that UCC-1, they have priority over almost everyone else if you default.
Don't let the dramatics scare you. UCC filings are standard business practice. If you make your loan payments, the filing is just paperwork. It's only an issue if you default, which hopefully won't happen.
easy to say when its not your equipment on the line! just saying people should understand what theyre signing up for
Quick question - are you set up as an LLC or corporation? The entity type affects how the UCC-1 should be filed. Make sure your lender has the right organizational structure information.
For LLCs, they need to use your exact registered name as filed with the Texas Secretary of State. Any variation can cause the filing to be legally insufficient.
This is another area where document verification helps - makes sure your LLC formation docs match exactly with what goes on the UCC-1.
Join the conversation
Another option is to use Certana.ai if you have any corporate documents to cross-reference. I've used it when state portals were down and needed to verify debtor name consistency before filing. Upload your loan docs and borrower's corporate charter, and it'll flag any name discrepancies that could cause filing issues later.
I've heard good things about automated document checking for UCC prep work.
Anything that reduces manual document review time is worth considering in my book.
UPDATE: Tried the early morning search and it worked! Found two existing UCC-1 filings I need to review before proceeding. Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
Make sure to check if those existing UCCs cover the same collateral you're planning to file against.
Good catch on finding those existing liens. Could have been a nasty surprise later.
Giovanni Martello
One more thing to check - make sure your secured party information is still current on the UCC-3. If the lender has changed their business name, address, or legal structure since the original filing, that could cause issues too. I've seen amendments rejected because the secured party name didn't match what was on the original UCC-1.
0 coins
Giovanni Martello
•Exactly. For amendments, everything has to match the original filing exactly unless you're specifically amending those details. Any changes to secured party info would need to be done through a separate amendment or you'd need to be very specific about what you're changing.
0 coins
Savannah Weiner
•This is such a pain point with UCC filings. The rules are so strict about matching but the error messages are so vague. At least now there are better tools to help identify these issues before you submit.
0 coins
Levi Parker
UPDATE: Finally got it resolved! It was indeed a debtor name formatting issue - the original UCC-1 had 'Manufacturing, LLC' with a comma before LLC, but I was filing the amendment as 'Manufacturing LLC' without the comma. Used one of those document comparison tools mentioned here and it flagged the discrepancy immediately. The amended UCC-3 went through without any problems once I fixed the punctuation. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about checking the exact formatting. What a learning experience!
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•Great outcome! This is exactly the kind of formatting issue that trips up so many filers. The comma placement thing is super common - glad the document checker helped you spot it quickly.
0 coins
Norah Quay
•Perfect example of why these UCC statement form rejections happen. The systems are so literal about name matching. Congrats on getting it resolved before your deadline!
0 coins