


Ask the community...
The real challenge with multi-state UCC management isn't just tracking deadlines - it's staying current with rule changes. States modify their requirements periodically and you might not realize it until a filing gets rejected. I try to check state websites quarterly but it's time-consuming.
Rule changes are definitely an issue. Michigan changed their debtor name requirements a couple years ago and I didn't realize it until several filings got rejected.
My advice is to start with getting your current data clean and organized, then worry about the tracking system. If your underlying information is wrong, no amount of automation will help. Make sure you have the exact debtor names, correct filing numbers, and accurate filing dates for everything currently active.
A clean data foundation is essential. I spent months building elaborate tracking systems before realizing half my underlying data was wrong. Had to start over from scratch.
This is where document verification tools can actually help a lot. Instead of manually auditing 200 filings, you can upload them and let software flag the obvious issues.
I went through something similar when we acquired a healthcare equipment financing portfolio. What finally worked for us was creating a detailed checklist for each UCC-3 assignment: exact debtor name match, correct filing number, proper assignee information, and appropriate fee calculation. We also started using a document verification tool to double-check everything before submission.
Which document verification tool did you use? We're looking for something to help with our due diligence process.
We started using Certana.ai after our legal department recommended it. You just upload the original UCC-1 and your new UCC-3 assignment, and it flags any inconsistencies automatically. Much faster than manual comparison.
Don't forget to check if any of the original secured parties had name changes since the original UCC-1 filings. If the assignor bank changed names or was acquired by another institution, you might need additional documentation to establish the chain of title.
Possibly. You might need to file UCC-3 amendments to update the secured party name first, then file your assignments. Check with your attorney on the proper sequence.
Check if the business has gone through any name changes since the original filing. Sometimes companies update their legal name with the state but don't file UCC-3 amendments to reflect the change, so the UCC records still show the old name.
Good thought - I should verify the current legal name with the MA Secretary of Corporations division before assuming the UCC search name is correct.
Definitely check that. I've seen situations where a business changed from LLC to Corp or vice versa, and the UCC filing still had the old entity type.
MA UCC database search is notoriously finicky. I've learned to try every possible variation: with/without punctuation, with/without entity designation, abbreviated vs spelled out words, etc. It's tedious but sometimes that's the only way to find what you're looking for. Their wildcard search function barely works either.
Update: Found it! Turns out the original filing had 'NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, LLC' with a comma before LLC. Such a tiny difference but it completely threw off the search. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - the filing number search worked once I located that in our loan file.
This thread is making me paranoid about my own continuation filings. Maybe I should start using some kind of document verification tool before I submit anything.
Definitely worth it. The stress of rejected filings and tight deadlines isn't worth saving a few bucks on verification.
I've been using Certana for about six months now. Upload your original UCC-1 and new filing, and it instantly shows any mismatches. Caught three potential rejections for me already.
Update us when you get the corrected filing approved! Always curious to hear how these Tennessee name-matching issues get resolved.
Good luck! Tennessee's system is frustrating but at least it's consistent in its pickiness.
Fingers crossed for a quick approval. These name mismatch rejections are the worst part of UCC practice.
Miguel Ramos
Quick update for anyone following this thread - I refiled the UCC-3 termination using the exact debtor name from the original UCC-1 ('Johnson Manufacturing' without the LLC) and it was accepted within 24 hours. Sometimes the simple approach really is the best approach. Thanks again for all the help!
0 coins
StarSailor
•Perfect timing for your client's refinance too. Nice work getting it sorted quickly.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Great outcome. This thread will be super helpful for anyone dealing with similar name mismatch issues.
0 coins
Yara Sabbagh
This is why I love this forum. Real solutions from people who've actually dealt with these problems. The Georgia SOS quirks can be so frustrating but threads like this make it manageable.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•Totally agree. So much better than trying to decipher the official SOS guidance documents.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•The collective wisdom here is invaluable. I've learned more from this forum than from any training course.
0 coins