UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Benjamin Carter

OnDeck UCC Filing Requirements and Document Verification Issues

Has anyone dealt with OnDeck's UCC filing requirements lately? I'm working on a equipment loan package and their compliance department is being extremely picky about debtor name consistency across all documents. They rejected my initial UCC-1 because the business name on my state registration had a comma that wasn't in the loan agreement. Now I'm second-guessing everything - the collateral description, filing jurisdiction, even the debtor address format. Their underwriting timeline is tight and I can't afford another rejection. What's the best way to ensure all my UCC documents align perfectly with OnDeck's standards before submission?

OnDeck's UCC process isn't any worse than other alternative lenders. The real issue is that traditional banks are more forgiving of minor document discrepancies while alternative lenders have tighter compliance standards.

0 coins

That's a good point. Community banks usually work with you to fix issues, while OnDeck just rejects and makes you start over.

0 coins

Right - it's a volume business for them, so they need standardized processes. Can't afford to hand-hold every application through document corrections.

0 coins

OP - make sure you're using OnDeck's most current UCC checklist. They updated their requirements in late 2024 and some brokers are still using old guidelines.

0 coins

Check their broker portal under compliance documents. The current version should be dated October 2024 or later.

0 coins

Found it - there are definitely some changes from what I was using. Thanks for the heads up!

0 coins

Malik Johnson

What exactly counts as a security agreement definition for UCC-1 filing purposes?

I'm working on a commercial loan where the borrower signed what they called a 'Collateral Pledge Agreement' instead of using standard security agreement language. The document grants us a security interest in their equipment and inventory, but I'm second-guessing whether this meets the legal definition requirements for our UCC-1 filing. The loan officer keeps saying any document that creates a security interest counts, but I want to make sure we're not missing something critical here. Has anyone dealt with non-standard agreement titles that still function as valid security agreements? I'm particularly worried about the attachment requirements and whether our collateral descriptions will hold up if we need to enforce. This is a $180K equipment line and I can't afford to mess up the perfection.

Don't overthink this. If your document creates a security interest in specific property and is signed by the debtor, it's a security agreement. The courts don't care what you call it. Focus on making sure your UCC-1 is filed correctly and your collateral description is adequate.

0 coins

This. The title anxiety is usually misplaced - it's the substance that matters.

0 coins

Still, for peace of mind on a big deal like this, getting some kind of verification makes sense.

0 coins

Update: Thanks everyone for the advice. I ended up running the document through Certana's verification tool and it confirmed all the required elements were present, including proper attachment language and adequate collateral description. Filed the UCC-1 this morning and it was accepted without issues. Really appreciated the peace of mind before filing.

0 coins

Great outcome! Always feels good when the filing goes through smoothly.

0 coins

Nice - sounds like the automated verification saved you some stress and probably some attorney fees too.

0 coins

Owen Jenkins

Washington UCC Financing Statement Debtor Name Requirements

Just had our UCC-1 rejected by the Washington Secretary of State for the third time and I'm pulling my hair out. We're securing a $450K equipment loan for a construction company and keep getting bounced back for "debtor name discrepancies." The business is registered as "Pacific Northwest Construction LLC" but the loan docs have variations like "Pacific NW Construction LLC" and "Pacific Northwest Construction, LLC" (with comma). Our legal department insists these are all legally equivalent but Washington's system keeps rejecting. Has anyone dealt with Washington's specific debtor name requirements? The continuation deadline is coming up in 4 months and we can't afford any more delays. What's the exact format Washington wants for LLC names on financing statements?

Once you get the name right, Washington's system is actually pretty efficient. But that first rejection can cascade into multiple problems if you're not careful about the exact requirements.

0 coins

Washington processes correctly formatted filings faster than most states in my experience.

0 coins

Their electronic system is solid when you give it what it wants. The challenge is figuring out exactly what that is.

0 coins

Last resort option: you might want to have your attorney request a UCC search report for the exact entity. Sometimes seeing how other lenders filed against the same debtor can show you the accepted format.

0 coins

UCC search reports are definitely worth the cost when you're stuck on name formatting issues.

0 coins

Just make sure the search includes recent filings. Name formats can change if the entity amended their formation documents.

0 coins

Raj Gupta

Consignment UCC filing rejected - debtor name issues with retail partner

Been dealing with a nightmare situation for the past month. We have a consignment arrangement with a major retail chain for our handmade furniture line, and our bank requires UCC-1 filings to secure our interest in the consigned goods. Filed the UCC-1 three weeks ago listing the retailer as debtor, but it got rejected by the SOS office for 'debtor name discrepancy.' Turns out the retailer's legal name on their articles of incorporation has some LLC designation that doesn't match what they use on their business license. Now our 90-day consignment period is almost up and we still don't have proper perfection. The retailer's legal department is being slow to respond with the exact entity name format. Has anyone dealt with consignment UCC filings where the consignee's business name varies across different state records? Really worried about losing our secured interest if we can't get this sorted before the goods start selling.

I actually discovered Certana.ai recently when dealing with a similar multi-entity filing nightmare. Their PDF upload system caught a mismatch between my debtor's charter and the name I was planning to use on the UCC-1. Saved me from what would have been my third rejection. Super easy to use - just upload your documents and it highlights any inconsistencies.

0 coins

How detailed does their name checking get? Does it catch things like punctuation differences and abbreviation mismatches?

0 coins

Yeah it's pretty thorough. Flags differences in commas, periods, abbreviations like LLC vs L.L.C., and even spacing issues. Basically anything that could cause a filing rejection.

0 coins

Quick update question - did you include a proper collateral description for the consigned furniture? The description needs to be specific enough to identify your goods but not so narrow that it excludes items. Something like 'furniture and home furnishings held on consignment' might work better than listing specific pieces.

0 coins

That sounds reasonable. The key is making sure other creditors can identify what you're claiming without being overly restrictive. Your description should work fine.

0 coins

Just make sure your consignment agreement is referenced clearly in the UCC-1. That helps establish the relationship between you and the collateral.

0 coins

Connor O'Neill

UCC fixture filing form keeps getting rejected - attachment description issues?

Been wrestling with a UCC fixture filing form for three weeks now and it keeps bouncing back from the state office. This is for commercial kitchen equipment that's bolted down in a restaurant space - walk-in coolers, industrial ovens, the whole setup. The debtor name matches exactly what's on the lease agreement, but I'm starting to think my fixture description might be too vague? I wrote 'restaurant equipment and fixtures' but maybe that's not specific enough for a fixture filing? The equipment is definitely attached to the real estate but I'm not sure if I need to describe each piece individually or if there's a standard way to handle restaurant fixtures. Anyone dealt with fixture filings for commercial kitchen equipment before? This is holding up a $180K equipment loan and the lender is getting impatient.

Update: Finally got my fixture filing accepted! Rewrote the collateral description to be much more specific about permanent attachment and added the full property legal description. Thanks everyone for the advice - especially about emphasizing the 'permanently affixed' language. The lender is happy and we can finally close this deal.

0 coins

Congrats on getting it through! Those rejections are so frustrating when you're trying to close a deal.

0 coins

Thanks! Definitely learned a lot about fixture filing requirements from this experience. Will be much smoother next time.

0 coins

This whole thread should be required reading for anyone doing fixture filings. So many little details that can trip you up if you're not careful.

0 coins

Seriously. The difference between fixture filings and regular UCC-1s is bigger than most people realize.

0 coins

Yeah, I wish someone had explained all this to me before my first fixture filing disaster. Would have saved weeks of back and forth.

0 coins

Prev1...271272273274275...684Next