Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Javier Cruz
Whatever you do, don't rush the filing. SBA deals have enough moving parts already without adding UCC problems to the mix. Take the time to get the collateral description right.
Emma Wilson
•This is solid advice. Better to take an extra day or two than deal with rejection and refiling.
You're right. I'll slow down and make sure everything is properly coordinated before filing. Thanks everyone for the guidance.
Malik Thomas
Just to add - keep copies of everything. SBA audits sometimes happen years later and they'll want to see that your UCC filings properly supported the original loan security.
NeonNebula
•Great point about documentation. SBA has long memories when it comes to loan compliance.
Definitely maintain a full filing record. Helps with any future amendments or continuation filings too.
Join the conversation
One more thing - when you refile, make sure the UCC-1 collateral description matches how the equipment is described in your loan agreement. I've seen cases where the collateral description was too vague and caused perfection issues later.
Collateral descriptions should be specific enough to identify the equipment but not so detailed that minor variations cause problems.
Exactly right. Something like 'chiropractic adjustment tables and digital radiographic equipment' is usually sufficient.
Diez Ellis
Update us when you get it resolved! Always good to hear success stories for future reference.
Esteban Tate
•Will do! Thanks everyone for the help. Feeling much more confident about getting this sorted out.
These threads are so helpful for learning about common filing issues.
Join the conversation
Just to pile on here - definitely no UCC 11 California form. Your lender probably has internal form numbers that don't match state forms. Focus on the UCC-3 continuation and get that debtor name corrected first. California SOS doesn't play games with name mismatches.
AstroAce
•Thanks everyone. I feel much more confident about what I need to do now. Going to tackle the name amendment first, then the continuation.
Liam Mendez
•Good plan. And definitely double-check everything before submitting. One wrong character can cause a rejection.
Late to this thread but wanted to add - I've seen the 'UCC 11' confusion before. Banks sometimes use their own internal numbering that doesn't match state forms. Always go directly to the Secretary of State website for the correct forms. California uses standard UCC-1, UCC-3, etc.
AstroAce
•Lesson learned. Always verify form numbers with the actual filing office.
And if you're not 100% sure about document consistency, tools like Certana.ai can help verify everything matches before you file. Worth checking out for peace of mind.
Join the conversation
Oscar O'Neil
I used Certana.ai recently for a similar situation and it saved me from making an expensive mistake. Uploaded my UCC-1 and the equipment loan agreement, and it caught that our debtor name on the filing didn't exactly match our current corporate registration. Would have been embarrassing to find that out after spending $90 on records that showed the mismatch.
Oscar O'Neil
•Pretty accurate in my experience. It's specifically designed for UCC document consistency so it knows what to look for. Just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.
I've heard good things about Certana for catching these kinds of document mismatches before they become problems with lenders.
Bottom line - if your lender specifically requested certified copies, you're probably stuck paying the $90. But if they just need verification of the filing, there are cheaper alternatives. The key is clarifying exactly what they need before you spend the money.
Lola Perez
•I'll call them tomorrow to clarify. Hopefully they'll accept something less expensive than the full certified copy.
Good plan. Most reasonable lenders will work with you on documentation requirements if you explain the cost difference.
Jacinda Yu
I ran into a similar issue recently and ended up using one of those commercial UCC search services that claims to check multiple name variations automatically. Cost a bit more than doing it myself but saved tons of time and they found 2 additional filings I had missed. Might be worth considering for high-stakes deals.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
•I used CT Corporation's UCC search service. They were thorough and provided a detailed report showing all the name variations they searched. A bit pricey but worth it for peace of mind on bigger transactions.
0 coins
Shelby Bauman
•Commercial services can be good, but I've found Certana.ai gives me more control over the process while still catching those name variations automatically. Plus I can verify the document consistency myself rather than just trusting a search report.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
Update us when you figure out which of those filings are actually for your target company! I'm curious how many of the 8 total filings (3 + 5) end up being legitimate hits vs false matches from similar company names.
0 coins
Charity Cohan
•Will do! I'm planning to spend tomorrow morning going through each filing systematically and cross-referencing addresses and other details. Should be able to narrow down which ones are actually relevant.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
•Looking forward to hearing how it turns out. These kinds of real-world examples are super helpful for understanding how to handle similar situations.
0 coins