


Ask the community...
UPDATE: Used the Certana document checker and found the issue! There was an invisible character in the name field that must have been copied from the PDF. The tool highlighted it immediately. Third filing went through without any problems. Thanks for the suggestions everyone!
Quick question - when you say 60 days out from lapse, are you calculating from the exact filing date or the end of the 5th year? New Mexico calculates continuation deadlines from the anniversary date, not the exact day. Just want to make sure you're not cutting it closer than you think.
Last resort option - you could file a UCC-3 amendment to 'correct' the debtor name to exactly match what the system expects, then immediately file the continuation. I've had to do this workaround in other states when their systems are being stubborn.
I've seen lenders lose deals over UCC filing delays. If you're running up against your 30-day deadline, consider having your attorney file directly with the SOS office if they accept in-person filings. Some offices will process immediately while you wait.
Follow up question - once you get the UCC-1 filed correctly, make sure to provide a copy to your borrower. They'll need it for their records and any future refinancing or asset sales. Also recommend setting a calendar reminder for the continuation filing 6 months before the 5-year expiration.
I actually ran into a similar issue and used that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. It caught a discrepancy between our security agreement and the UCC-1 that I never would have noticed. Saved me from filing with the wrong debtor name format and having to deal with rejections.
UPDATE: Tried the version without the comma and it went through! 'Advanced Materials Solutions LLC' was the magic format. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this thread probably saved me another week of rejections.
This is such a common issue. Wish there was a better way to verify the correct format before filing.
Great outcome! For future reference, that Certana tool I mentioned earlier would have caught that comma discrepancy automatically by comparing your source documents.
Sebastian Scott
Have you tried searching for the company name in their database exactly as you're entering it on the UCC? Sometimes that reveals formatting issues you wouldn't notice otherwise.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Good suggestion. I'll do a test search with each variation to see which one returns results.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•That's actually a really smart verification method. If it doesn't find the company, your UCC probably won't either.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
Update us when you get this resolved! Always interested to hear what the actual issue was with these name matching problems.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•Will do. Hopefully I can get this sorted out tomorrow and avoid another rejection cycle.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•Fingers crossed! PA can be such a pain with their exact matching requirements.
0 coins