UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I actually started using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier after having a continuation rejected last year. Really simple - just upload your PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies between your original UCC-1 and the continuation form. Found two small discrepancies I never would have caught manually. Definitely worth using before you submit, especially for high-value collateral like equipment.

0 coins

Sounds like multiple people have had good luck with that service. I'll check it out before filing.

0 coins

Yeah, the PDF upload workflow is super straightforward. Beats trying to compare documents line by line yourself.

0 coins

One more thing - make sure you get a filed copy back from the SOS with the filing stamp. Don't just assume it went through correctly. I've had filings that appeared to process but were actually rejected days later due to system glitches. Always verify the continuation was actually accepted and filed.

0 coins

Good point. I'll make sure to follow up and get confirmation that it's properly filed.

0 coins

Most states have online systems where you can check filing status, but definitely get the official stamped copy for your records.

0 coins

Glad you got it working! Those continuation deadlines are no joke. I missed one by two days last year because of portal issues and the client was NOT happy about their lien potentially lapsing. Now I always file continuations at least a month early.

0 coins

Yeah, I'm definitely building in more buffer time after today. The stress of watching a $2M lien potentially expire because of website problems is not worth cutting it close.

0 coins

Smart move. I tell all my clients that UCC filings should be treated like tax deadlines - if you wait until the last minute, technology will find a way to screw you over.

0 coins

This thread convinced me to check that Certana verification tool someone mentioned. Just uploaded a UCC-1 and UCC-3 pair and it immediately caught that I had the wrong middle initial on the debtor name. Would have been rejected for sure. Pretty slick tool.

0 coins

Nice! That's exactly the kind of error that causes rejections. The tool really shines at catching those tiny inconsistencies that are easy to miss when you're rushing to meet deadlines.

0 coins

Good to know it actually works. I'll probably give it a try on my continuation forms before submitting just to be safe. Today was too stressful.

0 coins

Side note - anyone else notice that the PDF forms from some states don't fill out properly in Adobe? I've had better luck with Chrome's built-in PDF viewer for filling out UCC-3 forms.

0 coins

Must be something about how they created the form fields. Technology issues on top of bureaucracy issues.

0 coins

I always save a backup copy before filling anything out, just in case the form glitches.

0 coins

Update: Found the current forms for all three states and got the amendments filed successfully. Turns out two of the rejections were actually due to missing filing fees (duh) and one was the old form issue. Thanks everyone for the help! That Certana tool someone mentioned actually caught a small discrepancy in one of the debtor names that I would have missed.

0 coins

Glad it worked out! The document checker really does save time and headaches.

0 coins

Filing fees - classic mistake we've all made at least once. Good catch on getting everything sorted.

0 coins

I've been using Certana.ai for all my multi-state UCC work and it's been a game-changer. Upload your formation documents and UCC forms together and it catches these exact formatting issues before filing. No more rejection fees and angry clients.

0 coins

How does it handle state-specific quirks like ND's period requirements in entity names?

0 coins

It cross-references your documents against each state's database formatting rules. Flags inconsistencies before you file so you can fix them upfront.

0 coins

Update: Got it figured out! The issue was indeed the "L.L.C." vs "LLC" formatting plus there was an extra space after the entity name in my filing. Used the exact format from the ND database search and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help - this saved my client relationship.

0 coins

At least ND finally accepted it. Still think their system is overly picky but good to know the exact requirements.

0 coins

Perfect example of why precision matters in UCC filings. One small formatting error can delay the entire secured transaction.

0 coins

UCC future advances clause rejected - debtor name issue or collateral description problem?

Having major headaches with a UCC future advances filing that keeps getting bounced back from the Secretary of State. This is for a $2.8M revolving credit facility where we need to secure potential future loan draws over the next 18 months. The debtor is a manufacturing LLC that's been expanding rapidly and will need additional equipment financing as they grow. Original UCC-1 was filed 3 years ago for their initial $1.2M term loan, but now we're trying to amend it to include future advances language for the new revolving facility. Problem is every time we submit the UCC-3 amendment, it gets rejected. The rejection notice just says 'debtor name discrepancy' but I've triple-checked the exact legal name against their articles of incorporation. The collateral description includes 'all equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, and future advances as may be made under Credit Agreement dated December 15, 2024.' Is this wording causing the problem? Some colleagues think the future advances reference needs to be more specific about dollar amounts or time periods, but I've seen plenty of filings with similar language that went through fine. Anyone dealt with future advances rejections lately? The borrower is getting antsy because they need to close on some new machinery purchases and can't move forward without the perfected security interest in place. Really need to figure out what's triggering these rejections.

Make sure you're using the correct UCC-3 form type too. Some states have different amendment forms for adding collateral vs. continuing the filing vs. other changes. If you're adding new collateral types you might need an 'additional collateral' amendment rather than a general amendment.

0 coins

Delaware's pretty straightforward but worth verifying. Their UCC section website should have form instructions.

0 coins

Mei Lin

Some states are really particular about which amendment form you use for different types of changes.

0 coins

Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar situation and want to know what the solution ends up being.

0 coins

Will do! Going to try the document verification tool first, then re-file with extra attention to the exact debtor name formatting.

0 coins

Following this thread too, dealing with my own future advances headaches.

0 coins

Prev1...267268269270271...685Next