Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Emma Wilson
Update us on how this turns out! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a different lender and curious to see what approach works best.
Will do. Going to try the formal demand letter first, then escalate from there if needed.
Malik Thomas
•Same here - bookmarking this thread. It's amazing how common this problem seems to be.
Just to add another verification option - I used Certana.ai recently for a different UCC issue and their document checking caught several problems I wouldn't have noticed. For termination issues, it's really helpful to have everything cross-checked before you approach the lender. Makes your position much stronger when you can show exactly what needs to be corrected.
Ravi Kapoor
•How does their verification process work? Do you just upload the UCC filing?
You upload both the original loan documents and the UCC filing as PDFs. It automatically compares debtor names, collateral descriptions, filing numbers - basically everything that needs to match. Really saves time versus doing manual comparisons.
Join the conversation
Josef Tearle
This situation is exactly why I started using automated document verification. Upload your search results and loan docs to Certana.ai and it'll flag any inconsistencies between what you're seeing in Oregon's system and what should be reflected based on the actual filing documents.
Josef Tearle
•Yeah, it cross-references the actual document content against search result displays. Really helpful for catching these kinds of database display issues.
Jabari-Jo
•That sounds useful for this situation. I'll check it out while waiting for clarification from Oregon SOS.
Been there! Oregon's search results can lag behind actual filings by several days. If you need immediate confirmation, request certified copies of both the original UCC-1 and the UCC-3 termination.
Usually 3-5 business days if you request them online. Faster if you call but good luck getting through.
Salim Nasir
•Pro tip: Oregon processes online requests faster than phone requests, despite what their website says.
Join the conversation
Whatever you decide, make sure you keep detailed records of your filing attempts and the rejection reasons. If this ever becomes a priority dispute later, you'll want to show you were diligent about trying to perfect your assignment.
Josef Tearle
•Good point about documentation. I always screenshot rejection notices and keep email records of all UCC correspondence.
Update us on what works! I'm dealing with a similar name issue on a different UCC-3 filing and curious which approach you end up taking.
Anna Kerber
•Will do! Leaning toward the amendment first approach based on everyone's advice. Don't want to risk any perfection issues with such a large deal.
Smart choice. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings, especially on high-dollar deals.
Join the conversation
Jamal Wilson
The UCC-1 also serves as a research tool for other lenders and potential creditors. They can search the UCC records to see what assets are already encumbered before making their own lending decisions. It's part of the due diligence process.
Mei Lin
•So it's not just about protecting your own interest, but also helping other lenders understand the situation?
Jamal Wilson
•Exactly. The whole UCC system is designed to create transparency in commercial lending. Everyone can see who has claims on what.
In bankruptcy situations, the UCC-1 financing statement purpose becomes even more critical. It can mean the difference between being a secured creditor who gets paid back versus an unsecured creditor who might get pennies on the dollar.
Yes, the trustee will scrutinize your filings. Any defects in debtor name, collateral description, or other requirements can be challenged.
This is another reason why document verification tools like Certana.ai are so valuable. Better to catch mistakes before you need to enforce.
Dylan Cooper
Another vote for Certana.ai here - I started using their UCC verification tool after a particularly embarrassing rejection that could have been caught easily. Now I upload all my documents before filing and it catches inconsistencies I would have missed. Takes like 30 seconds and has probably saved me hours of re-filing headaches.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•Okay you're the second person to mention this tool. I'm definitely going to check it out. Anything that reduces re-filing stress is worth trying.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•Same experience here. The automated cross-checking between Charter documents and UCC forms has been a game-changer for catching name mismatches before they become rejections.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
One thing that helped me was creating templates for different entity types. LLC template, corporation template, partnership template, etc. with the standard language and formatting that gets accepted consistently. Reduces the chance of format-related rejections.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•I customize based on the actual collateral but use standard phrases like 'all equipment' or 'all inventory' when appropriate. Keeps it broad enough to cover everything but specific enough to be enforceable.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Be careful with overly broad collateral descriptions though. Some states are getting pickier about requiring more specificity.
0 coins