DC UCC-1 form keeps getting rejected - debtor name issues?
I've been trying to file a UCC-1 in Washington DC for weeks now and it keeps getting rejected. The collateral is medical equipment for a practice we're financing, about $180k worth. The debtor is an LLC and I'm getting different rejection codes each time I resubmit. First it was debtor name format, then it was the collateral description being too vague. I've checked the exact legal name against the Articles of Organization three times. Is there something specific about DC's system that I'm missing? The continuation deadline for our existing filing is coming up in 6 months and I need to get this new filing perfected before then. Has anyone dealt with DC's particular requirements recently?
38 comments


Alejandro Castro
DC can be really picky about debtor names. Are you including the LLC designator exactly as it appears in the Articles? Sometimes they want 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out instead of just 'LLC'. Also, make sure there's no extra punctuation or spacing.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•I used 'LLC' but the Articles say 'Limited Liability Company' - that might be it! Should I also check if there are any other formatting requirements?
0 coins
Monique Byrd
•Yeah DC is super strict about that. I learned the hard way after three rejections last year.
0 coins
Jackie Martinez
What rejection codes are you getting exactly? DC usually gives pretty specific error messages. Also for medical equipment collateral, you might need to be more specific than just 'medical equipment' - they sometimes want model numbers or at least equipment categories.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•The latest rejection was 'debtor name does not match entity records' but I'm positive I have the right name. The collateral description just says 'medical diagnostic equipment' - should that be more detailed?
0 coins
Jackie Martinez
•Try 'medical diagnostic and imaging equipment' or list the specific types like MRI, X-ray, etc. DC wants enough detail to identify the collateral clearly.
0 coins
Lia Quinn
•I had the same issue with DC last month! Turns out their system is really sensitive to even minor differences in entity names.
0 coins
Haley Stokes
I've been dealing with UCC filings for 15 years and DC is definitely one of the more challenging jurisdictions. Have you tried running the debtor name through their entity search first to see exactly how it appears in their records? Sometimes there are subtle differences that aren't obvious.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•I did check their entity search but maybe I missed something. Should I be looking at the exact formatting they use in their database?
0 coins
Haley Stokes
•Exactly - copy the name character for character from their entity database. Don't trust your Articles of Organization copy, use their official record.
0 coins
Asher Levin
This might sound weird but I started using Certana.ai's document checker after getting burned on a similar situation. You can upload your Articles of Organization and your UCC-1 draft and it flags any name mismatches instantly. Saved me from another rejection cycle when I was dealing with a tricky debtor name situation.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•Never heard of that but sounds useful. Does it work with DC filings specifically?
0 coins
Asher Levin
•It checks document consistency regardless of state. Just upload your PDFs and it highlights any discrepancies between the entity docs and your UCC form before you file.
0 coins
Serene Snow
•That actually sounds really helpful for catching those small details that cause rejections.
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
UGH DC's filing system is the WORST. I swear they reject filings just to collect more fees. Their portal crashes half the time and their customer service acts like you're bothering them when you call for help.
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•I feel you on this. Spent hours on hold with them last week just to get basic filing questions answered.
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
•Their system has gotten better in the last year but yeah, it's still frustrating when you're dealing with tight deadlines.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
For medical equipment, are you filing as regular collateral or fixture filing? If the equipment is attached to the real estate you might need a fixture filing instead of a regular UCC-1.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•It's moveable equipment, not fixtures. Mostly portable diagnostic machines that can be relocated.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Good, then regular UCC-1 is correct. Just wanted to make sure you weren't missing that angle.
0 coins
Justin Trejo
•I made that mistake once - filed regular UCC when I needed fixture filing. Had to start over completely.
0 coins
Alana Willis
Are you using DC's online portal or filing by mail? I've had better luck with the online system lately, seems like they process those faster and give clearer rejection reasons.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•Using the online portal. The rejection messages are detailed but I'm still missing something obviously.
0 coins
Alana Willis
•Try calling their UCC department directly. Sometimes they can tell you exactly what's wrong over the phone.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
I had three DC rejections in a row last year because of debtor name formatting. Turned out the LLC had amended their Articles after formation and I was using the old name. Make sure you have the most current entity information.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•Oh wow, I didn't even think to check if they had amendments. That could definitely be the issue.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
•Yeah check their corporate filing history for any amendments or name changes. DC maintains pretty good records online.
0 coins
Sara Unger
•This is exactly why I always run a full entity history before doing UCC filings now.
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
Quick question - is this an original filing or are you trying to continue an existing UCC? If it's a continuation you need to use UCC-3 not UCC-1.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•This is a new original filing for new collateral. I mentioned the existing filing because we have other equipment already secured but this is separate.
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
•Got it, just wanted to make sure. I've seen people mix up continuation and new filings before.
0 coins
Freya Ross
Have you considered having someone else review your UCC-1 before filing? Sometimes a fresh set of eyes catches things you've been staring at too long. I use Certana.ai's verification tool now - it's like having an expert review without the consulting fees.
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•That's the second mention of that tool. Might be worth trying if it can catch whatever I'm missing.
0 coins
Freya Ross
•Yeah it's pretty straightforward - just upload your entity docs and UCC form and it flags inconsistencies. Beats getting another rejection.
0 coins
Leslie Parker
For what it's worth, I filed a DC UCC-1 last month for equipment financing and it went through on the first try. Used the exact entity name from their online database and made sure my collateral description was specific. Maybe try starting completely fresh instead of amending your rejected filing?
0 coins
Maggie Martinez
•That's a good point about starting fresh. I've been editing the same form each time. What did you use for your collateral description?
0 coins
Leslie Parker
•I used 'industrial manufacturing equipment and machinery' with serial numbers where available. Being specific definitely helped.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Starting fresh is good advice. Sometimes the system flags forms that have been rejected multiple times.
0 coins