< Back to UCC Document Community

Owen Jenkins

Washington UCC Financing Statement Debtor Name Requirements

Just had our UCC-1 rejected by the Washington Secretary of State for the third time and I'm pulling my hair out. We're securing a $450K equipment loan for a construction company and keep getting bounced back for "debtor name discrepancies." The business is registered as "Pacific Northwest Construction LLC" but the loan docs have variations like "Pacific NW Construction LLC" and "Pacific Northwest Construction, LLC" (with comma). Our legal department insists these are all legally equivalent but Washington's system keeps rejecting. Has anyone dealt with Washington's specific debtor name requirements? The continuation deadline is coming up in 4 months and we can't afford any more delays. What's the exact format Washington wants for LLC names on financing statements?

Washington is notoriously picky about exact name matches. You need to pull the exact entity name from the Secretary of State business registry - not from your loan documents. Go to the WA SOS website and search for the LLC. Use that EXACT spelling, punctuation, and format.

0 coins

This is correct. Washington requires the name exactly as it appears on the Articles of Organization. Even spacing matters.

0 coins

Been there! Made this mistake with a Portland client last year. The comma placement killed us.

0 coins

OMG yes Washington is the WORST for this!! I've had filings rejected for missing periods after abbreviations. Their system is so rigid it's insane.

0 coins

It's frustrating but they're actually protecting lien priority. Imagine if someone searched for the wrong name variation and missed your lien.

0 coins

I get it but come on... Pacific NW vs Pacific Northwest should be obvious to anyone.

0 coins

Had this exact issue last month with a Seattle-based borrower. After the second rejection, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your Articles of Organization and your draft UCC-1 and it instantly flags any name discrepancies before you even file. Saved me from a third rejection and the associated delays.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana.ai - does it work specifically with Washington filings? We're desperate at this point.

0 coins

It works with all states. You just upload PDFs of your formation docs and UCC forms and it cross-checks everything automatically. Way faster than manual comparison.

0 coins

Interesting. How accurate is it compared to doing the name search manually on the SOS website?

0 coins

The key with Washington is understanding they follow the UCC-9 "seriously misleading" standard very strictly. Any deviation from the registered name could make your filing ineffective against third parties, even if it gets accepted initially.

0 coins

Wait so even if they accept a slightly wrong name, the lien could be invalid later?

0 coins

Exactly. That's why they're so strict upfront. Better to reject than create a defective lien.

0 coins

Check if your LLC has any trade names or DBAs registered too. Sometimes loan docs use those instead of the legal entity name.

0 coins

Good point - they do business under a couple different names. Should we file separate UCC-1s for each?

0 coins

No, just use the registered legal entity name. DBAs don't typically require separate filings unless they're registered as separate entities.

0 coins

Are you filing electronically or paper? Washington's electronic system sometimes gives better error messages that help identify the specific name issue.

0 coins

Electronic through their portal. The error message just says "debtor name does not match registered entity" but doesn't specify what's wrong.

0 coins

Try calling their UCC division directly. Sometimes they can tell you exactly what they're seeing vs what you submitted.

0 coins

Their phone support is actually pretty helpful for UCC issues, unlike some states.

0 coins

Whatever you do don't let this drag past your continuation deadline! We had a client lose lien priority because they spent too long fighting name issues.

0 coins

That's exactly what I'm worried about. Four months seems like plenty of time but these rejections eat up weeks.

0 coins

File a continuation now with the correct name while you're still figuring out the amendment. Better safe than sorry.

0 coins

I've found that copying and pasting directly from the WA Secretary of State business search results eliminates formatting errors. Don't retype anything.

0 coins

Smart approach. Will try that for the next filing attempt.

0 coins

Yes! Hidden characters and weird spacing can get introduced when you retype.

0 coins

Just went through this nightmare with a Washington filing. Ended up using Certana's Charter→UCC-1 check workflow to verify our Articles of Incorporation matched our UCC-1 exactly. Found three tiny discrepancies I never would have caught manually - including a non-breaking space character that looked identical to a regular space. Would have been rejection #4 without that tool.

0 coins

Non-breaking space?? How do you even see that kind of thing?

0 coins

That's the beauty of automated checking - it catches invisible characters that human eyes miss. The tool highlighted the exact character positions that didn't match.

0 coins

This is why I hate electronic filings sometimes. At least with paper you knew what you were getting.

0 coins

Have you considered if this is actually a new LLC that hasn't fully processed through their system yet? Sometimes there's a lag between formation and when the name shows up in UCC searches.

0 coins

No, this LLC has been around for 3 years. Definitely not a timing issue.

0 coins

Ok good to rule that out. Then it's definitely a name formatting problem.

0 coins

Once you get the name right, Washington's system is actually pretty efficient. But that first rejection can cascade into multiple problems if you're not careful about the exact requirements.

0 coins

Efficiency is great once you're past the name hurdle. Three rejections later, I'm definitely being more careful now.

0 coins

Washington processes correctly formatted filings faster than most states in my experience.

0 coins

Their electronic system is solid when you give it what it wants. The challenge is figuring out exactly what that is.

0 coins

Last resort option: you might want to have your attorney request a UCC search report for the exact entity. Sometimes seeing how other lenders filed against the same debtor can show you the accepted format.

0 coins

Brilliant idea! If other lenders have successfully filed, we can see exactly how they formatted the debtor name.

0 coins

UCC search reports are definitely worth the cost when you're stuck on name formatting issues.

0 coins

Just make sure the search includes recent filings. Name formats can change if the entity amended their formation documents.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today