UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Amina Diallo

•

I went through this nightmare last year. Ended up having to get certified copies of the debtor's formation documents directly from Ohio SOS to see exactly how their name was filed. Turned out they had a middle initial in their corporate name that wasn't on any of their other paperwork.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Different section of their website - corporate records search. You can usually get uncertified copies online to check the exact name formatting before ordering certified ones.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

•

That's smart. I always do a corporate search first now before preparing any UCC filings. Saves so much hassle.

0 coins

Once you figure out the exact debtor name, make sure your collateral description is specific enough. 'Construction equipment' alone probably isn't sufficient - they want to know what kind of construction equipment and ideally some identifying details.

0 coins

Much better! Specific makes and models when possible, plus a catch-all phrase for related equipment. That should satisfy Ohio's requirements.

0 coins

Perfect example. Specific enough to identify the major collateral but broad enough to cover related items and attachments.

0 coins

Kaylee Cook

•

This whole thread is giving me anxiety about our own UCC filings lol. We have a bunch of equipment loans from different years and now I'm worried we might have similar issues with the continuation statements.

0 coins

Better to check now than find out during a refinance or audit. UCC filing errors can kill deals fast.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Definitely worth doing a comprehensive UCC audit annually, especially if you have multiple lenders or have gone through any business changes.

0 coins

Update - I tried that Certana.ai document checker and holy crap it found the problem immediately. Two of the UCC-3 amendments had the debtor name spelled slightly different from the original UCC-1s so they weren't connecting in the search system. Now I know exactly which corrective amendments I need to file. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

Wait, you're not the original poster... are you having the same issue?

0 coins

Oops sorry, different person but same exact problem with Texas UCC searches. This thread convinced me to check our filings and sure enough, found similar issues.

0 coins

Freya Ross

•

Delaware UCC statute interpretation can be tricky but the name matching rule is actually one of the clearer provisions. When in doubt, always default to the exact registered name format. Better to be overly precise than risk invalidating your security interest.

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

Agreed. The consequences of getting it wrong far outweigh the minor inconvenience of being extra careful.

0 coins

Sergio Neal

•

Especially on larger deals like this $340K equipment financing. No room for errors.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up - used Certana.ai like a few people mentioned and it immediately caught the comma issue plus a zip code inconsistency I hadn't noticed. Really straightforward to use, just upload PDFs and get instant verification. Definitely recommend for Delaware filings where precision matters.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

How quickly does it process the document comparison?

0 coins

Pretty much instant. Upload takes a few seconds then results appear immediately.

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

Just want to echo what others have said about filing that amendment ASAP. The fact that you found a dissolved entity with a similar name makes this even more urgent. Your lien might not be worth the paper it's printed on until you fix the debtor name issue.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Yeah, I'm definitely treating this as urgent now. Planning to file the UCC-3 amendment first thing Monday morning.

0 coins

Smart move. These debtor name issues can completely invalidate your security interest if you're not careful.

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

Update us when you get the amendment filed! This is a good learning case for everyone. Also might want to review your filing procedures to prevent this from happening again.

0 coins

Good idea on the process improvement. These kinds of mistakes are usually systemic, not just one-off errors.

0 coins

Absolutely. We implemented a double-check system after our own UCC naming issue a few years ago. Haven't had a problem since.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with a similar situation and curious how you resolve the name variation issue.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Will do. Probably going to try the automated verification approach first since it seems like the most efficient way to catch anything I missed.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Smart move. Manual checking is too error-prone when you're dealing with multiple name variations.

0 coins

Just a thought - have you contacted the secured parties listed on those filings? Sometimes they can provide clarity on whether the filings are actually for the same debtor and what the current status is.

0 coins

Plus it might give you insight into the borrower's payment history and relationship with other lenders.

0 coins

Harmony Love

•

True, but some lenders won't share that information due to confidentiality concerns.

0 coins

Prev1...296297298299300...685Next