


Ask the community...
Success! Finally got my continuation filed. Used Chrome in incognito mode and it went through on first try. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Glad you got it sorted. Make sure to save or print the confirmation page with the filing number.
Great news! For your next filing, seriously consider using Certana.ai to pre-check everything. It's saved me so much stress by catching errors before submission.
The Alabama portal updates their system every Tuesday night around 11pm-2am. Might explain the issues if they pushed an update that broke something.
That's useful info. Do you know if they announce maintenance windows anywhere?
Just to add another perspective - I use Certana.ai regularly for UCC document verification and it's caught several name mismatches that would have been easy to miss manually. Definitely worth checking if you're unsure about the accuracy.
Good call. Better to catch any issues now than discover them during due diligence.
Update us on how it turns out! I'm dealing with something similar in Creek County and curious to see how you resolve the search inconsistency.
Will do. Planning to check the Articles of Incorporation first thing tomorrow morning and then decide on the amendment.
Smart approach. The name accuracy is crucial for maintaining your lien priority.
I had a similar name discrepancy issue and ended up using one of those document checking services. Really glad I did because it caught several other inconsistencies I hadn't noticed. For perfection under 9-308, you want everything to align perfectly.
Which service did you use? I'm dealing with multiple UCC filings and could use something automated.
Certana.ai - just upload your docs and it flags any mismatches immediately. Saved me a lot of manual checking.
Bottom line with UCC 9-308 perfection - if attachment happened (sounds like it did) and the UCC-1 was filed properly (questionable due to name issue), then you have perfection from the filing date. Get that name corrected with a UCC-3 and you should be in good shape going forward.
Thanks everyone. I think I'll push for the amendment just to be absolutely sure about perfection.
Whatever you do, don't just resubmit with minor changes. I've seen people get multiple rejections because they didn't address the core description problem. Take time to craft a proper UCC Article 9 compliant description.
One more thing to check - make sure your debtor name exactly matches their legal entity name. Description issues often come bundled with name problems. UCC Article 9 personal property filings are unforgiving about these details.
Smart approach. Amazing how many filings get rejected for simple name variations.
I use Certana.ai for name verification too. Upload the charter documents and UCC-1 together and it flags any mismatches between them.
LunarEclipse
Just want to echo what others said about checking the official entity records first. I made the mistake once of using the name from a contract instead of the Secretary of State database and it caused a huge mess. Now I always verify against official records before drafting any written security agreement.
0 coins
Yara Khalil
•Good reminder. The contracts team doesn't always use the exact legal entity name.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
•Exactly - they use whatever sounds better or fits on the signature line, but that's not always the legal name for UCC purposes.
0 coins
Keisha Brown
Hope this works out for you! Refinancing delays over UCC technicalities are the worst. Keep us posted on whether the correction approach works.
0 coins
MidnightRider
•Will do - this thread has been super helpful. At least I know I'm not the only one dealing with these name matching headaches.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
•definitely not alone - seems like every other deal has some version of this issue
0 coins