< Back to UCC Document Community

ApolloJackson

New Hampshire UCC search showing wrong debtor info - filing number matches but names don't

Running into a weird issue with a New Hampshire UCC search that's got me scratching my head. Did a search using what I thought was the correct filing number from our loan docs, and the system pulled up a UCC-1 that has the right filing number but the debtor name is completely different from what's on our credit agreement. The collateral description matches our equipment loan perfectly, but the debtor shows as 'Mountain Ridge Construction LLC' when our borrower is 'Mountain Ridge Contracting LLC'. I'm wondering if this is just a typo in the original filing or if there's something more serious going on here. Has anyone seen this kind of mismatch before? I need to figure out if our lien is actually perfected or if we have a problem. The loan was funded 8 months ago and we're just now doing our annual lien audit. This could be a major issue if the UCC isn't properly tied to our borrower.

Oh man, this is exactly the kind of thing that keeps me up at night during lien audits. That one word difference between 'Construction' and 'Contracting' could be a real problem. New Hampshire is pretty strict about exact debtor name matches. Did you check the original UCC-1 that was filed? Sometimes the issue is in the filing itself, not the search results.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

That's what I'm afraid of. I'm trying to track down the original filing documents but our loan ops team says they don't have a copy of the actual UCC-1 that was submitted, just the credit agreement. How screwed are we if the name is wrong on the filing?

0 coins

If the debtor name doesn't match your actual borrower entity, your security interest might not be perfected. You'd need to check if 'Mountain Ridge Construction LLC' is maybe a DBA or related entity. But honestly, this sounds like a filing error that needs to be corrected ASAP.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

I've seen this exact scenario before. What you need to do is pull the actual UCC-1 filing from the New Hampshire SOS office and compare it word-for-word with your credit agreement. If there's a mismatch, you'll need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name. Don't wait on this - the longer you wait, the more complicated it gets if you need to enforce your lien.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Good point about pulling the actual filing. I'm going to request a certified copy from NH SOS tomorrow. If it is wrong, how long does a UCC-3 amendment take to process in New Hampshire?

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

Usually 2-3 business days for electronic filings in NH. But the key is making sure you have the correct legal entity name from the Secretary of State business registry before you file the amendment.

0 coins

This is why I always triple-check entity names before filing anything. Have you tried searching for both 'Mountain Ridge Construction LLC' and 'Mountain Ridge Contracting LLC' in the NH business entity database? Sometimes companies change their names or have multiple entities with similar names.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Just did that search and found that both entities exist! Mountain Ridge Construction LLC was dissolved in 2023, and Mountain Ridge Contracting LLC is active and matches our borrower. Looks like the wrong entity name was used on the original UCC-1.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

Bingo! That's your smoking gun right there. You definitely need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name to the active entity. The dissolved entity filing won't protect your lien.

0 coins

Wow, good catch on checking both entities. That dissolved entity thing is a huge red flag. File that amendment immediately.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

Had a similar issue last year with a debtor name mismatch. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool. I uploaded our credit agreement and the UCC-1 filing, and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy. The tool cross-references all the entity information and catches these kinds of errors that are easy to miss when you're manually comparing documents.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Never heard of Certana.ai before. How does their verification tool work exactly? Does it check against state business registries too?

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

You just upload PDFs of your documents and it runs automated checks for consistency. It caught our debtor name mismatch and also flagged some collateral description issues we hadn't noticed. Really handy for lien audits when you're dealing with multiple filings.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

UGH this is exactly why I hate the UCC system. One tiny mistake and your entire security interest is worthless. Eight months later and you're just finding this out? Your loan ops team should have caught this immediately after filing. What a mess.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Trust me, I'm not happy about this either. We're implementing quarterly lien audits going forward instead of annual ones. Can't afford to let stuff like this slide for 8 months.

0 coins

Jacob Lee

•

Don't beat yourself up too much. This happens more often than people admit. The important thing is you caught it and can fix it with a UCC-3 amendment.

0 coins

Quick question - are you sure the filing number is actually correct? Sometimes the search results can be confusing if you're searching by partial numbers or if there are similar filing numbers in the system.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Yeah, I double-checked the filing number from our loan docs. It's definitely the right number, just wrong debtor name on the actual UCC-1.

0 coins

Okay, just wanted to make sure. That makes the name mismatch even more concerning since everything else lines up correctly.

0 coins

File the UCC-3 amendment as soon as possible, but also document everything for your audit trail. If this goes sideways and you need to enforce your lien, you'll want to show that you corrected the error promptly after discovering it. The gap between your original filing and the amendment could be an issue in a dispute.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Good point about documentation. I'm keeping detailed records of when we discovered the issue and our steps to correct it. Hopefully that'll be enough if questions come up later.

0 coins

Also consider having your legal team review the situation. Eight months is a significant gap, and they might want to evaluate any potential exposure.

0 coins

Daniela Rossi

•

Absolutely agree on the legal review. Better to be overly cautious with UCC issues than to assume everything will be fine after the amendment.

0 coins

Ryan Kim

•

This whole thread is making me paranoid about our own UCC filings. We do annual audits too but maybe that's not enough. How do you all handle ongoing monitoring of your filings?

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

We switched to quarterly reviews after a similar issue. Also started using automated tools to catch discrepancies before they become big problems.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

That's actually where Certana.ai really shines - you can set up regular document verification runs to catch these issues early. Wish we'd had that tool when we filed our first batch of UCC-1s.

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

NH SOS is usually pretty good about processing amendments quickly. Just make sure you reference the original filing number correctly on your UCC-3 and provide the correct debtor name. Also include a brief explanation of what you're correcting in the amendment form.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Thanks for the NH-specific advice. I'll make sure to include clear references to the original filing and exactly what we're correcting.

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

No problem. I've filed dozens of amendments in NH and they're usually processed without issues as long as the paperwork is complete and accurate.

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

Just want to echo what others have said about filing that amendment ASAP. The fact that you found a dissolved entity with a similar name makes this even more urgent. Your lien might not be worth the paper it's printed on until you fix the debtor name issue.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Yeah, I'm definitely treating this as urgent now. Planning to file the UCC-3 amendment first thing Monday morning.

0 coins

Smart move. These debtor name issues can completely invalidate your security interest if you're not careful.

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

Update us when you get the amendment filed! This is a good learning case for everyone. Also might want to review your filing procedures to prevent this from happening again.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Will definitely post an update. Already talked to our legal team about revising our UCC filing checklist to include entity verification steps.

0 coins

Good idea on the process improvement. These kinds of mistakes are usually systemic, not just one-off errors.

0 coins

Absolutely. We implemented a double-check system after our own UCC naming issue a few years ago. Haven't had a problem since.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today