< Back to UCC Document Community

Rajan Walker

UCC credit search showing inconsistent debtor names - how to verify accuracy?

Running into a frustrating situation with a UCC credit search I pulled for a potential borrower. The search results show multiple UCC-1 filings under slightly different variations of the company name - some have "LLC" at the end, others don't, and one has a comma where the others don't. This is for a $850K equipment loan and I need to make sure I'm seeing the complete lien picture before we move forward. The debtor is registered as "Mountain View Equipment Rental LLC" but the UCC filings show up as "Mountain View Equipment Rental", "Mountain View Equipment Rental, LLC", and "Mountain View Equipment Rental LLC". Are these all the same entity? How do I know if I'm missing any liens because of name variations? Our underwriting team is getting nervous about the inconsistencies and I need to provide them with a definitive answer on the lien status.

This is exactly why debtor name accuracy is so critical in UCC searches. Even minor variations can cause you to miss filings. The search logic varies by state but generally you want to search under the exact legal name from the articles of incorporation AND common variations. For LLCs, definitely search with and without the entity designation.

0 coins

Second this - I've seen deals fall apart because lenders missed liens due to punctuation differences. Always search multiple name variations.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

But how do you know you've found all the variations? Seems like you could search forever trying different combinations.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

You need to pull the Secretary of State records first to get the exact registered name, then use that as your baseline. But honestly, manual searching is prone to errors. I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool recently - you can upload the UCC search results as PDFs and it cross-checks all the name variations automatically to flag potential matches you might have missed.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How accurate is it at catching the subtle name differences?

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

Pretty solid in my experience. It caught a filing I missed where the only difference was an extra space between words. Saved me from a potential subordination issue.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

Is this something you have to pay for or is there a free version for basic searches?

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

The comma issue is tricky - some filing systems treat "Company, LLC" and "Company LLC" as different entities even though they're the same business. I always recommend doing searches both ways. Also check if there were any name changes or mergers that might affect the search results.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Good point about name changes. I've seen situations where a company changed names but the old UCC filings remained under the previous name.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

That's exactly what happened to us last year. Cost us weeks of additional due diligence to track down all the historical filings.

0 coins

For an $850K loan you definitely need to be thorough. I'd suggest running searches under every variation you found plus checking for any DBA names or trade names the company might use. Better safe than sorry when you're dealing with that much exposure.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Absolutely. And don't forget to check if they have any subsidiaries or related entities that might have separate filings.

0 coins

Vince Eh

•

This is why I hate UCC searches... there's always something that makes you second-guess whether you found everything.

0 coins

Tell me about it. The whole system seems designed to create uncertainty.

0 coins

Have you considered ordering a comprehensive search from a professional service? For a loan that size it might be worth the extra cost to have someone else take responsibility for finding all the filings.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

That's what I was thinking too. Sometimes it's better to outsource the liability.

0 coins

Professional services are good but they're not perfect either. I've caught errors in their reports before.

0 coins

Wait, are all these filings active or are some terminated? You mentioned multiple UCC-1 filings but didn't say whether they're still effective. That makes a big difference in your lien priority analysis.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Good catch - I should have mentioned that. Two of them show as active, one shows as terminated. But the terminated one makes me wonder if there was a refinancing or if the lien was actually released properly.

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Definitely follow up on that terminated filing. Sometimes the UCC-3 termination gets filed incorrectly and the lien is still technically active.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

This is getting complicated fast. Maybe I should just require the borrower to provide lien releases for all filings before we proceed.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

I ran into something similar last month and ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded my search results and it flagged three additional potential matches I hadn't considered. One was just a different ordering of the words in the company name. Definitely worth trying for peace of mind on a large loan like yours.

0 coins

That's interesting. Does it work with search results from different states or just local filings?

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

It works with any PDF search results as far as I can tell. The key is that it looks for patterns and similarities that might indicate the same entity.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I think you're overthinking this. If the company has been operating for a while and these are just formatting differences in how the name was entered, they're probably all the same entity. Just make sure your UCC-1 uses the exact name from their articles of incorporation and you should be fine.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

I respectfully disagree. Small name differences can create big problems in lien priority disputes. Better to be thorough upfront.

0 coins

Yeah, I've seen lawyers argue about semicolons in UCC filings. Every character matters in this business.

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Lawyers will argue about anything if there's money involved. But the point about being thorough is valid.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with a similar situation and curious how you resolve the name variation issue.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Will do. Probably going to try the automated verification approach first since it seems like the most efficient way to catch anything I missed.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Smart move. Manual checking is too error-prone when you're dealing with multiple name variations.

0 coins

Just a thought - have you contacted the secured parties listed on those filings? Sometimes they can provide clarity on whether the filings are actually for the same debtor and what the current status is.

0 coins

Caden Turner

•

That's actually a really good idea. Direct communication with the existing lenders could clear up a lot of confusion.

0 coins

Plus it might give you insight into the borrower's payment history and relationship with other lenders.

0 coins

Harmony Love

•

True, but some lenders won't share that information due to confidentiality concerns.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today