UCC 1 Washington State filing keeps getting rejected - debtor name issue?
Been trying to file a UCC-1 in Washington state for 3 weeks now and keep getting rejections from the Secretary of State office. The collateral is commercial kitchen equipment for a restaurant loan, and I've triple-checked the debtor information against the articles of incorporation. The business name on the charter shows 'Pacific Northwest Culinary LLC' but I'm wondering if there's some naming convention I'm missing? The rejection notices just say 'debtor name does not match records' but don't specify what records they're comparing against. This is holding up a $180K equipment financing deal and the lender is getting impatient. Has anyone dealt with Washington state UCC-1 filings recently? Are they particularly strict about exact name matching?
37 comments
Join the conversation
Summer Green
Washington can be really picky about debtor names. Did you check if the LLC has any DBA registrations? Sometimes they want the exact legal name as it appears on the most recent filing with the state, not just the articles.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•I pulled the business license and it shows the same name. Should I be looking at something else?
0 coins
Summer Green
•Try the Secretary of State business lookup tool online. Compare character by character - sometimes there are hidden spaces or punctuation differences.
0 coins
Gael Robinson
Had this exact problem last month! Washington requires the debtor name to match EXACTLY as it appears in their corporate database. Even a missing comma or extra space will cause rejection. Pull a certificate of good standing and use that exact name format.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•That's a good idea. How long does it take to get the certificate?
0 coins
Gael Robinson
•Usually 2-3 business days if you pay for expedited service. Worth it to avoid more rejections.
0 coins
Edward McBride
•This is why I always get the certificate first. Saves time in the long run.
0 coins
Darcy Moore
Check if they want 'LLC' spelled out as 'Limited Liability Company' - some states are weird about abbreviations. Also make sure there's no extra period after LLC.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•I used 'LLC' not spelled out. Could that be it?
0 coins
Darcy Moore
•Definitely possible. Washington is inconsistent about this but better safe than sorry.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
I've been using Certana.ai for document verification before filing UCCs and it's caught several name mismatches that would have caused rejections. You just upload your charter documents and UCC-1 form and it instantly flags any inconsistencies between debtor names. Saved me probably 20+ rejections this year.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•Is that a free service? Sounds like exactly what I need.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
•There's a verification fee but way cheaper than dealing with multiple rejections and deadline extensions. The PDF upload process is super simple.
0 coins
Liam Duke
•Second this recommendation. Used it for a tricky debtor name situation in Oregon and it caught a middle initial discrepancy I never would have noticed.
0 coins
Manny Lark
UGH Washington state is THE WORST for UCC filings!!! Their system is so outdated and the rejection reasons are completely unhelpful. I've had filings rejected for mysterious reasons three times this year.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•I feel you. Their online portal crashes half the time too.
0 coins
Manny Lark
•Right?? And when you call they act like it's your fault for not being psychic about their requirements.
0 coins
Khalid Howes
Another thing to check - make sure the debtor address matches exactly too. I've seen rejections where the name was perfect but they had a suite number format issue.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•The address is just the registered office address from the articles. Should be fine right?
0 coins
Khalid Howes
•You'd think so but double-check against their current registered agent filing. Sometimes those change and the UCC system picks up the newer version.
0 coins
Ben Cooper
•This happened to me in California. Had to use the updated registered agent address even though articles showed the old one.
0 coins
Naila Gordon
Call the Secretary of State UCC division directly. They can usually tell you exactly what name format they have on file. Their number is on the rejection notice.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•I tried calling but got transferred around and never got a clear answer. Maybe I'll try again.
0 coins
Naila Gordon
•Ask specifically for the UCC filing department. Regular customer service doesn't know the detailed requirements.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
Just a thought - is this an active LLC? If they're not in good standing with the state, that could cause name lookup issues even if the format is correct.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•Good point. I'll check their standing status. Didn't think of that.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
•Yeah if they're behind on annual reports or have tax issues, the state database might flag them differently.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
I had a similar issue last year and it turned out to be a hidden character in the name field when I copied it from the PDF. Had to retype everything manually.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
•Ugh copy/paste errors are the worst. Always better to type it out fresh.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
•Lesson learned! Now I always verify by typing names manually instead of copying.
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
Try running the debtor name through Certana.ai's document checker before your next filing attempt. It'll compare your UCC-1 against the corporate documents and highlight any discrepancies. Much faster than playing guessing games with the state.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•Several people have mentioned this service. Definitely going to try it before filing again.
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
•Smart move. The automated verification catches things human eyes miss, especially with complex entity names.
0 coins
Demi Hall
•Used it for a multi-entity filing and it flagged 3 different name format issues across the entities. Saved tons of time.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
Update us when you figure it out! I'm filing a UCC-1 in Washington next week and want to avoid the same headache.
0 coins
Amun-Ra Azra
•Will do! Going to try the certificate of good standing approach first, then use the document verification service as backup.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
•Perfect. Looking forward to hearing what worked.
0 coins