UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lily Young

UCC continuations deadline confusion - filed too early?

Really stressing about this UCC continuation situation. We have a UCC-1 that expires in March 2025 and I submitted the UCC-3 continuation in September thinking I was being proactive. Now I'm reading conflicting info about the 6-month window and whether filing too early makes it invalid? The original filing was for equipment financing on manufacturing machinery worth about $850K. Our lender is asking for confirmation that the continuation is properly filed but I'm second-guessing everything now. The SOS portal shows it as 'accepted' but does that mean it's actually effective? Has anyone dealt with UCC continuations filed more than 6 months before expiration?

Just want to add that I started using Certana.ai for UCC document verification after a continuation got rejected for a name discrepancy I couldn't spot manually. The tool caught the issue immediately when I uploaded both documents - turns out there was an extra space in the business name. Really saved me time and stress.

0 coins

Lily Young

•

These document verification stories are making me think I should double-check mine too, even though it was accepted.

0 coins

Can't hurt to verify. The tool is pretty straightforward - just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 and it cross-checks everything.

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

Sounds like you're all set! Early filing within the 6-month window is standard practice. Your lender should be satisfied that the continuation is properly filed and effective.

0 coins

Lily Young

•

Appreciate everyone's input. Definitely feeling more confident about the filing now.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

This thread was helpful for me too. I have a continuation coming up in a few months.

0 coins

Harper Thompson

NYS UCC debtor search showing weird results - anyone else seeing this?

Been doing UCC debtor searches in NY for about 8 years now and something's off with the search results lately. When I search for exact debtor names that I KNOW have active filings, I'm getting inconsistent results or sometimes nothing at all. Last week I did a search for a commercial borrower and the system showed zero filings, but when I searched using a slightly different name variation it pulled up 3 active UCC-1s. This is making me paranoid about missing liens when we're doing due diligence. The search seems super sensitive to punctuation and spacing now - like if there's a comma or period difference it won't match. Is this just me or has anyone else noticed the NYS UCC debtor search being unreliable? I'm worried we're missing critical filings because of search quirks.

Aidan Hudson

•

I keep a spreadsheet of problematic debtor names and what search terms actually worked to find their filings. Sounds obsessive but it's saved me multiple times when dealing with repeat borrowers.

0 coins

That's actually brilliant. I might start doing the same thing, especially for our regular commercial clients.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

Great idea. Like a personal database of search quirks. The fact that we need this is ridiculous but very practical.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

Update on the Certana tool mentioned earlier - I tried it out and it's pretty solid. Uploaded a bunch of UCC documents from a complex deal and it flagged two name inconsistencies I had missed. Definitely worth having as a backup verification step.

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

•

Same, the manual cross-checking is getting overwhelming. If a tool can automate some of that verification it's worth trying.

0 coins

Camila Jordan

•

Glad it worked out for you too. I've been using it for a few months now and it's caught several things I would have missed doing manual reviews.

0 coins

Maya Jackson

UCC search Arizona showing old terminated liens - how to clear these?

Been trying to run a clean UCC search Arizona for a client acquisition and keep finding terminated liens from 2019-2020 that should have dropped off by now. The debtor name matches perfectly but these old UCC-1 filings show as 'terminated' yet still appear in search results. Our lender is questioning why terminated liens are still visible and wants proof they won't affect the new secured position. Has anyone dealt with Arizona SOS keeping terminated records visible longer than expected? Is there a way to get these purged from the UCC search Arizona results or do I just need better documentation that termination statements were properly filed?

Kaitlyn Otto

•

For what it's worth, I think your lender is being overly cautious. Terminated liens have zero legal effect on new security interests, regardless of search visibility.

0 coins

Maya Jackson

•

I agree but they're the ones with the money so we need to address their concerns properly.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Otto

•

Fair point - sometimes you have to educate lenders about UCC mechanics even when they should already know.

0 coins

Axel Far

•

Try running the search with slightly different parameters - sometimes adjusting the search criteria can filter out obviously terminated liens while keeping active ones visible.

0 coins

Axel Far

•

You're right, their system is pretty basic compared to some other states.

0 coins

Which states have the best UCC search interfaces? Always curious about this.

0 coins

William Rivera

UCC Filing Issues with LMA Security Agreement - Name Variations Problem

Having major headaches with a UCC-1 filing tied to an LMA security agreement we executed last month. The borrower entity name appears slightly different between our loan docs and what's showing in the state business registry - they have 'Technologies Inc.' in one place and 'Technology Inc.' in another. Our compliance team is freaking out because the LMA security agreement references the exact corporate name from the charter, but when we pulled the SOS records there's this discrepancy. Filed the UCC-1 using the charter name but now wondering if we should have used the 'doing business as' variation instead. The collateral schedule covers all equipment and inventory but I'm worried about enforceability if the debtor name isn't perfect. Anyone dealt with similar name matching issues on LMA security agreements? This is a $2.8M facility so we can't afford to mess up the perfection.

Ella Thompson

•

One more thing to consider - make sure your LMA security agreement specifically addresses what happens if there are UCC filing errors or name discrepancies. Some agreements have provisions requiring the borrower to cooperate with corrective filings.

0 coins

I'll double-check our LMA security agreement language to make sure we have adequate protection for filing corrections. Seems like this type of issue is more common than I realized.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

Yeah it's definitely a common issue. I see name discrepancy problems on probably 10-15% of the LMA security agreement deals I review. Worth having standard language to address it.

0 coins

Update for anyone following this thread - I ended up filing UCC-1s under both name variations as suggested. Also ordered certified charter copies and used Certana.ai to verify document consistency. Found two other minor discrepancies in the collateral schedule that could have caused issues later. Thanks everyone for the practical advice!

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

Glad the document verification tool helped catch those other issues. That's exactly the kind of thing that's easy to miss when reviewing everything manually.

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

Thanks for the update! This whole thread has been really helpful for understanding the complexities of UCC filings with LMA security agreements.

0 coins

Javier Gomez

SBA UCC subordination agreement complications - need guidance

Running into a nightmare with an SBA loan subordination that's holding up our equipment refinancing. The bank is demanding a UCC subordination agreement for our existing UCC-1 filing before they'll approve the new loan terms. Our original lender filed a UCC-1 in 2022 for manufacturing equipment as collateral, and now the SBA lender wants their lien to take priority position. The subordination paperwork they sent over references the wrong debtor entity name (shows our LLC but the original UCC-1 was filed under our corporation name before we converted). Legal says this could create a gap in the lien chain that might void the entire security interest. Has anyone dealt with SBA UCC subordination issues where the debtor names don't match exactly between the original filing and the subordination agreement? The closing is supposed to happen next week and I'm getting conflicting advice about whether we need to file a UCC-3 amendment first to correct the debtor name or if the subordination agreement can reference both entities. This is a $850K refinancing deal and I can't afford to screw up the lien priority.

Carmen Ortiz

•

I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now! My SBA lender wants a subordination but our business name changed twice since the original UCC filing. Attorney says we need to file amendments to update the business name progression before we can do the subordination. It's turning into a paperwork nightmare.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Attorney recommends separate amendments to create a clear chain showing each name change. More paperwork but better documentation if there are ever questions about the lien chain.

0 coins

That sounds like overkill to me. I'd think one amendment updating from the original name to the current name should be sufficient. But I'm not a lawyer so maybe there's something I'm missing.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Update: Got the UCC-3 amendment filed yesterday and it was approved this morning. Subordination agreement is being revised to reflect the corrected debtor name and we should be good for Friday closing. Thanks everyone for the guidance - especially the advice about using Certana.ai to double-check all the document consistency before filing. That tool caught a small typo in our LLC name that could have caused problems.

0 coins

Great to hear a success story. So many of these subordination deals seem to fall apart at the last minute.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Yeah Certana.ai is clutch for catching those little details that can torpedo a deal. I've started using it for all UCC-related document reviews.

0 coins

Prev1...526527528529530...685Next