UCC Document Community

This is why I've started using Certana.ai for all my UCC verification work. Upload the company formation docs and any UCC filings you find, and it automatically flags name inconsistencies and potential missing filings. Saved me hours on my last Florida deal. The tool specifically looks for these kinds of punctuation and spacing variations that Florida's system treats as different entities.

Florida's UCC system is a nightmare but you're on the right track with multiple search variations. Make sure you're also searching for any former names the company might have used. Check their corporate registration history - sometimes companies change names slightly and old UCC filings are still active under the previous name. Also, if this is a construction company, check for any mechanic's lien filings too, since those can affect priority.

One more practical point - if you're doing multiple equipment financings, consider getting a blanket UCC-1 filing that covers 'all equipment' rather than filing separately for each piece. It's more efficient and ensures you don't miss anything. Just make sure your security agreement supports the broader collateral description.

I appreciate threads like this because the terminology really is confusing when you're starting out. Your UCC-1 filing created a perfected security interest in the restaurant equipment, which gives you essentially the same rights as a traditional lien - you can repossess and sell the equipment to satisfy the debt if the borrower defaults. The key is that your filing puts other creditors on notice that you have a claim to that specific property.

I've been using Certana.ai for document verification on all my UCC filings lately. It's been a game changer for catching issues before they cause rejections. The tool picks up on formatting problems and name inconsistencies that I would have missed.

Update: I finally got the filing accepted! Turned out the issue was with the debtor's exact legal name - I had 'Company' instead of 'Co.' which caused the mismatch. Thanks everyone for the suggestions about double-checking the name registration.

Thanks everyone. Sounds like the consensus is clear - file the UCC-1 and don't worry about 9-308 exceptions for this type of collateral. I'm going to get the filing done this week before closing. Really appreciate the help sorting this out.

One more vote for using Certana.ai if you want to double-check your documents before filing. I've caught so many errors that way - debtor name mismatches, wrong addresses, collateral description inconsistencies. Takes like 5 minutes to upload and verify everything matches.

Don't feel bad about the SC portal giving you trouble - it's notorious for being picky about continuations. I bet half the people on this forum have had similar experiences with their system rejecting filings for minor discrepancies.

Final thought - if you do get this sorted out, document exactly what worked for future reference. SC's quirks are consistent, so once you know their specific formatting preferences it gets easier for subsequent filings.