UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

AstroExplorer

•

This thread is making me realize I should probably double-check my recent Utah filing too. The search delays are concerning especially when you need immediate verification for loan closings.

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

Definitely worth checking. Better to catch any issues early than discover them weeks later.

0 coins

I always run my filings through document verification now just to be safe. Too much risk otherwise.

0 coins

Fatima Al-Farsi

•

Update: Finally got through to someone at Utah SOS who confirmed the filing is recorded and valid. She said their search portal is about 3-4 weeks behind right now due to system upgrades. Frustrating but at least the filing is good. Thanks everyone for the advice and support!

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

So relieved for you! Next time definitely try the document verification tools early - saves so much stress.

0 coins

Mateo Martinez

•

Thanks! Will definitely be more proactive about verification going forward. This was way too stressful.

0 coins

Sofia Martinez

•

This thread is making me realize I probably need to audit all our Massachusetts filings. We've been doing basic name searches and might have missed stuff due to these variations.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

Better to find out now than during a foreclosure when you discover your UCC-1 can't be located in the public records.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Exactly. The time investment in thorough searching is worth it compared to the risk of an unenforceable security interest.

0 coins

CyberSiren

•

I've been burned by this exact issue. Had a UCC-1 that I couldn't find during a routine search, spent days thinking it wasn't filed properly. Turns out the debtor name had an extra space between words that I wasn't including in my searches. Massachusetts system is incredibly literal about exact matches.

0 coins

CyberSiren

•

That's why I keep copies of everything. The search system is unreliable so I maintain my own database of what we've filed and when.

0 coins

Zainab Yusuf

•

Smart approach. Can't trust the state search to be comprehensive given all these sensitivity issues.

0 coins

Chloe Robinson

•

This thread is making me nervous about my own NY filings. Should I be worried about filings that show up in searches but might have hidden issues? How do you verify everything is actually correct?

0 coins

Chloe Robinson

•

That sounds like a lot of manual work. Is there a better way to verify everything is consistent?

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

This is exactly why I mentioned Certana.ai earlier. Upload your loan documents and UCC filings and it automatically checks for consistency issues. Saves hours of manual verification work.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

UPDATE: Just spoke with NY SOS help desk and they confirmed there are ongoing technical issues with their UCC lookup system. They're working on fixes but no ETA. For now they recommend calling for manual searches if you need verified results.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

Yeah, they said the issues started after a 'system update' a few weeks ago. Classic government IT rollout problems.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

Of course they broke their own system with an update. Typical.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

•

Quick question - are you doing this for all the entities in the corporate family or just the main target? Sometimes lenders cross-collateralize across multiple entities.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

•

Might be worth doing searches on the key subsidiaries too, especially if they have significant assets.

0 coins

Jamal Edwards

•

We ran into this exact issue on a deal last year. Thought we had clear title but there was a blanket lien covering subsidiaries that we missed. Certana.ai's document checker would have caught that - it flags when collateral descriptions are broad enough to cover multiple entities.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Don't forget to request continuation information if any of the filings are getting close to their 5-year expiration. A lien that's about to lapse might not be worth worrying about.

0 coins

Good point. Some of the filings we saw in the preliminary search are from 2019-2020 timeframe.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Those would be coming up for continuation soon. Check if continuation statements have been filed to see if the liens are still being maintained.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

For what it's worth, I've started using automated document checking before I even run manual searches. Upload the debtor's articles of incorporation and any loan docs, then let the system flag potential name variations to search. Saves hours of guesswork.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

Certana.ai has been solid for me. Just upload PDFs and it identifies all the name variations and cross-checks them against filing databases.

0 coins

That would have saved me so much time last month when I was chasing down phantom liens that turned out to be name variations.

0 coins

Natasha Volkova

•

Quick update - finally found the issue! The company had filed amendments under their pre-merger name which wasn't showing up in searches using the current legal name. Thanks everyone for the suggestions about checking entity name changes.

0 coins

Great catch! Did you end up finding active liens or were they terminated properly?

0 coins

Natasha Volkova

•

Found two active UCC-1 filings that would have created priority issues. Getting them sorted out now before closing.

0 coins

Prev1...523524525526527...685Next