NYS UCC debtor search showing weird results - anyone else seeing this?
Been doing UCC debtor searches in NY for about 8 years now and something's off with the search results lately. When I search for exact debtor names that I KNOW have active filings, I'm getting inconsistent results or sometimes nothing at all. Last week I did a search for a commercial borrower and the system showed zero filings, but when I searched using a slightly different name variation it pulled up 3 active UCC-1s. This is making me paranoid about missing liens when we're doing due diligence. The search seems super sensitive to punctuation and spacing now - like if there's a comma or period difference it won't match. Is this just me or has anyone else noticed the NYS UCC debtor search being unreliable? I'm worried we're missing critical filings because of search quirks.
36 comments


Caleb Stark
Not just you! The NY system has been glitchy for months. I've started doing multiple search variations for every debtor name - with and without commas, different abbreviations, even common misspellings. It's ridiculous but I've caught filings this way that the exact name search missed.
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
•This is exactly why I always do at least 3-4 different name variations. The system logic seems inconsistent with how it handles punctuation.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•Wait, you're doing manual variations? That sounds like a nightmare for large portfolios...
0 coins
Ella Lewis
The search algorithm definitely changed sometime this year. I think they updated the backend system and it messed up the matching logic. What's really frustrating is when you know there should be filings but the search comes back empty, then you find them later under a slightly different name format.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•YES! This happened to me last month. Searched for 'ABC Industries LLC' and got nothing, then searched 'ABC Industries, LLC' (with comma) and found 2 active UCC-1s. Makes no sense.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
•The comma thing is real. Also try searching with and without 'Inc', 'LLC', 'Corp' - sometimes the system treats entity designations differently
0 coins
Alexis Renard
•This is giving me anxiety about all the searches I've done recently. How do we know we're not missing something important?
0 coins
Camila Jordan
I actually found a tool that helps with this exact problem. Certana.ai has a UCC document verification feature where you can upload your search results and it cross-checks everything for consistency. I started using it after I missed a filing that caused issues with a loan closing. You just upload the PDFs and it flags any potential name mismatches or missing documents. Saved me from another headache last week.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•Never heard of that service but sounds like exactly what I need. Do you upload the actual UCC filings or just the search results?
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•You can upload both - I usually upload the charter documents and UCC-1s together and it verifies everything matches properly. Really helpful for catching discrepancies.
0 coins
Tyler Lefleur
•Interesting, might have to check that out. The manual cross-checking is killing me with larger deals.
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
The NY system has ALWAYS been terrible with exact matches. I learned years ago to never trust a single search result. Always do variations, always double-check, always assume the system might miss something. It's extra work but better than missing a lien.
0 coins
Max Knight
•This shouldn't be our responsibility though. The search function should work properly without us having to be detectives.
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
•Agreed, but until they fix it we're stuck with workarounds. I keep a checklist of different search formats for every debtor name.
0 coins
Emma Swift
Here's what I do: exact name, name without punctuation, name with different entity designation, and reverse order (if it's 'First Last' try 'Last, First'). Also search for any DBAs or trade names. Time consuming but comprehensive.
0 coins
Isabella Tucker
•The reverse order thing is smart, never thought of that. Do you find many filings that way?
0 coins
Emma Swift
•Surprisingly yes, especially with individual debtors. Sometimes the filing shows 'Smith, John' but the search only works with 'John Smith
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•Adding this to my search routine. The fact that we have to do this is insane but whatever works.
0 coins
Jayden Hill
Anyone else notice the search being slower lately too? Used to be instant, now sometimes takes 10-15 seconds to load results. Makes doing multiple searches even more tedious.
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
•Yes! Thought it was just my internet but the whole portal seems sluggish lately.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•Peak hours are the worst. I try to do searches early morning or late evening when there's less traffic.
0 coins
LordCommander
This thread is making me realize I probably need to redo some recent searches. Has anyone compiled a list of the most common search variations that work? Would save us all time.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Good idea. Basic list: exact name, no punctuation, different entity suffix, abbreviated forms, full spelled out forms.
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•I mentioned Certana.ai earlier - they actually have guidance on name variations that work best with different state systems. Pretty helpful resource.
0 coins
LordCommander
•Thanks, I'll check that out. Anything that makes this process more reliable is worth trying.
0 coins
Lucy Lam
The worst part is when you're on a tight closing deadline and you can't be 100% sure your search caught everything. I've started building extra time into deals just for comprehensive UCC searches.
0 coins
Alexis Renard
•Same here. Used to budget 30 minutes for UCC due diligence, now it's easily an hour or more with all the variations.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
•At least we're being thorough. Better to over-search than miss something critical and have it blow up later.
0 coins
Max Knight
•True but the extra time adds up. Especially frustrating when you know the system could just work properly in the first place.
0 coins
Aidan Hudson
I keep a spreadsheet of problematic debtor names and what search terms actually worked to find their filings. Sounds obsessive but it's saved me multiple times when dealing with repeat borrowers.
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
•That's actually brilliant. I might start doing the same thing, especially for our regular commercial clients.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•Great idea. Like a personal database of search quirks. The fact that we need this is ridiculous but very practical.
0 coins
Zoe Wang
Update on the Certana tool mentioned earlier - I tried it out and it's pretty solid. Uploaded a bunch of UCC documents from a complex deal and it flagged two name inconsistencies I had missed. Definitely worth having as a backup verification step.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•Good to hear a follow-up. I'm definitely going to try it on my next deal. Can't afford to miss anything with these search issues.
0 coins
Tyler Lefleur
•Same, the manual cross-checking is getting overwhelming. If a tool can automate some of that verification it's worth trying.
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•Glad it worked out for you too. I've been using it for a few months now and it's caught several things I would have missed doing manual reviews.
0 coins