SCC UCC Search Results Not Matching - Anyone Else Having Issues?
Been trying to run a comprehensive UCC search through our usual channels and keep getting inconsistent results when cross-referencing different databases. Started with what should be a straightforward debtor name search but the results from different sources aren't lining up. Some filings show up in one system but not another, and I'm seeing discrepancies in filing numbers and dates. This is for a major equipment financing deal and we need to be absolutely certain about existing liens before we file our UCC-1. Has anyone else noticed search result inconsistencies lately? We're dealing with a debtor that has multiple variations of their business name across different filings which might be part of the problem. Need to make sure we're not missing any prior perfected security interests before we move forward with our own filing.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Diego Flores
I've run into this exact issue multiple times. The problem is usually debtor name variations - even small differences like 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' or missing middle initials can cause filings to show up in one database but not another. What specific name variations are you seeing?
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•We're seeing the debtor listed as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC', 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma), and 'ABC Mfg LLC' across different filings. The search results vary dramatically depending on which version I use.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•That comma variation is a classic problem. Most search systems treat punctuation differently. You'll need to search all possible variations to get complete results.
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
This is why I always do manual cross-checks between multiple databases, but it's incredibly time-consuming. Are you searching by debtor name only or also trying filing number searches?
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•Started with debtor name but yeah, the filing numbers I'm finding don't always cross-reference properly either. Some show as terminated in one system but still active in another.
0 coins
Sean Flanagan
•Filing number discrepancies usually mean data sync issues between systems. Super frustrating when you're trying to verify lien status.
0 coins
Zara Mirza
Had a similar nightmare last month. Spent hours trying to reconcile search results from different sources. Finally started using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload all the UCC documents you find and it cross-checks everything automatically. Catches name variations and filing inconsistencies that manual searches miss.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•Interesting - does it actually search the databases or just verify documents you already have?
0 coins
Zara Mirza
•It's more for verification - you upload the PDFs of filings you've found and it checks for consistency across all documents. Helped me catch a terminated UCC-3 that was still showing as active in one database.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•That sounds useful. We've had clients get burned by relying on search results that missed critical filings.
0 coins
Luca Russo
The real issue is that there's no standardized format across states for how debtor names get entered into the systems. Some clerks are more careful than others about exact name matching.
0 coins
Nia Wilson
•Exactly! We've seen filings get rejected because the debtor name on the UCC-1 didn't exactly match what was on file, even though it was the same company.
0 coins
Luca Russo
•And then you have to file a UCC-3 amendment just to fix a name variation. Waste of time and money.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
Are you checking both state and federal databases? Sometimes filings end up in unexpected places depending on the type of collateral involved.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•Good point - this involves equipment that could potentially be fixtures so I should probably check real estate records too.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•Definitely. Fixture filings can be tricky because they might be filed in real estate records instead of the standard UCC filing system.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•We always check both just to be safe. Better to over-search than miss something important.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
ugh this is exactly why I hate doing UCC searches. The systems never match up and you're never 100% sure you found everything. Then your client gets mad when a lien pops up later that didn't show in the original search.
0 coins
AstroAce
•I feel this pain. Had a deal blow up because we missed a UCC filing that was under a slightly different debtor name variation.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•Exactly! And then everyone blames you for not being thorough enough, but the search systems are just inconsistent.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
For equipment financing deals this size, have you considered hiring a professional search company? They usually have access to more comprehensive databases and know all the name variation tricks.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•We might have to go that route. Was hoping to handle it in-house but the inconsistencies are making me nervous about missing something critical.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•Professional search companies are worth the cost for major deals. They catch stuff that automated searches miss.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Plus they usually provide insurance coverage if they miss something, which gives everyone peace of mind.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
Make sure you're also checking for any UCC-3 continuations that might extend the life of older filings. Those don't always show up prominently in search results.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•Good catch - I need to look more carefully at the filing dates and see if any of these are coming up on their 5-year renewal deadlines.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Yeah, a filing that looks like it expired might actually be still valid if there was a continuation filed that didn't show up in your initial search.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
I've been using Certana.ai's UCC checker for situations like this - upload all the documents you've found from different searches and it flags any inconsistencies or missing connections between filings. Saved me from a major error last week.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•How does it handle different debtor name variations? That seems to be the biggest issue here.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•It cross-references all the name variations across your uploaded documents and flags potential matches you might have missed. Really helpful for complex searches like this.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•That might be exactly what I need. The manual cross-checking is taking forever and I'm not confident I'm catching everything.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
Just went through this exact scenario two weeks ago. Ended up finding three additional UCC filings that didn't show up in the initial search because of name variations. Always search every possible permutation of the debtor name.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
•That's what I was afraid of. How many different name variations did you end up having to search?
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•I think I did about 8 different searches with various combinations of the business name, abbreviations, and punctuation differences. Found filings under 3 different name variations.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•This is exactly why UCC searches can be so unreliable. The systems just aren't designed to handle real-world name variations well.
0 coins