< Back to UCC Document Community

Amun-Ra Azra

UCC and lien search coming back with inconsistent results - need advice on verification process

Been doing UCC and lien searches for our commercial lending department and I'm getting different results depending on which service I use. Same debtor name, same jurisdiction, but one search shows 3 active UCC-1 filings while another shows 5. The inconsistencies are making me nervous about missing something critical that could affect our security position. Has anyone else dealt with this? I'm wondering if there's a systematic way to cross-verify these searches because relying on just one source doesn't seem adequate anymore. We had a deal almost fall through last month because a lien showed up on one search that didn't appear on another until we dug deeper.

Summer Green

•

This is super common unfortunately. Different search services update their databases at different intervals and some have better access to certain state systems than others. For UCC searches specifically, you really need to verify the debtor name variations - even slight differences in punctuation or corporate suffixes can cause filings to be missed.

0 coins

Gael Robinson

•

YES exactly this! I learned the hard way that 'ABC Corp' vs 'ABC Corporation' can pull completely different results even though they're the same entity.

0 coins

The name variations thing is huge. We always run searches with multiple name formats now including with and without punctuation.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

What states are you searching in? Some state UCC systems are notorious for being glitchy or having delayed updates. Also are you doing exact name matches or variations? The search methodology makes a huge difference in what gets returned.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Mostly Delaware and New York filings. I've been doing exact matches but maybe I need to expand that approach.

0 coins

Darcy Moore

•

Delaware's system can be particularly tricky. Their database sometimes lags behind the actual filings by several days.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

I had this exact problem until I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the UCC search results as PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically - debtor names, filing numbers, dates. It caught 2 filings that one of my search services completely missed because of slight name discrepancies. Really saved me from a potential disaster.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

That sounds helpful - does it work with searches from different providers or just specific ones?

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

Works with any PDF results. You just upload whatever search reports you get and it analyzes them for consistency and flags potential issues.

0 coins

Liam Duke

•

Interesting, never heard of that tool but might be worth checking out given how manual this process usually is.

0 coins

Manny Lark

•

The real issue is that no single search service has perfect coverage. I always run searches through at least 2-3 different providers and then reconcile the results manually. Time consuming but necessary for anything over $500k.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

This is the way. Better to spend extra time upfront than deal with problems later when you find out about a senior lien position.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

•

Manual reconciliation is such a pain though. There has to be a better way than comparing spreadsheets line by line.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

Are you checking both the state UCC database directly AND using third-party search services? Sometimes going straight to the source catches things that get missed by the aggregators.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

I usually rely on our third-party service but you're right, I should be checking the state systems too.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

Definitely worth it for larger deals. The state databases are usually more current even if they're harder to navigate.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

This inconsistency problem is exactly why I document everything. Keep records of which search service was used, what date, what name variations were tried. If there's ever a question later you can show you did your due diligence.

0 coins

Cynthia Love

•

Good point about documentation. I've seen deals get held up because someone couldn't prove they did a thorough search.

0 coins

Darren Brooks

•

We keep a search log for every transaction now. Has saved us multiple times when borrower's counsel questioned our lien search results.

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

The timing of your searches matters too. If you're dealing with recent filings (within the last 30 days), some systems might not have them indexed yet. Always worth doing a follow-up search closer to closing.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

That's a good point I hadn't considered. How long is the typical lag time for new UCC filings to show up in searches?

0 coins

Rosie Harper

•

Varies by state but anywhere from 1-7 business days is normal. Some states are faster than others.

0 coins

Gael Robinson

•

I always do searches within 48 hours of closing just to be safe. Caught a last-minute UCC-1 filing once that way.

0 coins

Have you considered the possibility that some of the filings showing up might be terminated or lapsed? Not all search services are good at filtering out inactive filings, so you might be seeing old UCC-1s that should have been terminated with UCC-3s.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

That's definitely possible. How do you verify the status of older filings?

0 coins

You have to look at the individual filing records to see if there are corresponding termination statements. It's tedious but necessary.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

Following up on my earlier comment about Certana.ai - it actually helps with the terminated filing issue too. When you upload your search results, it flags filings that might have termination statements and helps you verify the current status. Much faster than checking each one manually.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

That termination checking feature sounds really useful. The manual process is definitely error-prone.

0 coins

Demi Hall

•

Automated verification tools are becoming essential for this kind of work. Too much room for human error otherwise.

0 coins

Whatever you do, make sure you're searching under all possible debtor names including any DBAs or trade names. I've seen UCC filings under names that weren't obvious from the main corporate records.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Good reminder. I need to be more thorough about checking for alternate business names.

0 coins

Summer Green

•

DBA searches are crucial. Sometimes the UCC-1 gets filed under the trade name instead of the legal entity name.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

This is why I always request a complete list of all business names from the borrower upfront. Saves time later.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

The bottom line is you can't rely on just one search. Use multiple services, check the state databases directly when possible, and verify the status of any filings you find. It's extra work but it protects your lender's security interest.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I need to implement a more systematic approach with multiple verification steps.

0 coins

Dana Doyle

•

Definitely look into some of the automated tools to help streamline the verification process. Makes the multi-source approach much more manageable.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

Smart approach. Better to over-search than under-search when it comes to UCC and lien verification.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today