< Back to UCC Document Community

Natasha Petrova

NY UCC filing search showing weird results - help needed

Having major issues with NY UCC filing search results and not sure what's going wrong. I'm trying to verify some collateral positions for a equipment financing deal and the search results don't match what I expected to find. When I search by debtor name I get partial matches but when I search by filing number I get completely different results. Is this normal for NY's system or am I doing something wrong? The debtor name variations seem to be causing problems - like searching 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' vs 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' gives totally different results. This is for a $2.8M equipment line and I need to make sure we have clean lien positions before funding. Anyone else dealing with NY UCC search inconsistencies?

NY's UCC search can be really finicky with debtor names. The comma placement and exact formatting matters more than it should. I've had similar issues where slight name variations return completely different result sets.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

This is so frustrating! Why can't the system just find close matches automatically like other states?

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

The NY SOS system requires exact character matching. Even extra spaces can throw off results.

0 coins

Malik Jackson

•

Are you searching both the debtor's exact legal name and any trade names? Sometimes UCC-1 filings use different name variations and you need to cast a wider net.

0 coins

Good point - I was only searching the legal entity name from their articles of incorporation. Should I be checking DBA registrations too?

0 coins

Malik Jackson

•

Definitely check DBAs and any name variations you can find in their corporate filings. Also try searching without the entity type designation.

0 coins

I usually run 5-6 different name variations just to be safe. Takes longer but catches more filings.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

I had a similar nightmare with NY searches last month. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to cross-check everything. You upload the corporate docs and it automatically runs name variations against the UCC database. Saved me hours of manual searching and caught discrepancies I would have missed.

0 coins

How does that work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs and it searches automatically?

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

Yeah, you upload the charter docs and any existing UCC filings, then it cross-references debtor names and flags inconsistencies. Really helpful for complex entity structures.

0 coins

NY's search interface is garbage compared to other states. I always do redundant searches with different name formats because their matching algorithm misses obvious variations.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Tell me about it. Sometimes I find filings by accident that should have shown up in my original search.

0 coins

The worst is when you're doing due diligence under time pressure and can't trust the search results.

0 coins

For equipment financing deals this size, are you also checking fixture filings? NY has some quirky rules about when equipment becomes fixtures.

0 coins

This is mobile equipment so probably not fixtures, but good reminder to check local property records too.

0 coins

Mobile equipment can still have fixture issues if it gets permanently installed. Worth double-checking the collateral descriptions.

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

I've seen mobile cranes get classified as fixtures when they're used at construction sites long-term. NY courts can be unpredictable.

0 coins

When the filing number search gives different results than name search, usually means there are multiple entities with similar names or the filing has errors in the debtor information.

0 coins

That makes sense. Should I be concerned about filings with debtor name errors or do those get thrown out?

0 coins

Depends on how serious the error is. Minor typos might still be enforceable but major name discrepancies could void the filing.

0 coins

Sean Flanagan

•

I always print out the actual UCC-1 documents, not just the search results summary. Sometimes the search results don't show all the important details about collateral descriptions.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

Good advice. The search summaries can be misleading about the actual scope of the security interest.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Yes! I've seen search results that made filings look broader than they actually were when you read the full document.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Have you tried calling NY SOS directly? Sometimes they can help explain weird search results or point out system issues.

0 coins

Didn't think of that. Do they actually provide search assistance or just technical support?

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

They'll help with basic search questions but won't interpret legal implications. Still worth a try for technical issues.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

This is why I always use multiple verification methods for large deals. Manual searches, automated tools, and sometimes even hiring a search company for complex situations.

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

What search companies do you recommend for NY? We might need professional help for some of our bigger transactions.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

CT Corporation and CSC are both reliable, but they're expensive. For most deals I just use Certana.ai's automated checking since it's much faster and cheaper.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

I've used both professional services and automated tools. The automated ones are getting really good at catching name discrepancies.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Make sure you're searching both current and lapsed filings. Sometimes continuation deadlines get missed and you'll only see the filing in lapsed records.

0 coins

How do I tell if a continuation was filed on time? The dates in NY's system are confusing.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Look for UCC-3 continuation statements filed within 6 months before the 5-year expiration date. If there's a gap, the original filing might have lapsed.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Just went through this exact situation last week. Turned out the debtor had changed their legal name after incorporation and there were filings under both the old and new names. NY doesn't automatically link related filings like some states do.

0 coins

That's probably what's happening here. How did you track down all the name variations?

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Had to pull their complete corporate history from NY Department of State and search every name they'd ever used. Time-consuming but necessary.

0 coins

This is exactly why automated document checking tools are so valuable. They catch these historical name issues that manual searches miss.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today