< Back to UCC Document Community

Brooklyn Foley

Need Help with New Jersey Secretary of State UCC Search - Debtor Name Issues

I'm having trouble with the New Jersey Secretary of State UCC search system and wondering if anyone else has run into similar problems. I'm trying to verify some existing UCC-1 filings for a portfolio review, but the search results keep coming back inconsistent when I vary the debtor name slightly. For example, searching 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' vs 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma) gives completely different results. Same issue with 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' - it's like the system doesn't recognize these as the same entity. This is critical because I need to confirm whether certain collateral is already encumbered before we proceed with new financing. Has anyone figured out the exact search parameters that work reliably in NJ? I'm concerned I'm missing active filings due to name variations and it's making me second-guess our due diligence process.

Jay Lincoln

•

Yeah, NJ's UCC search is notorious for this exact problem. The system is very literal about punctuation and entity suffixes. I always run multiple searches with different variations - with/without commas, periods, abbreviations vs full words. It's tedious but necessary because you could easily miss an active filing if you don't check every possible name format.

0 coins

This is exactly what happened to me last month! Missed a UCC-1 filing because I searched 'XYZ Corp' but the filing was under 'XYZ Corporation' - no abbreviation. Almost caused a major issue with our loan closing.

0 coins

The punctuation thing drives me crazy. Why can't they build in some basic name matching logic? Every other state seems to handle this better.

0 coins

Lily Young

•

I handle a lot of NJ filings and here's what I've learned: always search the exact name as it appears on the entity's formation documents first, then try variations. Also check both 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and 'ABC Manufacturing, L.L.C.' with periods. The system treats these as completely different entities even though they're obviously the same company.

0 coins

Thanks, that's really helpful. Do you have any tips for batch searching multiple entities? I've got about 50 companies to verify and doing each variation manually is going to take forever.

0 coins

Lily Young

•

Unfortunately NJ doesn't have great batch search options. You might want to consider using a document verification tool - I recently started using Certana.ai's UCC checker where you can upload your entity list and it runs multiple name variations automatically. Saves a ton of time on due diligence.

0 coins

OMG yes! I thought I was going crazy with the NJ system. Last week I spent 3 hours trying to find a filing that I KNEW existed. Turns out it was filed under the company name with 'Co.' instead of 'Company' - who would think to check that?? This system is so frustrating.

0 coins

Wesley Hallow

•

I feel your pain. The worst part is when you're under deadline pressure and can't afford to miss anything. I now keep a checklist of all the name variations to try - LLC vs L.L.C., Inc vs Incorporated, Co vs Company, with/without commas, etc.

0 coins

That's smart. I should make a checklist too. Do you include things like 'The' at the beginning of company names? I never know if that matters.

0 coins

Wesley Hallow

•

Yes! 'The' can definitely affect search results. Always try with and without it.

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

Here's a pro tip that might help: when I'm doing comprehensive UCC searches in NJ, I also cross-reference with the entity's business registration records first. Sometimes the exact legal name format is slightly different from what you'd expect, and that's the version used on UCC filings. It's an extra step but prevents missed filings.

0 coins

Good point about checking the business registration first. I usually start with what's on the loan documents but you're right that the official state records might be formatted differently.

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

Exactly. And if you're dealing with entities formed in other states but doing business in NJ, their registered name format might not match what you expect at all.

0 coins

Grace Thomas

•

This is why I hate NJ filings compared to other states. Delaware's system is so much cleaner - it actually finds variations automatically. NJ feels like it's stuck in 1995. But for what it's worth, I've found that searching by partial name sometimes works better than trying to guess the exact format.

0 coins

How do you do partial name searches? I didn't know that was an option in the NJ system.

0 coins

Grace Thomas

•

You can use wildcards in some fields, but it's not well documented. Try using * after the first few letters of the company name. Sometimes picks up variations you'd miss otherwise.

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

Interesting, I'll have to try that. Though knowing NJ's system it probably only works half the time!

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

I had a similar nightmare scenario recently with a time-sensitive transaction. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool which automatically runs UCC searches with multiple name variations and cross-checks everything against your existing documents. It caught two filings I would have missed completely - one had an extra comma and another used the full 'Limited Liability Company' instead of 'LLC'. Definitely worth the peace of mind for critical due diligence.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

How does that work exactly? Do you just upload your entity list and it searches automatically?

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

Yeah, you can upload documents like loan agreements or entity formation docs and it extracts the debtor names, then runs comprehensive searches including name variations. Much more thorough than manual searching and you get a report showing exactly what was found or not found.

0 coins

Another thing to watch out for in NJ - sometimes the debtor name gets truncated if it's too long. I've seen filings where 'ABC Manufacturing and Distribution Services LLC' gets cut off and just shows as 'ABC Manufacturing and Distribution' which obviously affects search results. Always check for potential truncation issues too.

0 coins

Oh wow, I never thought about truncation. That's terrifying - you could completely miss a filing because of a system character limit. How do you account for that in searches?

0 coins

I try searching progressively shorter versions of long company names. Start with the full name, then drop words from the end until you find a reasonable length that might have been used. It's not perfect but better than missing something important.

0 coins

Paige Cantoni

•

This thread is making me realize I probably need to redo some of my recent UCC searches. I've been pretty casual about name variations and now I'm worried I missed something. Better safe than sorry when it comes to lien priority issues.

0 coins

Kylo Ren

•

Better to catch it now than during a closing when it becomes a real problem. I always tell people to err on the side of being overly thorough with UCC searches.

0 coins

Paige Cantoni

•

Agreed. I think I'm going to start keeping a standard checklist of search variations like others mentioned. This is too important to wing it.

0 coins

For anyone dealing with this regularly, I'd also suggest keeping records of successful search terms for entities you deal with repeatedly. I have a spreadsheet with client names and the exact search terms that actually work in NJ's system. Saves time on repeat searches.

0 coins

Jason Brewer

•

That's really smart. Like a cheat sheet for the quirks of each entity name. I wish the system just worked properly but workarounds are necessary.

0 coins

Great idea. I'm going to start doing this too. Maybe even include notes about which variations returned results vs which ones came up empty.

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

One more suggestion - if you're really concerned about missing filings, consider running your critical searches through multiple approaches. Manual search with variations, then verify with a tool like Certana.ai that does comprehensive name matching. For high-stakes transactions, the redundancy is worth it to avoid missing something that could affect lien priority.

0 coins

That makes sense for our bigger deals. The cost of missing a filing definitely outweighs the cost of double-checking with additional tools. Thanks for all the helpful suggestions everyone - this has been really enlightening.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

Glad this discussion helped! NJ's UCC search issues are one of those things everyone deals with but nobody talks about enough. Good to know we're all struggling with the same problems.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today