< Back to Social Security Administration

Stunned by $3,500+ Social Security survivor benefit after waiting until FRA - was it worth the 6 year wait?

Just got my survivor benefit amount from SSA and I'm still in shock! My wife passed away in 2018 from a sudden heart attack at 58. She was the primary earner in our household for 30+ years in healthcare administration. When I turned 60 back in 2019, I contacted SSA about survivor benefits. The rep told me I'd receive around $1,850 if I claimed then. I was working part-time at my daughter's small business and managing okay financially, so I decided to keep researching. After reading countless articles about reduced benefits when claiming early, I made the tough decision to wait until my full retirement age for survivors (66 and 2 months). In the meantime, I claimed my own smaller retirement benefit at 62 (about $950/month) to help with expenses. Fast forward to now - I finally reached my survivor FRA last month and applied. The SSA specialist just called with my benefit amount: $3,547 per month! That's DOUBLE what I would've received at 60! I know there have been several COLA increases, but I never expected this much difference. Has anyone else experienced this kind of jump by waiting until FRA for survivor benefits? I calculated roughly $102,000 in "lost" benefits from waiting 6+ years, but the higher monthly amount will make up for that in about 5 years. For those facing this decision now - how are you weighing the early vs. FRA survivor benefit options? I know everyone's situation is different (health issues, financial needs, etc.), but I'm curious how others approached this choice.

You absolutely made the right financial move by waiting until your FRA to claim survivor benefits. The reduction for claiming survivor benefits early is significant - approximately 0.396% per month before your FRA. At age 60, that's a 28.5% permanent reduction! The dramatic difference you're seeing is due to three factors: 1. Avoiding the early claiming reduction 2. COLAs over the waiting period (which apply even to unclaimed benefits) 3. The fact that your wife's earnings record likely had higher indexed earnings toward the end of her career For others facing this decision, I recommend calculating your "break-even age" - how long you need to live with the higher benefit to make up for the years of not receiving any payments. In your case, you'll break even around age 71-72, and everything after that is essentially "profit" compared to claiming early.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Thanks for breaking that down! I hadn't considered how my wife's higher earnings in her final years affected the calculation. The SSA specialist mentioned something about indexing but I didn't fully understand. You're right about the break-even point - if I make it to 72 (which seems likely given my family history), waiting will have been worth it. I just wish the SSA explained these options more clearly when I first inquired at 60.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

my husband died 2 years ago and i took survivor benefits right at 60 because i needed the money NOW not later. got about $1,600/month which helped alot. reading your post makes me wonder if i messed up big time??? but honestly don't think i could of waited 6 more years. how did you manage financially during the waiting years?

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

You didn't mess up! This is the EXACT problem with so many SS discussions. Everyone's situation is different and there is NO UNIVERSAL RIGHT ANSWER! If you needed the money at 60, then claiming at 60 WAS the right choice for YOU. I've seen too many people suffering now because they followed some financial guru's advice to "always wait" when their personal circumstances didn't align with that strategy. Social Security isn't just a math problem - it's about quality of life too. The system is DELIBERATELY DESIGNED to be roughly actuarially equivalent over an average lifespan. The earlier/smaller vs later/larger decision is mostly about risk management and personal circumstances, not some obvious financial trick everyone should follow.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

I'm in a similar situation right now and completely STRESSED about making the right decision. I'm 61, my husband passed last year after 38 years together. I can get about $1,920/month now or wait until my FRA (66+8mo) for what they estimate would be around $3,300. But here's my dilemma - I have some health issues (diabetes and heart problems) and honestly don't know if waiting 5+ more years makes sense in my case. I'm still working but it's getting harder. The SSA website is so confusing and the one time I called, I waited THREE HOURS only to be disconnected! Did anyone find a better way to get actual help from SSA to run different scenarios?

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

I had the same problem with the SSA phone lines - it's almost impossible to get through! I finally found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an SSA agent in under 10 minutes instead of waiting for hours. They have a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - basically they use some technology to hold your place in line and call you when an agent is available. I was skeptical but it worked perfectly when I needed to get information about my husband's earnings record to figure out my survivor options. Regarding your actual question about waiting - with significant health issues, the calculation becomes very different. Have you considered taking your own reduced benefit now if you have enough work credits, then switching to the survivor benefit at your FRA? That's sometimes a good compromise.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

Congrats on the higher payment! But honestly you got lucky with timing. My mom waited to claim dad's survivor benefits and only got an extra $300/month compared to taking it early. The difference wasn't worth the 5 years of no payments at all. I think lots of people on this forum make it sound like waiting is ALWAYS best but really depends on COLAs during the waiting period.

0 coins

You raise a good point about COLA variability. The past few years have seen unusually high COLAs (5.9% in 2022, 8.7% in 2023, 3.2% in 2024) which significantly boosted benefits for those who waited during this specific timeframe. Historically, COLAs have averaged closer to 2-3%, which would result in less dramatic increases. Another factor is the deceased spouse's earnings history. If they had their highest earning years later in their career, the survivor benefit calculation can be more favorable than if their earnings peaked early.

0 coins

quick question - did taking your own benefit at 62 permanently reduce what you'll get from your own record if you ever switch back? I'm confused about the rules between survivor benefits and regular retirement.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Yes, claiming my own retirement benefit at 62 did permanently reduce it - it's about 30% less than if I'd waited until my full retirement age. But that doesn't matter now because the survivor benefit is so much higher that I'll never go back to my own. The SSA automatically gives you whichever is higher (your own or the survivor benefit). The only reason I took my own early was to have some income while waiting for the full survivor benefit. Hope that helps!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

This is a perfect example of why the "file as a survivor early, then switch to your own at 70" strategy doesn't always work. Many financial advisors push this as the universal best strategy, but it completely depends on the relative amounts of your benefit vs. your deceased spouse's. In your case, your own benefit was substantially lower than your wife's, so the reverse strategy made more sense - take your own reduced benefit early, then switch to the higher survivor benefit at FRA. One clarification: survivor benefits reach their maximum at your survivor FRA, while your own retirement benefits continue growing until age 70. This different growth timeline creates opportunities for strategic claiming that most people miss.

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

wait so survivor benefits DON'T grow after FRA?? i thought everything kept growing til 70??! nobody told me this when i was deciding!!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Correct - survivor benefits reach their maximum at your survivor FRA (which varies depending on your birth year, generally between 66-67). They do NOT earn delayed retirement credits after that point. In contrast, your own retirement benefit DOES continue growing by 8% per year from your FRA until age 70. This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of Social Security and unfortunately leads to people waiting too long for survivor benefits, thinking they're still increasing when they're not.

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

I just want to thank everyone for their insights! The Social Security system is so complicated, and it helps to hear from others who've navigated it. One thing I didn't mention in my original post - I almost gave up waiting about 2 years ago when my car broke down and I needed a new roof. Those were tough months living on my small retirement benefit. But I'm glad I stuck with the plan. For those currently deciding, don't forget to factor in Medicare premiums when you turn 65 - that was an expense I hadn't properly calculated and it took a bite out of my budget!

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

The Medicare premiums surprised me too! And if your income goes up too much (like from taking a larger SS benefit), you can get hit with IRMAA surcharges that make Medicare even more expensive. Did that affect you at all with the higher survivor benefit?

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Fortunately no IRMAA issues for me yet, but you're right to mention it! My total income still keeps me in the lower brackets for Medicare premiums. But it's definitely something others should research if they have other income sources besides Social Security.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
7,156 users helped today