Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I've been receiving caretaker benefits from Social Security for taking care of my nephew since last year, and now I'm trying to file my taxes. I can't figure out which 1099 form I should be looking for! I know retirement benefits come on a SSA-1099, but these are caretaker benefits so I'm confused. I checked the online portal but don't see anything there. Does anyone know the exact suffix or form name? My tax preparer is asking and I feel stupid not knowing. Thanks for any help!
I'm totally confused about my husband's Full Retirement Age and when he should actually apply for Social Security retirement benefits. He was born in November 1958 so his FRA is 66 years and 8 months according to the SSA chart I found. But I don't understand WHEN exactly he reaches that age and becomes eligible for his full benefit amount. Would it be July 2025? And more importantly, when should he actually submit his application? Can he do it online or does he need to call for an appointment? I've heard you should apply 3-4 months before you want benefits to start, but I'm not sure if that means he should contact them in March or April? Everything about this process seems unnecessarily complicated! Any help sorting this out would be greatly appreciated.
Based on the discussion so far, let me clarify the timing for your husband: - Born November 1958 - FRA = 66 years + 8 months = July 2025 - Apply online 3-4 months before benefits start - If starting at FRA in July 2025, apply in March/April 2025 Since his employer wants him to stay through 2025, he has excellent options: 1. He can reach FRA in July 2025, apply for benefits, AND continue working with no earnings limit penalties. 2. He could delay applying past FRA while working, earning delayed retirement credits of 8% per year (prorated monthly at 2/3% per month) until age 70. Option #2 could significantly increase his lifetime benefit if he has average or above-average life expectancy. Many financial advisors recommend this approach if you don't need the money immediately, especially for the higher-earning spouse.
This makes perfect sense now. I thought the earnings limit would still apply even after FRA but I see that's not the case. Since he plans to work through December 2025 anyway, we'll definitely run the numbers to see if delaying makes sense. One final question - does he still need to sign up for Medicare at 65 even if he delays his SS retirement benefit?
Yes, Medicare enrollment at 65 is separate from your Social Security retirement benefit decision. He should absolutely sign up for Medicare during his Initial Enrollment Period (3 months before his 65th birthday month, his birthday month, and 3 months after). Failing to enroll in Medicare Part B during this window can result in permanent late enrollment penalties, even if he's still working. However, if he has creditable employer health insurance from a company with 20+ employees, he can delay Medicare Part B enrollment without penalty until that coverage ends. He should still enroll in Medicare Part A at 65 though, as it's premium-free and can serve as secondary insurance to his employer coverage.
Hello everyone! I've been receiving SSDI since 2009 (born in 1956), and now at 68, I'm collecting regular Social Security retirement benefits. My situation is a bit complicated because my husband is 2 years younger than me and plans to retire in February 2026 when he'll be 66 and 10 months old. Here's where I'm confused - my Social Security benefit is actually higher than what his will be when he starts collecting (mainly due to our age difference). I'm new to this group and wondering if there are any additional benefits I should be applying for? I really don't want to mess up anything that might affect what he'll receive. Are there any spousal benefits I should consider? Or anything else I'm missing? Thanks in advance for any guidance!
As others have mentioned, your husband might be eligible for a spousal supplement if 50% of your PIA exceeds his own PIA. One more thing to consider—has your husband checked his earnings record on ssa.gov to make sure all his work years are correctly recorded? It's not uncommon to find errors, especially for jobs from many years ago. If he has 35+ years of work history, also consider whether his current earnings might be higher than some earlier years. Working even just a few more months could potentially increase his benefit if he's replacing a lower-earning year in his top 35.
I wish I could get a straight answer from SSA!!! Their website says one thing, the phone people say another, and then when you go to the office they tell you something completely different! No wonder we're all confused about what benefits we can get. The whole system needs to be simplified!!!
I lost my husband last year and I'm trying to do some serious retirement planning now (I'm 54). When I called SSA to ask about getting estimates for survivor benefits at different ages, they told me I have to wait until I'm 62 to know what my survivor benefits will be! That's 8 years away and completely useless for my planning purposes. I specifically asked about getting some kind of benefit matrix showing what I might receive at different ages (60, FRA, 70, etc.) so I could make informed decisions. The rep seemed confused by my request and just scheduled me for an in-person appointment at my local office. Has anyone successfully gotten survivor benefit estimates before age 62? Am I completely wasting my time with this appointment? I need to make some important financial decisions NOW and can't wait 8 more years just to understand my options! Any advice from those who've been through this?
your not wasting time i think u should go to appointment because the people in person are nicer then the phone people
One additional thing to keep in mind - and something that confused me greatly during my own widow planning - is that you'll eventually need to decide between your own retirement benefit and your survivor benefit. You can take one first and switch to the other later if it's higher. This can be a complex but beneficial strategy. For example: 1. Take reduced survivor benefits at 60 2. Switch to your own retirement benefit at 70 (if it's higher by then) OR 1. Take your own retirement benefit at 62 2. Switch to survivors at your FRA for the maximum survivor amount This is exactly why you need those estimates now - to figure out which strategy works best for your situation. Make sure to specifically ask about these switching strategies during your appointment.
This is excellent advice about the switching strategy. I'll add that the optimal strategy depends a lot on the relative amounts of your own benefit vs. your survivor benefit, as well as your life expectancy and immediate financial needs. Having these estimates is crucial for making an informed decision.
I'm in a weird spot with Social Security after the WEP repeal and need some guidance on maximizing my benefits. My work history is split between SS and non-SS employment. I worked enough in SS-covered jobs when I was younger to earn the required credits. Then I taught for many years in a district that didn't pay into Social Security (fell under Windfall Elimination Provision). I retired at 61 with a defined benefit pension of about $3,750/month. For the past few years, I've been working part-time making around $25,000 annually in a job that DOES pay into SS while collecting my pension. With the WEP repeal, I'll now be eligible for my full SS benefit instead of the reduced amount! But here's my dilemma - I have two potential opportunities: 1. Return to full-time teaching that DOESN'T pay into SS for 3 years. I'd "double-dip" (get pension + salary) without my pension being recalculated. Salary would be about $62,000. 2. Teach full-time for 3 years in a district that DOES pay into SS. Salary around $69,000, which would boost my future SS benefit. According to my calculations, my SS benefit at 65 would be about $713/month if I keep my part-time job. If I work full-time in an SS-covered position for 3 years, it might increase to around $1,001/month. Financially, I'm comfortable - no debt and almost $750,000 in savings (money market/CDs/IRAs). I enjoy semi-retirement but don't mind working a few more years if it makes financial sense long-term. Am I missing anything important in my decision-making process? Which option would you recommend?
One more important consideration: Remember that Social Security benefits are calculated based on your highest 35 years of indexed earnings. If you don't have 35 years of SS-covered employment, the formula fills in zeros for the missing years. If you work 3 more years in SS-covered employment at $69,000, you'd be replacing 3 zeros (or very low earning years) in your calculation. That's why you're seeing such a significant jump in your estimated benefit (from $713 to $1,001). Have you requested your Social Security earnings record? That would show exactly which years would be replaced and might help with your decision. You can view this online if you have a mySocialSecurity account.
You're overthinking this way too much. If you don't need the money, do what makes you HAPPY. Period. End of story. No more analysis needed!
Melissa Lin
dont social security beneifts only get taxed if you make over a certain amount? i forget what it is but i think most people dont even pay tax on ss
0 coins
Sunny Wang
You're right! Social Security benefits are only taxable if your combined income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of your Social Security benefits) exceeds $25,000 for individuals or $32,000 for married filing jointly. At most, 85% of benefits become taxable, never 100%. But as another commenter pointed out, if these are benefits for a child/dependent that the original poster is receiving as a representative payee, they aren't taxable to the representative payee at all.
0 coins
Everett Tutum
Update: I found the form and checked box 5 like someone suggested. Turns out these payments aren't even my taxable income since I'm just the representative payee for my nephew! I feel silly now but glad I asked. Thanks everyone for your help!
0 coins
Effie Alexander
You're not silly at all! This is a very common misunderstanding. The SSA doesn't do a great job explaining the tax implications of being a representative payee. I'm glad you got it sorted out before filing your taxes incorrectly!
0 coins