< Back to Social Security Administration

Confused about SS benefit sequencing with WEP/GPO - can I still take spousal now & switch to mine at 70?

I'm approaching my FRA (67 years 2 months) soon and feeling totally confused about my Social Security options. From discussions in other forums, I've seen several people mention a strategy of claiming the lower benefit (either personal or spousal) initially, then switching to the higher benefit at age 70 to maximize lifetime payments. After waiting nearly 3 hours on hold Monday, I finally spoke with someone at SSA to ask about this approach. She couldn't give me a clear answer but promised someone from my local office would call. Sure enough, they called today (missed it of course!), but when I called back I only waited about 15 minutes. Here's where I'm confused - the rep told me this strategy is impossible. She claimed when I file for any benefit, they automatically evaluate both spousal and personal benefits and just give me whichever is higher. She said I'm "deemed" as filing for both and can't let one grow while collecting the other. This is particularly frustrating because I'm affected by both WEP and GPO (from a government pension), which significantly reduces my benefits. I was hoping to collect maybe $500-600 in spousal benefits now while letting my own grow until 70. The rep seemed rushed to end our call because of their call volume, so I'm questioning her information. How are others managing to implement this strategy? Is she giving me accurate information? When I mentioned learning about this option from online groups, she dismissively said to "never trust social media, only trust SSA." Yet they rush me off the phone after making me wait hours! I'm really confused about how to maximize my benefits with these WEP/GPO complications.

CosmicCowboy

•

The SSA representative was providing accurate information for your situation. The ability to take one benefit first and let another grow (called "restricted application") is only available to people born on or before January 1, 1954. Since you mentioned your FRA is 67y2m, you were born after that cutoff date. For those born after January 1, 1954, the deemed filing rule applies whenever you file for either retirement or spousal benefits. This means you're effectively filing for all benefits you're eligible for at that time. With WEP and GPO both applying to your situation, you're in a particularly complicated spot. The Government Pension Offset can reduce spousal benefits by 2/3 of your government pension amount, often eliminating them entirely. The Windfall Elimination Provision reduces your own benefits based on years of substantial earnings under Social Security.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Thank you! This makes so much more sense now. So all those people talking about switching strategies must have been born before 1954. I wish the SSA rep had explained this clearly instead of rushing me off the phone. Is there ANY way to maximize benefits when dealing with both WEP and GPO? I worked 23 years under Social Security and 12 years in state government.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

the ssa lady was right. cant do that switcheroo thing anymore. my sister tried the exact same thing last year & got same answer. its some kinda rule change they did years ago

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Thanks for confirming! Did your sister also have WEP/GPO complications, or was she just trying the regular switch strategy?

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

The restricted application strategy (what you're describing) was eliminated by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 for anyone born after January 1, 1954. Since your FRA is 67 years and 2 months, you were born around 1958, so you're subject to deemed filing rules. With WEP/GPO, your situation is particularly complex. The Government Pension Offset will reduce your spousal benefit by 2/3 of your non-covered pension amount. The Windfall Elimination Provision uses a modified formula to calculate your own SS benefit based on your years of substantial earnings under Social Security. At this point, your best strategy is probably to: 1. Get a detailed calculation of your WEP-adjusted personal benefit 2. Calculate your GPO-adjusted spousal benefit 3. Compare potential lifetime totals of claiming at FRA vs. age 70 Even with WEP, delaying until 70 still provides the same 8% per year increase between FRA and 70, which might be your best strategy depending on your health and financial situation.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

This is extremely helpful! I didn't realize the restricted application option was completely eliminated for my age group. So even with WEP, I'd still get the 8% annual increase between FRA and 70? That's good to know - maybe waiting is still my best option.

0 coins

Natasha Orlova

•

The SSA people are the WORST!!! They give different answers depending who you talk to and rush you off the phone. I've been dealing with them for months about my disability claim and get told something different EVERY SINGLE TIME. And they expect us to just trust whatever they say??? I don't know about the WEP/GPO stuff but I wouldn't trust what that one person told you without getting a second opinion. Their phone system is a nightmare though!

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

same here! waited 2 hrs last week and then they hung up on me lol

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

I was in a similar situation last year with WEP/GPO concerns. After several frustrating calls to SSA, I discovered Claimyr (claimyr.com). They connected me to a Social Security representative in under 20 minutes instead of the hours-long wait I was experiencing. The agent I reached was able to pull up my actual WEP calculation and show me exactly how much delaying until 70 would increase my benefit despite the reduction. They even emailed me documentation I could reference later. You can see how it works in their video demo: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU Regarding your specific question - the restricted application strategy ended for people born after January 1, 1954. Those born before could file a restricted application for just spousal benefits at FRA while letting their own benefit grow until 70. For those born after (like you and me), deemed filing rules apply.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Thanks for the Claimyr tip - those wait times are killing me! I'm going to check that out. It sounds like I need to get exact calculations of my WEP reduction to make an informed decision. I appreciate the confirmation about the restricted application cutoff date - at least now I understand why I was getting conflicting information.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

my husband n me were hit w/ wep too its a mess!! have you checked if you qualify for the wep guarantee? if you have 30+ years of substantial earnings under SS the WEP doesnt apply or gets reduced w/ 21-29 yrs. the SSA rep probly didnt even check this for you

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

I have 23 years of substantial earnings under SS, so I'm in that partial reduction category. You're right that the rep didn't mention anything about this! I need to figure out exactly how much my WEP reduction will be with those 23 years.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

this is why i tell everyone to just claim at 62! all these complicated rules and strategies and then they keep changing the rules anyway. bird in hand is worth 2 in bush lol

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

While claiming at 62 is simpler, it's not financially optimal for many people, especially those with longevity in their family. For someone expected to live into their mid-80s or beyond, waiting until FRA or even 70 often provides significantly more lifetime benefits despite the delayed start. Each situation is unique though, so there's no one-size-fits-all answer.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

To give you some concrete numbers about WEP, with 23 years of substantial earnings, your WEP reduction won't be the full amount. The maximum WEP reduction for someone reaching 62 in 2025 is about $613 per month, but with 23 years of substantial earnings, your reduction would be significantly less - about 70% of that maximum. Delaying until 70 still increases your WEP-reduced benefit by 8% per year beyond FRA. Since GPO is likely eliminating most or all of your spousal benefit anyway, focusing on maximizing your own benefit might be your best strategy. Consider requesting a detailed benefit calculation from SSA that shows your WEP-adjusted amounts at different claiming ages. This will give you the specific numbers to make your decision.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Thank you for these specific numbers! This is exactly what I needed. I had no idea the WEP reduction would be less with 23 years of substantial earnings. I'm going to request that detailed calculation as you suggested. This makes me feel much better about my options.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

i think everybody born after 1954 got screwed by that law change!! my brother in law was born in december 1953 and got to do the restricted thing but my sister missed it by 3 months. not fair!!

0 coins

Natasha Orlova

•

EXACTLY!!! The whole system is rigged against us. My cousin got to do this because she was born in 1952 and saved like $40,000 by using that strategy. Then they pull the rug out from under the rest of us. And now we're stuck with all these complicated WEP/GPO penalties too!!!

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,793 users helped today