Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm new to this community but wanted to share some encouragement as someone who works in disability advocacy. Reading through this thread, it's clear you have a much stronger case than you might realize, and the advice you've received here is excellent. What strikes me most is how organized and documented your approach has become through this conversation. The combination of your son's text messages, your supplemental spending records, and his age (17) creates a compelling narrative for SSA. Many parents in your situation give up too early, but you're absolutely right to pursue this. One additional suggestion: when you have your son write his statement, encourage him to be very specific about amounts and timeframes. Instead of "Dad wouldn't buy me clothes," something like "On [date], I asked Dad for $50 for winter clothes since mine were too small, and he said the SSI money was already spent on bills, so Mom had to send me money instead." That level of detail is powerful. Also, don't underestimate the psychological impact of simply filing these complaints. Even if your ex doesn't know the specific details of your case, the fact that SSA is now scrutinizing his payee performance often leads to immediate changes in behavior. The money might start being used more appropriately just because he knows someone is watching. Your determination to protect your son's financial future - especially while managing your own disability challenges - is admirable. That $8,750+ at stake, plus any accumulated savings, absolutely justifies this effort. Your son will benefit from having a parent who fought for his rights, regardless of the final outcome. Keep pushing forward with those forms and stay organized. You're doing everything right.

0 coins

Welcome to the community, and thank you for your encouraging perspective as someone in disability advocacy! Your point about the level of detail in my son's statement is really valuable - I can see how specific amounts, dates, and circumstances would paint a much clearer picture than general complaints. I'll definitely work with him this weekend to include those kinds of specifics while the incidents are still fresh in his memory. The insight about the psychological impact of filing complaints is something I hadn't fully considered but makes perfect sense. Even if the formal process takes time, just knowing that SSA is now paying attention to how the benefits are being used could lead to immediate improvements in how my ex handles the money. That alone might help protect the remaining funds while we work through the official channels. Thank you for recognizing that this fight is worthwhile despite my own disability challenges. Sometimes when you're managing SSDI yourself, people make you feel like you shouldn't be advocating for additional resources, but you're absolutely right that my son's financial future justifies this effort. Your encouragement to stay organized and keep pushing forward means a lot - having professional validation that I'm on the right track gives me the confidence to follow through with all these excellent suggestions I've received here.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I wanted to offer some additional perspective on your situation. I work with families navigating SSA benefits and have seen cases like yours resolved successfully, even with tight timelines. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is that you can also file a complaint with your Congressional representative's office - they often have dedicated staff who can expedite SSA reviews when there's potential misuse involved. This runs parallel to your SSA filing and sometimes gets faster results. Since your son is 17, I'd also suggest discussing with him whether he wants to request that SSA consider him capable of managing his own benefits before he turns 18. Some 17-year-olds can petition for early capability determination, which would remove both parents from the equation entirely if he's found capable. The documentation strategy everyone has outlined is spot-on. I'd add one more element: if you have any communication with your ex about the benefits (texts, emails), save those too. Sometimes payees inadvertently admit to inappropriate use in casual conversation. Your instincts about protecting those funds are absolutely correct. Even if this takes several months to resolve, establishing the paper trail now protects not just current benefits but ensures accountability for any past misuse. Don't let anyone discourage you from advocating for your son's financial future - this is exactly what a good parent should do. You've got solid advice here and a strong case. File those forms Monday and keep pushing forward!

0 coins

I'm currently dealing with this exact same issue! I have two divorces from the early 1990s and have been putting off my application for weeks because I thought I needed certified copies of everything before I could even submit. This thread has been incredibly helpful - it's such a relief to learn that approximate dates with explanatory notes are acceptable for your own retirement benefits! The SSA website really does make everything sound mandatory and scary when the reality seems much more reasonable. Based on everyone's experiences here, I'm going to submit my application this week using language like "divorced approximately fall 1993 - exact date unavailable after 30+ years" and include brief notes explaining why precise information isn't accessible. It sounds like SSA understands that people don't keep perfect records from decades ago and processes these situations routinely. Thank you to everyone who shared their real experiences - knowing that so many people successfully submitted with estimates and got approved without documentation requests gives me the confidence to stop overthinking this and finally get my application in!

0 coins

You're absolutely making the right decision! I went through this same exact situation about 6 months ago - two divorces from the early 90s and completely panicking about exact dates. I used almost identical language to what you're planning ("divorced approximately fall 1992 - exact date unavailable after 30+ years") and my application sailed through without any issues. The SSA really does understand that people don't have perfect recall of events from 30+ years ago. I wish I hadn't stressed about it for so long - the relief after hitting submit was amazing! Don't let the pursuit of perfect paperwork delay your benefits when you're eligible. Get that application in this week and celebrate taking this important step!

0 coins

I just went through this exact same process about 4 months ago and completely understand your frustration! I had two divorces from the 1980s and was absolutely panicking about not remembering exact dates. After reading advice similar to what's shared in this thread, I submitted my application with approximate dates like "divorced approximately summer 1986 - exact date unknown after 38 years" and included brief explanatory notes. My application was approved in about 7 weeks with ZERO follow-up requests for documentation! The SSA representative I eventually spoke with confirmed what others have mentioned - for your own retirement benefits, they understand that people don't maintain perfect records from decades ago. They're primarily using this information to verify your legal name history and identify potential future beneficiaries on your record. Don't let this paperwork anxiety delay your application when you're so close to 66! Submit with your best estimates and honest explanations about why exact dates aren't available. The worst case scenario is they ask for more information later, but based on my experience and what I've seen from others, that rarely happens for retirement benefits based on your own work record. Get that application submitted this week - you'll feel such relief once it's done!

0 coins

I'm so sorry for your loss, Zoe. This entire thread has been incredibly valuable - I'm facing a similar situation as I'll be turning 60 in early 2026. The consistent advice about applying 3 months before your 60th birthday has really helped clarify the timing for me. I wanted to add one more tip that helped me when I was gathering documents for other government benefits: create a simple spreadsheet or checklist with all the required documents and check them off as you collect them. This way you can see at a glance what you still need to gather. Also, I learned from dealing with other federal agencies that it's worth calling your local SSA office directly (not just the national number) to ask about their current processing times. Sometimes local offices can give you more specific timelines based on their current workload. The national average might be 6-8 weeks, but your local office might be faster or slower. Thank you to everyone who has shared their experiences - this community support makes such a difficult process feel much more manageable!

0 coins

That's such a practical suggestion about creating a spreadsheet to track all the required documents! I'm definitely going to do that - it would be so helpful to have a visual checklist to make sure I don't miss anything important. Your tip about calling the local SSA office directly is really smart too. I hadn't thought about the fact that processing times might vary by location, but that makes total sense. It would be great to get a more accurate timeline estimate for my specific area rather than just the national average. I'm adding both of these suggestions to my growing list of preparation steps for August. Thank you for sharing these practical tips - every little detail helps make this overwhelming process feel more organized and manageable!

0 coins

I'm so sorry for your loss, Zoe. This thread has been absolutely incredible to read - the amount of practical, real-world advice shared here is amazing! As someone who will be going through this same process in a couple of years when my husband's survivor benefits become relevant, I'm bookmarking this entire conversation. The consistency of the "apply 3 months before turning 60" advice across so many different experiences really gives me confidence in that timeline. I especially appreciate all the specific tips about calling SSA early on Tuesday/Wednesday mornings, having your husband's mother's maiden name ready, and keeping copies of absolutely everything. One small thing I wanted to add that might help - when my aunt went through a similar government benefit application process, she found it helpful to practice explaining her situation out loud before making the official call. It sounds silly, but having your "story" organized in your mind can help you communicate more clearly during what can be an emotional and stressful phone conversation. Zoe, it sounds like you have an excellent plan for August 2025, and with all this great advice from the community, you're going to be so well-prepared. Wishing you all the best with the application process!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I want to add my heartfelt thanks for this absolutely invaluable discussion! I'm currently 59 and was widowed six months ago after a 27-year marriage. Like so many others here, I had completely misunderstood the Social Security survivor benefit rules around remarriage and had been living with the belief that remarrying before 60 would permanently eliminate my eligibility for my late husband's benefits. This thread has been nothing short of life-changing for me - discovering that remarriage before 60 only temporarily suspends benefits rather than permanently eliminating them has completely shifted how I can approach my future. What's particularly striking is how this discussion has revealed that virtually all of us were operating under the same fundamental misunderstanding, which really highlights a serious communication gap in how SSA presents these crucial rules. At 59, I'm so close to that important age 60 threshold, but now I know that even if I meet someone special before then, I wouldn't be making a permanent financial sacrifice. The personal experiences shared here, especially from members who've actually navigated these exact situations, provide the kind of real-world guidance that's simply impossible to find in official materials. This community has created something truly extraordinary - a comprehensive resource that addresses nearly every scenario someone in our situation might face, backed by both technical expertise and genuine lived experience. Thank you all for your wisdom, support, and willingness to share your stories during what are undoubtedly challenging times in all our lives!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Oliver! I'm also a newcomer here and your story really resonates with me. At 59, you're in such a unique position - so close to that crucial age 60 threshold that you have the flexibility to make decisions based purely on your heart rather than financial concerns. What's been most eye-opening for me about this entire discussion is how it's exposed this massive communication failure by SSA. The fact that virtually every single person who shared their story here was operating under the same misconception really shows this isn't just individual confusion - it's a systemic problem that's affecting major life decisions for countless widowed people across the country. Like you, I find the combination of technical expertise and real personal experiences shared here incredibly valuable. Members like Alice Pierce and Elin Robinson provided the regulatory clarity we needed, while people like Lim Wong and Beth Ford showed us what it actually looks like to navigate these situations in real life. This thread has honestly become better than any official resource I've found anywhere. It's amazing how Amy's original question has created this comprehensive guide that could help so many others who are facing these same difficult decisions. Thank you for sharing your experience - knowing that others are working through these same challenges during such a difficult time in our lives really helps all of us feel less alone in this journey.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful to have discovered this amazingly comprehensive discussion! I'm currently 53 and was widowed just eight months ago after a 21-year marriage. Like virtually everyone else who has shared their story here, I had completely misunderstood the Social Security survivor benefit rules around remarriage. I honestly believed that remarrying before 60 would permanently eliminate my eligibility for my late husband's benefits, which has been causing me significant anxiety as I try to envision what my future might look like. Reading through this entire thread has been absolutely transformative - learning that remarriage before 60 only temporarily suspends benefits rather than permanently eliminating them has given me hope and options I didn't know I had. What's most striking is how this discussion has revealed what appears to be a widespread communication problem with how SSA explains these critical rules. The fact that so many intelligent, well-informed people were all operating under the same fundamental misunderstanding really demonstrates this isn't just individual confusion but a systemic issue affecting major life decisions for widowed people nationwide. At 53, I now realize I have seven years to make informed choices about my future, and knowing I have real flexibility rather than an all-or-nothing scenario feels like a tremendous weight has been lifted. The combination of technical expertise from knowledgeable members and real-world experiences from people who've actually navigated these situations creates an invaluable resource that's honestly better than anything I've found through official channels. Thank you all for your wisdom, support, and willingness to share your experiences during what I know are challenging times for all of us!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Ethan! I'm also a newcomer here and your message really captures what so many of us have experienced. At 53, you actually have the most time of anyone in this discussion to make thoughtful decisions about your future - seven whole years before that age 60 threshold! What's been most remarkable about this entire thread is how it's created this incredible educational resource that none of us could have found anywhere else. Like you, I was amazed to discover that virtually everyone here was operating under the same misconception about permanent vs. temporary benefit loss. It really shows how poorly SSA communicates these life-altering distinctions. The fact that you're already recognizing you have "real flexibility rather than an all-or-nothing scenario" during what must still be such a raw time in your grief journey shows incredible strength. This community has truly created something special - combining regulatory expertise with genuine lived experiences to help people like us navigate these complex decisions with confidence rather than fear. Thank you for adding your voice to this discussion - it helps all of us feel less alone in working through these challenging situations!

0 coins

so confused lol. why would SSA let us do this? seems like theyd have to pay out more money this way

0 coins

It's just how the law is written. When Congress amended the Social Security rules in 2015, they specifically preserved this option for survivor benefits while eliminating similar strategies for spousal benefits. The survivor strategy remains because it helps people (mostly women) who might otherwise face financial hardship after losing a spouse. Remember that survivor benefits are paid from the same overall Social Security trust fund, so it's not really "extra" money - it's just allowing more flexible timing for when you claim different types of benefits you're entitled to.

0 coins

This is such valuable information! I had no idea this option existed for divorced surviving spouses. I'm 58 and my ex-husband passed away two years ago after we were married for 12 years. I've been dreading the thought of claiming early and getting reduced benefits, but it sounds like I could potentially claim survivor benefits at 60 and then switch to my own higher benefit at 70. Does anyone know if there are any earnings restrictions while collecting survivor benefits? I'm still working full-time and won't be ready to fully retire for several more years.

0 coins

Yes, there are earnings restrictions for survivor benefits before you reach full retirement age, just like with regular retirement benefits. For 2025, if you're under FRA, you can earn up to $23,400 per year without any reduction in benefits. If you earn more than that, they'll reduce your survivor benefits by $1 for every $2 you earn above the limit. In the year you reach FRA, the limit is higher and the reduction is less ($1 for every $3 over the higher threshold), and once you reach FRA, there's no earnings limit at all. Since you're 58 now, you'd need to consider this if you claim survivor benefits at 60 while still working full-time.

0 coins

Prev1...157158159160161...837Next