As a newcomer to this community, I want to add my heartfelt thanks for this absolutely invaluable discussion! I'm currently 59 and was widowed six months ago after a 27-year marriage. Like so many others here, I had completely misunderstood the Social Security survivor benefit rules around remarriage and had been living with the belief that remarrying before 60 would permanently eliminate my eligibility for my late husband's benefits. This thread has been nothing short of life-changing for me - discovering that remarriage before 60 only temporarily suspends benefits rather than permanently eliminating them has completely shifted how I can approach my future. What's particularly striking is how this discussion has revealed that virtually all of us were operating under the same fundamental misunderstanding, which really highlights a serious communication gap in how SSA presents these crucial rules. At 59, I'm so close to that important age 60 threshold, but now I know that even if I meet someone special before then, I wouldn't be making a permanent financial sacrifice. The personal experiences shared here, especially from members who've actually navigated these exact situations, provide the kind of real-world guidance that's simply impossible to find in official materials. This community has created something truly extraordinary - a comprehensive resource that addresses nearly every scenario someone in our situation might face, backed by both technical expertise and genuine lived experience. Thank you all for your wisdom, support, and willingness to share your stories during what are undoubtedly challenging times in all our lives!

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful to have discovered this amazingly comprehensive discussion! I'm currently 53 and was widowed just eight months ago after a 21-year marriage. Like virtually everyone else who has shared their story here, I had completely misunderstood the Social Security survivor benefit rules around remarriage. I honestly believed that remarrying before 60 would permanently eliminate my eligibility for my late husband's benefits, which has been causing me significant anxiety as I try to envision what my future might look like. Reading through this entire thread has been absolutely transformative - learning that remarriage before 60 only temporarily suspends benefits rather than permanently eliminating them has given me hope and options I didn't know I had. What's most striking is how this discussion has revealed what appears to be a widespread communication problem with how SSA explains these critical rules. The fact that so many intelligent, well-informed people were all operating under the same fundamental misunderstanding really demonstrates this isn't just individual confusion but a systemic issue affecting major life decisions for widowed people nationwide. At 53, I now realize I have seven years to make informed choices about my future, and knowing I have real flexibility rather than an all-or-nothing scenario feels like a tremendous weight has been lifted. The combination of technical expertise from knowledgeable members and real-world experiences from people who've actually navigated these situations creates an invaluable resource that's honestly better than anything I've found through official channels. Thank you all for your wisdom, support, and willingness to share your experiences during what I know are challenging times for all of us!

so confused lol. why would SSA let us do this? seems like theyd have to pay out more money this way

This is such valuable information! I had no idea this option existed for divorced surviving spouses. I'm 58 and my ex-husband passed away two years ago after we were married for 12 years. I've been dreading the thought of claiming early and getting reduced benefits, but it sounds like I could potentially claim survivor benefits at 60 and then switch to my own higher benefit at 70. Does anyone know if there are any earnings restrictions while collecting survivor benefits? I'm still working full-time and won't be ready to fully retire for several more years.

Thanks everyone for the helpful responses! To summarize what I've learned: 1. Only the payments I physically receive in 2024 count for 2024 taxes 2. The December payment that arrives in January 2025 will count for 2025 taxes 3. I should wait for my SSA-1099 form in late January/early February for the official numbers 4. The 1099 will show the gross amount before any Medicare deductions 5. I might want to consider tax withholding from my SS payments going forward This helps tremendously with my year-end planning!

You've got a great summary there! Just one additional tip since you mentioned year-end planning - if you have other retirement account withdrawals planned for 2024 (like from a 401k or traditional IRA), you might want to calculate whether those combined with your Social Security benefits will push you into a higher tax bracket or increase the taxable portion of your SS benefits. Sometimes it's worth spreading those withdrawals across tax years to minimize the overall tax impact. Good luck with your planning!

Having read through all these excellent responses, I want to add one more consideration that could be crucial for your situation. Since you're getting $160k over 5 years, you'll want to be very careful about the "substantial services" rule that applies to installment sales of businesses. If the SSA determines that you're providing substantial services to earn those installment payments (rather than just receiving payment for assets already sold), they can treat the entire payment stream as self-employment income subject to SE tax and earnings limits - even if the initial sale was properly structured as capital gains. The key is ensuring your installment agreement clearly states that payments are for assets already transferred, not for future services. Any ongoing relationship should be minimal and well-documented as "asset transfer completion" rather than business services. Given the complexity everyone has outlined here, I'd strongly recommend getting a determination letter from SSA BEFORE finalizing your sale. You can submit a detailed description of your proposed transaction and ask for a written determination of how they'll treat it. This takes time (several months typically) but could save you from nasty surprises later. Also consider that if you delay SS until 67 and live off the business proceeds, you'll not only avoid the earnings test but also qualify for delayed retirement credits. At $32k annually from the sale, this might actually maximize your lifetime benefits significantly.

I've been reading through all this fantastic advice, and I wanted to add something from my experience helping my dad with a similar situation last year. One thing that really caught my attention is the discussion about timing and delayed retirement credits. Given that you have $160k coming in over 5 years ($32k annually), you might actually be in an ideal position to optimize your lifetime Social Security benefits. Here's a strategy worth considering: 1. Delay Social Security until age 70 (not just 67) to maximize delayed retirement credits - that's an 8% increase for each year from 67-70, totaling 24% higher monthly benefits for life 2. Use the business sale proceeds to cover living expenses from 63-70 3. This approach eliminates ALL earnings test concerns and could result in significantly higher lifetime benefits The math works out especially well if you have longevity in your family. At $32k per year from the sale, you'd have enough to live on (potentially supplemented with some part-time work that keeps you under earnings limits if needed). I'd also strongly echo the advice about getting that SSA determination letter before finalizing anything. My dad's attorney was able to get one, and while it took about 4 months, it prevented any nasty surprises down the road. Don't let the buyer pressure you into a timeline that doesn't work for YOUR retirement optimization!

I'm in the exact same situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I submitted my retirement application 6 weeks ago and have been getting increasingly worried about the "pending" status with no updates. Like many others here, I also worked for a local government agency (the county assessor's office) for about 4 years in my early career, so now I understand why my application is probably taking longer. The SSA website's 4-6 week estimate is completely misleading and causing unnecessary stress for people trying to plan their retirements. I've been hesitant to try calling because of all the horror stories about hold times, but after reading about the 7am strategy and the Claimyr service, I'm going to give both a try this week. It's frustrating that we have to jump through so many hoops just to get basic information about our own applications, but at least knowing these delays are unfortunately normal helps reduce some of the anxiety. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and tips - this community support makes the waiting much more bearable!

I'm just starting to research the Social Security retirement application process and stumbled upon this incredibly informative discussion! As someone who hasn't filed yet but is planning to retire in about 8 months, reading through all these real experiences has been both enlightening and concerning. It's clear that the SSA website's 4-6 week processing estimate is completely outdated and misleading. I worked for a state agency for about 5 years early in my career, so based on what everyone's sharing here about government employment causing delays, I'm now planning to submit my application at least 3-4 months before I actually need benefits to start. The tips about calling at 7am, checking MySocialSecurity messages regularly, and having backup options like Claimyr or contacting congressional representatives are incredibly valuable. Thank you to everyone who's shared their experiences and advice - this real-world knowledge is so much more helpful than the official SSA guidance!