IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Gabrielle Dubois

โ€ข

Just wanted to add one important timing consideration that might help with your planning. You don't have to change the beneficiary immediately when your child is born. Since you're the account owner, you maintain control over when to make this change. This could be strategic from a gift tax perspective - you might want to wait until early in the tax year to make the change so you have the full annual exclusion available, or you could time it around other gifts you're planning to make to your child. Also, keep in mind that if your account values are substantial, you and your wife can each make separate gifts using your individual annual exclusions. So if you have $30,000 in the account, you could each gift $15,000 to stay under the annual limits (assuming 2023 limits), effectively doubling your gift capacity without needing to file Form 709. Congratulations on the upcoming arrival! It's great that you're thinking ahead about these tax implications.

0 coins

This is such a helpful point about timing! I hadn't considered that we could strategically time the beneficiary change. Since our baby is due in August, would it make sense to wait until January of the following year to make the change? That way we'd have the full annual exclusion available and wouldn't have to worry about any other gifts we might make during the birth year (like maybe contributing more to the 529 after the baby arrives). Thanks for the congratulations and the strategic advice!

0 coins

Dominic Green

โ€ข

One thing to keep in mind is that the growth in your 529 account since you opened it will also be considered part of the gift when you change the beneficiary. So if you originally contributed $20,000 but the account has grown to $25,000, the entire $25,000 would be treated as the gift amount, not just your original contributions. This is why timing can be particularly important if your accounts have performed well. You might want to consider making the beneficiary change sooner rather than later if you expect continued growth, since waiting could potentially push you over the annual exclusion limits. Also, don't forget that each parent can make separate gifts, so if you and your wife are both listed as account owners on separate 529s, you could potentially use both of your annual exclusions. Just make sure you're clear on which spouse is the account owner for each 529 to properly calculate the gift tax implications.

0 coins

CyberSiren

โ€ข

This is a really important point about the growth being included in the gift valuation! I'm actually curious about something - if the account has grown significantly, would it ever make sense to consider withdrawing some funds first (paying the penalty) and then changing the beneficiary on a smaller amount? Or would that create even more tax complications? Also, when you mention separate 529s for each spouse, do you mean we should have opened individual accounts rather than joint ones? We currently have everything set up jointly, so I'm wondering if that limits our gift tax planning options.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

โ€ข

I'm currently studying for my CTA exams after working in corporate tax for about 2 years, so I can definitely relate to your nervousness! Your manager suggesting it after 18 months is actually a really good sign - they clearly see potential in your abilities. From my experience so far, the technical knowledge from your day-to-day work forms a solid foundation, but the exams definitely push you into areas you might not encounter regularly. I've found inheritance tax and international aspects particularly challenging since I rarely deal with those in my current role. What's helped me most is treating the preparation like a structured work project - I created a detailed study schedule, set weekly milestones, and track my progress religiously. I'm doing about 10-12 hours per week and plan to continue for 6-7 months total. The biggest adjustment for me has been shifting from the computational mindset of compliance work to the advisory approach the exams require. Start practicing written answers early - the time pressure is real and structuring clear advice under exam conditions is quite different from having time to research and double-check everything at work. One practical tip: I joined an online study forum where current candidates share resources and discuss tricky concepts. It's been invaluable for staying motivated and getting different perspectives on complex topics. Given the approaching deadline and your manager's support, I'd say register and commit properly to the preparation. The time investment is substantial but everyone I've spoken to who qualified says it's genuinely worth it for career progression. Good luck with your decision!

0 coins

Emma Thompson

โ€ข

Amun-Ra, your approach of treating CTA preparation like a structured work project is brilliant! I'm someone who responds really well to clear milestones and tracking progress, so that resonates with me. Your point about inheritance tax and international aspects being particularly challenging is helpful - those are definitely areas I rarely touch in my current corporate tax role, so I'll need to budget extra time for those topics. I'm really interested in the online study forum you mentioned. Could you share which one you're using? Having that community support and different perspectives on complex concepts sounds invaluable, especially for someone like me who might be studying mostly solo initially. The shift from computational to advisory mindset seems to be the consistent theme in everyone's advice - I'm starting to realize this might be the biggest hurdle for me given how compliance-focused my current work is. But it also sounds like exactly the kind of skill development that would benefit my career regardless. Thanks for the encouragement about registering! Between your advice and everyone else's positive experiences, I'm feeling much more confident about taking the plunge. The consistent 10-12 hours per week timeline also gives me a realistic benchmark to work with.

0 coins

Alina Rosenthal

โ€ข

I'm in a very similar situation to you - about 20 months into my corporate tax role at a regional firm and my manager has been hinting that I should consider CTA. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful and honestly quite reassuring! What strikes me most from everyone's advice is how consistent the time commitment estimates are (8-12 hours per week for 6-8 months) and the emphasis on developing advisory writing skills early. That shift from computational compliance work to client-focused advice seems to be the biggest adjustment for most people. I'm particularly encouraged by how many people mentioned that 18 months of corporate tax experience is actually a strong foundation. I think I was underestimating how much relevant knowledge I've already built up through day-to-day work. The career progression benefits that multiple people have mentioned - more interesting advisory work, faster promotions, better earning potential - really align with what I'm hoping to achieve. It sounds like the investment in time and effort genuinely pays off fairly quickly after qualifying. I think I'm going to follow everyone's advice and register for the next session. Having read all these experiences, the combination of my manager's support, solid foundation from work experience, and clear study strategies from people who've been through it makes me feel much more confident about tackling this challenge. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread has been exactly what I needed to make an informed decision!

0 coins

Nia Johnson

โ€ข

I'm a newcomer to this community and currently preparing my PTIN application as a foreign national from Germany. This thread has been absolutely invaluable - thank you all for sharing such detailed experiences and practical advice! Reading through everyone's stories, it's clear that the three main pitfalls are: 1) using incorrect notarization (US vs. home country), 2) missing apostilles, and 3) inadequate translations. The consistency of these issues across different countries is really striking. For other German nationals who might find this thread, here's what I'm planning based on the guidance shared here: 1. **Notarization**: Use a German "Notar" (not just any notary) to create a certified copy with official seal 2. **Apostille**: Get it from the "Landgericht" (Regional Court) in the jurisdiction where the notary is located 3. **Translation**: Use a certified "vereidigte รœbersetzer" for any German text portions 4. **Timeline**: Planning for 10-12 weeks total based on the experiences shared The cost estimates people have provided are really helpful for budgeting - it looks like I should expect around โ‚ฌ60-80 for notarization, โ‚ฌ25 for apostille, and โ‚ฌ100-150 for certified translation. One question for the group: Has anyone had success getting the German apostille remotely, or does it require in-person submission? Some German courts now offer online services, but like @Demi Lagos mentioned for Spain, I want to make sure the IRS accepts digitally-issued apostilles. Thanks again for creating such a supportive and informative community - this collective knowledge is going to save so many people from unnecessary rejections!

0 coins

Welcome to the community @Nia Johnson! Your German-specific plan looks very well researched based on all the experiences shared in this thread. The cost estimates you've outlined seem realistic too - it's helpful to see the breakdown for different countries. Regarding your question about remote apostille services in Germany, I'd lean toward being cautious and going with the traditional in-person or mail submission to the Landgericht. While digital apostilles are becoming more common, the IRS can be very particular about document formats, especially for foreign submissions. Given how much time and money you're investing in getting everything right, the extra effort to get a traditional paper apostille might be worth avoiding any potential issues. From what others have shared in this thread, it seems like the safest approach is to stick with established, traditional methods rather than newer digital options when dealing with the IRS. You don't want to risk a rejection over something like document format when you've put so much effort into getting all the other requirements perfect. Your 10-12 week timeline planning is smart - better to overestimate and be pleasantly surprised than to be caught short on time. The experiences shared here really show how important it is to start this process well in advance of when you actually need the PTIN active. This thread has become such an amazing resource for foreign nationals navigating the PTIN process. Thanks for contributing your German-specific research - it'll definitely help other German applicants who find this discussion!

0 coins

Jessica Nolan

โ€ข

As a newcomer to this community who's also dealing with PTIN application challenges as a foreign national (from Mexico), I wanted to add my recent experience to this incredibly helpful thread. I just went through my first rejection last month and found many of the same issues you all have described. What's particularly frustrating is that the rejection letter was quite vague - it just said "documents not properly notarized by foreign notary" without explaining what specifically was wrong. After reading through this discussion, I realized I made several mistakes: 1. I used a regular "notario pรบblico" instead of understanding I needed a more formal notarization 2. I completely missed the apostille requirement (had never heard of this before!) 3. I didn't get my Spanish text portions translated Based on everyone's experiences here, I'm now planning to: - Get my passport notarized by a "Notario Pรบblico" with proper credentials in Mexico - Obtain an apostille from the "Secretarรญa de Relaciones Exteriores" - Have certified translations done for the Spanish portions - Use the cover letter approach @Callum Savage mentioned - Send everything via certified mail with tracking The timeline and cost information shared here has been invaluable for planning. It looks like I should budget around 2,500-3,000 pesos total and allow 8-10 weeks for the complete process. Thank you all for sharing such detailed experiences - this thread should be pinned as a resource for foreign nationals! The community support here makes navigating these complex requirements so much more manageable.

0 coins

Welcome to the community @Jessica Nolan! Your experience with the vague rejection letter is unfortunately very common - so many of us have dealt with that same frustration. It's great that you found this thread before your second attempt! Your Mexican-specific plan looks solid based on all the experiences shared here. The Secretarรญa de Relaciones Exteriores is definitely the right authority for apostilles in Mexico. One small tip - when you go to the Notario Pรบblico, make sure they include their "nรบmero de patente" (license number) clearly on the notarization. I've heard that can sometimes be an issue if it's not prominently displayed. The budget you've outlined (2,500-3,000 pesos) seems reasonable based on the cost breakdowns others have shared for their countries. And your 8-10 week timeline is realistic - it's smart to build in that buffer. One question - have you considered using any of the services mentioned in this thread like Claimyr to speak directly with the IRS before resubmitting? Given how vague your rejection letter was, it might be worth getting specific guidance about your case to avoid any other potential issues you might not have identified. This thread really has become an amazing resource! The collective experiences shared here could save so many people from multiple rejections. Thanks for adding your Mexican perspective - it helps build out the international knowledge base for future applicants. Best of luck with your resubmission!

0 coins

Haley Bennett

โ€ข

Emma, what an amazing gift from your parents! After reading through this entire thread, I'm struck by how consistently everyone has confirmed that this is definitely a gift situation, not taxable income to you. As someone who's dealt with complex family financial situations, I want to emphasize how important it is that you're asking these questions upfront rather than discovering potential issues later. The peace of mind you'll have knowing this won't create any unexpected tax burden is invaluable. One small addition to all the excellent advice you've received: make sure to keep a copy of your final mortgage statement showing the payoff amount and date. This will be helpful documentation for your records, and it's also satisfying to have that "paid in full" statement as a keepsake of this incredible milestone! Your parents have given you such a wonderful foundation for financial freedom. Being mortgage-free opens up so many opportunities - whether that's accelerating retirement savings, building wealth, or simply having more flexibility in your monthly budget. Make sure to take a moment to really appreciate this life-changing generosity. This community has done an outstanding job walking you through every aspect of this situation. You're all set to move forward with confidence!

0 coins

Andre Rousseau

โ€ข

This is such a heartwarming situation, and I'm so glad you found this amazing community for guidance! As someone who works in financial planning, I can confirm that everyone here has given you absolutely spot-on advice. Your parents' direct payment to your mortgage company is unequivocally a gift to you, not taxable income. The IRS treats this exactly the same as if they had handed you $165,000 in cash and you immediately paid off the mortgage yourself - it's simply a different delivery method for the same economic transaction. What really stands out to me about this thread is how the community went above and beyond just answering your tax question. The practical advice about documentation, potential 1099-C forms, insurance updates, and your parents' Form 709 requirements creates a complete roadmap for handling this gift properly. One thing I'd add that might help with your peace of mind: consider setting up a brief meeting with a tax professional before year-end just to review your situation and confirm everything is documented correctly. While the tax treatment is clear-cut (no income to you), having professional confirmation can be worth the consultation fee for such a significant transaction. Your parents have given you an incredible foundation for financial success. Enjoy every moment of being mortgage-free - it's such a liberating feeling! What a wonderful blessing to receive from such generous and loving parents.

0 coins

Liam McGuire

โ€ข

Be very careful about which line you use on Schedule 1 for the attorney fee deduction. The IRS has specific requirements for employment discrimination settlements under IRC Section 62(a)(20). You'll want to use Schedule 1, Line 24z "Other adjustments" and write "Attorney fees - employment discrimination settlement" in the description. Don't put it under legal fees or business expenses, as those have different rules and limitations. Also, make sure your settlement actually qualifies as "employment discrimination" - this includes claims under Title VII, ADA, ADEA, and similar federal employment laws. Some employment settlements (like wrongful termination based solely on state contract law) might not qualify for the above-the-line deduction. Keep all your documentation together: the settlement agreement, 1099 form, attorney fee agreement, and any correspondence that clearly identifies the nature of your discrimination claim. The IRS has been more aggressive about reviewing these deductions lately.

0 coins

MoonlightSonata

โ€ข

This is really helpful clarification! I'm dealing with a similar situation and wasn't sure about the specific line item. Quick question - if my settlement was for both discrimination AND retaliation claims under the same federal laws, does that still qualify for the above-the-line deduction? My attorney said retaliation falls under the same umbrella but I want to make sure before I file. Also, when you mention keeping correspondence about the nature of the discrimination claim, would the EEOC charge document be sufficient proof, or do I need something more specific from the settlement paperwork itself?

0 coins

Kaiya Rivera

โ€ข

Yes, retaliation claims absolutely qualify for the above-the-line deduction when they're filed under the same federal employment laws! Retaliation is considered part of the discrimination claim itself under Title VII, ADA, ADEA, etc. The IRS doesn't distinguish between the underlying discrimination and retaliation - they're treated as one qualifying claim. Your EEOC charge document would be excellent supporting documentation since it establishes the federal law basis for your claim. I'd also recommend keeping a copy of the settlement agreement that references the EEOC charge or specifically mentions the federal statutes involved. The key is showing that your settlement resolves claims under qualifying federal employment discrimination laws. If your settlement agreement is vague about the legal basis, you might also want to keep any demand letters or legal filings that clearly reference the specific federal statutes. The IRS wants to see that this isn't just a general employment dispute but specifically covers claims under the federal laws that qualify for the deduction.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

โ€ข

I went through this exact situation two years ago with my age discrimination settlement. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier - if your settlement includes both back pay and other damages (like emotional distress), you might need to treat different portions differently for tax purposes. The back pay portion is subject to employment taxes (Social Security, Medicare) even though it's being paid as a settlement, while other damages typically aren't. My attorney didn't break this down clearly in the initial paperwork, and I had to go back and request a detailed allocation between back pay and other damages. Also, don't forget that if your settlement includes interest or punitive damages, those portions are always fully taxable regardless of the attorney fee deduction. Make sure your attorney provides a breakdown of what each portion of the settlement represents - it can make a significant difference in your final tax liability. The good news is that once you get all the documentation sorted out, the above-the-line deduction really does work as described. I saved about $8,000 in taxes by properly deducting my attorney fees rather than trying to claim them as itemized deductions.

0 coins

Brady Clean

โ€ข

This is incredibly valuable information that I wish I had known earlier! I'm curious about the back pay portion being subject to employment taxes - does this mean I would need to pay both my portion AND the employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes on that part? And how do you typically request that breakdown from your attorney if they didn't provide it initially? Also, when you mention punitive damages being fully taxable, does that mean those portions wouldn't qualify for the attorney fee deduction at all, or just that they're taxable income but the attorney fees related to obtaining them can still be deducted?

0 coins

Prev1...6970717273...5644Next