


Ask the community...
Something nobody has mentioned yet - have you considered a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) investment? It's technically still real estate so you can use a 1031 exchange, but you become a passive investor without landlord responsibilities. Might be a middle ground if you want out of active property management but still want the tax benefits of a 1031.
That's an interesting option I hadn't considered. How does the income work from something like that? Is it comparable to what you might get from a rental property? And would I still qualify if I'm coming from a partnership LLC structure?
The income from a DST is typically distributed monthly or quarterly and is generally comparable to what you might see from a rental property, usually in the 4-6% range depending on the specific trust. Many DSTs focus on stable, long-term leased properties like corporate office buildings or industrial spaces. Yes, you would still qualify coming from a partnership LLC structure, though there are some complexities to navigate. Each partner in your LLC would need to be treated as an individual investor in the 1031 exchange process. You would likely need to either dissolve the partnership before the exchange or have the partnership itself invest in the DST, depending on your specific situation and goals.
Have you talked to your partner about possibly not selling at all? If you refinance the property instead of selling it, you can pull cash out without triggering a taxable event. You could use that cash for your business purchase while maintaining the real estate investment.
This is actually smart advice. I did something similar last year. Refinanced my rental property at 4.5% and used the cash to buy into a local business. The interest is deductible as a business expense too if you structure it right.
Something else to consider - if you're going to buy that Samsung just for product photos, make sure you're not already taking other deductions for photography equipment. The IRS might question why you need both a DSLR camera AND an expensive phone for the same business purpose. It's totally fine if you have legitimate different uses (phone for quick social media content, DSLR for high-res product listings), but be prepared to explain the business necessity for multiple photography tools. I've been audited before and they definitely look at these patterns.
Thanks for bringing this up! I actually don't have any camera equipment yet - I've been using my ancient phone which takes terrible photos. The new phone would be my only photography equipment. Do you think that makes the case stronger for it being a legitimate business expense?
Yes, that definitely strengthens your case for the business expense deduction. When it's your only photography equipment and directly tied to improving your product listings, it's much easier to justify as a necessary business expense. Just make sure to keep good documentation - save your current product photos, then take new ones with the new phone to show the improvement. This before/after comparison can be extremely helpful if you're ever questioned about the business necessity. Also keep any feedback from customers or analytics showing that better photos improved your sales conversion rate.
Quick tip on the VAT part - make sure you're actually VAT registered before trying to claim input VAT! Depending on your country, you might not need to register until you hit a certain revenue threshold. If you're not registered, you can't reclaim the VAT, but you can still take the full cost (including VAT) as a business expense for your income tax.
$600 is definitely on the higher side. I'd recommend shopping around a bit. H&R Block quoted me $350 for a similar situation (multi-state, 3 W-2s, and some investment stuff). Just make sure whoever you go with is experienced with multi-state returns and early withdrawals from retirement accounts.
Thanks for the suggestion! Did H&R Block handle your multi-state situation well? I've heard mixed things about them for more complicated situations.
They did okay with my multi-state stuff, but I had to be really proactive and double-check their work. The person I got was relatively new and missed allocating some of my income correctly between states at first. After I pointed it out, they fixed it, but it made me wonder what else might have been missed if I hadn't been paying attention. If you go with H&R Block or similar, try to get their more experienced preparers and ask specifically about their experience with multi-state returns and early retirement withdrawals. The quality really varies depending on which preparer you get assigned to.
Former tax preparer here! To give you a different perspective - yes, $600 is within the normal range for your situation. The multi-state issue alone typically adds $150-200 to the base price at many firms, and early IRA withdrawals add complexity because we have to determine if any exceptions apply to reduce the penalty. Four W-2s isn't a big deal by itself, but combined with everything else, your return requires significantly more time than an average one.
Consider doing a 1031 exchange if you're interested in owning other real estate! You can defer paying capital gains tax if you reinvest the proceeds into a "like-kind" property. You'd need to identify the new property within 45 days of selling and complete the purchase within 180 days, but it could save you a lot in taxes.
My brother tried to do a 1031 exchange last year and it was a complete nightmare with all the timing restrictions. Make sure you have a qualified intermediary lined up BEFORE you sell if you go this route!
Is no one going to mention that $87,000 for 35 acres that was supposedly "worthless" sounds suspiciously low if a mining company is interested? You might want to get your own appraisal or consult with a lawyer before accepting their first offer. Mining companies typically don't make offers unless they know something valuable is there.
THIS! My cousin sold some "worthless" land in Wyoming to a mining company for what seemed like a great price, only to find out later they discovered a major lithium deposit. Do your homework before selling!
Jessica Nguyen
The revenue sharing aspect is the most interesting part of this proposal to me. I've worked in economic development for a manufacturing state, and we've always struggled with the fact that we produce goods but the tax revenue goes to the states where consumers live. 20% seems like a reasonable starting point, though I imagine high-consumption states with no sales tax (like NH) or minimal manufacturing (like FL) would strongly resist. The real challenge would be creating the administrative framework for this revenue sharing. This system could actually reduce some of the tax incentive battles between states trying to lure manufacturers. If production states automatically get a revenue share, there's less pressure to offer massive tax breaks.
0 coins
Isaiah Thompson
ā¢Wouldn't this system potentially hurt consumers though? If retailers have to implement complex new compliance systems, those costs will just get passed along to buyers. Plus, I imagine the definition of "production state" could get messy - what if components come from multiple states?
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
ā¢That's a legitimate concern about costs, but the proposal actually addresses this by building on existing systems rather than creating entirely new ones. Many retailers already use automated systems for multi-state sales tax compliance post-Wayfair. Extending these to include origin data isn't as big a leap as starting from scratch. Regarding the multi-state production issue, you're right that it complicates things. A workable approach might be to use the final assembly location or implement a proportional system based on value-add at each production stage. The automobile industry already tracks this kind of data for regulatory compliance, so there are existing models to follow.
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
Has anyone else noticed that the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision has completely changed the compliance landscape for small businesses? Before 2018, I only had to worry about collecting tax in my home state. Now I'm tracking economic nexus thresholds across 45+ states. If this hybrid system adds another layer to track (origin-based calculations), it could push more sellers to marketplace platforms like Amazon who handle tax compliance. That would actually strengthen the role of marketplace facilitators, which aligns with part of the proposal.
0 coins
Alexander Evans
ā¢This is exactly why I moved all my sales to Amazon last year. The compliance burden post-Wayfair was just too much for my small operation. I was spending more time on tax research than actually running my business. The irony is that marketplace facilitator laws were supposed to level the playing field, but they've pushed more of us smaller sellers onto the big platforms. If this hybrid system gets implemented, I bet even more sellers will decide it's not worth the hassle of compliance.
0 coins