IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

14 Don't forget to check your credit reports too! When my wallet was stolen with my SSN card in it (I know, stupid to carry it), I put a freeze on all three credit bureaus. It's free and prevents anyone from opening new accounts in your name. You can temporarily lift it when you need to apply for credit yourself. Here are the links: Equifax: equifax.com/personal/credit-report-services Experian: experian.com/freeze TransUnion: transunion.com/credit-freeze Check your credit reports frequently over the next year too. You can get free weekly reports through AnnualCreditReport.com right now.

0 coins

1 Thanks, I didn't even think about freezing my credit! Do you know if there's any downside to doing this? Will it affect anything with my existing accounts?

0 coins

14 No downside to your existing accounts - those all continue to work normally. Credit cards, loans, anything already open is completely unaffected. The freeze only prevents NEW accounts from being opened. The only minor inconvenience is that you need to temporarily lift the freeze when you want to apply for new credit (like a car loan or new credit card). This just requires logging into the credit bureau websites or calling them to lift the freeze temporarily - you can even specify exactly how long you want it lifted for.

0 coins

8 Something similar happened to me last year - I accidentally left my entire tax folder in an Uber! I immediately filed a police report and contacted the IRS for an IP PIN. The IP PIN was a game changer because it meant nobody could file a return under my name without that special 6-digit code. The only annoying part is you have to get a new IP PIN every year, but it's worth the peace of mind. If you go to IRS.gov you can request one through their online portal if you can verify your identity. Otherwise you might need to file Form 14039.

0 coins

16 Did you have any issues getting the IP PIN? I tried getting one online but couldn't pass their identity verification (they asked about an old loan I don't remember details about). Is there another way to get it?

0 coins

Layla Mendes

•

Direct File is still in its pilot phase for 2025 filings. The IRS is planning to expand it to include state returns in future years, but they started with just federal to work out the kinks. This is actually pretty clearly stated during the signup process, but a lot of people miss it. You're definitely not alone in being confused! Several of my friends had the same issue. For what it's worth, I think the IRS should make this limitation MUCH more obvious during the filing process.

0 coins

Do we know which states will be included when they eventually expand? I'm in Texas so we don't have state income tax anyway, but curious about the rollout plans.

0 coins

Layla Mendes

•

The IRS hasn't announced specific states that will be included in future Direct File expansions. The rollout will likely depend on which states are willing to partner with the federal system, so it will vary. For Texas residents like yourself, you're actually in a good position since you don't have state income tax to worry about. Direct File is already a complete solution for you. The taxpayers who have to deal with this two-step process are those in the 41 states plus DC that have income tax filing requirements.

0 coins

Aria Park

•

Check your state's tax website! Most states (like 22 of them I think) have their own free filing portal separate from the IRS. I used Direct File for federal and then my state's portal for state taxes and paid $0 total. Took a little longer having to enter info twice but saved me like $50 compared to TurboTax.

0 coins

Thanks for the tip! I wish I'd known this before paying for TurboTax. Will definitely check Colorado's website for next year. Did you have to re-enter all your information or was there a way to import data from your federal return?

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

Something no one's mentioned yet: if you DO decide to file jointly and include your Canadian spouse, remember she'll need an ITIN (Individual Taxpayer Identification Number) since she's not eligible for a Social Security Number. Getting an ITIN can be a pain - you'll need to submit Form W-7 with proper documentation. Also, consider this: does your spouse have any investments in Canada? RRSPs or TFSAs? These can create additional reporting headaches if you file jointly, including potential FBAR and FATCA requirements.

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Thanks for bringing this up - I actually forgot to mention that my wife does have a TFSA (Tax-Free Savings Account) in Canada with about 20K in it. Would that really complicate things if we filed jointly? She also has a small retirement account through her employer.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

Yes, that would definitely add complications if you file jointly. With MFJ, you'd need to report those accounts on a Foreign Bank Account Report (FBAR) if the combined value of all foreign accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point during the year. You might also need to file Form 8938 depending on the total value. The bigger issue is that the US doesn't recognize the tax-free status of Canadian TFSAs the same way Canada does. If filing jointly, the earnings in her TFSA could be considered taxable income in the US, which defeats the whole purpose of that account from a Canadian perspective. This is one of those quirks of international taxation that often makes filing separately more advantageous.

0 coins

Has anyone had experience with the "year of arrival" elections? My understanding is that in the first year you're married to a nonresident alien, there are special rules that might let you file jointly under certain circumstances, even if your spouse doesn't have a green card or isn't a resident alien yet.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Yes, there's a provision called "first-year choice" or "nonresident spouse treated as resident" election. It allows you to treat a nonresident alien spouse as a US resident for tax purposes, which enables joint filing. However, it comes with a major caveat: your spouse must agree to be taxed on worldwide income, not just US source income. This means ALL of their foreign income becomes subject to US taxation.

0 coins

Chris King

•

Going back to the original question about Justice Thomas - there's also the issue of whether these were actually "gifts" in the tax sense. The IRS defines a gift as a transfer made out of "detached and disinterested generosity." If there's an expectation of something in return (even implied), it's not technically a gift and could be taxable income. For regular people, the IRS rarely challenges gift classification. But for public officials, especially judges, large transfers labeled as "gifts" from people who might have interests before the court could potentially be scrutinized differently.

0 coins

That's really interesting about the "detached and disinterested generosity" definition. How would the IRS even determine if there was an expectation of something in return? Seems pretty subjective. Would they look at things like whether the gift-giver had cases before the court?

0 coins

Chris King

•

The IRS would look at the relationship between the parties, the timing of the gifts, and any pattern of behavior that might suggest the transfers weren't purely generous. They consider factors like whether the giver had business before the recipient (in this case, cases before the court) and whether the amounts seem disproportionate to their personal relationship. You're right that it's subjective and often difficult to prove. The burden would be on the IRS to demonstrate that the transfers weren't genuine gifts. For high-profile situations, they might examine communications between parties, the history of their relationship, and whether the recipient took actions that benefited the giver after receiving the gifts. But these cases are complex and rarely straightforward.

0 coins

Rachel Clark

•

I think we're missing something important here - federal judges and Supreme Court justices have specific financial disclosure requirements separate from tax laws. They have to file annual financial disclosure forms listing gifts above certain thresholds. This is completely separate from tax compliance. So even if the gift tax rules were followed correctly (donor filing Form 709, etc.), there could still be ethics issues if the gifts weren't properly disclosed on these judicial financial disclosure forms. That's a separate potential problem from any tax compliance issues.

0 coins

Do you know what the threshold is for gifts that Supreme Court justices have to disclose? $2.4 million seems WAYYY above any reasonable threshold. And what happens if they don't disclose properly? Any actual consequences?

0 coins

This might be a dumb question, but does the nature of the side gig matter for tax purposes? Like, is "phone service" income treated differently than other types of self-employment income? I have some side income from online tutoring and was wondering if different categories get reported differently.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Not a dumb question at all! For tax purposes, the nature of the service generally doesn't matter - all self-employment income gets reported on Schedule C. The IRS doesn't treat "phone service" income differently than tutoring or other services. What DOES matter is properly classifying whether you're an employee (W-2) or independent contractor (1099), and ensuring you keep good records of business expenses that could be deductible. You might also need to look into quarterly estimated tax payments if your side income is substantial.

0 coins

Thanks for clarifying! That makes me feel better. One follow-up question - do I need to be super specific about the nature of the service when filling out Schedule C, or can I just put something general like "consulting services"?

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

Just to add something important - even if you don't get a 1099 form (because you didn't provide your SSN), you STILL legally have to report all income. The IRS is clear that ALL income from whatever source is taxable unless specifically exempted. Don't make the mistake of thinking "no form = don't need to report it" because that's how people end up with tax problems later.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

Thanks for pointing that out! I definitely plan to report the income properly. I was mainly trying to figure out the timing (this year vs. next) and what forms I'd need. Sounds like I should probably just provide my SSN now and deal with it on this year's taxes instead of waiting. Really appreciate everyone's advice!

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

You're making a smart choice! It's always better to handle tax situations promptly rather than letting them linger. And yes, providing your SSN now would be the proper approach - you'll get the correct documentation (likely a 1099-NEC), which will make reporting much simpler. One other tip: since this is self-employment income, keep track of any related expenses that might be deductible. Even for a small amount like $850, deductions can still help reduce your tax liability a bit. Good luck with your taxes!

0 coins

Prev1...46724673467446754676...5645Next