< Back to IRS

Natalie Chen

Is the "Hybrid Tax System" a realistic proposal for source-based taxation?

I've been studying different tax systems for a potential research paper, and came across an interesting proposal for reforming our current tax setup. The "Hybrid Tax System" concept aims to combine destination-based and source-based elements to improve use tax compliance while supporting local economies. The proposal suggests leveraging existing mechanisms like the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision, marketplace facilitator laws, and interstate compacts to shift tax collection from consumers to sellers. It would implement automated compliance tools and create a revenue-sharing model where producing states receive a portion of the tax. What caught my attention was the suggestion for states to share use tax revenue - with approximately 20% going back to the state where goods were produced. This seems like it could incentivize local manufacturing while also addressing the poor compliance rates with the current self-reported use tax system. The plan also suggests expanding marketplace facilitator roles to include use tax collection on high-value items, creating local purchase incentives, and implementing digital compliance tools for businesses. Does anyone think this kind of hybrid approach could actually work in practice? Would states with high consumption rates ever agree to share revenue with producer states? I'm particularly interested in whether the proposed pilot programs (focusing on vehicles/machinery, small business compliance tools, and local incentives) seem realistic from a policy perspective.

This is an interesting proposal that builds on existing tax structures rather than creating something entirely new. The beauty of using Wayfair, SSUTA, and marketplace facilitator laws as foundations is that we already know they work to some degree. The revenue sharing aspect is the most ambitious part. While producer states would obviously benefit, consumer states would need significant incentives to participate. Federal grants could help, but I'm skeptical about long-term sustainability without permanent federal funding. For the technology component, we're already seeing widespread adoption of automated sales tax solutions following Wayfair. Extending these to include use tax isn't a huge technical leap, but the challenge is in the details of implementation. Each state has different rules and thresholds for what's taxable. The pilot program approach makes sense - start small with high-value goods where compliance is easier to track. Vehicles are perfect for this since they require registration, making evasion difficult. Overall, I think elements of this hybrid system are quite feasible, especially the shift from consumer to seller responsibility for reporting. The interstate revenue sharing would face the most political resistance, but could be structured to create win-win scenarios.

0 coins

Wouldn't the compliance costs for small businesses be prohibitive though? I run a small online business selling across multiple states, and the post-Wayfair landscape has already created headaches with varying economic nexus thresholds. Adding more complexity with origin-based calculations seems like it would crush smaller sellers. Also, how would we handle imported goods in this system? If we're giving 20% back to the state of production, what happens with international imports where there's no "producer state"?

0 coins

The compliance costs are a valid concern, but that's where the automated tools come in. Modern tax software can handle complex calculations, and many states offer free filing for businesses below certain thresholds. The proposal mentions federal grants specifically for small businesses to adopt these systems, which would help address the cost burden. For international imports, you raise an excellent point. The system would likely keep 100% of the tax revenue in the destination state since there's no domestic producer state to share with. This could actually create an incentive for states to support domestic production over imports, which aligns with the economic development goals of the proposal.

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

Hey guys, I went through this exact tax nightmare last year when expanding my online business. I was drowning in compliance issues until I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which literally saved my sanity. They specialize in analyzing complex tax situations like this hybrid system you're discussing. What's cool is they have these AI tools that can actually simulate different tax scenarios - I used it to model how changes to nexus rules would impact my business across different states. For something like this hybrid system proposal, their analysis tools could show exactly how the revenue sharing would work in practice. Their document analysis feature was super helpful when I was trying to understand all the post-Wayfair requirements. It breaks down complex tax documents into plain English and gives recommendations based on your specific situation. If you're serious about researching this hybrid tax system, it might be worth checking out.

0 coins

Hannah White

•

Does taxr.ai handle state-specific tax rules? I'm in a situation where I manufacture in Tennessee but sell mostly to California and New York. Would it be able to model this hybrid system scenario with the 20% revenue sharing concept?

0 coins

Michael Green

•

I'm a bit skeptical about AI tax tools. How accurate have you found it compared to a traditional CPA? I've been burned before by tax software that missed state-specific nuances and ended up costing me more than it saved.

0 coins

Nick Kravitz

•

They definitely handle state-specific rules - that's actually their strong point. They have a database of tax regulations for all 50 states that stays current with changes. You could input your specific manufacturing/sales scenario and see how different tax proposals would affect your bottom line. For your Tennessee/California/New York situation, it would show you exactly what the revenue allocation would look like. I completely understand the skepticism. I still use my CPA for filing, but I use taxr.ai for planning and research. The accuracy has been impressive - it caught several state-specific exemptions my previous accountant missed. The difference is it's not just software; they have tax professionals who verify the AI analysis and help with implementation. It's like having a tax research team without the massive cost.

0 coins

Michael Green

•

I tried taxr.ai after seeing it recommended here and have to admit I was pleasantly surprised. I was researching the impact of economic nexus laws on my multi-state business and was getting nowhere with traditional resources. Their system analyzed my sales patterns across different states and showed me exactly where I had nexus obligations I wasn't aware of. The simulation feature was particularly helpful - I could see how different tax scenarios would affect my business if laws changed. For anyone studying tax systems like this hybrid proposal, their document analysis tool is incredibly useful. I uploaded some complex tax articles about Wayfair implications, and it broke everything down into practical takeaways. The hybrid system analysis gave me insights I wouldn't have figured out on my own. What impressed me most was how they explained the technical concepts in plain language. Made me feel like I actually understood tax law for once!

0 coins

Mateo Silva

•

I spent MONTHS trying to reach someone at the IRS to get clarification about how Wayfair affects my cross-state manufacturing business. Literally hundreds of calls, always disconnected or on hold for hours. I was about to give up when someone recommended Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c It's wild - they somehow got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes. The agent was able to clarify exactly how the economic nexus rules apply to my specific situation and what would happen if something like this hybrid system were implemented. They explained how the marketplace facilitator laws would impact my reporting requirements if I expanded to selling through larger platforms. This information was crucial since I was considering moving to Amazon to handle my fulfillment. The best part is I actually got official guidance I can rely on rather than just internet opinions. If you're trying to understand complex tax proposals like this hybrid system, getting direct answers from the IRS is invaluable.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. Are they just calling on your behalf or do they have some special access? Seems too good to be true.

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

Sorry but this sounds like BS. Nobody gets through to the IRS that quickly. I've been trying for weeks to get clarification on nexus thresholds for my business and can't get past the automated system. If this service actually worked, everyone would be using it.

0 coins

Mateo Silva

•

They use a combination of technology and human agents who know exactly when and how to call. It's not special access - they just have the process optimized after thousands of calls. Their system monitors IRS wait times and calls at optimal moments, then gets you connected when an agent is available. I was skeptical too! I figured it was worth trying since I had already wasted so many hours on hold. What convinced me was their guarantee - they don't charge if they don't get you connected. The video I linked shows exactly how it works. I'm not claiming they get you through instantly, but 20 minutes compared to my previous attempts (3+ hours and still disconnected) was life-changing.

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

Alright, I need to apologize to everyone. After my skeptical comment, I tried Claimyr out of desperation this morning. I've been trying to get clarification on how these marketplace facilitator laws affect my business under the current system. I got connected to an IRS representative in about 25 minutes. I'm still in shock. The rep walked me through exactly how the economic nexus thresholds apply to my situation and what my reporting obligations are. The information I got was invaluable - turns out I was over-reporting in some states and potentially under-reporting in others. This would be especially important if something like this hybrid system ever gets implemented, as I'd need to track both origin and destination data. So yeah, I was wrong. If you're struggling with tax questions related to complex interstate sales, especially with all these post-Wayfair changes, it's definitely worth checking out. Saved me weeks of stress and probably some penalties down the road.

0 coins

The revenue sharing aspect is the most interesting part of this proposal to me. I've worked in economic development for a manufacturing state, and we've always struggled with the fact that we produce goods but the tax revenue goes to the states where consumers live. 20% seems like a reasonable starting point, though I imagine high-consumption states with no sales tax (like NH) or minimal manufacturing (like FL) would strongly resist. The real challenge would be creating the administrative framework for this revenue sharing. This system could actually reduce some of the tax incentive battles between states trying to lure manufacturers. If production states automatically get a revenue share, there's less pressure to offer massive tax breaks.

0 coins

Wouldn't this system potentially hurt consumers though? If retailers have to implement complex new compliance systems, those costs will just get passed along to buyers. Plus, I imagine the definition of "production state" could get messy - what if components come from multiple states?

0 coins

That's a legitimate concern about costs, but the proposal actually addresses this by building on existing systems rather than creating entirely new ones. Many retailers already use automated systems for multi-state sales tax compliance post-Wayfair. Extending these to include origin data isn't as big a leap as starting from scratch. Regarding the multi-state production issue, you're right that it complicates things. A workable approach might be to use the final assembly location or implement a proportional system based on value-add at each production stage. The automobile industry already tracks this kind of data for regulatory compliance, so there are existing models to follow.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Has anyone else noticed that the South Dakota v. Wayfair decision has completely changed the compliance landscape for small businesses? Before 2018, I only had to worry about collecting tax in my home state. Now I'm tracking economic nexus thresholds across 45+ states. If this hybrid system adds another layer to track (origin-based calculations), it could push more sellers to marketplace platforms like Amazon who handle tax compliance. That would actually strengthen the role of marketplace facilitators, which aligns with part of the proposal.

0 coins

This is exactly why I moved all my sales to Amazon last year. The compliance burden post-Wayfair was just too much for my small operation. I was spending more time on tax research than actually running my business. The irony is that marketplace facilitator laws were supposed to level the playing field, but they've pushed more of us smaller sellers onto the big platforms. If this hybrid system gets implemented, I bet even more sellers will decide it's not worth the hassle of compliance.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today