


Ask the community...
Coming back to the original question - we were in an almost identical situation last year. Husband with woodworking business, me with 3 kids. We calculated our taxes both ways (jointly and separately) and filing jointly saved us about $4,200! The biggest factors were: 1. Child Tax Credit - filing jointly let us maximize this based on our combined income 2. Earned Income Credit - not available if filing separately 3. Lower overall tax bracket for some of our income when combined 4. Still got to take all the business deductions The business deductions worked the same either way, but we got more tax benefits overall by filing jointly.
Did filing jointly affect how your husband claimed his business expenses at all? That's one thing I'm worried about - if somehow his carpentry deductions would be limited if we file together.
Not at all! He claimed exactly the same business expenses either way. The Schedule C for his business worked exactly the same whether we filed jointly or separately. All his tools, materials, vehicle expenses, studio rent, insurance - everything was deductible exactly the same way. The only difference was that when we filed jointly, all those business deductions helped offset our combined income, plus we qualified for additional credits that saved us thousands. If we had filed separately, I would have gotten some credits for the kids, but not as much as when we combined everything, and we would have lost some credits entirely.
Has anyone looked into the Self-Employment tax implications? That's what killed us last year. My husband's carpentry business did well but we got hit with a huge SE tax bill.
Self-employment tax is calculated the same way regardless of filing status. It's always 15.3% of net business profit (12.4% for Social Security up to the wage limit and 2.9% for Medicare on all profit). Filing jointly doesn't change this amount. What filing jointly DOES help with is the income tax portion, where you get better rates and more credits. So while the SE tax stays the same, your overall tax burden is usually lower when filing jointly because of how everything else is calculated more favorably.
Don't forget to check if your state treats Roth IRA withdrawals the same way as federal. I made this mistake last year with my excess contribution and ended up with a state tax notice because I only reported it on my federal return.
Which state are you in? I'm in California and wondering if I need to handle this differently for state taxes.
I'm in Massachusetts, which generally follows federal treatment but has a few differences for reporting. In California, they mostly follow the federal treatment for excess contribution withdrawals, but you should still report the distribution on your CA return. The main thing is to make sure the state knows the nature of the withdrawal (correcting an excess contribution) so it's not mistakenly treated as an early distribution subject to penalties. The tax software should handle this correctly if you input the 1099-R information properly, but it's worth double-checking the state section specifically.
Has anyone actually gotten the withholding back when they filed? I had the same situation (excess Roth contribution that I withdrew) and Vanguard withheld 20%, but when I filed my taxes I somehow still owed money!
You should definitely get credit for the withholding! Check your 1040 - the withholding from your 1099-R should be included in the total federal income tax withheld on line 25d. Sounds like something else in your return might have been causing you to owe.
I'm a renter in California too! Just wanted to add that while there's no specific "renter's tax," you might want to consider if you work from home at all. If you use part of your rental exclusively for work (like a home office), you might be eligible for the home office deduction. But be careful - this is only for self-employed people or certain types of employees with specific situations. Also, keep track of any renter's insurance you pay - in some states that could be deductible if you itemize!
I'm confused about the home office deduction. I've been working fully remote since 2021 but my employer doesn't require it. Can I still claim my spare bedroom that I use as an office?
Unfortunately, if you're a W-2 employee (even if fully remote), the home office deduction typically isn't available to you anymore. This was suspended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through 2025 for employees. The home office deduction is generally only available if you're self-employed or an independent contractor. If you have a side gig that you run from home in addition to your regular job, you might be able to claim the deduction for that portion of your work, but not for your primary employment.
Has anyone heard about the new California Rental Registry program? I got a letter saying I need to report my rental information to the state. Is this legit or some kind of scam? Wondering if this is related to taxes in some way.
One tip nobody mentioned - make sure you're also considering if you need to amend your state tax return to reflect this additional 1099 income! Most states require you to report federal changes. I had a similar situation with multiple amendments and got hit with a state penalty because I only fixed the federal return.
Good point about the state return! If I amend my federal return for this 1099 income, do I need to wait until the IRS processes that amendment before filing the state amendment? Or should I do both at the same time?
You should check your specific state's requirements as they vary. Most states want you to wait until the federal amendment is completed and accepted by the IRS before filing a state amendment. This is because they'll want you to include a copy of your federal acceptance letter or transcript showing the changes. Some states have a specific timeframe (like 60 or 90 days) after your federal amendment is finalized to submit your state amendment. Missing this deadline can result in penalties, so definitely check your state tax agency's website for their specific process.
Does anyone know if the $1040 income from watching a special needs family member would be considered household employment (requiring Schedule H) rather than self-employment? I had a similar situation and my accountant said it made a difference in how it's taxed.
It depends on who controlled the work. If the family directed exactly how and when care was provided, it might be household employment. If OP was more independent in providing care on their own terms, it's likely self-employment. The distinction matters because household employees don't pay self-employment tax, but employers should pay their share of FICA taxes.
Brian Downey
Former IRS employee here. Let me clarify a few things: 1) Failing to pay taxes when due is not automatically a crime. It's only criminal if it's willful (meaning you could have paid but chose not to) 2) Filing late returns is not automatically criminal either, but it's a factor that can contribute to a criminal case 3) What makes cases criminal vs civil usually depends on: - Amount owed (larger amounts get more scrutiny) - Duration of non-payment (longer = worse) - Evidence of ability to pay while avoiding payment - Pattern of behavior over multiple years - Evidence of concealment or lying In your case, filing on time and setting up an installment agreement shows good faith compliance. That's exactly what you should be doing. The IRS recognizes when people are making efforts to comply versus actively trying to evade their obligations.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
ā¢This is super helpful, thanks! Quick question - how much is considered a "larger amount" that might trigger more scrutiny? Are we talking $10k, $50k, $100k+?
0 coins
Brian Downey
ā¢There's no fixed threshold, but generally speaking, the Criminal Investigation division typically focuses on cases involving substantially higher amounts - usually $100k+ in unpaid taxes. That said, smaller amounts can still trigger criminal investigation if other aggravating factors are present (like a clear pattern of evasion, hiding assets, or lying to investigators). The IRS has limited resources for criminal prosecution, so they tend to focus on cases that are either very substantial in dollar amount or have clear evidence of fraudulent intent. For most people with moderate tax debts who are making efforts to comply, the focus is on collection rather than prosecution.
0 coins
Landon Flounder
One thing nobody mentioned is that Biden's case also involved substantial income that wasn't properly reported for years, not just late payment. The IRS looks at patterns of behavior across multiple years, not just a one-time late payment. I went through an IRS audit a few years back (not criminal, just verification), and they explained that they look for patterns. One year of problems might be a mistake, but multiple years suggests a pattern that could be interpreted as deliberate.
0 coins
Callum Savage
ā¢Yeah this is true. From what I read, it was like a pattern over multiple tax years with substantial income. I think that's the big difference between that case and just owing money that you're paying through an installment plan.
0 coins