


Ask the community...
Just wanted to add something that might be helpful - if you're using commercial tax software, check if there's a software update available. Last year I had a similar issue with not seeing the correct tax year for an extension, and it turned out my software needed an update to show the current filing options. After updating, all the correct years appeared in the dropdown. Some companies push these updates automatically, but others require you to manually check and install them.
Thanks for this suggestion! Which tax software were you using? I'm on TaxAct for Business, and I'm wondering if that might be the issue.
I was using ProSeries when I had that issue. With TaxAct, you should be able to check for updates by going to the Help menu and looking for "Check for Updates" or something similar. If you're using their online version rather than desktop software, try clearing your browser cache or using a different browser entirely. Sometimes these issues can also be related to the subscription level you have - some tax years might not be available if your subscription doesn't cover that period. Might be worth checking with TaxAct support directly if the update doesn't resolve it.
Has anyone successfully filed a 1065 extension online this year? I'm struggling with the same issue as OP but with different software (Drake). Thinking this might be a broader problem with the IRS systems perhaps?
I filed our partnership extension last week using UltraTax and had no issues selecting the 2023 tax year (for filing in 2024). Everything processed normally. So I don't think it's an IRS-wide system issue.
Something else to consider for child performer income - check if your state has what's called a "Coogan Law." In California, New York, Louisiana, and some other states, a percentage of a child performer's earnings must be set aside in a blocked trust account until they reach adulthood. This wouldn't show up on tax forms, but is a legal requirement in those states.
We're in Illinois. Do you know if there are any special requirements here? The commercial was for a regional grocery chain, and I don't think they mentioned anything about special accounts when we signed the contracts.
Illinois doesn't have a specific Coogan Law like California or New York, so you don't have the same legal requirement to set up a blocked trust account. However, it's still a good practice to save some of your children's earnings for their future. Since the commercial was for a regional grocery chain and the earnings were relatively modest ($1,200 each), you're mainly just dealing with the standard tax considerations that have been discussed in other comments. Just make sure to check those W-2s to see if any taxes were withheld, as that would be a good reason to file returns for them to get those withholdings back.
Another thing to consider - once your kids get a taste of that sweet commercial money, they might want to do more! My daughter started with one commercial at age .4 and now at 10 she's done dozens. Get yourself a good system for tracking their income and expenses each year. Also worth noting that if they start making "substantial" income (over $2,500 annually), you might run into the "kiddie tax" for unearned income. This doesn't apply to W-2 wages from performing, but if you invest their earnings and generate interest/dividends, that can trigger different tax rules.
One thing nobody's mentioned - you should check if you're truly self-employed or if the company is misclassifying you. There's a big difference between independent contractor and employee. If they control WHEN and HOW you work (set schedule, specific processes, etc.) you might actually be an employee under IRS rules. Companies save a lot of money by classifying workers as contractors because they don't pay their share of taxes or benefits. If you think you're misclassified, you can file Form SS-8 with the IRS to request a determination. You can also file Form 8919 to report your share of uncollected social security and Medicare taxes.
That's interesting - my company definitely sets my hours and tells me exactly how to do the work. They even monitor my computer activity during work hours. Does that mean I should be classified as an employee instead? What would happen if I filed those forms you mentioned?
Based on what you're describing, it sounds like you're likely misclassified. When a company sets your hours, dictates how you perform your work, and monitors your activity, those are strong indicators that you should be classified as an employee, not an independent contractor. If you file Form SS-8, the IRS will review your situation and make a determination about your proper classification. This process can take several months, but it's free. If the IRS determines you are an employee, your employer would be responsible for paying their share of Social Security and Medicare taxes (the 7.65% you're currently paying as part of your self-employment tax). You could then file Form 8919 instead of Schedule SE to report those uncollected taxes on your income tax return, which would reduce your tax burden.
Kind of unrelated but TurboTax has a self-employed version that walks you through all of this pretty easily. I was in your same situation and it helped me figure out all those Schedule C deductions and quarterly payment stuff. Just make sure you track all your expenses throughout the year!
Don't forget to check if you qualify for any partial exclusion of capital gains! If you used the inherited property as your primary residence for any period during the 5 years before selling, you might be eligible for a prorated portion of the $250,000 exclusion ($500,000 if married filing jointly). For example, if you lived there for 1 year out of the 2-year requirement, you might qualify for 50% of the exclusion, which could be significant. There are also exceptions if you had to sell due to health issues, job changes, or unforeseen circumstances.
Is this true even for inherited properties? I thought the primary residence exclusion only applied if you actually owned the home, not if you inherited it?
The primary residence exclusion applies to any home you own and use as your main home, regardless of how you acquired it. If you inherited the property and then lived in it as your primary residence, those years of use count toward the 2-out-of-5 year requirement. What matters is ownership and use, not how you originally obtained the property. If you inherited it and immediately sold it without living there, then no, you wouldn't qualify. But if you lived in the inherited house after receiving it, those years absolutely count toward potential primary residence exclusion.
Has anyone dealt with calculating the stepped-up basis when you don't have an appraisal from the time of inheritance? My father passed in 2017 and I'm just now selling his house, but we never got a formal appraisal back then.
You can get a retroactive appraisal! I was in this exact situation. Find a qualified appraiser who specializes in retroactive valuations - they'll research comparable sales from that time period to establish what the property was worth when you inherited it. It costs a few hundred dollars but can save you thousands in taxes by properly establishing your basis.
Madison King
Don't forget to report this to adult protective services in your area too, not just the police. Financial exploitation of seniors is something they take seriously and they might have additional resources to help. Also report to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center at IC3.gov.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
ā¢Definitely this! Also reach out to the SEC and FINRA if this "advisor" claimed any professional credentials. Even if they were overseas, these agencies track these scams and sometimes can help with recovery.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
ā¢Thanks for this advice. We did file a police report but I didn't know about adult protective services or the IC3. I'll definitely look into those resources today. Mom is so embarrassed about all this that she's been reluctant to tell anyone, but I'm trying to get her all the help possible.
0 coins
Ella Knight
Has anyone considered the wash sale rule implications here? If her mom buys similar stocks within 30 days before or after this loss, it could impact the deductibility.
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
ā¢Good point about wash sales, but it likely doesn't apply here since this wasn't a normal market transaction where she sold at a loss. This was essentially theft through transfer. But you're right that she should avoid buying substantially identical securities within 30 days if she wants to ensure the loss deduction isn't deferred.
0 coins