


Ask the community...
Worth noting that how this works depends on HOW your employer is providing the insurance. If they're directly paying for a marketplace plan they selected for you, that's handled differently than if they're reimbursing you for a plan you chose yourself (like through a QSEHRA or an ICHRA arrangement). If it's a reimbursement arrangement, make sure you've properly reported your premium tax credit situation on Form 8962. The proper way to handle this can vary based on the specific arrangement your employer has set up.
My employer actually picks the plan and pays the premium directly to the marketplace. They just give me this weird separate W-2 at the end of the year showing what they paid. So based on what you're saying, that would be the first scenario? And does that change how I should enter it in TurboTax?
Yes, if your employer selects and pays for the plan directly, that's more like traditional employer-provided coverage, just administered through the marketplace instead of a group plan. In this case, you would enter the W-2 normally in TurboTax, and the software should recognize that these amounts aren't subject to federal income tax. Just make sure when entering the W-2 that you include any codes shown in Box 12, as these codes tell the tax software how to treat different types of income. If your W-2 has code DD in Box 12, that explicitly marks the amount as employer-provided health coverage, which is not included in taxable income.
Has anyone else noticed that TurboTax sometimes miscalculates when you have these special W-2 situations? Last year I had a similar marketplace premium W-2 and TurboTax initially included it as taxable income. I had to go back and manually adjust something to get it right.
I've had issues with TurboTax too. Try checking if there's a code in Box 12 of your W-2 (like DD for employer health coverage). Sometimes TurboTax doesn't recognize these codes if you don't enter them exactly. Also worth reviewing the "Review" section before filing to make sure the taxable income calculation looks right.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is that your aunt's Social Security might become partially taxable if her income goes up from these IRA distributions. If her only income is $850/month in SS benefits, she's probably not paying federal income tax now. But adding taxable distributions from the inherited IRA might push her into having some of her Social Security become taxable too. There's a calculation for "combined income" (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of Social Security benefits). If that exceeds certain thresholds, up to 85% of SS benefits can become taxable.
Oh no, I didn't even think about that! Is there some way she can plan these withdrawals to minimize the tax impact on her Social Security? She really relies on that money.
Your aunt might want to carefully plan her withdrawals to stay under the threshold where Social Security becomes taxable if possible. For a single filer, Social Security can become partially taxable when combined income exceeds $25,000. She should also check if her state taxes Social Security benefits - some states do while others don't. Given her situation, she might want to talk to a tax professional who specializes in retirement planning for low-income individuals. Some communities offer free tax counseling for seniors through programs like VITA or Tax-Aide that could help her plan this out.
Has anyone mentioned Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) yet? Depending on when the original account owner died and the relationship between them, your aunt might be required to withdraw a certain amount each year according to specific schedules. The SECURE Act changed a lot of these rules in 2020. For most non-spouse beneficiaries who inherited after 2019, there's now a 10-year rule requiring the account to be fully distributed within 10 years of the original owner's death.
The 10-year rule doesn't apply the same way to all inherited accounts though. If the original owner had already started RMDs, the beneficiary might need to continue taking annual distributions AND empty the account within 10 years. It got even more complicated with the SECURE 2.0 Act.
Another thing to watch for on your K1 is unreimbursed partnership expenses in box 13 code W. I missed this my first year and it cost me. These are expenses you paid personally for the partnership that you can deduct. Common for smaller partnerships where partners sometimes cover expenses out of pocket.
Are those still deductible? I thought the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated unreimbursed partnership expense deductions? My accountant told me they're not deductible anymore for 2023 taxes.
You're mixing up two different things. The TCJA eliminated unreimbursed employee business expenses (that used to be on Schedule A), but unreimbursed partnership expenses reported on K-1 are still deductible. If you're a partner and you pay for business expenses out of pocket (without being reimbursed), these expenses can still be deducted on your Schedule E. The key is that they must be properly reported on your K-1 in box 13 with code W. This is different from employee expenses - it's because as a partner, you're not an employee of the partnership.
Just a practical tip - check if your K1 has any entries in Box 20 (for partnerships) or Box 17 (for S-corps) labeled as "tax basis capital account." This is super important. If it shows a negative amount, you might have a taxable gain even if you don't receive any distributions! I learned this the hard way.
Could you explain more about why a negative amount creates a taxable gain? I think mine shows negative but I didn't report anything extra and now I'm worried.
Hate to be that person, but this marriage tax situation was a major reason my partner and I decided not to get legally married. We did the math with our accountant and realized we'd pay about $4,500 MORE per year in taxes if we got married (we both make similar six-figure incomes). It's bizarre that the tax code effectively penalizes some married couples. We had a commitment ceremony instead and keep our finances and tax filings separate. Not the right choice for everyone, but something to consider if the marriage tax hit is substantial.
Does your accountant take into consideration things like health insurance, Social Security survivor benefits, inheritance laws, etc? The tax piece is just one part of the financial picture of marriage. Curious how those other factors weighed in.
Yes, we did a comprehensive analysis. For our specific situation (both have good employer health insurance, substantial retirement savings, and have proper estate planning with attorneys), the tax penalty outweighed other benefits by a significant margin. We're fortunate to be in a state that has strong domestic partnership protections. We don't have children and have advanced healthcare directives in place. It's definitely not a one-size-fits-all decision, but the tax impact was too substantial for us to ignore.
Everyone's talking about withholdings but what about your mortgage interest? When you were single, whoever claimed the mortgage got a big tax benefit relative to their solo income. Now that $28k interest is spread across your combined higher income, making it proportionally less impactful. Plus, are you still itemizing? Many married couples find they're better off with the standard deduction ($25,900 for 2022) than itemizing, especially if mortgage interest is your main deduction. Could be another part of your surprise tax bill.
This is an excellent point that many people miss. When you combine incomes but have the same deductions, those deductions have less "power" to reduce your overall tax liability.
Fidel Carson
One thing nobody's mentioning is that you should be thinking about your own financial independence regardless of inheritance possibilities. I was in a similar position (left career for kids, potential inheritance) and the best advice I got was to build my OWN retirement security. Even with no tax changes, inheritances can get complicated - siblings, medical costs eating away assets, parents living longer than expected, market downturns, etc. I went back to work part-time but negotiated a 401k match even at reduced hours. Some companies are flexible about this if you ask!
0 coins
Isaiah Sanders
ā¢Did you find it difficult to negotiate that part-time with benefits arrangement? I've been thinking about trying something similar but worried companies would just laugh at the idea. Any tips on how to approach it?
0 coins
Fidel Carson
ā¢I was definitely nervous about asking! The key was approaching companies that already advertised flexible work arrangements rather than trying to convince traditional employers. I researched which companies in my field were rated well for work-life balance and specifically mentioned I was looking for part-time professional work with benefits during interviews. It took about 6 interviews before I found the right fit. I also gained leverage by offering to work reduced hours for slightly reduced pay percentage (I work 25 hours but get paid 70% of full-time salary). The company saves some money while still getting an experienced professional, and I get the flexible schedule plus benefits I needed.
0 coins
Xan Dae
Has anyone used free tax/financial tools from public libraries? My local library offers free access to financial planning databases and even tax seminars. Learned so much about estate planning without spending a dime!
0 coins
Fiona Gallagher
ā¢I'd never thought to check the library for financial resources. What kinds of databases did they have access to? Was it mostly general info or could you get personalized advice too?
0 coins