


Ask the community...
Don't forget about state taxes too! QSBS is a federal exclusion, but not all states conform to the federal treatment. I live in California and they don't follow the federal QSBS rules - which was a nasty surprise when I sold my startup shares last year. Still had to pay CA state tax on my gains even though I qualified for federal QSBS exemption.
Oh man, I hadn't even thought about state taxes! Do you know what states besides California don't follow the federal QSBS rules? I'm in Pennsylvania if that makes any difference.
Pennsylvania actually does follow the federal QSBS rules, so you should be good on both state and federal taxes if you qualify. States that don't fully conform to federal QSBS rules include California, Alabama, Mississippi, New Jersey, and a few others. Some states partially conform, meaning they might offer a reduced exclusion percentage or have additional state-specific requirements. It's definitely worth checking with a tax professional familiar with your state's specific rules since this can make a huge difference in your total tax bill.
Has anyone successfully claimed QSBS exclusion using TurboTax or other DIY tax software? I'm trying to figure out if I can handle this myself or if I need to find a specialized accountant.
I tried doing this in TurboTax last year and it was super confusing. They do have a section for it but you have to know exactly where to look - it's under investment income, then capital gains, then there's a checkbox about "special conditions" where you can select Section 1202 stock. But honestly, it was really hard to tell if I was doing it right. I ended up hiring a CPA just to be safe since it was a big amount of money.
I've been a tax preparer for 15 years, and portable buildings are definitely in a gray area for Section 179. Here's what I tell my clients: 1) Document EVERYTHING about the portable nature - take photos showing it's not on a permanent foundation, keep all marketing materials describing it as "portable" 2) If it has a VIN or serial number, that strongly supports personal property treatment 3) Have a written business use policy showing it's 100% for business 4) If you ever sell the property with the building, the sale contract should list the building separately as personal property In audits I've handled, these documentation steps have successfully supported Section 179 treatment for portable structures. But remember, the burden of proof is always on you as the taxpayer.
Does the size of the portable building matter? I'm looking at something smaller (8x12) for my business. Would that have a better chance of qualifying for Section 179 since it's obviously more "portable" than larger structures?
Size can certainly help strengthen your case. An 8x12 structure is clearly more portable than larger buildings, making it easier to argue it's personal property rather than a real estate improvement. Smaller buildings are also more likely to be sold in the marketplace as movable units rather than permanent structures. However, the fundamental criteria remain the same regardless of size - lack of permanent foundation, designed to be relocated, not permanently affixed to land, etc. Even large portable buildings can qualify if they meet these criteria. The key is always proper documentation of the portable nature and 100% business use.
Jumping in late but wanted to share my experience - I section 179'd a 12x30 portable workshop last year and had no issues. My accountant said the key was that it came from a portable building dealer, had a serial number, and was sitting on blocks rather than a permanent foundation. We documented everything with photos and kept all the marketing materials showing it was designed to be moved. Good luck with your woodworking business!
Did you have to file any special forms beyond the regular Section 179 form? And did you classify it as "furniture and equipment" or something else in your tax software?
No special forms were needed beyond Form 4562 (Depreciation and Amortization) where you claim Section 179 deductions. I listed it as "Portable Workshop Structure" in the property description. In terms of classification, my accountant put it under "Machinery and Equipment" rather than anything related to real estate or buildings. She said this classification further reinforces that it's personal property eligible for Section 179 rather than a building improvement that would need to be depreciated over a longer period.
Speaking from experience, I'd avoid Tax Hardship Center completely. I made the mistake of using them last year after being in a similar situation (7 years unfiled, mostly self-employed). They charged me the $500 initial fee, then came back and wanted another $3,000 to actually resolve my situation! I ended up going to a local Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) site instead, which helps people who make under $57,000 for FREE. They helped me file 3 years of returns (which was all I actually needed based on my income level) and set up a payment plan with the IRS. Total cost: $0. For your situation, especially as someone who's done freelance work, you might actually have deductions you don't know about that could significantly reduce what you owe. Look into expenses related to your illustration and music work - supplies, equipment, software, workspace, etc.
Thank you for sharing this. Do you know if VITA sites can handle more complicated situations like mine with a decade of unfiled returns and mixed income types? I'm worried they might turn me away because it's too complex.
VITA sites can definitely handle your situation. They're staffed by IRS-certified volunteers who specifically help people with lower incomes navigate tax issues. Many locations have volunteers who specialize in self-employment and 1099 income situations. You're right that some VITA sites might initially seem hesitant about handling 10 years of unfiled returns all at once. What I'd suggest is going in first to get help determining which years you actually need to file for (likely not all 10), and then working on 2-3 years at a time. Most people in your situation find they only need to file 6 years back to get into compliance.
Has anyone ever filed for multiple years at once using online tax software like TurboTax or H&R Block? I'm in a similar situation (5 years unfiled) and wondering if that's a viable option.
I filed 4 years of back taxes using FreeTaxUSA last year. You have to buy previous year versions separately, but it was WAY cheaper than TurboTax or H&R Block. I think I paid about $15 per year for state filing (federal was free). The downside is you have to print and mail the previous years - can't e-file them. Current year can be e-filed though.
Thanks for the tip on FreeTaxUSA! Did you have to wait for each year to process before filing the next one, or did you send them all at once? I'm worried about penalties accumulating while I'm getting everything organized.
The TurboTax satisfaction guarantee is only for their desktop software. I used to work for Intuit (not in tax stuff tho). Online products have different terms. Its in their fine print but they dont make it obvious.
That should be illegal though, right? They can't advertise a guarantee prominently and then hide in fine print that it doesn't apply to their main product that most people use?
Has anyone tried Credit Karma Tax (now called Cash App Taxes)? It's completely free for federal and state filing. I switched from TurboTax last year and it was pretty good, handled my somewhat complicated return with no issues. No hidden fees or fake guarantees.
I used it this year! It's definitely more basic than TurboTax but gets the job done. The interface isn't as polished but I saved like $120 and my refund was exactly the same as what TurboTax calculated when I did a comparison before submitting. Only downside is they don't support some more complex tax situations like multi-state filing or foreign income.
CosmicCaptain
Theatre professor here - this is actually something we discuss in our Professional Development course. The key distinction is whether you have income from acting that you're reporting. If you're just a student with no income from acting, these are personal expenses. But if you're earning money from acting (even small gigs), and reporting that income on Schedule C, then a portion of these services can be justified as professional research. Pro tip: Start keeping a viewing log now. Note which shows/films you watched specifically for professional development, what you studied (acting techniques, dialects, etc.), and how it relates to your professional goals. This documentation is essential if you're ever questioned about these deductions.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
ā¢Is there a specific format you recommend for this viewing log? Should it be detailed or just basic info like date, title, and purpose? I'm trying to get better about documentation but don't want to overcomplicate things.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
ā¢Nothing fancy needed! A simple spreadsheet or even a note on your phone works well. Include: 1) Date watched, 2) Title, 3) Platform (Netflix, theater, etc.), 4) Brief purpose (e.g., "Studied accent work for upcoming role" or "Researched period movement for 1920s play"), and 5) Approximate time spent. This doesn't need to be elaborate - just enough to show the IRS that you're tracking business versus personal use. Most of my professional actor friends spend about 5-10 minutes per week updating their viewing logs. The key is consistency rather than extensive detail.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
I tried deducting streaming services during college when I had some acting income and got audited! The IRS agent told me that you need to be very careful about how you claim these. Here's what I learned: 1. You absolutely NEED income from acting to claim these deductions 2. You should only deduct the percentage used for professional research 3. You need documentation showing which specific shows/films were watched for professional purposes I ended up having to pay back the deductions plus a small penalty because I claimed 100% of my streaming services without proper documentation. Don't make my mistake!
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
ā¢Were there any red flags that triggered your audit? I'm curious if it was the streaming services specifically or something else in your return that caught their attention.
0 coins